A systematic review of 119 ANN-MEG studies shows rapid growth across decoding, BCI, clinical, modeling, and source-localization applications, with recurring reproducibility gaps.
Machine learning for neural decoding
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite rapid advances in machine learning tools, the majority of neural decoding approaches still use traditional methods. Modern machine learning tools, which are versatile and easy to use, have the potential to significantly improve decoding performance. This tutorial describes how to effectively apply these algorithms for typical decoding problems. We provide descriptions, best practices, and code for applying common machine learning methods, including neural networks and gradient boosting. We also provide detailed comparisons of the performance of various methods at the task of decoding spiking activity in motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus. Modern methods, particularly neural networks and ensembles, significantly outperform traditional approaches, such as Wiener and Kalman filters. Improving the performance of neural decoding algorithms allows neuroscientists to better understand the information contained in a neural population and can help advance engineering applications such as brain machine interfaces.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
q-bio.NC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Artificial Neural Networks for Magnetoencephalography: A review of an emerging field
A systematic review of 119 ANN-MEG studies shows rapid growth across decoding, BCI, clinical, modeling, and source-localization applications, with recurring reproducibility gaps.