REVIEW 3 minor 91 cited by
GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object
T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-17 · grok-4.3
Pith's one-line read Gravitational waves reveal a merger of a 23-solar-mass black hole with a 2.6-solar-mass compact object, the most unequal mass ratio observed.
desk verdict GW190814 is a clean high-SNR detection of the most extreme mass-ratio merger yet, with a secondary at 2.5-2.67 solar masses that lands in the gap. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The GW190814 gravitational-wave signal extracted from LIGO-Virgo detector data using general-relativity waveform templates for parameter estimation of masses, spins, and distance.
What would settle it
A reanalysis of the three-detector strain data that yields a secondary mass outside the 2.50-2.67 solar mass range or shows clear deviations from general-relativity waveform predictions would falsify the reported interpretation.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 M⊙ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 M⊙. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured with gravitational waves, 0.112, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to ≤ 0.07. Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} for the new class of
Load-bearing premise
The detected signal arises from a compact binary coalescence whose waveform matches general-relativity templates without significant unmodeled noise or alternative contributions.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports the detection of gravitational-wave event GW190814 on 2019 August 14, a compact binary coalescence observed by the LIGO-Virgo network with network SNR 25. It claims component masses of 22.2-24.3 M⊙ (primary black hole) and 2.50-2.67 M⊙ (secondary compact object) at 90% credible level, mass ratio 0.112, luminosity distance 241 Mpc, and sky localization 18.5 deg². The analysis includes matched-filter searches, Bayesian parameter estimation with GR waveform templates, tests showing no deviations from general relativity and confirmation of higher multipoles, and a single-event Poisson estimate of the merger rate density for this source class as 1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}. Astrophysical implications for formation channels are discussed.
Significance. If the central result holds, the detection is significant for identifying the first compact object in the neutron-star/black-hole mass gap within a binary system and for measuring the most extreme mass ratio yet observed with gravitational waves. The high SNR enables tight spin constraints (primary spin ≤0.07) and robust GR consistency tests. The rate estimate, while broad, adds to the emerging population statistics for unequal-mass systems. Strengths include the direct use of validated matched-filter and Bayesian pipelines with explicit cross-detector consistency checks and higher-multipole confirmation.
minor comments (3)
- Abstract: the statement that 'no electromagnetic counterpart has been confirmed to date' would benefit from a brief citation to the relevant follow-up papers or a note on the depth of the searches performed.
- Rate estimation section: the quoted 1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} interval is derived from a single-event Poisson likelihood; a short quantitative discussion of sensitivity to the comoving-volume prior choice would clarify the robustness of the bounds.
- Figure captions (e.g., those showing posterior distributions): explicitly note the credible intervals (90%) used for the reported mass and distance ranges to aid quick comparison with other GW events.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive review of our manuscript on the detection of GW190814 and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately captures the key results, including the component masses, mass ratio, SNR, localization, GR tests, higher-multipole confirmation, and rate estimate. No major comments were raised in the report.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The paper reports a high-SNR gravitational-wave detection and parameter estimation for GW190814 using standard matched-filter searches, coherent Bayesian inference with established GR waveform templates, and a single-event Poisson likelihood for the merger rate. Mass and spin constraints follow directly from data-to-template comparison without self-definition or renaming of fitted quantities as predictions. Rate bounds use a uniform comoving-volume prior whose minor sensitivity is explicitly noted and does not force the central observational claim. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is present; the analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks such as prior LIGO/Virgo detections and independent noise characterization.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- merger rate density =
1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}
assumptions (1)
- domain assumption General relativity accurately predicts the waveform of a compact binary coalescence including higher multipoles
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BYRWG5L
@misc{pith2026200612611,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BYRWG5L}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2006.12611}
}
abstract
We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 $M_{\odot}$ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 $M_{\odot}$ (all measurements quoted at the 90$\%$ credible level). The gravitational-wave signal, GW190814, was observed during LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run on August 14, 2019 at 21:10:39 UTC and has a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 in the three-detector network. The source was localized to 18.5 deg$^2$ at a distance of $241^{+41}_{-45}$ Mpc; no electromagnetic counterpart has been confirmed to date. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured with gravitational waves, $0.112^{+0.008}_{-0.009}$, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to $\leq 0.07$. Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1-23 Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ for the new class of binary coalescence sources that GW190814 represents. Astrophysical models predict that binaries with mass ratios similar to this event can form through several channels, but are unlikely to have formed in globular clusters. However, the combination of mass ratio, component masses, and the inferred merger rate for this event challenges all current models for the formation and mass distribution of compact-object binaries.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcingdimension_forced unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 M⊙ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 M⊙
-
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.Hamiltonianenergy_conservation unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Showing 60 of 91 Pith papers that cite this
-
A story about a tipsy kangaroo: Reversible jump MCMC for model selection in the analysis of gravitational-wave signals from the coalescence of compact objects
A single RJMCMC run can rank BBH, NSBH, and BNS waveform models and deliver the favored model's parameter posteriors, validated on injections and two real GW events.
-
Joint inference of line-of-sight acceleration and orbital eccentricity in neutron-star--black-hole binaries
All five NSBH events are consistent with zero line-of-sight acceleration; the joint posterior for GW200105_162426 disfavors both zero LOSA and zero eccentricity at 90% credibility.
-
Constraints on Line-of-Sight Acceleration from O1-O4
All known compact binary mergers show line-of-sight accelerations consistent with zero under a new time-domain Doppler-shift model, with current detectors only sensitive to high-acceleration scenarios.
-
Tests of general relativity at the fourth post-Newtonian order with GW230627 and GW250114
Bayesian analysis of GW230627 and GW250114 finds no deviation from GR at 4PN and 4.5PN orders, setting the first empirical baseline with 90% intervals of order O(1)-O(10).
-
A Multi-Wavelength View of the First Type Ic-BL Supernova with an Einstein Probe X-ray Shock Breakout
First definitive X-ray shock breakout from a Type Ic-BL supernova, with radio constraints and a rate calculation implying most such supernovae produce fainter signals than observed here.
-
Fast gravitational waveform models for quasi-circular coalescences of neutron star--black hole binaries
Presents new NSBH waveform models IMRPhenomXHM_NSBH, SEOBNRv5HM_ROM_NRTidalv3_NSBH, and IMRPhenomXPHM_NSBH incorporating higher modes and tidal effects via NRTidalv3 extensions, validated against NR simulations and ap...
-
Untangling the interplay of the Equation-of-State and the Collision Term towards the generation of Directed and Elliptic Flow at intermediate energies
In UrQMD simulations of Au+Au at SIS18/SIS100 energies, the final midrapidity elliptic flow is generated late by the mean-field potential during the breakup of a matter bridge, not by early squeeze-out or spectator shadowing.
-
On the formation of GW190814
GW190814's low-mass component may be the remnant of a neutron star merger that was kicked into a second merger with a 23 solar mass black hole in a hierarchical triple system.
-
A Two-month, Galaxy-targeted NIR Follow-up of the Sub-solar-mass Gravitational Wave Candidate S251112cm: Probing Electromagnetic Counterpart Scenarios
A deep two-month UKIRT J-band campaign over 59 high-priority host galaxies found no electromagnetic counterpart to the sub-solar-mass gravitational-wave candidate S251112cm, disfavoring bright kilonova models within t...
-
AT 2024qfm: a luminous fast blue optical transient at a redshift of z = 0.2267 identified by Lasair-ZTF
A new luminous fast blue optical transient, AT 2024qfm, was discovered at z=0.2267 with a Lasair broker filter and matches AT 2018cow in luminosity and 13 day fade.
-
Testing the spin-induced multipole moments of compact binary coalescences using the flexible theory-independent framework
A flexible gravitational-wave test constrains spin-induced quadrupole and octupole moments, finds consistency with Kerr black holes in current data, and projects order 10^-2 to 10^-1 bounds for Einstein Telescope and ...
-
Reconstruction of Primordial Power Spectrum from Gravitational Waves of High-Redshift Black Hole Binaries
Gradient-descent inversion of redshifted BBH mass distributions recovers the PBH mass function and, via regularized Press-Schechter, a candidate O(10^{-2}) bump in the small-scale primordial power spectrum.
-
Rotating Fermion-Boson Stars in $R$-squared Gravity
R-squared gravity enlarges the equilibrium domain of rotating fermion-boson stars and raises static and Keplerian maximum masses relative to GR while remaining compatible with current compact-object constraints.
-
Compactness Inference in Gravitational-Wave Mergers with PhenomDECO: Catalog Benchmarks and Robustness Diagnostics
PhenomDECO analysis of GWTC-3 events finds all considered signals consistent with binary black holes once low-frequency noise effects are addressed via higher starting frequencies.
-
Is the coexistence of strange quark stars and hadronic stars favored by astrophysical data? A Bayesian analysis
Bayesian analysis of astrophysical and laboratory data favors the two-families scenario of coexisting hadronic and strange quark stars over the one-family scenario.
-
Improving low-latency multi-messenger follow-up of neutron star-black hole mergers with mode-by-mode filtering
Mode-by-mode filtering of higher-order modes enables low-latency marginalization over mode information in NSBH gravitational-wave signals, tightening constraints on distance, inclination, and secondary mass.
-
Eccentric and unbound compact binaries in the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA catalog: parameter estimation and waveform systematics with SEOBNRv6EHM
SEOBNRv6EHM reduces parameter biases for eccentric binaries versus prior models and shows mild support for eccentricity in five catalog events plus comparable unbound fits for three high-mass events.
-
Ces\`aro convergence of the high-order WKB method and its applications to black-hole overtones and long-lived modes
High-order WKB with Padé approximants and Cesàro means enables computation of black-hole overtones and long-lived quasinormal modes, with a noted limitation that apparent convergence can be incorrect for some metrics.
-
Massquerade: Impacts of Mass Ratio Reversals on Binary Black Hole Merger Rates and Mass Distributions
Mass ratio reversals produce qualitatively different contributions to BBH merger rates and masses in COMPAS versus SEVN simulations, with core-growth dominating and most systems arising from massive low-metallicity pr...
-
Gravitational Bound State Perturbations Inside Black Holes and Isospectrality
Polar perturbations inside Schwarzschild have ℓ−1 bound states; ℓ−2 of them are exactly isospectral to axial bound states, and the extra ground state is the algebraically special mode, yielding ΔA = 16π l_Pl².
-
Testing general relativity with amplitudes of subdominant gravitational-wave modes
An extended gravitational-wave amplitude test adds (4,4) and (3,2) modes, reports a new δA44 constraint from GW230814, and shows precession and eccentricity can mimic GR violations.
-
A new group of low-spin $50-70M_\odot$ Black Holes and the high pair-instability mass cutoff
GWTC-4.0 reveals low-spin black holes up to ~68.5 Msun, implying a higher pair-instability mass cutoff and a lower 12C(alpha,gamma)16O rate.
-
Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses
GWTC-4 data supports three subpopulations of merging black holes with transition masses at about 28 and 40 solar masses, differing in mass ratio and spin.
-
A Robust and Efficient F-statistic-based Framework for Consistent Bayesian Inference of Compact Binary Coalescences
F-statistic framework analytically maximizes over distance and polarization to enable faster Bayesian inference of compact binary coalescences with a new evidence formulation that matches full frequency-domain results...
-
Distinguishing Neutron Star vs. Low-Mass Black Hole Binaries with Late Inspiral & Postmerger Gravitational Waves $-$ Sensitivity to Transmuted Black Holes and Non-Annihilating Dark Matter
Future high-frequency-sensitive GW detectors can distinguish binary neutron star from low-mass black hole mergers in late phases, enabling separation of merger rates and constraints on heavy non-annihilating dark matt...
-
All-sky search for long-duration gravitational-wave transients in the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing run
No long-duration gravitational-wave transients were found in O4a data; 50% efficiency amplitude limits improved by about 30% over O3, and eccentric CBC rate limits improved by factors of 2-7.
-
Searching for intermediate mass ratio binary black hole mergers in the third observing run of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA
No confident intermediate mass ratio inspirals are found in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O3 data, yielding 90% upper limits of roughly 30-1000 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 on their local merger rate and showing higher modes boost search volume b...
-
Non-oscillatory gravitational quasinormal modes of Reissner-Nordstr\"om-de Sitter spacetime
Purely imaginary gravitational quasinormal modes of Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes are computed and shown to obey a universal small-hole formula and to generate late-time exponential tails.
-
Stellar-mass black holes in young massive and open stellar clusters -- VI. Role of external galactic field
Even strongly tidally stripped young star clusters continue to form dynamical black hole mergers and Gaia-BH-like BH-main-sequence binaries, with nearly unchanged merger property distributions.
-
Time-frequency structure in the post-merger binary black hole gravitational wave signal
Post-merger signals from asymmetric black hole binaries develop extra time-frequency peaks for strong aligned spin and a broken sky symmetry for mild precessing spin, consistent with the horizon-geometry correlation idea.
-
Time Evolution of Black Hole Perturbations in Quadratic Gravity
Gravitational perturbations of Einstein-Weyl black holes show late-time oscillatory tails decaying as t^{-5/6} and break the null-geodesic correspondence in the eikonal regime.
-
Towards constraining QCD phase transitions in neutron star interiors: Bayesian Inference with TOV linear response analysis
A Bayesian framework with analytical TOV linear-response gradients and a neural-network equation of state reconstructs neutron star EoSs and constrains first-order phase transition parameters from simulated mass-radius data.
-
Braneworld Neutron Stars: Constraining Brane Tension with Observational Data
Using six neutron star equations of state, braneworld gravity can support the 2.5 to 2.67 solar mass object seen in GW190814 and gives a lower bound on brane tension near 2×10^37 dyne/cm^2.
-
Nuclear matter properties from chiral-scale effective theory including a dilatonic scalar meson
A nuclear matter model based on chiral-scale effective theory with a dilatonic meson reproduces saturation properties and yields a stiff high-density equation of state with neutron star masses near 2.8 to 3 solar masses.
-
Probing Primordial Black Hole Mergers in Clusters with Pulsar Timing Data
Bayesian analysis of IPTA DR2 shows scalar-induced gravitational waves dominate and PBH merger backgrounds are strongly disfavored relative to an astrophysical SMBHB explanation.
-
Probing time-dependent scalar wigs with extreme mass ratio inspirals
For EMRIs where the smaller black hole carries an oscillating scalar cloud with mass 0.001 <= mu_s m_p <= 0.02, the scalar energy flux is negligible, so the inspiral and gravitational waveform are essentially unchanged.
-
Quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of Morris-Thorne wormholes
Sixth-order WKB formulas for wormhole quasinormal modes and grey-body factors are presented, but the grey-body factor part is internally inconsistent.
-
Thermalization effects on the dynamics of growing vacuum bubbles
Bubble-wall terminal velocity depends on plasma thermalization; non-equilibrium and free-streaming regimes give slower or different walls, and stationary solutions can be bypassed by runaways.
-
Quantum van der Waals quarkyonic matter at non-zero isospin asymmetry
The authors generalize the quantum van der Waals quarkyonic matter model to asymmetric nuclear matter and find neutron star masses up to about 2.6 solar masses, with isospin-dependent repulsion preferred by observations.
-
Gravitational wave complementarity and impact of NANOGrav data on gravitational leptogenesis: cosmic strings
Cosmic-string gravitational waves can probe gravitational leptogenesis, and if NANOGrav's signal is gravitational waves, it disfavors lightest neutrino masses above about 25 meV within this model.
-
Rapidly Spinning Compact Stars with Deconfinement Phase Transition
Holographic neutron star models with a deconfinement phase transition give Mmax/MTOV = 1.227(+0.031/-0.016), slightly above the Breu-Rezzolla bound, supporting a rapidly rotating neutron star interpretation of GW19081...
-
Effects of Differential Rotation on the Maximum Mass of Neutron Stars
Differential rotation substantially boosts hyperonic neutron-star maximum mass to the GW190814 range, yet a soft SU(6) EoS still fails the PSR J0740+6620 constraint at 346 Hz.
-
A stepping stone toward detecting gravitational wave memory: a cumulative analysis with the full $(\ell=2, m=0)$ spherical harmonic using events from GWTC-4.0 and GWTC-5.0
Cumulative log10 Bayes factor of 1.38±0.79 favors the full (2,0) mode in GWTC-4.0; decisive evidence is projected to need ~166 events under optimistic assumptions.
-
The Chirp-Mass Ladder: A New Rung Emerges
The chirp-mass distribution of GW-detected binary black holes shows a ladder of peaks doubling in mass, with a new intermediate peak at 19 solar masses confirming a prior prediction from the hierarchical merger model.
-
Astrophysical Constraints on Hadron--Quark Crossover in Hybrid Neutron Stars
A Bayesian analysis of smooth hadron-quark crossover neutron stars using NICER and GW170817 data favors a broad, high-density mixed transition, disfavors pure quark cores, and makes a neutron-star interpretation of GW...
-
Scalar-induced gravitational waves from inflation with symmetry breaking
Late gauge-field excitation in charged symmetry-breaking inflation pushes enhanced SIGWs into the GHz band, where longitudinal and charge-mixing parameters reshape the spectrum in opposite, distinguishable ways.
-
Parameter Estimation on LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O4a Binary Merger Triggers with Sub-solar Mass Components
Bayesian re-analysis of the seven LVK O4a sub-solar-mass triggers finds three that are compatible with a sub-solar-mass component, though none rises to detection significance.
-
Can average speed of sound and thermodynamic response functions signal the exotic phases in neutron star cores?
Average speed of sound, its logarithmic derivative, and thermodynamic response functions distinguish sharp-interface versus mixed-phase hadron-quark transitions inside hybrid neutron stars.
-
Quark and hybrid stars with renormalization group improvement of NNLO perturbative QCD
RGOPT-resummed NNLO pQCD EoS for massive quarks in beta equilibrium is fitted and applied to construct pure quark stars (X=3.08-3.58) and hybrid stars (X~2-2.98) compatible with PSR J0740+6620 and GW190814.
-
Line-of-sight acceleration in compact binaries with higher harmonics and eccentricity
Implements consistent line-of-sight acceleration corrections in quasi-circular and eccentric GW waveform models, applies them to GWTC-3 events, and reports no substantial evidence for acceleration while warning of bia...
-
Hybrid stars among mass gap objects are excluded by twin stars at $1.4\,M_\odot$
Mass-gap compact objects could be hybrid stars only with very early deconfinement and stiff quark matter; confirming 1.4 M⊙ twin stars would cap hybrid-star maximum mass below 2.2 M⊙.
-
Searching for binary black hole mergers with deep learning in Advanced LIGO's third observing run
A hybrid matched-filter/deep-learning pipeline recovers 31 known O3 events and reports a new tentative high-mass candidate, with sensitivity comparable to existing searches only for chirp masses above 25 solar masses.
-
Quasinormal spectra of higher dimensional regular black holes in theories with infinite curvature corrections
For six families of higher-dimensional regular black holes, positive higher-curvature coupling reduces quasinormal-mode oscillation frequencies and damping rates, a trend verified at low and eikonal multipoles.
-
A case study of GW190425 for classifying binary neutron star versus binary black hole mergers and constraining asymmetric dark matter with gravitational wave detectors
Assuming GW190425 was a black hole merger from dark-matter-induced neutron star collapse, the authors derive dark matter constraints and forecast that only Einstein Telescope/Cosmic Explorer can confidently classify s...
-
Binary black holes in the heat of merger
Develops a frequency-domain approximant for tidal heating in nonspinning black hole binaries that extends to merger and includes horizon parameters.
-
Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysical data: The impacts of likelihood functions of low density matter constraints
Using a uniform instead of Gaussian likelihood for low-density nuclear constraints leaves neutron star radii and masses nearly unchanged, but shifts the inferred nuclear incompressibility.
-
PSR J0952-0607: Probing the Stiffest Equations of State and r-Mode Suppression Mechanisms
Using the 709.2 Hz spin of PSR J0952-0607 in Bayesian equation-of-state inference shifts its inferred non-rotating mass to 2.10+0.25-0.24 Msun and makes r-mode stability depend on crust rigidity.
-
Bayesian constraints on covariant density functional equations of state of compact stars with new NICER mass-radius measurements
Bayesian fits that include the 2024 NICER results for PSR J0437 and J1231 narrow the allowed radius range for canonical-mass neutron stars to roughly 12.5 to 12.8 km in covariant density functional models.
-
Phase consistency test to identify type II strongly lensed gravitational wave signals using a single event
A new test looks for a -π/12 phase offset between the (2,2) and (3,3) modes to identify type II lensed gravitational waves from a single event, applied to GW190412 and GW190814 with inconclusive results.
-
Multi-Messenger Cosmology: A Route to Accurate Inference of Dark Energy Beyond CPL Parametrization from XG Detectors
A simulation forecast claims CE+ET bright standard sirens can measure dark energy EoS parameters with sigma(w0)=0.010, sigma(wa)=0.049, sigma(wb)=0.072, better than other planned probes.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Aasi , J., Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., et al. 2015, , 32, 074001, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001
-
[2]
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2016 a , , 116, 061102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
-
[3]
Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run
---. 2016 b , , 6, 041015, 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041015
-
[4]
---. 2016 c , , 33, 134001, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/13/134001
-
[5]
---. 2016 d , , 93, 122003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122003
-
[6]
---. 2016 e , , 93, 122004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122004
-
[7]
Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914
---. 2016 f , , 116, 241102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102
-
[8]
---. 2016 g , , 116, 221101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221101
Show all 286 references
-
[9]
2017 a , , 119, 161101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
---. 2017 a , , 119, 161101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
2017 doi
-
[10]
2017 b , , 848, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
---. 2017 b , , 848, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
2017 doi
-
[11]
2017 c , , 848, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c
---. 2017 c , , 848, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c
2017 doi
-
[12]
2017 d , , 850, L39, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478
---. 2017 d , , 850, L39, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478
2017 doi
- [13]
-
[14]
2017 f , , 851, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c
---. 2017 f , , 851, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c
2017 doi
-
[15]
2017 g , , 851, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9a35
---. 2017 g , , 851, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9a35
2017 doi
-
[16]
2018, , 121, 161101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101
---. 2018, , 121, 161101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101
2018 doi
-
[17]
2019 a , PhRvX, 9, 031040, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040
---. 2019 a , PhRvX, 9, 031040, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040
2019 doi
-
[18]
2019 b , , 9, 011001, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011001
---. 2019 b , , 9, 011001, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011001
2019 doi
-
[19]
2019 c , arXiv:1908.06060 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06060
---. 2019 c , arXiv:1908.06060 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06060
2019
-
[20]
2019 d , , 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102
---. 2019 d , , 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102
2019 doi
-
[21]
2019 e , , 100, 104036, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104036
---. 2019 e , , 100, 104036, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104036
2019 doi
-
[22]
2019 f , , 875, 160, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3d
---. 2019 f , , 875, 160, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3d
2019 doi
-
[23]
2020 a , ApJL, 892, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5
---. 2020 a , ApJL, 892, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5
2020 doi
-
[24]
2020 b , arXiv:1304.0670v10 https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0670v10
---. 2020 b , arXiv:1304.0670v10 https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0670v10
2020 arXiv
-
[25]
2020 c , CQGra, 37, 045006, 10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f7c
---. 2020 c , CQGra, 37, 045006, 10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f7c
2020 doi
-
[26]
D., Abraham , S., et al
Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., Abraham , S., et al. 2020 d , arXiv:2004.08342 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.08342
2020
-
[27]
2010, CQGra, 27, 194011, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194011
Accadia , T., Acernese , F., Antonucci , F., et al. 2010, CQGra, 27, 194011, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194011
2010 doi
-
[28]
2018, , 35, 205004, 10.1088/1361-6382/aadf1a
Acernese , F., Adams , T., Agatsuma , K., et al. 2018, , 35, 205004, 10.1088/1361-6382/aadf1a
2018 doi
-
[29]
2015, , 32, 024001, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001
Acernese , F., Agathos , M., Agatsuma , K., et al. 2015, , 32, 024001, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001
2015 doi
-
[30]
2020, arXiv:2002.01950 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01950
Ackley , K., Amati , L., Barbieri , C., et al. 2020, arXiv:2002.01950 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01950
2020
-
[31]
2016, CQGra, 33, 175012, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/17/175012
Adams , T., Buskulic , D., Germain , V., et al. 2016, CQGra, 33, 175012, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/17/175012
2016 doi
-
[32]
Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., Arnaud , M., et al. 2016, , 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830
2016 doi
-
[33]
2019, , 25330
Ageron, M., Baret, B., Coleiro, A., et al. 2019, , 25330. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3/25330.gcn3
2019
-
[34]
Ajith, P., Fotopoulos, N., Privitera, S., Neunzert, A., & Weinstein, A. J. 2014, PhRvD, 89, 084041, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084041
2014 doi
-
[35]
2011, , 106, 241101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101
Ajith , P., Hannam , M., Husa , S., et al. 2011, , 106, 241101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101
2011 doi
-
[36]
O., & Berti , E
Alsing , J., Silva , H. O., & Berti , E. 2018, , 478, 1377, 10.1093/mnras/sty1065
2018 doi
-
[37]
A., Kasliwal , M
Andreoni , I., Goldstein , D. A., Kasliwal , M. M., et al. 2020, , 890, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a1b
2020 doi
-
[38]
2020, , 492, 3904, 10.1093/mnras/stz3142
Antier , S., Agayeva , S., Aivazyan , V., et al. 2020, , 492, 3904, 10.1093/mnras/stz3142
2020 doi
-
[39]
Antonini , F., & Perets , H. B. 2012, , 757, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/27
2012 doi
-
[40]
Antonini , F., Toonen , S., & Hamers , A. S. 2017, , 841, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e
2017 doi
-
[41]
A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G
Apostolatos, T. A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G. J., & Thorne, K. S. 1994, , 49, 6274, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6274
1994 doi
-
[42]
2020, CmPhy, 3, 43, 10.1038/s42005-020-0310-x
Arca Sedda , M. 2020, CmPhy, 3, 43, 10.1038/s42005-020-0310-x
2020 doi
-
[43]
G., Buonanno, A., Faye, G., & Ochsner, E
Arun, K. G., Buonanno, A., Faye, G., & Ochsner, E. 2009, , 79, 104023, 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.104023
2009 doi
-
[44]
G., Iyer, B
Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., Qusailah, M. S. S., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. 2006 a , PhRvD, 74, 024006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.024006
2006 doi
-
[45]
2006 b , CQGra, 23, L37–L43, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/l01
---. 2006 b , CQGra, 23, L37–L43, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/l01
2006 doi
-
[46]
D., et al
Ashton , G., H \"u bner , M., Lasky , P. D., et al. 2019, , 241, 27, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc
2019 doi
-
[47]
2017, , 464, L36, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw177
Askar , A., Szkudlarek , M., Gondek-Rosi \'n ska , D., Giersz , M., & Bulik , T. 2017, , 464, L36, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw177
2017 doi
-
[48]
P., Tollerud , E
Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068
2013 doi
-
[49]
2017, PhRvD, 95, 024010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024010
Babak, S., Taracchini, A., & Buonanno, A. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 024010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024010
2017 doi
-
[50]
D., Jain , R
Bailyn , C. D., Jain , R. K., Coppi , P., & Orosz , J. A. 1998, , 499, 367, 10.1086/305614
1998 doi
-
[51]
2013, PhRvD, 87, 024035, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024035
Baird, E., Fairhurst, S., Hannam, M., & Murphy, P. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 024035, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024035
2013 doi
- [52]
-
[53]
Blanchet , L., Damour , T., Esposito-Far \`e se , G., & Iyer , B. R. 2005, , 71, 124004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.124004
2005 doi
-
[54]
R., Will , C
Blanchet , L., Damour , T., Iyer , B. R., Will , C. M., & Wiseman , A. G. 1995, , 74, 3515, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3515
1995 doi
-
[55]
R., & Sinha, S
Blanchet, L., Faye, G., Iyer, B. R., & Sinha, S. 2008, CQGra, 25, 165003, 10.1088/0264-9381/25/16/165003, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/23/239501
2008 doi
-
[56]
2017, , 95, 044028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044028
Boh \'e , A., Shao , L., Taracchini , A., et al. 2017, , 95, 044028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044028
2017 doi
-
[57]
A., Kumar, P., & Nitz, A
Brown, D. A., Kumar, P., & Nitz, A. H. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 082004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.082004
2013 doi
-
[58]
1999, , 59, 084006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006
Buonanno, A., & Damour, T. 1999, , 59, 084006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006
1999 doi
-
[59]
2003, , 67, 104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.029904
Buonanno, A., et al. 2003, , 67, 104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.029904
2003 doi
-
[60]
2019, MNRAS, 485, 3153, 10.1093/mnras/stz543
Burrows, A., Radice, D., & Vartanyan, D. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3153, 10.1093/mnras/stz543
2019 doi
-
[61]
C., Skinner , M
Burrows , A., Vartanyan , D., Dolence , J. C., Skinner , M. A., & Radice , D. 2018, , 214, 33, 10.1007/s11214-017-0450-9
2018 doi
-
[62]
2012, , 748, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/136
Cannon , K., Cariou , R., Chapman , A., et al. 2012, , 748, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/136
2012 doi
-
[63]
2016 a , PhRvD, 96, 082002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.082002
Capano, C., Dent, T., Hanna, C., et al. 2016 a , PhRvD, 96, 082002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.082002
2016 doi
-
[64]
2016 b , PhRvD, 93, 124007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124007
Capano, C., Harry, I., Privitera, S., & Buonanno, A. 2016 b , PhRvD, 93, 124007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124007
2016 doi
-
[65]
2019, LRR, 22, 4, 10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4
Cardoso , V., & Pani , P. 2019, LRR, 22, 4, 10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4
2019 doi
-
[66]
1971, , 26, 331, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.331
Carter , B. 1971, , 26, 331, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.331
1971 doi
-
[67]
2004, , 21, S1809, 10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/024
Chatterji, S., et al. 2004, , 21, S1809, 10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/024
2004 doi
-
[68]
Chen, H.-Y., Fishbach, M., & Holz, D. E. 2018, Nat, 562, 545, 10.1038/s41586-018-0606-0
2018 doi
- [69]
-
[70]
2017, , 848, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c
Chornock , R., Berger , E., Kasen , D., et al. 2017, , 848, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c
2017 doi
-
[71]
Clausen , D., Sigurdsson , S., & Chernoff , D. F. 2013, , 428, 3618, 10.1093/mnras/sts295
2013 doi
-
[72]
2007, , 76, 102004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.102004
Cokelaer, T. 2007, , 76, 102004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.102004
2007 doi
-
[73]
B., Shapiro , S
Cook , G. B., Shapiro , S. L., & Teukolsky , S. A. 1994, , 424, 823, 10.1086/173934
1994 doi
-
[74]
2011, PhRvD, 84, 062003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.062003
Cornish, N., Sampson, L., Yunes, N., & Pretorius, F. 2011, PhRvD, 84, 062003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.062003
2011 doi
-
[75]
J., & Littenberg, T
Cornish, N. J., & Littenberg, T. B. 2015, , 32, 135012, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/13/135012
2015 doi
-
[76]
2018, PhRvD, 98, 084028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084028
Cotesta, R., Buonanno, A., Bohé, A., et al. 2018, PhRvD, 98, 084028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084028
2018 doi
-
[77]
W., Dietrich , T., Antier , S., et al
Coughlin , M. W., Dietrich , T., Antier , S., et al. 2020, , 492, 863, 10.1093/mnras/stz3457
2020 doi
-
[78]
S., Berger , E., Villar , V
Cowperthwaite , P. S., Berger , E., Villar , V. A., et al. 2017, , 848, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8fc7
2017 doi
-
[79]
T., Fonseca , E., Ransom , S
Cromartie , H. T., Fonseca , E., Ransom , S. M., et al. 2019, NatAs, 439, 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2
2019 doi
-
[80]
Cutler, C., & Flanagan, E. E. 1994, , 49, 2658, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2658
1994 doi
-
[81]
2018, , 479, 2374, 10.1093/mnras/sty1703
D \'a lya , G., Galg \'o czi , G., Dobos , L., et al. 2018, , 479, 2374, 10.1093/mnras/sty1703
2018 doi
- [82]
-
[83]
2001, PhLB, 513, 147, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00642-6
Damour , T., Jaranowski , P., & Sch \"a fer , G. 2001, PhLB, 513, 147, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00642-6
2001 doi
-
[84]
S., Dent, T., Tápai, M., et al
Davies, G. S., Dent, T., Tápai, M., et al. 2020, arXiv:2002.08291 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08291
2020
-
[85]
2012, , 86, 043011, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043011
Del Pozzo, W. 2012, , 86, 043011, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043011
2012 doi
-
[86]
K., Ajith, P., & Sathyaprakash, B
Dhanpal, S., Ghosh, A., Mehta, A. K., Ajith, P., & Sathyaprakash, B. 2019, PhRvD, 99, 10.1103/physrevd.99.104056
2019 doi
-
[87]
N., Giacobbo , N., Mapelli , M., et al
Di Carlo , U. N., Giacobbo , N., Mapelli , M., et al. 2019, , 487, 2947, 10.1093/mnras/stz1453
2019 doi
-
[88]
2019, , 887, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab59db
Dobie , D., Stewart , A., Murphy , T., et al. 2019, , 887, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab59db
2019 doi
-
[89]
2012, , 759, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/52
Dominik , M., Belczynski , K., Fryer , C., et al. 2012, , 759, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/52
2012 doi
-
[90]
2015, , 806, 263, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/263
Dominik , M., Berti , E., O'Shaughnessy , R., et al. 2015, , 806, 263, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/263
2015 doi
-
[91]
Effler, A., Schofield, R. M. S., Frolov, V. V., et al. 2015, CQGra, 32, 035017, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/3/035017
2015 doi
-
[92]
J., & Stanway , E
Eldridge , J. J., & Stanway , E. R. 2016, , 462, 3302, 10.1093/mnras/stw1772
2016 doi
-
[93]
J., Stanway , E
Eldridge , J. J., Stanway , E. R., Xiao , L., et al. 2017, , 34, e058, 10.1017/pasa.2017.51
2017 doi
-
[94]
T., Woosley , S
Ertl , T., Janka , H. T., Woosley , S. E., Sukhbold , T., & Ugliano , M. 2016, , 818, 124, 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/124
2016 doi
-
[95]
Essick , R., Landry , P., & Holz , D. E. 2020, , 101, 063007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063007
2020 doi
-
[96]
2019 a , arXiv:1908.00555 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00555
Fairhurst , S., et al. 2019 a , arXiv:1908.00555 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00555
2019
-
[97]
2019 b , arXiv:1908.05707 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.05707
---. 2019 b , arXiv:1908.05707 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.05707
2019
-
[98]
Farr , B., Berry , C. P. L., Farr , W. M., et al. 2016, , 825, 116, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/116
2016 doi
-
[99]
M., & Chatziioannou , K
Farr , W. M., & Chatziioannou , K. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 65, 10.3847/2515-5172/ab9088
2020 doi
-
[100]
M., Fishbach , M., Ye , J., & Holz , D
Farr , W. M., Fishbach , M., Ye , J., & Holz , D. E. 2019, , 883, L42, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4284
2019 doi
-
[101]
M., Sravan, N., Cantrell, A., et al
Farr, W. M., Sravan, N., Cantrell, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/103
2011 doi
-
[102]
M., Peiris , H
Feeney , S. M., Peiris , H. V., Williamson , A. R., et al. 2019, , 122, 061105, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.061105
2019 doi
-
[103]
2020, The landscape of disk outflows from black hole - neutron star mergers
Fern\' a ndez, R., Foucart, F., & Lippuner, J. 2020, The landscape of disk outflows from black hole - neutron star mergers. 2005.14208
2020
-
[104]
2019, ApJ, 871, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf96e
Fishbach, M., Gray, R., Magaña Hernandez, I., Qi, H., & Sur, A. 2019, ApJ, 871, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf96e
2019 doi
-
[105]
Fishbach , M., & Holz , D. E. 2020, , 891, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7247
2020 doi
-
[106]
E., & Hinderer, T
Flanagan, E. E., & Hinderer, T. 2008, , 77, 021502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502
2008 doi
-
[107]
D., et al
Foucart, F., Buchman, L., Duez, M. D., et al. 2013, PhRvD, 88, 064017, 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064017
2013 doi
-
[108]
Fragione , G., Grishin , E., Leigh , N. W. C., Perets , H. B., & Perna , R. 2019, , 488, 47, 10.1093/mnras/stz1651
2019 doi
-
[109]
2019, , 486, 4443, 10.1093/mnras/stz1131
Fragione , G., & Loeb , A. 2019, , 486, 4443, 10.1093/mnras/stz1131
2019 doi
-
[110]
Freire , P. C. C., Ransom , S. M., B \'e gin , S., et al. 2008, , 675, 670, 10.1086/526338
2008 doi
-
[111]
L., Belczynski , K., Wiktorowicz , G., et al
Fryer , C. L., Belczynski , K., Wiktorowicz , G., et al. 2012, , 749, 91, 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91
2012 doi
-
[112]
2018, , 480, 2011, 10.1093/mnras/sty1999
Giacobbo , N., & Mapelli , M. 2018, , 480, 2011, 10.1093/mnras/sty1999
2018 doi
-
[113]
2018, , 475, L15, 10.1093/mnrasl/slx203
Giesers , B., Dreizler , S., Husser , T.-O., et al. 2018, , 475, L15, 10.1093/mnrasl/slx203
2018 doi
-
[114]
S., et al
Gomez , S., Hosseinzadeh , G., Cowperthwaite , P. S., et al. 2019, , 884, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4ad5
2019 doi
-
[115]
M., Qi , H., et al
Gray , R., Hernandez , I. M., Qi , H., et al. 2020, , 101, 122001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.122001
2020 doi
-
[116]
K., et al
Guo , X., Chu , Q., Chung , S. K., et al. 2018, Computer Physics Communications, 231, 62, 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.002
2018 doi
-
[117]
G., et al
Gupta , A., Gerosa , D., Arun , K. G., et al. 2020, , 101, 103036, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103036
2020 doi
-
[118]
2020, , 101, 022003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.022003
Hanna , C., Caudill , S., Messick , C., et al. 2020, , 101, 022003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.022003
2020 doi
-
[119]
Hansen , R. O. 1974, JMP, 15, 46, 10.1063/1.1666501
1974 doi
-
[120]
2014, , 89, 024010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024010
Harry, I., et al. 2014, , 89, 024010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024010
2014 doi
-
[121]
W., Allen, B., & Sathyaprakash, B
Harry, I. W., Allen, B., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. 2009, , 80, 104014, 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.104014
2009 doi
-
[122]
Hartle , J. B. 1967, , 150, 1005, 10.1086/149400
1967 doi
-
[123]
Healy, J., & Lousto, C. O. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 024037, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024037
2017 doi
-
[124]
A., & Dosopoulou , F
Hoang , B.-M., Naoz , S., Kocsis , B., Rasio , F. A., & Dosopoulou , F. 2018, , 856, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaafce
2018 doi
-
[125]
2016, ApJL, 825, L19, 10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L19
Hofmann, F., Barausse, E., & Rezzolla, L. 2016, ApJL, 825, L19, 10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L19
2016 doi
- [126]
-
[127]
K., Luan , J., et al
Hooper , S., Chung , S. K., Luan , J., et al. 2012, , 86, 024012, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.024012
2012 doi
-
[128]
Hoy, C., & Raymond, V. 2020. 2006.06639
2020
-
[129]
2020, Statistical and systematic uncertainties in extracting the source properties of neutron star - black hole binaries with gravitational waves
Huang, Y., Haster, C.-J., Vitale, S., et al. 2020, Statistical and systematic uncertainties in extracting the source properties of neutron star - black hole binaries with gravitational waves. 2005.11850
2020
-
[130]
Hunter , J. D. 2007, CSE, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
2007 doi
-
[131]
2016, , 93, 044006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044006
Husa , S., Khan , S., Hannam , M., et al. 2016, , 93, 044006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044006
2016 doi
-
[132]
Indik, N., Fehrmann, H., Harke, F., Krishnan, B., & Nielsen, A. B. 2018, , 97, 124008, 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124008
2018 doi
-
[133]
K., Ghosh, A., et al
Islam, T., Mehta, A. K., Ghosh, A., et al. 2020, PhRvD, 101, 10.1103/physrevd.101.024032
2020 doi
-
[134]
2013, , 21, 59, 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2
Ivanova , N., Justham , S., Chen , X., et al. 2013, , 21, 59, 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2
2013 doi
-
[135]
2012, ARNPS, 62, 407, 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901
Janka, H.-T. 2012, ARNPS, 62, 407, 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901
2012 doi
-
[136]
2020, , 892, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357
Jiang , J.-L., Tang , S.-P., Wang , Y.-Z., Fan , Y.-Z., & Wei , D.-M. 2020, , 892, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357
2020 doi
-
[137]
2017, PhRvD, 95, 064024, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064024
Jim\'enez-Forteza, X., Keitel, D., Husa, S., et al. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 064024, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064024
2017 doi
-
[138]
K., et al
Johnson-McDaniel , N. K., et al. 2016, Determining the final spin of a binary black hole system including in-plane spins: Method and checks of accuracy, Tech. Rep. LIGO -T1600168, LIGO Project. https://dcc.ligo.org/T1600168/public
2016
-
[139]
2020, , 101, 103004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103004
Kalaghatgi , C., Hannam , M., & Raymond , V. 2020, , 101, 103004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103004
2020 doi
- [140]
-
[141]
2016, RScI, 87, 114503, 10.1063/1.4967303
Karki , S., Tuyenbayev , D., Kandhasamy , S., et al. 2016, RScI, 87, 114503, 10.1063/1.4967303
2016 doi
-
[142]
2017, Nat, 551, 80, 10.1038/nature24453
Kasen , D., Metzger , B., Barnes , J., Quataert , E., & Ramirez-Ruiz , E. 2017, Nat, 551, 80, 10.1038/nature24453
2017 doi
-
[143]
M., Kasen , D., Lau , R
Kasliwal , M. M., Kasen , D., Lau , R. M., et al. 2019, , L14, 10.1093/mnrasl/slz007
2019 doi
-
[144]
2017, Beam Position from Angle to Length minimization, Tech
Kasprzack , M., & Yu , H. 2017, Beam Position from Angle to Length minimization, Tech. Rep. LIGO -T1600397, LIGO Project. https://dcc.ligo.org/T1600397/public
2017
-
[145]
2018, PhRvD, 98, 10.1103/physrevd.98.124033
Kastha, S., Gupta, A., Arun, K., Sathyaprakash, B., & Van Den Broeck, C. 2018, PhRvD, 98, 10.1103/physrevd.98.124033
2018 doi
-
[146]
G., Sathyaprakash, B
Kastha, S., Gupta, A., Arun, K. G., Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Van Den Broeck, C. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 044007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044007
2019 doi
-
[147]
Kaup , D. J. 1968, PhRv, 172, 1331, 10.1103/PhysRev.172.1331
1968 doi
-
[148]
2020, , 893, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8309
Kawaguchi , K., Shibata , M., & Tanaka , M. 2020, , 893, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8309
2020 doi
-
[149]
2019, PhRvD, 100, 024059, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024059
Khan, S., Chatziioannou, K., Hannam, M., & Ohme, F. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 024059, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024059
2019 doi
-
[150]
2016, , 93, 044007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007
Khan , S., Husa , S., Hannam , M., et al. 2016, , 93, 044007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007
2016 doi
-
[151]
2020, , 101, 024056, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.024056
Khan , S., Ohme , F., Chatziioannou , K., & Hannam , M. 2020, , 101, 024056, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.024056
2020 doi
-
[152]
Kidder, L. E. 2008, PhRvD, 77, 044016, 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.044016
2008 doi
-
[153]
Kim , C., Kalogera , V., & Lorimer , D. R. 2003, , 584, 985, 10.1086/345740
2003 doi
-
[154]
2008, , 25, 114029
Klimenko, S., et al. 2008, , 25, 114029
2008
-
[155]
2016, , 93, 042004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.042004
---. 2016, , 93, 042004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.042004
2016 doi
-
[156]
Kochanek , C. S. 2014, , 785, 28, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/28
2014 doi
-
[157]
D., Farr , W
Kreidberg , L., Bailyn , C. D., Farr , W. M., & Kalogera , V. 2012, , 757, 36, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/36
2012 doi
-
[158]
V., Saleem, M., Samajdar, A., et al
Krishnendu, N. V., Saleem, M., Samajdar, A., et al. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 104019, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104019
2019 doi
-
[159]
U., Tauris, T
Kruckow, M. U., Tauris, T. M., Langer, N., Kramer, M., & Izzard, R. G. 2018, , 481, 1908, 10.1093/mnras/sty2190
2018 doi
-
[160]
Kumar, P., Pürrer, M., & Pfeiffer, H. P. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 044039, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044039
2017 doi
-
[161]
E., et al
Kumar, P., Blackman, J., Field, S. E., et al. 2019, PhRvD, 99, 124005, 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.124005
2019 doi
-
[162]
2020, , 101, 123007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123007
Landry , P., Essick , R., & Chatziioannou , K. 2020, , 101, 123007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123007
2020 doi
-
[163]
Li, T. G. F., Del Pozzo, W., Vitale, S., et al. 2012, PhRvD, 85, 082003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.082003
2012 doi
-
[164]
2018, LIGO Algorithm Library , 10.7935/GT1W-FZ16
LIGO Scientific Collaboration . 2018, LIGO Algorithm Library , 10.7935/GT1W-FZ16
2018 doi
-
[165]
2019 a ,
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration . 2019 a , . https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_l/S190814bv.lvc
2019
-
[166]
2019 b , Public Alerts User Guide
---. 2019 b , Public Alerts User Guide. https://emfollow.docs.ligo.org/userguide/content.html
2019
-
[167]
2019 c , GraceDB, S190814bv
---. 2019 c , GraceDB, S190814bv. https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S190814bv/
2019
-
[168]
2019 d , , 25324
---. 2019 d , , 25324. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/other/GW190814bv.gcn3
2019
-
[169]
2019 e , , 25333
---. 2019 e , , 25333. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3/25333.gcn3
2019
-
[170]
Lim , Y., & Holt , J. W. 2019, EPJA, 55, 209, 10.1140/epja/i2019-12917-9
2019 doi
-
[171]
2010, , 82, 103011, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.103011
Lindblom, L. 2010, , 82, 103011, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.103011
2010 doi
-
[172]
Lindblom , L., & Indik , N. M. 2012, , 86, 084003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.084003
2012 doi
-
[173]
2014, , 89, 064003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064003
---. 2014, , 89, 064003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064003
2014 doi
-
[174]
2019, GCN, 25354
Lipunov , V., Gorbovskoy , E., Kornilov , V., et al. 2019, GCN, 25354. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn/gcn3/25354.gcn3
2019
-
[175]
B., & Cornish, N
Littenberg, T. B., & Cornish, N. J. 2015, , 91, 084034, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084034
2015 doi
-
[176]
K., et al
Liu , Y., Du , Z., Chung , S. K., et al. 2012, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29, 235018, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/23/235018
2012 doi
-
[177]
2018, PhRvL., 120, 161102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.161102
London, L., Khan, S., Fauchon-Jones, E., et al. 2018, PhRvL., 120, 161102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.161102
2018 doi
-
[178]
2018, , 479, 4391, 10.1093/mnras/sty1613
Mapelli , M., & Giacobbo , N. 2018, , 479, 4391, 10.1093/mnras/sty1613
2018 doi
-
[179]
Mapelli , M., Giacobbo , N., Santoliquido , F., & Artale , M. C. 2019, , 487, 2, 10.1093/mnras/stz1150
2019 doi
-
[180]
2017, , 604, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630188
Marchant , P., Langer , N., Podsiadlowski , P., et al. 2017, , 604, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630188
2017 doi
-
[181]
Margalit , B., & Metzger , B. D. 2017, , 850, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa991c
2017 doi
-
[182]
2020, arXiv:2004.10001 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10001
Matas, A., et al. 2020, arXiv:2004.10001 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10001
2020
-
[183]
O., & Mottola, E
Mazur, P. O., & Mottola, E. 2004, PNAS, 101, 9545, 10.1073/pnas.0402717101
2004 doi
-
[184]
McKernan , B., Ford , K. E. S., & O'Shaughnessy , R. 2020, arXiv:2002.00046 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00046
2020
-
[185]
W., Goldstein, J., et al
Meidam, J., Tsang, K. W., Goldstein, J., et al. 2018, PhRvD, 97, 044033, 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.044033
2018 doi
-
[186]
2012, , 108, 091101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.091101
Messenger , C., & Read , J. 2012, , 108, 091101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.091101
2012 doi
-
[187]
2017, , 95, 042001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.042001
Messick , C., Blackburn , K., Brady , P., et al. 2017, , 95, 042001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.042001
2017 doi
-
[188]
C., Chirenti , C., & Lamb , F
Miller , M. C., Chirenti , C., & Lamb , F. K. 2020, , 888, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ef9
2020 doi
-
[189]
C., Lamb , F
Miller , M. C., Lamb , F. K., Dittmann , A. J., et al. 2019, , 887, L24, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5
2019 doi
-
[190]
C., & Fairhurst, S
Mills, J. C., & Fairhurst, S. 2020, Measuring gravitational-wave subdominant multipoles, Tech. Rep. LIGO-P2000136. https://https://dcc.ligo.org/P2000136/public
2020
-
[191]
K., Arun, K
Mishra, C. K., Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. 2010, PhRvD, 82, 064010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.064010
2010 doi
-
[192]
K., Kela, A., Arun, K
Mishra, C. K., Kela, A., Arun, K. G., & Faye, G. 2016, PhRvD, 93, 084054, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084054
2016 doi
-
[193]
2020, Constraints on the Physical Properties of S190814bv through Simulations based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey
Morgan, R., Soares-Santos, M., Annis, J., et al. 2020, Constraints on the Physical Properties of S190814bv through Simulations based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey. 2006.07385
2020
-
[194]
2016, , 33, e048, 10.1017/pasa.2016.40
M \"u ller , B. 2016, , 33, e048, 10.1017/pasa.2016.40
2016 doi
-
[195]
M \"u ller , H., & Serot , B. D. 1996, , 606, 508, 10.1016/0375-9474(96)00187-X
1996 doi
-
[196]
Nair, R., Bose, S., & Saini, T. D. 2018, PhRvD, 98, 023502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023502
2018 doi
-
[197]
J., Vigna-G \'o mez , A., Stevenson , S., et al
Neijssel , C. J., Vigna-G \'o mez , A., Stevenson , S., et al. 2019, , 490, 3740, 10.1093/mnras/stz2840
2019 doi
-
[198]
V., Veledina , A., Poutanen , J., et al
Neustroev , V. V., Veledina , A., Poutanen , J., et al. 2014, , 445, 2424, 10.1093/mnras/stu1924
2014 doi
-
[199]
Ng, K. K. Y., Vitale, S., Zimmerman, A., et al. 2018, PhRvD, 98, 083007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083007
2018 doi
-
[200]
2019, gwastro/pycbc: PyCBC Release v1.15.2, 10.5281/zenodo.3596447
Nitz, A., Harry, I., Brown, D., et al. 2019, gwastro/pycbc: PyCBC Release v1.15.2, 10.5281/zenodo.3596447
2019 doi
-
[201]
H., Dal Canton, T., Davis, D., & Reyes, S
Nitz, A. H., Dal Canton, T., Davis, D., & Reyes, S. 2018, , 98, 024050, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024050
2018 doi
-
[202]
H., Dent , T., Dal Canton , T., Fairhurst , S., & Brown , D
Nitz , A. H., Dent , T., Dal Canton , T., Fairhurst , S., & Brown , D. A. 2017, , 849, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f50
2017 doi
-
[203]
H., Dent , T., Davies , G
Nitz , A. H., Dent , T., Davies , G. S., et al. 2020, , 891, 123, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab733f
2020 doi
-
[204]
Nuttall , L. K. 2018, RSPTA, 376, 20170286, 10.1098/rsta.2017.0286
2018 doi
-
[205]
E., et al
Olejak , A., Belczynski , K., Holz , D. E., et al. 2020, arXiv:2004.11866 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11866
2020
-
[206]
2020, arXiv:2004.09442 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09442
Ossokine, S., et al. 2020, arXiv:2004.09442 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09442
2020
-
[207]
Owen, B. J. 1996, , 53, 6749, 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.6749
1996 doi
-
[208]
J., & Sathyaprakash, B
Owen, B. J., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. 1999, , 60, 022002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.022002
1999 doi
-
[209]
\"O zel , F., Psaltis , D., Narayan , R., & McClintock , J. E. 2010, , 725, 1918, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1918
2010 doi
-
[210]
\" O zel , F., Psaltis , D., Narayan , R., & Villarreal , A. S. 2012, , 757, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/55
2012 doi
-
[211]
Pappas , G., & Apostolatos , T. A. 2012, , 108, 231104, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.231104
2012 doi
-
[212]
M., Bae , Y.-B., & Belczynski , K
Park , D., Kim , C., Lee , H. M., Bae , Y.-B., & Belczynski , K. 2017, , 469, 4665, 10.1093/mnras/stx1015
2017 doi
-
[213]
2019, PhRvD, 100, 123017, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123017
Payne, E., Talbot, C., & Thrane, E. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 123017, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123017
2019 doi
-
[214]
2017, , 846, 146, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8628
Petrovich , C., & Antonini , F. 2017, , 846, 146, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8628
2017 doi
-
[215]
1998, , 57, 5287, 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.5287
Poisson , E. 1998, , 57, 5287, 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.5287
1998 doi
-
[216]
Poisson, E., & Will, C. M. 1995, PhRvD, 52, 848, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.848
1995 doi
-
[217]
F., & McMillan , S
Portegies Zwart , S. F., & McMillan , S. L. W. 2000, , 528, L17, 10.1086/312422
2000 doi
-
[218]
A., & Yungelson , L
Postnov , K. A., & Yungelson , L. R. 2014, LRR, 17, 3, 10.12942/lrr-2014-3
2014 doi
-
[219]
M., Sip o cz , B
Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., G \"u nther , H. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f
2018 doi
-
[220]
Privitera , S., Mohapatra , S. R. P., Ajith , P., et al. 2014, , 89, 024003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024003
2014 doi
-
[221]
2020, Technical note on the measurement of inspiral higher order modes by coherentWaveBurst in GW190814 , Tech
Prodi , G., Vedovato , G., Drago , M., et al. 2020, Technical note on the measurement of inspiral higher order modes by coherentWaveBurst in GW190814 , Tech. Rep. LIGO-T2000124, LIGO Project. https://dcc.ligo.org/T2000124/public
2020
-
[222]
2016, PhRvD, 93, 064041, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.064041
Pürrer, M. 2016, PhRvD, 93, 064041, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.064041
2016 doi
-
[223]
E., Watts , A
Raaijmakers , G., Riley , T. E., Watts , A. L., et al. 2019, , 887, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab451a
2019 doi
-
[224]
2008, , 78, 044021, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044021
Racine, E. 2008, , 78, 044021, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044021
2008 doi
-
[225]
N., et al
Rastello , S., Mapelli , M., Di Carlo , U. N., et al. 2020, arXiv:2003.02277 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02277
2020
-
[226]
R., & Weih , L
Rezzolla , L., Most , E. R., & Weih , L. R. 2018, , 852, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa401
2018 doi
-
[227]
E., Watts , A
Riley , T. E., Watts , A. L., Bogdanov , S., et al. 2019, , 887, L21, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c
2019 doi
-
[228]
L., Chatterjee , S., & Rasio , F
Rodriguez , C. L., Chatterjee , S., & Rasio , F. A. 2016, , 93, 084029, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084029
2016 doi
-
[229]
L., Zevin , M., Amaro-Seoane , P., et al
Rodriguez , C. L., Zevin , M., Amaro-Seoane , P., et al. 2019, , 100, 043027, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043027
2019 doi
-
[230]
2018, , 615, A132, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732117
Rosswog , S., Sollerman , J., Feindt , U., et al. 2018, , 615, A132, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732117
2018 doi
-
[231]
2019, , 484, 4216, 10.1093/mnras/stz226
Roulet , J., & Zaldarriaga , M. 2019, , 484, 4216, 10.1093/mnras/stz226
2019 doi
-
[232]
S., & Ajith, P
Roy, S., Sengupta, A. S., & Ajith, P. 2019, , 99, 024048, 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.024048
2019 doi
-
[233]
S., & Arun , K
Roy , S., Sengupta , A. S., & Arun , K. G. 2019, arXiv:1910.04565 https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04565
2019
-
[234]
S., & Thakor, N
Roy, S., Sengupta, A. S., & Thakor, N. 2017, , 95, 104045, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.104045
2017 doi
-
[235]
L., & Tsokaros , A
Ruiz , M., Shapiro , S. L., & Tsokaros , A. 2018, , 97, 021501, 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.021501
2018 doi
-
[236]
Ryan , F. D. 1997, , 55, 6081, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6081
1997 doi
-
[237]
2019, arXiv:1901.08580 https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08580
Sachdev , S., Caudill , S., Fong , H., et al. 2019, arXiv:1901.08580 https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08580
2019 arXiv
-
[238]
S., Loeb , A., & Berger , E
Safarzadeh , M., Hamers , A. S., Loeb , A., & Berger , E. 2020, , 888, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5dc8
2020 doi
-
[239]
2010, , 82, 064016, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.064016
Santamar \' a , L., Ohme , F., Ajith , P., et al. 2010, , 82, 064016, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.064016
2010 doi
-
[240]
1991, , 44, 3819, 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3819
Sathyaprakash, B., & Dhurandhar, S. 1991, , 44, 3819, 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3819
1991 doi
-
[241]
2015, , 91, 024043, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024043
Schmidt , P., Ohme , F., & Hannam , M. 2015, , 91, 024043, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024043
2015 doi
-
[242]
Schutz, B. F. 1986, Nat, 323, 310, 10.1038/323310a0
1986 doi
-
[243]
2019, , 100, 023015, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023015
Shibata , M., Zhou , E., Kiuchi , K., & Fujibayashi , S. 2019, , 100, 023015, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023015
2019 doi
-
[244]
1993, Nat, 364, 423, 10.1038/364423a0
Sigurdsson , S., & Hernquist , L. 1993, Nat, 364, 423, 10.1038/364423a0
1993 doi
-
[245]
2017, , 836, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5729
Silsbee , K., & Tremaine , S. 2017, , 836, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5729
2017 doi
- [246]
-
[247]
2019, arXiv:1909.11873 https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11873
Smith , R., & Ashton , G. 2019, arXiv:1909.11873 https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11873
2019
-
[248]
2019, , 876, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab14f1
Soares-Santos , M., Palmese , A., Hartley , W., et al. 2019, , 876, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab14f1
2019 doi
-
[249]
Speagle , J. S. 2020, , 493, 3132–3158, 10.1093/mnras/staa278
2020 doi
-
[250]
2019, , 485, 889, 10.1093/mnras/stz359
Spera , M., Mapelli , M., Giacobbo , N., et al. 2019, , 485, 889, 10.1093/mnras/stz359
2019 doi
-
[251]
P., Naoz , S., Ghez , A
Stephan , A. P., Naoz , S., Ghez , A. M., et al. 2019, , 878, 58, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e4d
2019 doi
-
[252]
Sukhbold , T., & Woosley , S. E. 2014, , 783, 10, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/10
2014 doi
-
[253]
R., Levan , A
Tanvir , N. R., Levan , A. J., Gonz \'a lez-Fern \'a ndez , C., et al. 2017, , 848, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa90b6
2017 doi
-
[254]
R., & Gair , J
Taylor , S. R., & Gair , J. R. 2012, , 86, 023502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.023502
2012 doi
-
[255]
R., Gair , J
Taylor , S. R., Gair , J. R., & Mandel , I. 2012, , 85, 023535, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023535
2012 doi
-
[256]
2019, , 25557
The IceCube Collaboration . 2019, , 25557. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3/25557.gcn3
2019
-
[257]
E., Fauchon-Jones, E., Khan, S., et al
Thompson, J. E., Fauchon-Jones, E., Khan, S., et al. 2020, arXiv:2002.08383 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08383
2020
-
[258]
A., Kochanek, C
Thompson, T. A., Kochanek, C. S., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2019, Sci, 366, 637, 10.1126/science.aau4005
2019 doi
-
[259]
A., Kochanek , C
Thompson , T. A., Kochanek , C. S., Stanek , K. Z., et al. 2020, Sci, 368, eaba4356, 10.1126/science.aba4356
2020 doi
-
[260]
Thorne , K. S. 1980, RvMP, 52, 299, 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.299
1980 doi
-
[261]
2018, CQGra, 35, 145009, 10.1088/1361-6382/aac89d
Tiwari , V. 2018, CQGra, 35, 145009, 10.1088/1361-6382/aac89d
2018 doi
-
[262]
2016, , 94, 064015, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064015
Uchikata , N., Yoshida , S., & Pani , P. 2016, , 94, 064015, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064015
2016 doi
-
[263]
2012, , 757, 69, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/69
Ugliano , M., Janka , H.-T., Marek , A., & Arcones , A. 2012, , 757, 69, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/69
2012 doi
-
[264]
A., Mills, J
Usman, S. A., Mills, J. C., & Fairhurst, S. 2019, ApJ, 877, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0b3e
2019 doi
-
[265]
A., Nitz , A
Usman , S. A., Nitz , A. H., Harry , I. W., et al. 2016, , 33, 215004, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/21/215004
2016 doi
-
[266]
Van Den Broeck , C., & Sengupta , A. S. 2007 a , CQGra, 24, 155, 10.1088/0264-9381/24/1/009
2007 doi
-
[267]
2007 b , CQGra, 24, 1089, 10.1088/0264-9381/24/5/005
---. 2007 b , CQGra, 24, 1089, 10.1088/0264-9381/24/5/005
2007 doi
-
[268]
van den Heuvel , E. P. J., & Tauris , T. M. 2020, Sci, 368, eaba3282, 10.1126/science.aba3282
2020 doi
-
[269]
2015, , 91, 042003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042003
Veitch , J., Raymond , V., Farr , B., et al. 2015, , 91, 042003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042003
2015 doi
-
[270]
2020, , 101, 083030, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083030
Venumadhav , T., Zackay , B., Roulet , J., Dai , L., & Zaldarriaga , M. 2020, , 101, 083030, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083030
2020 doi
-
[271]
Verde , L., Treu , T., & Riess , A. G. 2019, NatAs, 3, 891, 10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0
2019 doi
-
[272]
J., Haggard , D., et al
Vieira , N., Ruan , J. J., Haggard , D., et al. 2020, , 895, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab917d
2020 doi
-
[273]
Viets , A. D. Wade , M., Urban , A. L., et al. 2018, , 35, 095015, 10.1088/1361-6382/aab658
2018 doi
-
[274]
A., Guillochon , J., Berger , E., et al
Villar , V. A., Guillochon , J., Berger , E., et al. 2017, , 851, L21, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9c84
2017 doi
-
[275]
2018, , 121, 021303, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.021303
Vitale , S., & Chen , H.-Y. 2018, , 121, 021303, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.021303
2018 doi
-
[276]
2017, PhRvD, 95, 064053, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064053
Vitale, S., Lynch, R., Raymond, V., et al. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 064053, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064053
2017 doi
-
[277]
2014, PhRvL, 112, 251101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.251101
Vitale, S., Lynch, R., Veitch, J., Raymond, V., & Sturani, R. 2014, PhRvL, 112, 251101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.251101
2014 doi
-
[278]
M., Butler , N
Watson , A. M., Butler , N. R., Lee , W. H., et al. 2020, , 159, 10.1093/mnras/staa161
2020 doi
-
[279]
J., Selsing , J., et al
Watson , D., Hansen , C. J., Selsing , J., et al. 2019, Nat, 574, 497, 10.1038/s41586-019-1676-3
2019 doi
-
[280]
2020, , 636, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935842
Wyrzykowski , ., & Mandel , I. 2020, , 636, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935842
2020 doi
-
[281]
2019, , 876, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e3
Yang , Y., Bartos , I., Haiman , Z., et al. 2019, , 876, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e3
2019 doi
-
[282]
S., Fong , W.-F., Kremer , K., et al
Ye , C. S., Fong , W.-F., Kremer , K., et al. 2020, , 888, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5dc5
2020 doi
-
[283]
2009, PhRvD, 80, 122003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.122003
Yunes, N., & Pretorius, F. 2009, PhRvD, 80, 122003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.122003
2009 doi
-
[284]
2019 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1910.09528
Zackay , B., Dai , L., Venumadhav , T., Roulet , J., & Zaldarriaga , M. 2019 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1910.09528. 1910.09528
2019
-
[285]
2019 b , , 100, 023007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023007
Zackay , B., Venumadhav , T., Dai , L., Roulet , J., & Zaldarriaga , M. 2019 b , , 100, 023007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023007
2019 doi
-
[286]
M., Mapelli , M., Branchesi , M., & Tormen , G
Ziosi , B. M., Mapelli , M., Branchesi , M., & Tormen , G. 2014, , 441, 3703, 10.1093/mnras/stu824
2014 doi
Reviewed May 17, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.