Models delayed verification in multi-agent LLMs as graph consensus, derives stability thresholds (inverse golden ratio for delay two) via grounded Laplacian, and gives a supermodular greedy rule for corrector placement; experiments on five models confirm dose-delay oscillations.
A survey on llm-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges.Vicinagearth, 1(1):9, 2024a
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
SDRL trains LLMs via self-generated multi-path debates and joint optimization of standalone plus debate-conditioned responses to boost both single-model reasoning and multi-agent debate performance.
In agentic AI, safety and fairness are governed by interaction topology rather than model scale or alignment.
citing papers explorer
-
Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement
Models delayed verification in multi-agent LLMs as graph consensus, derives stability thresholds (inverse golden ratio for delay two) via grounded Laplacian, and gives a supermodular greedy rule for corrector placement; experiments on five models confirm dose-delay oscillations.
-
Learning from Self-Debate: Preparing Reasoning Models for Multi-Agent Debate
SDRL trains LLMs via self-generated multi-path debates and joint optimization of standalone plus debate-conditioned responses to boost both single-model reasoning and multi-agent debate performance.
-
Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment
In agentic AI, safety and fairness are governed by interaction topology rather than model scale or alignment.