The exact spin-elimination idea via Walsh-Hadamard expansion is sound, but the paper's explicit two-spin, three-spin, and other gadget formulas contain sign errors that break the claimed ground-state preservation.
Fully Programmable Spatial Photonic Ising Machine by Focal Plane Division
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Ising machines are an emerging class of hardware that promises ultrafast and energy-efficient solutions to NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. Spatial photonic Ising machines (SPIMs) exploit optical computing in free space to accelerate the computation, showcasing parallelism, scalability, and low power consumption. However, current SPIMs can implement only a restricted class of problems. This partial programmability is a critical limitation that hampers their benchmark. Achieving full programmability of the device while preserving its scalability is an open challenge. Here, we report a fully programmable SPIM achieved through a novel operation method based on the division of the focal plane. In our scheme, a general Ising problem is decomposed into a set of Mattis Hamiltonians, whose energies are simultaneously computed optically by measuring the intensity on different regions of the camera sensor. Exploiting this concept, we experimentally demonstrate the computation with high success probability of ground-state solutions of up to 32-spin Ising models on unweighted maximum cut graphs with and without ferromagnetic bias. Simulations of the hardware prove a favorable scaling of the accuracy with the number of spins. Our fully programmable SPIM enables the implementation of many quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems, further establishing SPIMs as a leading paradigm in non von Neumann hardware.
fields
quant-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Exact Spin Elimination in Ising Hamiltonians and Energy-Based Machine Learning
The exact spin-elimination idea via Walsh-Hadamard expansion is sound, but the paper's explicit two-spin, three-spin, and other gadget formulas contain sign errors that break the claimed ground-state preservation.