Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.01549 v2 pith:U3FAUDXI submitted 2022-11-03 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords clientselectionclientslearningchallengesfederatedheterogeneityopportunities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As a privacy-preserving paradigm for training Machine Learning (ML) models, Federated Learning (FL) has received tremendous attention from both industry and academia. In a typical FL scenario, clients exhibit significant heterogeneity in terms of data distribution and hardware configurations. Thus, randomly sampling clients in each training round may not fully exploit the local updates from heterogeneous clients, resulting in lower model accuracy, slower convergence rate, degraded fairness, etc. To tackle the FL client heterogeneity problem, various client selection algorithms have been developed, showing promising performance improvement. In this paper, we systematically present recent advances in the emerging field of FL client selection and its challenges and research opportunities. We hope to facilitate practitioners in choosing the most suitable client selection mechanisms for their applications, as well as inspire researchers and newcomers to better understand this exciting research topic.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AFBS:Buffer Gradient Selection in Semi-asynchronous Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AFBS scores buffered gradients by staleness and dataset size, discards low-value ones, and clusters clients through random-projection-encrypted label distributions before aggregation in semi-asynchronous federated learning.

Pith tools