AFBS scores buffered gradients by staleness and dataset size, discards low-value ones, and clusters clients through random-projection-encrypted label distributions before aggregation in semi-asynchronous federated learning.
Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As a privacy-preserving paradigm for training Machine Learning (ML) models, Federated Learning (FL) has received tremendous attention from both industry and academia. In a typical FL scenario, clients exhibit significant heterogeneity in terms of data distribution and hardware configurations. Thus, randomly sampling clients in each training round may not fully exploit the local updates from heterogeneous clients, resulting in lower model accuracy, slower convergence rate, degraded fairness, etc. To tackle the FL client heterogeneity problem, various client selection algorithms have been developed, showing promising performance improvement. In this paper, we systematically present recent advances in the emerging field of FL client selection and its challenges and research opportunities. We hope to facilitate practitioners in choosing the most suitable client selection mechanisms for their applications, as well as inspire researchers and newcomers to better understand this exciting research topic.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
AFBS:Buffer Gradient Selection in Semi-asynchronous Federated Learning
AFBS scores buffered gradients by staleness and dataset size, discards low-value ones, and clusters clients through random-projection-encrypted label distributions before aggregation in semi-asynchronous federated learning.