Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On $L^\alpha$-flatness of Erd\H{o}s-Littlewood's polynomials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.21499 v1 pith:2GP7OIXK submitted 2025-04-30 math.CA math.DS

classification math.CAmath.DS
keywords polynomialsalphas--littlewoodanalogousanswerbonamiclassclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

It is shown that Erd\"{o}s--Littlewood's polynomials are not $L^\alpha$-flat when $\alpha > 2$ is an even integer (and hence for any $\alpha \geq 4$). This provides a partial solution to an old problem posed by Littlewood. Consequently, we obtain a positive answer to the analogous Erd\"{o}s--Newman conjecture for polynomials with coefficients $\pm 1$; that is, there is no ultraflat sequence of polynomials from the class of Erd\"{o}s--Littlewood polynomials. Our proof is short and simple. It relies on the classical lemma for $L^p$ norms of the Dirichlet kernel, the Marcinkiewicz--Zygmund interpolation inequalities, and the $p$-concentration theorem due to A. Bonami and S. R\'ev\'esz.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A generalization of Littlewood's $L^\alpha$ flat theorem, $\alpha>0$

    math.NT 2025-09 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Claims to confirm the L^α-Littlewood, L^1-Newman, and L^∞-Erdős conjectures via a short Clarkson-inequality argument, but the key norm-convergence step is unjustified.

Pith tools