Citation notice #8970 · 2026-08-07 06:34:21.451453+00:00

The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideas

Correction Crossref Open

cites Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment, which carries a correction notice dated 2025-07-31. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 18

M \"u ge Simsek, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment. Scientometrics, 129: 0 2521--2532, 2024. URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04968-7

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

M u ge Simsek, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment. Scientometrics, 129: 0 2521--2532, 2024. URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04968-7

02Event

Type: Correction
Source: Crossref
Original DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-04968-7
Notice DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05378-z
Date: 2025-07-31
Title: Correction to: Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? A field Experiment
Reasons: ['Correction']
Work: Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? a field experiment (2024)

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.