Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine learning for neural decoding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.00909 v4 pith:KWMLIXN7 submitted 2017-08-02 q-bio.NC cs.LGstat.ML

classification q-bio.NCcs.LGstat.ML
keywords decodingneuralmachinelearningmethodsperformancealgorithmsapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite rapid advances in machine learning tools, the majority of neural decoding approaches still use traditional methods. Modern machine learning tools, which are versatile and easy to use, have the potential to significantly improve decoding performance. This tutorial describes how to effectively apply these algorithms for typical decoding problems. We provide descriptions, best practices, and code for applying common machine learning methods, including neural networks and gradient boosting. We also provide detailed comparisons of the performance of various methods at the task of decoding spiking activity in motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus. Modern methods, particularly neural networks and ensembles, significantly outperform traditional approaches, such as Wiener and Kalman filters. Improving the performance of neural decoding algorithms allows neuroscientists to better understand the information contained in a neural population and can help advance engineering applications such as brain machine interfaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artificial Neural Networks for Magnetoencephalography: A review of an emerging field

    q-bio.NC 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 119 ANN-MEG studies shows rapid growth across decoding, BCI, clinical, modeling, and source-localization applications, with recurring reproducibility gaps.

Pith tools