Claims to confirm the L^α-Littlewood, L^1-Newman, and L^∞-Erdős conjectures via a short Clarkson-inequality argument, but the key norm-convergence step is unjustified.
On $L^\alpha$-flatness of Erd\H{o}s-Littlewood's polynomials
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
It is shown that Erd\"{o}s--Littlewood's polynomials are not $L^\alpha$-flat when $\alpha > 2$ is an even integer (and hence for any $\alpha \geq 4$). This provides a partial solution to an old problem posed by Littlewood. Consequently, we obtain a positive answer to the analogous Erd\"{o}s--Newman conjecture for polynomials with coefficients $\pm 1$; that is, there is no ultraflat sequence of polynomials from the class of Erd\"{o}s--Littlewood polynomials. Our proof is short and simple. It relies on the classical lemma for $L^p$ norms of the Dirichlet kernel, the Marcinkiewicz--Zygmund interpolation inequalities, and the $p$-concentration theorem due to A. Bonami and S. R\'ev\'esz.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.NT 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A generalization of Littlewood's $L^\alpha$ flat theorem, $\alpha>0$
Claims to confirm the L^α-Littlewood, L^1-Newman, and L^∞-Erdős conjectures via a short Clarkson-inequality argument, but the key norm-convergence step is unjustified.