Pith. sign in

Reference change · event page

Reference changes · DOI

2019 d , , 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 3 open · 3 total · 0 disputed
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.123.011102
Notice DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.123.011102
Event date
2019-07-01
Machine twin
JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open
The First Model-Independent Upper Bound on Micro-lensing Signature of the Highest Mass Binary Black Hole Event GW231123

ref [14] · 2512.19077 · notice #4463 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Abbott, B. P., et al. 2019 b , title Tests of General Relativity with GW170817 , Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Abbott, B. P., et al. 2019 b, title Tests of General Relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102

Correction Open
Tests of scalar polarizations with multi-messenger events

ref [59] · 2604.24526 · notice #4462 · dispute

Raw extraction · citation context

Abbott, Physical Review Letters123(2019), 10.1103/physrevlett.123.011102. [56] Y. Hagihara, N. Era, D. Iikawa, A. Nishizawa, and H. Asada, Physical Review D100(2019), 10.1103/phys- revd.100.064010. [57] H. Takeda, S. Morisaki, and A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064037 (2021). [58] A. A. Svidzinsky and R. C. Hilborn, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2021), 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00080-6. [59] K. Chatziioannou, M. Isi, C.-J. Haster, and T. B. Lit- tenberg, Physical Review D104(2021), 10.1103/phys- revd.104.044005. [60] H. Takeda, S. Tsujikawa, and A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. D109, 104072 (2024), arXiv:2311.09281 [gr-qc]. [61] H. Takeda, S. Morisaki, and A. Nishizawa, Physical Re- view D105(2022), 10.1103/physrevd.105.084019. [62] D. M. Eardley, D.

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Abbott, Physical Review Letters123(2019), 10.1103/physrevlett.123.011102. [56] Y. Hagihara, N. Era, D. Iikawa, A. Nishizawa, and H. Asada, Physical Review D100(2019), 10.1103/phys- revd.100.064010. [57] H. Takeda, S. Morisaki, and A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064037 (2021). [58] A. A. Svidzinsky and R. C. Hilborn, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2021), 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00080-6. [59] K. Chatziioannou, M. Isi, C.-J. Haster, and T. B. Lit- tenberg, Physical Review D104(2021), 10.1103/phys- revd.104.044005. [60] H. Takeda, S. Tsujikawa, and A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. D109, 104072 (2024), arXiv:2311.09281 [gr-qc]. [61] H. Takeda, S. Morisaki, and A. Nishizawa, Physical Re- view D105(2022), 10.1103/physrevd.105.084019. [62] D. M. Eardley, D

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.