The paper claims blockchains can be understood through three components: membership selection, consensus mechanism, and structure, and classifies leading systems accordingly.
The Attack of the Clones Against Proof-of-Authority
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this paper, we explore vulnerabilities and countermeasures of the recently proposed blockchain consensus based on proof-of-authority. The proof-of-work blockchains, like Bitcoin and Ethereum, have been shown both theoretically and empirically vulnerable to double spending attacks. This is why Byzantine fault tolerant consensus algorithms have gained popularity in the blockchain context for their ability to tolerate a limited number t of attackers among n participants. We formalize the recently proposed proof-of-authority consensus algorithms that are Byzantine fault tolerant by describing the Aura and Clique protocols present in the two mainstream implementations of Ethereum. We then introduce the Cloning Attack and show how to apply it to double spend in each of these protocols with a single malicious node. Our results show that the Cloning Attack against Aura is always successful while the same attack against Clique is about twice as fast and succeeds in most cases.
fields
cs.DC 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Deconstructing Blockchains: A Comprehensive Survey on Consensus, Membership and Structure
The paper claims blockchains can be understood through three components: membership selection, consensus mechanism, and structure, and classifies leading systems accordingly.