Reference change · event page

Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-04968-7
Notice DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05378-z
Event date: 2025-07-31
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideas

ref [18] · 2506.20803 · notice #8970 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

M \"u ge Simsek, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment. Scientometrics, 129: 0 2521--2532, 2024. URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04968-7

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

M u ge Simsek, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment. Scientometrics, 129: 0 2521--2532, 2024. URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04968-7

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.