Pith. sign in

Reference change · event page

Reference changes · DOI

Erratum regarding corrections related to Ethical approval and informed consent in articles published in [Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 5C (2025)]

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed
DOI
10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100169
Notice DOI
10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100249
Event date
2026-01-02
Machine twin
JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open
Imperfectly Cooperative Human-AI Interactions: Comparing the Impacts of Human and AI Attributes in Simulated and User Studies

ref [44] · 2604.15607 · notice #7647 · dispute

Raw extraction · citation context

Much of the existing literature centers on purely cooperative settings where people and AI effec- tively function as teammates, interacting to achieve common goals (Cooke et al., 2024; Nguyen et al., 2025). Nonetheless, AI systems are increasingly conceptualized in contexts where competitive goals coincide with group-level objectives (Albert and Koubaa, 2025; Sun et al., 2024). For example, Nicolas (2025) demonstrated that people are more likely to rely on AI recommendations over humans when tasks are framed as competitive tests. How- ever, the presence of direct non-cooperative dy- namics in human-AI interactions remains largely unexplored. Recent works have begun explor- ing such dynamics through LLM-based simulation 2 techniques, where both humans and AI agents are

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.