LVLMs show vocabulary hijacking by inert tokens that decode to hijacking anchors; HABI locates them, NHAR finds resilient heads, and HAVAE boosts those heads to cut hallucinations.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05369 , year=
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
PRIME enables online process reward model updates in LLM RL using implicit rewards from rollouts and outcome labels, yielding 15.1% average gains on reasoning benchmarks and surpassing a stronger instruct model with 10% of the data.
Mixed Preference Optimization with the MMPR dataset boosts multimodal CoT reasoning, lifting InternVL2-8B to 67.0 accuracy on MathVista (+8.7 points) and matching the 76B model.
Empathic similarity feedback in prompts generates more acceptable compromises than chain-of-thought, and margin-based training on the resulting data lets smaller models produce them without ongoing empathy estimation.
citing papers explorer
-
Vocabulary Hijacking in LVLMs: Unveiling Critical Attention Heads by Excluding Inert Tokens to Mitigate Hallucination
LVLMs show vocabulary hijacking by inert tokens that decode to hijacking anchors; HABI locates them, NHAR finds resilient heads, and HAVAE boosts those heads to cut hallucinations.
-
Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards
PRIME enables online process reward model updates in LLM RL using implicit rewards from rollouts and outcome labels, yielding 15.1% average gains on reasoning benchmarks and surpassing a stronger instruct model with 10% of the data.
-
Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization
Mixed Preference Optimization with the MMPR dataset boosts multimodal CoT reasoning, lifting InternVL2-8B to 67.0 accuracy on MathVista (+8.7 points) and matching the 76B model.
-
Generating Place-Based Compromises Between Two Points of View
Empathic similarity feedback in prompts generates more acceptable compromises than chain-of-thought, and margin-based training on the resulting data lets smaller models produce them without ongoing empathy estimation.