AgingBench demonstrates multi-dimensional degradation in deployed AI agents through four aging mechanisms diagnosed by temporal graphs and counterfactual probes across hundreds of runs.
EvoClaw: Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolution
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
With AI agents increasingly deployed as long-running systems, it becomes essential to autonomously construct and continuously evolve customized software to enable interaction within dynamic environments. Yet, existing benchmarks evaluate agents on isolated, one-off coding tasks, neglecting the temporal dependencies and technical debt inherent in real-world software evolution. To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepCommit, an agentic pipeline that reconstructs verifiable Milestone DAGs from noisy commit logs, where milestones are defined as functionally cohesive development goals. These executable sequences enable EvoClaw, a novel benchmark that requires agents to sustain system integrity and limit error accumulation, dimensions of long-term software evolution largely missing from current benchmarks. Our evaluation of 12 frontier models across 4 agent frameworks reveals a critical vulnerability: overall performance scores drop significantly from >80% on isolated tasks to at most 38% in continuous settings, exposing agents' profound struggle with long-term maintenance and error propagation.
fields
cs.AI 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Empirical study of EvoMap shows 98% of assets never reused, scores driven by self-reported metadata, and 84% of assets using vacuous validation tests.
citing papers explorer
-
Your Agents Are Aging Too: Agent Lifespan Engineering for Deployed Systems
AgingBench demonstrates multi-dimensional degradation in deployed AI agents through four aging mechanisms diagnosed by temporal graphs and counterfactual probes across hundreds of runs.
-
Behind EvoMap: Characterizing a Self-Evolving Agent-to-Agent Collaboration Network
Empirical study of EvoMap shows 98% of assets never reused, scores driven by self-reported metadata, and 84% of assets using vacuous validation tests.