FluxFlow uses conservative pixel-space flow-matching with uncertainty weights and Wiener test-time correction to outperform baselines on photometric and scientific accuracy for ground-to-space super-resolution, validated on a new real 19,500-pair DESI-HST dataset.
Training Flow Matching: The Role of Weighting and Parameterization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We study the training objectives of denoising-based generative models, with a particular focus on loss weighting and output parameterization, including noise-, clean image-, and velocity-based formulations. Through a systematic numerical study, we analyze how these training choices interact with the intrinsic dimensionality of the data manifold, model architecture, and dataset size. Our experiments span synthetic datasets with controlled geometry as well as image data, and compare training objectives using quantitative metrics for denoising accuracy (PSNR across noise levels) and generative quality (FID). Rather than proposing a new method, our goal is to disentangle the various factors that matter when training a flow matching model, in order to provide practical insights on design choices.
fields
cs.CV 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
FluxFlow: Conservative Flow-Matching for Astronomical Image Super-Resolution
FluxFlow uses conservative pixel-space flow-matching with uncertainty weights and Wiener test-time correction to outperform baselines on photometric and scientific accuracy for ground-to-space super-resolution, validated on a new real 19,500-pair DESI-HST dataset.