pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2112.06861 · v3 · submitted 2021-12-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration , the Virgo Collaboration , the KAGRA Collaboration: R. Abbott , H. Abe , F. Acernese , K. Ackley , N. Adhikari , R. X. Adhikari
show 1676 more authors
V. K. Adkins V. B. Adya C. Affeldt D. Agarwal M. Agathos K. Agatsuma N. Aggarwal O. D. Aguiar L. Aiello A. Ain P. Ajith T. Akutsu P. F. de Alarc\'on S. Albanesi R. A. Alfaidi A. Allocca P. A. Altin A. Amato C. Anand S. Anand A. Ananyeva S. B. Anderson W. G. Anderson M. Ando T. Andrade N. Andres M. Andr\'es-Carcasona T. Andri\'c S. V. Angelova S. Ansoldi J. M. Antelis S. Antier T. Apostolatos E. Z. Appavuravther S. Appert S. K. Apple K. Arai A. Araya M. C. Araya J. S. Areeda M. Ar\`ene N. Aritomi N. Arnaud M. Arogeti S. M. Aronson K. G. Arun H. Asada Y. Asali G. Ashton Y. Aso M. Assiduo S. Assis de Souza Melo S. M. Aston P. Astone F. Aubin K. AultONeal C. Austin S. Babak F. Badaracco M. K. M. Bader C. Badger S. Bae Y. Bae A. M. Baer S. Bagnasco Y. Bai J. Baird R. Bajpai T. Baka M. Ball G. Ballardin S. W. Ballmer A. Balsamo G. Baltus S. Banagiri B. Banerjee D. Bankar J. C. Barayoga C. Barbieri B. C. Barish D. Barker P. Barneo F. Barone B. Barr L. Barsotti M. Barsuglia D. Barta J. Bartlett M. A. Barton I. Bartos S. Basak R. Bassiri A. Basti M. Bawaj J. C. Bayley M. Bazzan B. R. Becher B. B\'ecsy V. M. Bedakihale F. Beirnaert M. Bejger I. Belahcene V. Benedetto D. Beniwal M. G. Benjamin T. F. Bennett J. D. Bentley M. BenYaala S. Bera M. Berbel F. Bergamin B. K. Berger S. Bernuzzi C. P. L. Berry D. Bersanetti A. Bertolini J. Betzwieser D. Beveridge R. Bhandare A. V. Bhandari U. Bhardwaj R. Bhatt D. Bhattacharjee S. Bhaumik A. Bianchi I. A. Bilenko G. Billingsley S. Bini R. Birney O. Birnholtz S. Biscans M. Bischi S. Biscoveanu A. Bisht B. Biswas M. Bitossi M.-A. Bizouard J. K. Blackburn C. D. Blair D. G. Blair R. M. Blair F. Bobba N. Bode M. Bo\"er G. Bogaert M. Boldrini G. N. Bolingbroke L. D. Bonavena F. Bondu E. Bonilla R. Bonnand P. Booker B. A. Boom R. Bork V. Boschi N. Bose S. Bose V. Bossilkov V. Boudart Y. Bouffanais A. Bozzi C. Bradaschia P. R. Brady A. Bramley A. Branch M. Branchesi J. E. Brau M. Breschi T. Briant J. H. Briggs A. Brillet M. Brinkmann P. Brockill A. F. Brooks J. Brooks D. D. Brown S. Brunett G. Bruno R. Bruntz J. Bryant F. Bucci T. Bulik H. J. Bulten A. Buonanno K. Burtnyk R. Buscicchio D. Buskulic C. Buy R. L. Byer G. S. Cabourn Davies G. Cabras R. Cabrita L. Cadonati M. Caesar G. Cagnoli C. Cahillane J. Calder\'on Bustillo J. D. Callaghan T. A. Callister E. Calloni J. Cameron J. B. Camp M. Canepa S. Canevarolo M. Cannavacciuolo K. C. Cannon H. Cao Z. Cao E. Capocasa E. Capote G. Carapella F. Carbognani M. Carlassara J. B. Carlin M. F. Carney M. Carpinelli G. Carrillo G. Carullo T. L. Carver J. Casanueva Diaz C. Casentini G. Castaldi S. Caudill M. Cavagli\`a F. Cavalier R. Cavalieri G. Cella P. Cerd\'a-Dur\'an E. Cesarini W. Chaibi S. Chalathadka Subrahmanya E. Champion C.-H. Chan C. Chan C. L. Chan K. Chan M. Chan K. Chandra I. P. Chang P. Chanial S. Chao C. Chapman-Bird P. Charlton E. A. Chase E. Chassande-Mottin C. Chatterjee Debarati Chatterjee Deep Chatterjee M. Chaturvedi S. Chaty K. Chatziioannou C. Chen D. Chen H. Y. Chen J. Chen K. Chen X. Chen Y.-B. Chen Y.-R. Chen Z. Chen H. Cheng C. K. Cheong H. Y. Cheung H. Y. Chia F. Chiadini C-Y. Chiang G. Chiarini R. Chierici A. Chincarini M. L. Chiofalo A. Chiummo R. K. Choudhary S. Choudhary N. Christensen Q. Chu Y-K. Chu S. S. Y. Chua K. W. Chung G. Ciani P. Ciecielag M. Cie\'slar M. Cifaldi A. A. Ciobanu R. Ciolfi F. Cipriano F. Clara J. A. Clark P. Clearwater S. Clesse F. Cleva E. Coccia E. Codazzo P.-F. Cohadon D. E. Cohen M. Colleoni C. G. Collette A. Colombo M. Colpi C. M. Compton M. Constancio Jr. L. Conti S. J. Cooper P. Corban T. R. Corbitt I. Cordero-Carri\'on S. Corezzi K. R. Corley N. J. Cornish D. Corre A. Corsi S. Cortese C. A. Costa R. Cotesta R. Cottingham M. W. Coughlin J.-P. Coulon S. T. Countryman B. Cousins P. Couvares D. M. Coward M. J. Cowart D. C. Coyne R. Coyne J. D. E. Creighton T. D. Creighton A. W. Criswell M. Croquette S. G. Crowder J. R. Cudell T. J. Cullen A. Cumming R. Cummings L. Cunningham E. Cuoco M. Cury{\l}o P. Dabadie T. Dal Canton S. Dall'Osso G. D\'alya A. Dana B. D'Angelo S. Danilishin S. D'Antonio K. Danzmann C. Darsow-Fromm A. Dasgupta L. E. H. Datrier Sayak Datta Sayantani Datta V. Dattilo I. Dave M. Davier D. Davis M. C. Davis E. J. Daw R. Dean D. DeBra M. Deenadayalan J. Degallaix M. De Laurentis S. Del\'eglise V. Del Favero F. De Lillo N. De Lillo D. Dell'Aquila W. Del Pozzo L. M. DeMarchi F. De Matteis V. D'Emilio N. Demos T. Dent A. Depasse R. De Pietri R. De Rosa C. De Rossi R. DeSalvo R. De Simone S. Dhurandhar M. C. D\'iaz N. A. Didio T. Dietrich L. Di Fiore C. Di Fronzo C. Di Giorgio F. Di Giovanni M. Di Giovanni T. Di Girolamo A. Di Lieto A. Di Michele B. Ding S. Di Pace I. Di Palma F. Di Renzo A. K. Divakarla Divyajyoti A. Dmitriev Z. Doctor L. Donahue L. D'Onofrio F. Donovan K. L. Dooley S. Doravari M. Drago J. C. Driggers Y. Drori J.-G. Ducoin P. Dupej U. Dupletsa O. Durante D. D'Urso P.-A. Duverne S. E. Dwyer C. Eassa P. J. Easter M. Ebersold T. Eckhardt G. Eddolls B. Edelman T. B. Edo O. Edy A. Effler S. Eguchi J. Eichholz S. S. Eikenberry M. Eisenmann R. A. Eisenstein A. Ejlli E. Engelby Y. Enomoto L. Errico R. C. Essick H. Estell\'es D. Estevez Z. Etienne T. Etzel M. Evans T. M. Evans T. Evstafyeva B. E. Ewing F. Fabrizi F. Faedi V. Fafone H. Fair S. Fairhurst P. C. Fan A. M. Farah S. Farinon B. Farr W. M. Farr E. J. Fauchon-Jones G. Favaro M. Favata M. Fays M. Fazio J. Feicht M. M. Fejer E. Fenyvesi D. L. Ferguson A. Fernandez-Galiana I. Ferrante T. A. Ferreira F. Fidecaro P. Figura A. Fiori I. Fiori M. Fishbach R. P. Fisher R. Fittipaldi V. Fiumara R. Flaminio E. Floden H. K. Fong J. A. Font B. Fornal P. W. F. Forsyth A. Franke S. Frasca F. Frasconi J. P. Freed Z. Frei A. Freise O. Freitas R. Frey P. Fritschel V. V. Frolov G. G. Fronz\'e Y. Fujii Y. Fujikawa Y. Fujimoto P. Fulda M. Fyffe H. A. Gabbard W. E. Gabella B. U. Gadre J. R. Gair J. Gais S. Galaudage R. Gamba D. Ganapathy A. Ganguly D. Gao S. G. Gaonkar B. Garaventa C. Garc\'ia N\'u\~nez C. Garc\'ia-Quir\'os F. Garufi B. Gateley V. Gayathri G.-G. Ge G. Gemme A. Gennai V. Gennari J. George O. Gerberding L. Gergely P. Gewecke S. Ghonge Abhirup Ghosh Archisman Ghosh Shaon Ghosh Shrobana Ghosh Tathagata Ghosh B. Giacomazzo L. Giacoppo J. A. Giaime K. D. Giardina D. R. Gibson C. Gier M. Giesler P. Giri F. Gissi S. Gkaitatzis J. Glanzer A. E. Gleckl P. Godwin E. Goetz R. Goetz N. Gohlke J. Golomb B. Goncharov G. Gonz\'alez M. Gosselin R. Gouaty D. W. Gould S. Goyal B. Grace A. Grado V. Graham M. Granata V. Granata A. Grant S. Gras P. Grassia C. Gray R. Gray G. Greco A. C. Green R. Green A. M. Gretarsson E. M. Gretarsson D. Griffith W. L. Griffiths H. L. Griggs G. Grignani A. Grimaldi E. Grimes S. J. Grimm H. Grote S. Grunewald P. Gruning A. S. Gruson D. Guerra G. M. Guidi A. R. Guimaraes G. Guix\'e H. K. Gulati A. M. Gunny H.-K. Guo Y. Guo Anchal Gupta Anuradha Gupta I. M. Gupta P. Gupta S. K. Gupta R. Gustafson F. Guzman S. Ha I. P. W. Hadiputrawan L. Haegel S. Haino O. Halim E. D. Hall E. Z. Hamilton G. Hammond W.-B. Han M. Haney J. Hanks C. Hanna M. D. Hannam O. Hannuksela H. Hansen T. J. Hansen J. Hanson T. Harder K. Haris J. Harms G. M. Harry I. W. Harry D. Hartwig K. Hasegawa B. Haskell C.-J. Haster J. S. Hathaway K. Hattori K. Haughian H. Hayakawa K. Hayama F. J. Hayes J. Healy A. Heidmann A. Heidt M. C. Heintze J. Heinze J. Heinzel H. Heitmann F. Hellman P. Hello A. F. Helmling-Cornell G. Hemming M. Hendry I. S. Heng E. Hennes J. Hennig M. H. Hennig C. Henshaw A. G. Hernandez F. Hernandez Vivanco M. Heurs A. L. Hewitt S. Higginbotham S. Hild P. Hill Y. Himemoto A. S. Hines N. Hirata C. Hirose T-C. Ho S. Hochheim D. Hofman J. N. Hohmann D. G. Holcomb N. A. Holland I. J. Hollows Z. J. Holmes K. Holt D. E. Holz Q. Hong J. Hough S. Hourihane E. J. Howell C. G. Hoy D. Hoyland A. Hreibi B-H. Hsieh H-F. Hsieh C. Hsiung Y. Hsu H-Y. Huang P. Huang Y-C. Huang Y.-J. Huang Yiting Huang Yiwen Huang M. T. H\"ubner A. D. Huddart B. Hughey D. C. Y. Hui V. Hui S. Husa S. H. Huttner R. Huxford T. Huynh-Dinh S. Ide B. Idzkowski A. Iess K. Inayoshi Y. Inoue P. Iosif M. Isi K. Isleif K. Ito Y. Itoh B. R. Iyer V. JaberianHamedan T. Jacqmin P.-E. Jacquet S. J. Jadhav S. P. Jadhav T. Jain A. L. James A. Z. Jan K. Jani J. Janquart K. Janssens N. N. Janthalur P. Jaranowski D. Jariwala R. Jaume A. C. Jenkins K. Jenner C. Jeon W. Jia J. Jiang H.-B. Jin G. R. Johns N. K. Johnson-McDaniel R. Johnston A. W. Jones D. I. Jones P. Jones R. Jones P. Joshi L. Ju A. Jue P. Jung K. Jung J. Junker V. Juste K. Kaihotsu T. Kajita M. Kakizaki C. V. Kalaghatgi V. Kalogera B. Kamai M. Kamiizumi N. Kanda S. Kandhasamy G. Kang J. B. Kanner Y. Kao S. J. Kapadia D. P. Kapasi C. Karathanasis S. Karki R. Kashyap M. Kasprzack W. Kastaun T. Kato S. Katsanevas E. Katsavounidis W. Katzman T. Kaur K. Kawabe K. Kawaguchi F. K\'ef\'elian D. Keitel J. S. Key S. Khadka F. Y. Khalili S. Khan T. Khanam E. A. Khazanov N. Khetan M. Khursheed N. Kijbunchoo A. Kim C. Kim J. C. Kim J. Kim K. Kim W. S. Kim Y.-M. Kim C. Kimball N. Kimura M. Kinley-Hanlon R. Kirchhoff J. S. Kissel S. Klimenko T. Klinger A. M. Knee T. D. Knowles N. Knust E. Knyazev Y. Kobayashi P. Koch G. Koekoek K. Kohri K. Kokeyama S. Koley P. Kolitsidou M. Kolstein K. Komori V. Kondrashov A. K. H. Kong A. Kontos N. Koper M. Korobko M. Kovalam N. Koyama D. B. Kozak C. Kozakai V. Kringel N. V. Krishnendu A. Kr\'olak G. Kuehn F. Kuei P. Kuijer S. Kulkarni A. Kumar Prayush Kumar Rahul Kumar Rakesh Kumar J. Kume K. Kuns Y. Kuromiya S. Kuroyanagi K. Kwak G. Lacaille P. Lagabbe D. Laghi E. Lalande M. Lalleman T. L. Lam A. Lamberts M. Landry B. B. Lane R. N. Lang J. Lange B. Lantz I. La Rosa A. Lartaux-Vollard P. D. Lasky M. Laxen A. Lazzarini C. Lazzaro P. Leaci S. Leavey S. LeBohec Y. K. Lecoeuche E. Lee H. M. Lee H. W. Lee K. Lee R. Lee I. N. Legred J. Lehmann A. Lema\^itre M. Lenti M. Leonardi E. Leonova N. Leroy N. Letendre C. Levesque Y. Levin J. N. Leviton K. Leyde A. K. Y. Li B. Li J. Li K. L. Li P. Li T. G. F. Li X. Li C-Y. Lin E. T. Lin F-K. Lin F-L. Lin H. L. Lin L. C.-C. Lin F. Linde S. D. Linker J. N. Linley T. B. Littenberg G. C. Liu J. Liu K. Liu X. Liu F. Llamas R. K. L. Lo T. Lo L. T. London A. Longo D. Lopez M. Lopez Portilla M. Lorenzini V. Loriette M. Lormand G. Losurdo T. P. Lott J. D. Lough C. O. Lousto G. Lovelace J. F. Lucaccioni H. L\"uck D. Lumaca A. P. Lundgren L.-W. Luo J. E. Lynam M. Ma'arif R. Macas J. B. Machtinger M. MacInnis D. M. Macleod I. A. O. MacMillan A. Macquet I. Maga\~na Hernandez C. Magazz\`u R. M. Magee E. Maggio R. Maggiore M. Magnozzi S. Mahesh E. Majorana I. Maksimovic S. Maliakal A. Malik N. Man V. Mandic V. Mangano G. L. Mansell M. Manske M. Mantovani M. Mapelli F. Marchesoni D. Mar\'in Pina F. Marion Z. Mark S. M\'arka Z. M\'arka C. Markakis A. S. Markosyan A. Markowitz E. Maros A. Marquina S. Marsat F. Martelli I. W. Martin R. M. Martin M. Martinez V. A. Martinez V. Martinez K. Martinovic D. V. Martynov E. J. Marx H. Masalehdan K. Mason E. Massera A. Masserot M. Masso-Reid S. Mastrogiovanni A. Matas M. Mateu-Lucena F. Matichard M. Matiushechkina N. Mavalvala J. J. McCann R. McCarthy D. E. McClelland P. K. McClincy S. McCormick L. McCuller G. I. McGhee S. C. McGuire C. McIsaac J. McIver T. McRae S. T. McWilliams D. Meacher M. Mehmet A. K. Mehta Q. Meijer A. Melatos D. A. Melchor G. Mendell A. Menendez-Vazquez C. S. Menoni R. A. Mercer L. Mereni K. Merfeld E. L. Merilh J. D. Merritt M. Merzougui S. Meshkov C. Messenger C. Messick P. M. Meyers F. Meylahn A. Mhaske A. Miani H. Miao I. Michaloliakos C. Michel Y. Michimura H. Middleton D. P. Mihaylov L. Milano A. L. Miller A. Miller B. Miller M. Millhouse J. C. Mills E. Milotti Y. Minenkov N. Mio Ll. M. Mir M. Miravet-Ten\'es A. Mishkin C. Mishra T. Mishra T. Mistry S. Mitra V. P. Mitrofanov G. Mitselmakher R. Mittleman O. Miyakawa K. Miyo S. Miyoki Geoffrey Mo L. M. Modafferi E. Moguel K. Mogushi S. R. P. Mohapatra S. R. Mohite I. Molina M. Molina-Ruiz M. Mondin M. Montani C. J. Moore J. Moragues D. Moraru F. Morawski A. More C. Moreno G. Moreno Y. Mori S. Morisaki N. Morisue Y. Moriwaki B. Mours C. M. Mow-Lowry S. Mozzon F. Muciaccia Arunava Mukherjee D. Mukherjee Soma Mukherjee Subroto Mukherjee Suvodip Mukherjee N. Mukund A. Mullavey J. Munch E. A. Mu\~niz P. G. Murray R. Musenich S. Muusse S. L. Nadji K. Nagano A. Nagar K. Nakamura H. Nakano M. Nakano Y. Nakayama V. Napolano I. Nardecchia T. Narikawa H. Narola L. Naticchioni B. Nayak R. K. Nayak B. F. Neil J. Neilson A. Nelson T. J. N. Nelson M. Nery P. Neubauer A. Neunzert K. Y. Ng S. W. S. Ng C. Nguyen P. Nguyen T. Nguyen L. Nguyen Quynh J. Ni W.-T. Ni S. A. Nichols T. Nishimoto A. Nishizawa S. Nissanke E. Nitoglia F. Nocera M. Norman C. North S. Nozaki G. Nurbek L. K. Nuttall Y. Obayashi J. Oberling B. D. O'Brien J. O'Dell E. Oelker W. Ogaki G. Oganesyan J. J. Oh K. Oh S. H. Oh M. Ohashi T. Ohashi M. Ohkawa F. Ohme H. Ohta M. A. Okada Y. Okutani C. Olivetto K. Oohara R. Oram B. O'Reilly R. G. Ormiston N. D. Ormsby R. O'Shaughnessy E. O'Shea S. Oshino S. Ossokine C. Osthelder S. Otabe D. J. Ottaway H. Overmier A. E. Pace G. Pagano R. Pagano M. A. Page G. Pagliaroli A. Pai S. A. Pai S. Pal J. R. Palamos O. Palashov C. Palomba H. Pan K.-C. Pan P. K. Panda P. T. H. Pang C. Pankow F. Pannarale B. C. Pant F. H. Panther F. Paoletti A. Paoli A. Paolone G. Pappas A. Parisi H. Park J. Park W. Parker D. Pascucci A. Pasqualetti R. Passaquieti D. Passuello M. Patel M. Pathak B. Patricelli A. S. Patron S. Paul E. Payne M. Pedraza R. Pedurand M. Pegoraro A. Pele F. E. Pe\~na Arellano S. Penano S. Penn A. Perego A. Pereira T. Pereira C. J. Perez C. P\'erigois C. C. Perkins A. Perreca S. Perri\`es D. Pesios J. Petermann D. Petterson H. P. Pfeiffer H. Pham K. A. Pham K. S. Phukon H. Phurailatpam O. J. Piccinni M. Pichot M. Piendibene F. Piergiovanni L. Pierini V. Pierro G. Pillant M. Pillas F. Pilo L. Pinard C. Pineda-Bosque I. M. Pinto M. Pinto B. J. Piotrzkowski K. Piotrzkowski M. Pirello M. D. Pitkin A. Placidi E. Placidi M. L. Planas W. Plastino C. Pluchar R. Poggiani E. Polini L. Pompili D. Y. T. Pong S. Ponrathnam E. K. Porter R. Poulton A. Poverman J. Powell M. Pracchia T. Pradier A. K. Prajapati K. Prasai R. Prasanna G. Pratten M. Principe G. A. Prodi L. Prokhorov P. Prosposito L. Prudenzi A. Puecher M. Punturo F. Puosi P. Puppo M. P\"urrer H. Qi N. Quartey V. Quetschke P. J. Quinonez R. Quitzow-James N. Qutob F. J. Raab G. Raaijmakers H. Radkins N. Radulesco P. Raffai S. X. Rail S. Raja C. Rajan K. E. Ramirez T. D. Ramirez A. Ramos-Buades J. Rana P. Rapagnani A. Ray V. Raymond N. Raza M. Razzano J. Read L. A. Rees T. Regimbau L. Rei S. Reid S. W. Reid D. H. Reitze P. Relton A. Renzini P. Rettegno B. Revenu A. Reza M. Rezac F. Ricci D. Richards J. W. Richardson L. Richardson G. Riemenschneider K. Riles S. Rinaldi K. Rink N. A. Robertson R. Robie F. Robinet A. Rocchi S. Rodriguez L. Rolland J. G. Rollins M. Romanelli R. Romano C. L. Romel A. Romero I. M. Romero-Shaw J. H. Romie S. Ronchini L. Rosa C. A. Rose D. Rosi\'nska M. P. Ross S. Rowan S. J. Rowlinson S. Roy Santosh Roy Soumen Roy D. Rozza P. Ruggi K. Ruiz-Rocha K. Ryan S. Sachdev T. Sadecki J. Sadiq S. Saha Y. Saito K. Sakai M. Sakellariadou S. Sakon O. S. Salafia F. Salces-Carcoba L. Salconi M. Saleem F. Salemi A. Samajdar E. J. Sanchez J. H. Sanchez L. E. Sanchez N. Sanchis-Gual J. R. Sanders A. Sanuy T. R. Saravanan N. Sarin B. Sassolas H. Satari B. S. Sathyaprakash O. Sauter R. L. Savage V. Savant T. Sawada H. L. Sawant S. Sayah D. Schaetzl M. Scheel J. Scheuer M. G. Schiworski P. Schmidt S. Schmidt R. Schnabel M. Schneewind R. M. S. Schofield A. Sch\"onbeck B. W. Schulte B. F. Schutz E. Schwartz J. Scott S. M. Scott M. Seglar-Arroyo Y. Sekiguchi D. Sellers A. S. Sengupta D. Sentenac E. G. Seo V. Sequino A. Sergeev Y. Setyawati T. Shaffer M. S. Shahriar M. A. Shaikh B. Shams L. Shao A. Sharma P. Sharma P. Shawhan N. S. Shcheblanov A. Sheela Y. Shikano M. Shikauchi H. Shimizu K. Shimode H. Shinkai T. Shishido A. Shoda D. H. Shoemaker D. M. Shoemaker S. ShyamSundar M. Sieniawska D. Sigg L. Silenzi L. P. Singer D. Singh M. K. Singh N. Singh A. Singha A. M. Sintes V. Sipala V. Skliris B. J. J. Slagmolen T. J. Slaven-Blair J. Smetana J. R. Smith L. Smith R. J. E. Smith J. Soldateschi S. N. Somala K. Somiya I. Song K. Soni S. Soni V. Sordini F. Sorrentino N. Sorrentino R. Soulard T. Souradeep E. Sowell V. Spagnuolo A. P. Spencer M. Spera P. Spinicelli A. K. Srivastava V. Srivastava K. Staats C. Stachie F. Stachurski D. A. Steer J. Steinhoff J. Steinlechner S. Steinlechner N. Stergioulas D. J. Stops M. Stover K. A. Strain L. C. Strang G. Stratta M. D. Strong A. Strunk R. Sturani A. L. Stuver M. Suchenek S. Sudhagar V. Sudhir R. Sugimoto H. G. Suh A. G. Sullivan J. M. Sullivan T. Z. Summerscales L. Sun S. Sunil A. Sur J. Suresh P. J. Sutton Takamasa Suzuki Takanori Suzuki Toshikazu Suzuki B. L. Swinkels M. J. Szczepa\'nczyk P. Szewczyk M. Tacca H. Tagoshi S. C. Tait H. Takahashi R. Takahashi S. Takano H. Takeda M. Takeda C. J. Talbot C. Talbot K. Tanaka Taiki Tanaka Takahiro Tanaka A. J. Tanasijczuk S. Tanioka D. B. Tanner D. Tao L. Tao R. D. Tapia E. N. Tapia San Mart\'in C. Taranto A. Taruya J. D. Tasson R. Tenorio J. E. S. Terhune L. Terkowski M. P. Thirugnanasambandam M. Thomas P. Thomas E. E. Thompson J. E. Thompson S. R. Thondapu K. A. Thorne E. Thrane Shubhanshu Tiwari Srishti Tiwari V. Tiwari A. M. Toivonen A. E. Tolley T. Tomaru T. Tomura M. Tonelli Z. Tornasi A. Torres-Forn\'e C. I. Torrie I. Tosta e Melo D. T\"oyr\"a A. Trapananti F. Travasso G. Traylor M. Trevor M. C. Tringali A. Tripathee L. Troiano A. Trovato L. Trozzo R. J. Trudeau D. Tsai K. W. Tsang T. Tsang J-S. Tsao M. Tse R. Tso S. Tsuchida L. Tsukada D. Tsuna T. Tsutsui K. Turbang M. Turconi D. Tuyenbayev A. S. Ubhi N. Uchikata T. Uchiyama R. P. Udall A. Ueda T. Uehara K. Ueno G. Ueshima C. S. Unnikrishnan A. L. Urban T. Ushiba A. Utina G. Vajente A. Vajpeyi G. Valdes M. Valentini V. Valsan N. van Bakel M. van Beuzekom M. van Dael J. F. J. van den Brand C. Van Den Broeck D. C. Vander-Hyde H. van Haevermaet J. V. van Heijningen M. H. P. M. van Putten N. van Remortel M. Vardaro A. F. Vargas V. Varma M. Vas\'uth A. Vecchio G. Vedovato J. Veitch P. J. Veitch J. Venneberg G. Venugopalan D. Verkindt P. Verma Y. Verma S. M. Vermeulen D. Veske F. Vetrano A. Vicer\'e S. Vidyant A. D. Viets A. Vijaykumar V. Villa-Ortega J.-Y. Vinet A. Virtuoso S. Vitale H. Vocca E. R. G. von Reis J. S. A. von Wrangel C. Vorvick S. P. Vyatchanin L. E. Wade M. Wade K. J. Wagner R. Wald R. C. Walet M. Walker G. S. Wallace L. Wallace J. Wang J. Z. Wang W. H. Wang R. L. Ward J. Warner M. Was T. Washimi N. Y. Washington J. Watchi B. Weaver C. R. Weaving S. A. Webster M. Weinert A. J. Weinstein R. Weiss C. M. Weller R. A. Weller F. Wellmann L. Wen P. We{\ss}els K. Wette J. T. Whelan D. D. White B. F. Whiting C. Whittle D. Wilken D. Williams M. J. Williams A. R. Williamson J. L. Willis B. Willke D. J. Wilson C. C. Wipf T. Wlodarczyk G. Woan J. Woehler J. K. Wofford D. Wong I. C. F. Wong M. Wright C. Wu D. S. Wu H. Wu D. M. Wysocki L. Xiao T. Yamada H. Yamamoto K. Yamamoto T. Yamamoto K. Yamashita R. Yamazaki F. W. Yang K. Z. Yang L. Yang Y.-C. Yang Y. Yang Yang Yang M. J. Yap D. W. Yeeles S.-W. Yeh A. B. Yelikar M. Ying J. Yokoyama T. Yokozawa J. Yoo T. Yoshioka Hang Yu Haocun Yu H. Yuzurihara A. Zadro\.zny M. Zanolin S. Zeidler T. Zelenova J.-P. Zendri M. Zevin M. Zhan H. Zhang J. Zhang L. Zhang R. Zhang T. Zhang Y. Zhang C. Zhao G. Zhao Y. Zhao Yue Zhao R. Zhou Z. Zhou X. J. Zhu Z.-H. Zhu A. B. Zimmerman M. E. Zucker J. Zweizig
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th
keywords gravitational wavestests of general relativitycompact binary mergersgraviton massquasi-normal modesbinary black holesGWTC-3
0
0 comments X

The pith

Analysis of 15 high-confidence gravitational wave events from GWTC-3 finds all tested quantities consistent with general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The collaboration examines 15 confident compact binary signals detected in the second half of the third observing run, including binary black hole mergers and one neutron star-black hole merger. After subtracting the best-fit general relativity waveforms, the remaining power in the data matches detector noise expectations. Multiple independent checks, such as post-Newtonian deformation coefficients, gravitational wave polarization content, dispersion relations, and quasi-normal mode frequencies of remnant black holes, all align with GR predictions. The work tightens the upper limit on the graviton mass and shows that pre-merger and post-merger inferences of final black hole mass and spin are mutually consistent.

Core claim

Using the 15 confident signals from GWTC-3, the collaboration performs a suite of tests of general relativity in the dynamical strong-field regime. Residual power after subtracting best-fit waveforms is consistent with noise. All post-Newtonian deformation coefficients match GR values. Spin-induced quadrupole moments of binary black hole components agree with those of Kerr black holes. No evidence appears for gravitational wave dispersion, non-GR polarization modes, or post-merger echoes. The graviton mass bound improves to 2.42 × 10^{-23} eV/c² at 90% credibility. Final mass and spin inferred from pre-merger and post-merger waveform segments are consistent, as are the quasi-normal mode ring

What carries the argument

The set of consistency tests applied to individual and combined gravitational wave signals, including residual power analysis after GR waveform subtraction, post-Newtonian coefficient estimation, polarization mode decomposition, and quasi-normal mode frequency and damping time checks.

If this is right

  • The data support continued use of GR-based waveform models for parameter estimation in future detections.
  • Population-level constraints from the full catalog tighten bounds on possible deviations from GR.
  • Remnant black hole properties inferred from ringdown match those predicted by GR merger calculations.
  • Absence of dispersion or echoes places limits on modifications to gravitational wave propagation.
  • Consistency across independent tests reduces the likelihood that hidden systematics are concealing new physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Continued null results would increase confidence that any quantum-gravity corrections remain undetectable at current merger energies.
  • The same analysis framework could be applied to future events with higher signal-to-noise ratios to probe stronger-field regimes.
  • If a deviation appears in a single loud event, it would immediately motivate targeted follow-up searches in the existing catalog.
  • The updated graviton mass limit can be combined with other astrophysical or cosmological bounds for a joint constraint.

Load-bearing premise

The 15 selected events are accurately described by the general relativity waveform models used for subtraction and parameter estimation, without unmodeled systematics in detector noise or calibration that could mimic or mask deviations.

What would settle it

Observation of statistically significant residual power after subtracting the best-fit GR waveform from any event, or a post-Newtonian coefficient that deviates from its GR value by more than the reported uncertainty.

read the original abstract

The ever-increasing number of detections of gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binaries by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors allows us to perform ever-more sensitive tests of general relativity (GR) in the dynamical and strong-field regime of gravity. We perform a suite of tests of GR using the compact binary signals observed during the second half of the third observing run of those detectors. We restrict our analysis to the 15 confident signals that have false alarm rates $\leq 10^{-3}\, {\rm yr}^{-1}$. In addition to signals consistent with binary black hole (BH) mergers, the new events include GW200115_042309, a signal consistent with a neutron star--BH merger. We find the residual power, after subtracting the best fit waveform from the data for each event, to be consistent with the detector noise. Additionally, we find all the post-Newtonian deformation coefficients to be consistent with the predictions from GR, with an improvement by a factor of ~2 in the -1PN parameter. We also find that the spin-induced quadrupole moments of the binary BH constituents are consistent with those of Kerr BHs in GR. We find no evidence for dispersion of GWs, non-GR modes of polarization, or post-merger echoes in the events that were analyzed. We update the bound on the mass of the graviton, at 90% credibility, to $m_g \leq 2.42 \times 10^{-23} \mathrm{eV}/c^2$. The final mass and final spin as inferred from the pre-merger and post-merger parts of the waveform are consistent with each other. The studies of the properties of the remnant BHs, including deviations of the quasi-normal mode frequencies and damping times, show consistency with the predictions of GR. In addition to considering signals individually, we also combine results from the catalog of GW signals to calculate more precise population constraints. We find no evidence in support of physics beyond GR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs a suite of tests of general relativity on the 15 confident gravitational-wave events (FAR ≤ 10^{-3} yr^{-1}) from the second half of the third LIGO-Virgo observing run, including binary black hole mergers and the neutron star-black hole candidate GW200115_042309. Tests cover residual power after GR waveform subtraction, post-Newtonian deformation coefficients (improved -1PN constraint), spin-induced quadrupole moments, gravitational-wave dispersion, non-GR polarizations, post-merger echoes, graviton mass bound (updated to m_g ≤ 2.42 × 10^{-23} eV/c² at 90% credibility), consistency of pre- and post-merger remnant properties, and quasi-normal mode deviations for remnants. Individual and population-combined results show consistency with GR, with the conclusion of no evidence for physics beyond GR.

Significance. If the results hold, this represents a substantial extension of prior GWTC-1/GWTC-2 analyses to a larger catalog with improved sensitivity, delivering tighter bounds on multiple deviation parameters and the graviton mass while incorporating a new event class. Strengths include the use of public events, standard LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA pipelines for reproducibility, and explicit combination of results for population constraints. The work reinforces GR in the strong-field dynamical regime without introducing new free parameters or ad-hoc entities.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and sections on residual tests and PN coefficients] The central claim of consistency with GR and no evidence for beyond-GR physics rests on the assumption that the selected GR waveform models (used for matched filtering, subtraction, and parameter estimation) accurately describe the 15 events without unmodeled systematics in noise or calibration that could bias residuals or deviation parameters. While standard, the manuscript should explicitly quantify the potential impact of such systematics on the reported bounds (e.g., via injection studies or alternative waveform families) in the sections describing the residual tests and PN coefficient constraints, as this is load-bearing for interpreting the null results.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states an improvement by a factor of ~2 in the -1PN parameter but does not cite the specific previous bound or the exact new constraint value; the main text should provide this comparison with a reference to prior work for clarity.
  2. [Figures and tables on combined constraints] Figure captions and tables summarizing individual event results should include explicit statements on the number of events contributing to each combined constraint to aid reader interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the interpretation of our null results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and sections on residual tests and PN coefficients] The central claim of consistency with GR and no evidence for beyond-GR physics rests on the assumption that the selected GR waveform models (used for matched filtering, subtraction, and parameter estimation) accurately describe the 15 events without unmodeled systematics in noise or calibration that could bias residuals or deviation parameters. While standard, the manuscript should explicitly quantify the potential impact of such systematics on the reported bounds (e.g., via injection studies or alternative waveform families) in the sections describing the residual tests and PN coefficient constraints, as this is load-bearing for interpreting the null results.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly addressing the potential impact of waveform systematics is important for robust interpretation of the null results. The primary waveform models employed (IMRPhenomXPHM for most events and SEOBNRv4PHM for cross-checks) are the standard choices validated extensively by the LVK collaboration for the mass and spin ranges of GWTC-3 events. However, to directly respond to this comment, the revised manuscript will include additional text in the residual tests and PN coefficient sections. This will reference existing injection studies from GWTC-2/3 analyses demonstrating that unmodeled systematics do not produce spurious deviations at the level of our reported bounds, and we will add a brief comparison using an alternative waveform family (e.g., NRSur7dq4) for a representative subset of events to confirm that the -1PN constraint and residual consistency remain unchanged within statistical uncertainties. These additions will be concise and will not alter the main conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical GR deviation tests on GWTC-3 data are data-driven fits, not self-referential

full rationale

The paper conducts a suite of empirical tests on 15 GW events by introducing free deviation parameters (e.g., post-Newtonian coefficients, graviton mass, polarization modes, QNM deviations) into waveform models and fitting them directly to the strain data. Results are reported as consistency checks where fitted values match GR predictions within uncertainties; this is a standard statistical test outcome, not a quantity defined by construction from the GR templates or prior fits. Residual tests subtract best-fit waveforms and compare to noise, which is falsifiable by the data. No steps reduce a claimed prediction to an input by definition, and self-citations to prior LIGO papers supply context or updated bounds without serving as the sole justification for the new GWTC-3 conclusions. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks (detector noise models, independent waveform approximants).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the validity of GR waveform templates for subtraction and parameter estimation, plus accurate characterization of detector noise; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced beyond the standard deviation coefficients.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption GR waveform models accurately describe the signals from compact binary coalescences in the strong-field regime
    Invoked when subtracting best-fit waveforms and testing residuals and PN coefficients.
  • domain assumption Detector noise is stationary and well-characterized by the noise model used in the analysis
    Required for claiming residual power is consistent with noise.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 15185 in / 1267 out tokens · 51775 ms · 2026-05-12T02:34:18.206978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 36 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. Black-Hole Scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet: Numerical Relativity Meets Analytics

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of black hole scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity agree closely with effective-one-body analytic predictions.

  3. Gravity Echoes from Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Future microhertz detections combined with nanohertz pulsar terms can serve as gravity echoes to measure supermassive black hole binary inspiral rates from hundreds to thousands of years in the past.

  4. Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.

  5. Properties of natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr quasinormal modes are Pollaczek-Jacobi polynomials with complex parameters, with recurrence peaking at the physical overtone index for Schwarzschild.

  6. End-to-End Population Inference from Gravitational-Wave Strain using Transformers

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dingo-Pop uses a transformer to perform amortized, end-to-end population inference from GW strain data in seconds, bypassing per-event Monte Carlo sampling.

  7. Scalar memory from compact binary coalescences

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    In Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, the change in scalar charge during binary black hole mergers generates a scalar memory contribution that modifies the total memory signal on observable timescales.

  8. Lessons from binary dynamics of inspiralling equal-mass boson-star mergers

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Numerical simulations of equal-mass boson-star mergers reveal larger waveform deviations from black-hole binaries in late inspiral and merger, plus odd multipole excitations for certain scalar-field phases, with some ...

  9. Beyond Three Terms: Continued Fractions for Rotating Black Holes in Modified Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A reduction scheme transforms arbitrary N-term scalar and matrix recurrence relations from black hole perturbations in modified gravity into three-term relations solvable by continued fractions.

  10. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  11. A cosmology-to-ringdown EFT consistency map for scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An EFT consistency map transports cosmology-conditioned posteriors from scalar-tensor FLRW backgrounds to black-hole quasinormal-mode kernels, showing tensor-speed effects fall below ringdown detectability while other...

  12. Testing General Relativity with Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework is developed to test beyond-GR effects in nanohertz continuous waves from individual SMBHBs, deriving modified inter-pulsar correlations, antenna responses, and phase delays for three deviation classes, va...

  13. Scalar emission from binary neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories with kinetic screening

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kinetic screening non-monotonically suppresses or enhances scalar quadrupolar emission from equal-mass neutron star binaries depending on screening radius versus wavelength, with a dipole re-emerging linearly with mas...

  14. Merger remnant and eccentricity dynamics surrogates for eccentric nonspinning black hole binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New surrogate models predict remnant properties and eccentricity dynamics for eccentric nonspinning black hole binary mergers using numerical relativity data over a limited parameter space.

  15. All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A closed formula computes static post-Newtonian corrections at arbitrary odd orders in gravity, yielding the explicit seventh post-Newtonian potential that matches an independent diagrammatic method.

  16. Robust parameter inference for Taiji via time-frequency contrastive learning and normalizing flows

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A glitch-robust amortized inference framework combining normalizing flows, time-frequency multimodal fusion, and contrastive learning outperforms MCMC for Taiji massive black hole binary parameter estimation under noi...

  17. Ringing of rapidly rotating black holes in effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Leading-order cubic-curvature corrections to scalar quasinormal modes of black holes with spins up to 0.99M are computed numerically for modes up to l=5 with relative errors below 10^{-4}.

  18. GW231123: False Massive Graviton Signatures from Unmodeled Point-Mass Lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unmodeled point-mass lensing produces a spurious nonzero graviton mass posterior in GW231123 that vanishes when lensing is included in the analysis.

  19. Particle motions and gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole spacetimes of loop quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The LQG parameter ξ enlarges equatorial bound orbit energy ranges, confines off-equatorial trajectories, and produces larger deviations from Kerr waveforms in EMRI models for two rotating LQG black holes, though signa...

  20. Can Oscillatory and Persistent Nonlinearities Be Bridged in Black Hole Ringdown?

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quadratic quasinormal modes and Christodoulou memory effect are related through bridge coefficients depending primarily on remnant black hole parameters.

  21. Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant is consistent with a Kerr black hole and bound the dominant quadrupolar mode frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction, with constraints tighter than prior multi-event catalogs.

  22. Resonant transmission of scalar waves through rotating traversable wormhole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rotation enhances Breit-Wigner resonances in scalar wave transmission through Teo wormholes by trapping modes in the throat potential well.

  23. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  24. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  25. Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.

  26. Agnostically decoding gravitational wave model deficiencies in GWTC-3

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for a mass-scale dependent model deficiency is found in the highest-SNR GWTC-3 events.

  27. Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dynamical couplings in interacting dark energy models reduce deviations from LambdaCDM to 1.3-1.5 sigma and yield no Bayesian preference over the standard model.

  28. Black Hole-Boson Star Binaries: Gravitational Wave Signals and Tidal Disruption

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations of black hole-boson star binaries show that scalar self-interactions can suppress tidal disruption while radiative efficiency depends on the chosen potential.

  29. Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

  30. GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.

  31. Total transmission modes in draining bathtub model with vorticity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Numerical spectra of total transmission modes in the draining bathtub model with vorticity can have positive or negative imaginary parts depending on parameters, with higher overtones exhibiting pronounced spectral mobility.

  32. Tests of scalar polarizations with multi-messenger events

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian analysis of GW170817 with PPE framework and EM polarization constraints shows mild preference for scalar mode in quadrupole harmonics and improves bounds on non-GR parameters by up to 60%.

  33. Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Parametric models incorporating waveform phase and amplitude uncertainties mitigate systematic errors in gravitational wave parameter estimation, producing consistent results across models and raw/deglitched data for ...

  34. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

  35. Improved Constraints on Non-Kerr Deviations from Binary Black Hole Inspirals Using GWTC-4 Data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bayesian constraints from GWTC-4 binary black hole inspirals show Johannsen metric deformation parameters α13 and ε3 consistent with zero, supporting the Kerr hypothesis.

  36. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

295 extracted references · 295 canonical work pages · cited by 35 Pith papers · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    It makes full use of gravitational- wave signal modelling and hence the complete SNR of the signal

    The pSEOBNRv4HM analysis The pSEOBNRv4HM ringdown analysis [11, 122], which uses parameterized spinning EOB waveforms with higher modes calibrated to non-precessing NR simulations [118, 266], mea- sures QNM frequencies within the framework of a complete IMR BBH waveform model. It makes full use of gravitational- wave signal modelling and hence the complet...

  2. [2]

    and NR fits [160]. This gives us more confidence in the measured QNMs, while also pointing to the possibility that correlations among the remnant parameters may be responsible for the apparent deviation. Further, as has been argued in [11], imperfect noise modelling can also lead to overestimation of damping time [122]. Finally, we can not rule out the st...

  3. [3]

    Waveform systematics and parameter degeneracies The increasing number of events detected results in a large variety of systems observed, spanning regions of parameter space where different approximants lead to visibly different es- timates of source parameters [82, 137, 288, 289]. Such discrep- ancies are expected for non-standard events, and are a direct...

  4. [4]

    Glitches can lead to systematic deviations in the null parameter that is measured and mimic false deviations from GR [11, 294]

    Non-stationarity and non-Gaussianity of the detector noise An additional important aspect of data analysis is the impact of transient non-Gaussian noise or glitches affecting the data around the time of the event analysed. Glitches can lead to systematic deviations in the null parameter that is measured and mimic false deviations from GR [11, 294]. These ...

  5. [5]

    VI, and two ringdown tests, Sec

    Anomalies observed in the case of GW191109 010717 Among the di fferent events we analysed, GW191109 010717 is the only event which led to sta- tistically significant deviations in three of our null tests (i.e., modified dispersion tests, Sec. VI, and two ringdown tests, Sec. VIII A). GW191109 010717 is the heaviest system in our event list and hence has t...

  6. [6]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

  10. [10]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Astrophys

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collab- oration, KAGRA Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163 [astro-ph.HE]

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016)

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017), arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

  13. [14]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

  14. [15]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

  15. [16]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collab- oration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

  16. [17]

    C. M. Will, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

  17. [18]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    E. Berti et al. , Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

  18. [19]

    C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6058 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9406022

  19. [20]

    R. N. Lang, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084014 (2014), arXiv:1310.3320 [gr-qc]

  20. [21]

    R. N. Lang, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084027 (2015), arXiv:1411.3073 [gr-qc]

  21. [22]

    Gravitational waveforms in scalar-tensor gravity at 2PN relative order

    N. Sennett, S. Marsat, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084003 (2016), arXiv:1607.01420 [gr-qc]

  22. [23]

    Hairy binary black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory and their effective-one-body description

    M. Khalil, N. Sennett, J. Steinhoff, J. Vines, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104010 (2018), arXiv:1809.03109 [gr-qc]

  23. [24]

    Bernard, Phys

    L. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D98, 044004 (2018), arXiv:1802.10201 [gr-qc]

  24. [25]
  25. [26]

    Tahura and K

    S. Tahura and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D98, 084042 (2018), [Er- ratum: Phys. Rev. D 101, 109902 (2020)], arXiv:1809.00259 [gr-qc]

  26. [27]

    T. P. Sotiriou and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D75, 084007 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612065

  27. [28]

    Shiralilou, T

    B. Shiralilou, T. Hinderer, S. Nissanke, N. Ortiz, and H. Witek, arXiv:2105.13972 [gr-qc] (2021)

  28. [29]

    Barausse, C

    E. Barausse, C. Palenzuela, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, Phys. Rev. D 87, 081506 (2013), arXiv:1212.5053 [gr-qc]

  29. [30]

    Shibata, K

    M. Shibata, K. Taniguchi, H. Okawa, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084005 (2014), arXiv:1310.0627 [gr-qc]

  30. [31]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104016 (2020), arXiv:1911.02588 [gr-qc]

  31. [32]

    Okounkova, Phys

    M. Okounkova, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084046 (2020), arXiv:2001.03571 [gr-qc]

  32. [33]

    Cayuso and L

    R. Cayuso and L. Lehner, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084008 (2020), arXiv:2005.13720 [gr-qc]

  33. [34]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Phys. Rev. D103, 044040 (2021), arXiv:2011.03547 [gr-qc]

  34. [35]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 101102 (2021), arXiv:2105.08571 [gr-qc]

  35. [37]

    TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

  36. [38]

    A. J. K. Chua and M. Vallisneri, arXiv:2006.08918 [gr-qc] (2020)

  37. [39]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

  38. [40]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

  39. [41]

    Numerical Relativity and Astrophysics

    L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 661 (2014), arXiv:1405.4840 [astro-ph.HE]

  40. [42]

    K. Jani, J. Healy, J. A. Clark, L. London, P. Laguna, and D. Shoemaker, Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 204001 (2016), arXiv:1605.03204 [gr-qc]

  41. [43]

    Boyleet al., Class

    M. Boyle et al., Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 195006 (2019), arXiv:1904.04831 [gr-qc]. 37

  42. [44]

    Healy and C

    J. Healy and C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D102, 104018 (2020), arXiv:2007.07910 [gr-qc]

  43. [45]

    N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, A. Ghosh, S. Ghonge, M. Saleem, N. V . Krishnendu, and J. A. Clark, Phys. Rev. D105, 044020 (2022), arXiv:2109.06988 [gr-qc]

  44. [46]

    Constraining Lorentz-violating, Modified Dispersion Relations with Gravitational Waves

    S. Mirshekari, N. Yunes, and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 85, 024041 (2012), arXiv:1110.2720 [gr-qc]

  45. [47]

    Okounkova, W

    M. Okounkova, W. M. Farr, M. Isi, and L. C. Stein, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044067 (2022), arXiv:2101.11153 [gr-qc]

  46. [48]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation

    A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104037 (2018), arXiv:1710.04825 [gr-qc]

  47. [49]

    The gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories

    E. Belgacem, Y . Dirian, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104066 (2018), arXiv:1712.08108 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [50]

    V . A. Kosteleck´y and M. Mewes, Phys. Lett. B757, 510 (2016), arXiv:1602.04782 [gr-qc]

  49. [51]

    Wang and Z.-C

    S. Wang and Z.-C. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1032 (2020), arXiv:2002.00396 [gr-qc]

  50. [52]

    Shao, Phys

    L. Shao, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104019 (2020), arXiv:2002.01185 [hep-ph]

  51. [53]

    Mewes, Phys

    M. Mewes, Phys. Rev. D99, 104062 (2019), arXiv:1905.00409 [gr-qc]

  52. [54]

    O’Neal-Ault, Q

    K. O’Neal-Ault, Q. G. Bailey, T. Dumerchat, L. Haegel, and J. Tasson, Universe 7, 380 (2021), arXiv:2108.06298 [gr-qc]

  53. [55]

    C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D57, 2061 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9709011 [gr-qc]

  54. [56]

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V . Wagoner, and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 884 (1973)

  55. [57]

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, and A. P. Lightman, Phys. Rev. D8, 3308 (1973)

  56. [58]

    Iyonaga, K

    A. Iyonaga, K. Takahashi, and T. Kobayashi, J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys. 12, 002, arXiv:1809.10935 [gr-qc]

  57. [59]

    Wagle, A

    P. Wagle, A. Saffer, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D100, 124007 (2019), arXiv:1910.04800 [gr-qc]

  58. [60]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, J. High Energy Phys. 02, 062, arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]

  59. [61]

    AdS/CFT duality and the black hole information paradox

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, Nucl. Phys. B623, 342 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0109154 [hep-th]

  60. [62]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101, 9545 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407075

  61. [63]

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, Living Rev. Relativity20, 5 (2017), arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]

  62. [64]

    Danielsson, L

    U. Danielsson, L. Lehner, and F. Pretorius, arXiv:2109.09814 [gr-qc] (2021)

  63. [65]

    G. F. Giudice, M. McCullough, and A. Urbano, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 001, arXiv:1605.01209 [hep-ph]

  64. [66]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?

    V . Cardoso, E. Franzin, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 171101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 089902 (2016)], arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]

  65. [67]

    Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,

    V . Cardoso and P. Pani, Nature Astron. 1, 586 (2017), arXiv:1709.01525 [gr-qc]

  66. [68]

    Echoes of ECOs: gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale

    V . Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084031 (2016), arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]

  67. [69]

    Black Hole Spectroscopy: Testing General Relativity through Gravitational Wave Observations

    O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Garrison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 787 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0309007

  68. [71]

    Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns

    S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D85, 124056 (2012), arXiv:1111.5819 [gr-qc]

  69. [72]

    Meidam, M

    J. Meidam, M. Agathos, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064009 (2014)

  70. [73]

    Echoes from the Abyss: Tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons

    J. Abedi, H. Dykaar, and N. Afshordi, Phys. Rev. D96, 082004 (2017), arXiv:1612.00266 [gr-qc]

  71. [74]

    Comments on: "Echoes from the abyss: Evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons"

    G. Ashton, O. Birnholtz, M. Cabero, C. Capano, T. Dent, B. Kr- ishnan, G. D. Meadors, A. B. Nielsen, A. Nitz, and J. Wester- weck, arXiv:1612.05625 [gr-qc] (2016)

  72. [75]

    Low significance of evidence for black hole echoes in gravitational wave data

    J. Westerweck, A. Nielsen, O. Fischer-Birnholtz, M. Cabero, C. Capano, T. Dent, B. Krishnan, G. Meadors, and A. H. Nitz, Phys. Rev. D 97, 124037 (2018), arXiv:1712.09966 [gr-qc]

  73. [76]

    Uchikata, H

    N. Uchikata, H. Nakano, T. Narikawa, N. Sago, H. Tagoshi, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D100, 062006 (2019), arXiv:1906.00838 [gr-qc]

  74. [77]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D94, 084002 (2016), arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc]

  75. [78]

    R. Nair, S. Perkins, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 191101 (2019), arXiv:1905.00870 [gr-qc]

  76. [79]

    Gupta, S

    A. Gupta, S. Datta, S. Kastha, S. Borhanian, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 201101 (2020), arXiv:2005.09607 [gr-qc]

  77. [80]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, Fermi-GBM Collaboration, and INTE- GRAL Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

  78. [81]

    Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251301 (2017), arXiv:1710.06394 [astro-ph.CO]

  79. [82]

    Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO]

  80. [83]

    Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories

    J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251303 (2017), arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO]

Showing first 80 references.