pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1602.03837 · v1 · submitted 2016-02-11 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration , the Virgo Collaboration
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 00:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavesLIGObinary black holesmergergeneral relativityinspiralringdownastrophysics
0
0 comments X

The pith

LIGO detected a gravitational-wave signal from two merging black holes that matches general relativity predictions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first simultaneous observation of a transient gravitational-wave signal in the two LIGO detectors on September 14 2015. The signal increases in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak strain of 1.0 times 10 to the minus 21 and matches the waveform expected for the inspiral merger and ringdown of two black holes with initial masses 36 and 29 solar masses. A sympathetic reader would care because this constitutes the first direct detection of gravitational waves and demonstrates that binary stellar-mass black hole systems exist and merge as general relativity forecasts. The source lies at a luminosity distance of 410 megaparsecs and the event radiated 3 solar masses of energy in gravitational waves.

Core claim

The two LIGO detectors observed a transient gravitational-wave signal on September 14 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC with a matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 24 and a false-alarm rate below one event per 203000 years. The signal sweeps upward in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with peak strain 1.0 times 10 to the minus 21 and matches the general-relativity waveform for the inspiral and merger of black holes whose source-frame masses are 36 plus 5 minus 4 and 29 plus 4 minus 4 solar masses. The final black hole has mass 62 plus 4 minus 4 solar masses after 3.0 plus 0.5 minus 0.5 solar masses were radiated in gravitational waves at a luminosity distance of 410 plus 160 minus 180 megaparsecs.

What carries the argument

Matched-filter search against general-relativity waveform templates for binary black hole coalescence using coincidence between the two LIGO detectors to suppress noise.

If this is right

  • Binary systems of stellar-mass black holes exist and can merge within a Hubble time.
  • General relativity correctly predicts the strong-field dynamics and energy loss during black hole coalescence.
  • Gravitational waves from such mergers are detectable with current interferometer technology.
  • The final black hole forms with a mass deficit accounted for by gravitational-wave emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A single detection already implies that black hole merger rates are high enough for routine observations once detector sensitivity improves.
  • The measured masses and distance provide a new calibration point for models of black hole formation from massive stars.
  • Repeated detections of similar events could eventually yield an independent measurement of the Hubble constant.

Load-bearing premise

The observed transient must be produced by an astrophysical source rather than by instrumental or environmental noise.

What would settle it

A reanalysis of the raw detector data that reproduces the identical transient after applying stricter instrumental vetoes or that raises the estimated background rate above one event per 203000 years.

read the original abstract

On September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory simultaneously observed a transient gravitational-wave signal. The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of $1.0 \times 10^{-21}$. It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. The signal was observed with a matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 24 and a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203 000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1 {\sigma}. The source lies at a luminosity distance of $410^{+160}_{-180}$ Mpc corresponding to a redshift $z = 0.09^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$. In the source frame, the initial black hole masses are $36^{+5}_{-4} M_\odot$ and $29^{+4}_{-4} M_\odot$, and the final black hole mass is $62^{+4}_{-4} M_\odot$, with $3.0^{+0.5}_{-0.5} M_\odot c^2$ radiated in gravitational waves. All uncertainties define 90% credible intervals.These observations demonstrate the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems. This is the first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first direct detection of gravitational waves from the merger of two stellar-mass black holes. On 14 September 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC, both LIGO detectors observed a transient signal that sweeps in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with peak strain 1.0e-21. The event has matched-filter SNR of 24 and false-alarm rate <1 per 203000 years (>5.1 sigma). The waveform matches general-relativity templates for binary black hole inspiral-merger-ringdown. The source is at luminosity distance 410^{+160}_{-180} Mpc (z=0.09), with source-frame initial masses 36^{+5}_{-4} and 29^{+4}_{-4} solar masses, final mass 62^{+4}_{-4} solar masses, and 3.0 solar masses radiated in gravitational waves (all 90% credible intervals). The result demonstrates the existence of stellar-mass binary black hole systems.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a landmark observation that provides the first direct evidence for gravitational waves, confirms general relativity in the strong-field dynamical regime, and establishes the existence of stellar-mass binary black holes. The high SNR, rigorous background estimation, independent burst searches, calibration budgets, and parameter-estimation consistency with GR templates constitute a robust detection. The work opens gravitational-wave astronomy and supplies falsifiable predictions for future events.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that all uncertainties are 90% credible intervals, but this qualification should be repeated explicitly when the mass and distance values are first presented in the main text to avoid any ambiguity in interpretation of the reported errors.
  2. The manuscript notes the use of data-quality vetoes and calibration uncertainty budgets, but a short dedicated paragraph summarizing the total systematic error budget on the recovered SNR and parameter posteriors would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, recognition of its landmark significance, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in detection or parameter-estimation chain

full rationale

The paper reports a direct observational claim: a coincident transient in the two LIGO detectors with matched-filter SNR 24 and FAR <1/203000 yr from background estimation on time-shifted data. Waveform consistency is checked against GR templates generated by independent numerical-relativity and post-Newtonian calculations that predate and do not incorporate this event. Masses, distance, and radiated energy are posterior outputs from Bayesian parameter estimation performed after the detection threshold is passed; they are not inputs to the detection statistic or significance calculation. No equation or step equates a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests on self-citation of an unverified uniqueness result. The analysis pipeline is externally benchmarked by calibration, vetoes, and unmodeled burst searches.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that general relativity correctly predicts the waveform shape used for matched filtering and that the detector noise is adequately modeled as stationary and Gaussian for the purpose of background estimation. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • initial black hole masses
    Fitted parameters obtained by matching the observed signal to general relativity waveform templates; reported with 90 percent credible intervals.
  • luminosity distance
    Derived from the amplitude of the matched waveform; reported with 90 percent credible intervals.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity accurately predicts the gravitational waveform from binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown
    Invoked when the observed signal is identified by its match to numerical relativity templates.
  • domain assumption The LIGO noise is stationary and Gaussian over the relevant time scales for background estimation
    Required to convert the observed signal-to-noise ratio into a false-alarm rate of less than 1 per 203000 years.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5574 in / 1571 out tokens · 72247 ms · 2026-05-11T00:04:36.386358+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean dimension_forced echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole... initial black hole masses are 36+5−4 M⊙ and 29+4−4 M⊙, and the final black hole mass is 62+4−4 M⊙, with 3.0+0.5−0.5 M⊙c² radiated in gravitational waves.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/Hamiltonian.lean energy_conservation echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of 1.0×10−21... false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1σ.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. Black-Hole Scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet: Numerical Relativity Meets Analytics

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of black hole scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity agree closely with effective-one-body analytic predictions.

  3. Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.

  4. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    astro-ph.HE 2023-11 accept novelty 8.0

    EHT data show a 51.8 microarcsecond ring around Sgr A* consistent with the shadow of a 4 million solar mass Kerr black hole viewed at moderate inclination.

  5. Inspiral gravitational waveforms from charged compact binaries with scalar hair

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories, charged compact binaries produce gravitational waveforms containing a leading -1 post-Newtonian dipole correction controlled by one deviation parameter b.

  6. Gravitational-Bumblebee perturbations: Exact decoupling and isospectrality

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bumblebee gravity perturbations decouple exactly into gravitational and vector sectors, with gravitational modes dynamically immune to Lorentz violation and odd-even parities strictly isospectral.

  7. Spin-Induced Nonlinear Scalarization of Kerr Black Holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Kerr black holes in an EsGB model without linear instability undergo nonlinear scalarization above spin 0.5, existing in a finite low-mass high-spin wedge rather than a narrow band.

  8. Constraining Dipole Radiation with Multiband Gravitational Waves from Eccentric Binary Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multiband observations of eccentric binary black holes can constrain dipole-radiation deviations from general relativity to |b| ≲ 10^{-7} for a GW231123-like event when combining one year of space-based data with grou...

  9. Trapping, Irregular Waveforms, and Efficient Radiation in Ultra-relativistic Black Hole Encounters

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Ultra-relativistic black hole flybys can radiate over 65% of their energy in gravitational waves via irregular waveforms caused by radiation trapping and lensing, without coalescence.

  10. Physics informed operator learning of parameter dependent spectra

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DeepOPiraKAN learns parameter-to-spectrum mappings via operator learning and achieves relative errors of O(10^{-6}) to O(10^{-4}) for Kerr black hole quasinormal modes up to n=7 when benchmarked against Leaver's method.

  11. How lonely are the Binary Compact Objects Detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    No three-body encounter signatures detected in GW170817, GW190814, and GW230627_015337, constraining intermediate-mass black holes above 100 solar masses within roughly 0.1 AU of these binaries.

  12. Beyond Three Terms: Continued Fractions for Rotating Black Holes in Modified Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A reduction scheme transforms arbitrary N-term scalar and matrix recurrence relations from black hole perturbations in modified gravity into three-term relations solvable by continued fractions.

  13. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 7.0

    LIGO and Virgo detected 39 compact binary coalescence events in O3a, including 13 new ones, with black hole binaries up to 150 solar masses and the first significantly asymmetric mass ratios.

  14. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  15. N-body next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit interaction via effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    The NLO gravitational spin-orbit Hamiltonian for N spinning bodies is computed via PN-EFT, with only three-body diagrams new beyond the binary case, and the result matches the known ADM Hamiltonian up to canonical tra...

  16. Demagnetizing KBR and New Ricci-flat Rotating Metric

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Demagnetizing the KBR solution produces a new Ricci-flat rotating metric with deformation parameter B that preserves key Kerr thermodynamic relations despite non-asymptotically flat boundaries.

  17. Analytical Fluxes from Generic Schwarzschild Geodesics

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Chebyshev-basis expansion reduces gravitational-wave fluxes from arbitrary-eccentricity bound Schwarzschild geodesics to sums of previously derived Keplerian Fourier coefficients, achieving 10^{-5} relative accuracy...

  18. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

  19. Polydoxon Transformations and Scientific Reward in Physics

    physics.hist-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scientific rewards in physics arise from contributions that transform the Polydoxon—the structured set of viable theories—via expansion, contraction, reconfiguration, or enabling moves, with reward scaling by the tran...

  20. Implications of the LISA stochastic signal from eccentric stellar mass black hole binaries in vacuum

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    High initial eccentricities in stellar-mass black hole binaries produce a stochastic gravitational wave background distinguishable by LISA from quasi-circular models, enabling upper bounds on eccentricity and separati...

  21. Testing General Relativity with Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework is developed to test beyond-GR effects in nanohertz continuous waves from individual SMBHBs, deriving modified inter-pulsar correlations, antenna responses, and phase delays for three deviation classes, va...

  22. Gravitational Waves from a Black Hole Falling Radially into a Thin-Shell Traversable Wormhole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Analytic gravitational waveforms from radial test-particle infall into a thin-shell traversable wormhole exhibit a characteristic pulse-gap structure from repeated throat crossings and lie within reach of ground-based...

  23. Merger remnant and eccentricity dynamics surrogates for eccentric nonspinning black hole binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New surrogate models predict remnant properties and eccentricity dynamics for eccentric nonspinning black hole binary mergers using numerical relativity data over a limited parameter space.

  24. Beyond the Separatrix: Analytic Continuation of Darwin Variables for Plunging Geodesics in Schwarzschild Spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An analytic continuation of Darwin variables yields a real parametrization of bound, scattering, and plunging geodesics in Schwarzschild spacetime.

  25. Magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Magnetic reconnection enables higher energy extraction efficiency from singly-rotating five-dimensional Kerr black holes than from doubly-rotating ones and can exceed the Blandford-Znajek process in the single-rotation case.

  26. Tidal Response and Thermodynamics of Black Holes

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new gauge-invariant effective action computes black hole Love numbers without Regge-Wheeler methods, and these numbers determine leading thermodynamic corrections under external perturbations.

  27. Normalizing flows for density estimation in multi-detector gravitational-wave searches

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Normalizing flows replace binned histograms for estimating multi-detector signal parameters in PyCBC, slashing storage by three orders of magnitude with under 0.05% sensitivity loss and up to 6.55% gains in specific cases.

  28. Data-Driven Acceleration of Eccentricity Reduction for Binary Black Hole Simulations

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A Gaussian Process Regression model trained on an archive of eccentricity-reduced binary black hole simulations predicts initial conditions that achieve low eccentricity with zero or one iteration.

  29. Irreducible Gravitational Wave Background as a Particle Detector

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral features imprinted by long-lived BSM particles on any primordial GWB directly determine the particles' mass and decay rate once the model and initial abundance are specified.

  30. Cracking Gravitational Wave Multiple Ringdown Modes in Space

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FIREFLY algorithm enables 200-fold faster multi-mode ringdown analysis for space-borne gravitational wave detectors while remaining compatible with time-delay interferometry.

  31. Mechanical Long Baseline Differential Gradiometers as Low Frequency Gravitational Wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A vertical long-wire suspended gradiometer configuration amplifies gravitational wave signals from order h to order h L/D by separating gravitational force from moment of inertia.

  32. Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal effective-one-body gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural network surrogate approximates precessing compact binary gravitational waveforms up to 1000x faster than the base EOB model with validated accuracy.

  33. Relativistic signatures of scalar dark matter in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Relativistic metric backreaction from scalar dark matter clouds in EMRIs produces dominant polar gravitational wave corrections for Mμ ≲ 0.12, exceeding axial and scalar radiation channels at small separations.

  34. Twisted doughnuts: Thick disk torus around equatorial asymmetric black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Equatorial asymmetry in black hole spacetimes twists thick tori, displacing their centers and cusps away from the equatorial plane in the same direction as Keplerian orbits.

  35. Superradiant Suppression of Non-minimally Coupled Scalar fields for a Rotating Charged dS Black Hole in Conformal Weyl Gravity

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Superradiant amplification of charged scalar fields around rotating charged de Sitter black holes is suppressed in conformal Weyl gravity relative to general relativity, with strong exponential suppression for massive...

  36. Particle motions and gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole spacetimes of loop quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The LQG parameter ξ enlarges equatorial bound orbit energy ranges, confines off-equatorial trajectories, and produces larger deviations from Kerr waveforms in EMRI models for two rotating LQG black holes, though signa...

  37. Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    gr-qc 2020-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    IMRPhenomXPHM is a new computationally efficient phenomenological model for precessing binary black hole gravitational-wave signals that incorporates higher-order modes via twisting-up maps from non-precessing waveforms.

  38. Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    gr-qc 2019-03 accept novelty 6.0

    Binary black hole signals in GWTC-1 are consistent with general relativity predictions, with an improved graviton mass bound of mg ≤ 4.7 × 10^{-23} eV/c² at 90% credible level.

  39. Quasinormal modes of massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations for Euler Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quasinormal frequencies and greybody factors for massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations in Euler-Heisenberg black holes with perfect fluid dark matter are calculated via AIM and sixth-order WKB, showing tha...

  40. Scattered light noise at LIGO Livingston Observatory during O4

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    Scattered light glitches at LIGO Livingston during O4 were traced to microseismic and high-frequency ground motions and mitigated by baffles and seismic isolation.

  41. Multimessenger consistency tests of the Friedmann cosmological model

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Derives multimessenger consistency conditions and a curvature relation for the Friedmann model using GW and EM luminosity distances, independent of dark energy and density parameters.

  42. The Impact of Spin Priors on Parameterized Tests of General Relativity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spin prior choices propagate into tests of GR via the 1.5PN deviation parameter δφ̂3 in a non-trivial, event-dependent way, with stronger effects for short-inspiral events and partial degeneracy with χ_eff when the de...

  43. Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.

  44. The properties and predictions of quasi-periodic oscillations around a black hole in nonlocal gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nonlocal gravity shrinks the ISCO radius, boosts QPO frequencies, and constrains α/M ≤ 0.452 with M ≲ 43.6 M_⊙ for observed high-frequency QPOs under resonance models.

  45. Sensitivity of black hole spectral instability against perturbations of the effective potential

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Black hole fundamental quasinormal modes exhibit strong sensitivity to small perturbations in the effective potential, with the instability type depending on the potential shape and perturbation distance from the black hole.

  46. Pre-localization of Massive Black Hole Binaries in the Millihertz Band

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A neural spline flow pipeline performs amortized inference on millihertz MBHB signals, delivering ~20 deg² pre-merger sky localizations in ~1 minute while matching PTMCMC sky modes and parameter uncertainties.

  47. Regular Black Holes in General Relativity from Nonlinear Electrodynamics with de Sitter Cores

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New regular black hole metrics in GR arise from a magnetic monopole NLED configuration with de Sitter cores, are fitted to Sgr A* shadow size, and remain stable under scalar perturbations.

  48. Hawking area law in quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exact Hawking area law from black hole mergers restricts quantum gravity to singular Ricci-flat or specific regular black holes in Stelle and nonlocal theories, derives the standard entropy-area law, and realizes Barr...

  49. Emergent structure in the binary black hole mass distribution and implications for population-based cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    B-spline agnostic reconstruction of binary black hole masses from GWTC-4.0 reveals multiple features and a logarithmic hierarchy that impacts Hubble constant measurements, with a low-mass subpopulation isolation metho...

  50. Bayesian Analysis of Gravitational Wave Microlensing Effects from Galactic Double White Dwarfs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian analysis of simulated Taiji observations shows microlensing from lenses above 10^5 solar masses can be distinguished from unlensed DWD signals when separation is below 3 Einstein radii, while lower masses or ...

  51. Scalarizations of magnetized Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes induced by parity-violating and parity-preserving interactions

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Magnetic fields lower the scalarization threshold for electromagnetic and gravitational Chern-Simons couplings but produce opposite trends on the two Gauss-Bonnet branches, with nonlinear terms converting exponential ...

  52. Topologically equivalent yet radiatively distinct orbits in EMRI system

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In dyonic black holes, periodic orbits with identical rotation numbers but spanning different curvature regions generate radiatively distinct gravitational waveforms in EMRIs.

  53. Spectroscopy of analogue black holes using simulation-based inference

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulation-based inference reliably extracts physical parameters from noisy spectra of analogue black holes.

  54. Quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Increasing the mass of a perturbing scalar field around Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes strongly suppresses damping in several quasinormal branches, producing quasi-resonant long-lived oscillations.

  55. Probing High-Quality Axions with Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-quality axion models with N_DW=1 and dark matter abundance requirement restrict the gauge breaking scale to 1.6e11-1e16 GeV, yielding a band of gravitational wave signals from two-step phase transitions consisten...

  56. Memory-Burden Suppression of Hawking Radiation and Neutrino Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Memory-burden backreaction deforms the Hawking spectrum to suppress its high-energy tail, lowering total luminosity and neutrino flux by a factor set by a single suppression parameter and thereby relaxing IceCube boun...

  57. Black Hole-Boson Star Binaries: Gravitational Wave Signals and Tidal Disruption

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations of black hole-boson star binaries show that scalar self-interactions can suppress tidal disruption while radiative efficiency depends on the chosen potential.

  58. Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA EMRIs can constrain deviations from Kerr equatorial symmetry to 10^{-2} and axial symmetry to 10^{-3} using Analytic Kludge waveforms and Fisher analysis.

  59. Axial gravitational perturbations and echo-like signals of a hairy black hole from gravitational decoupling

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Axial perturbations around a hairy black hole from gravitational decoupling produce echo-like gravitational-wave signals that arise dynamically from a double-peak trapping cavity in the effective potential.

  60. Cosmological coupled black holes immersed in dark sector

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exact solution for a black hole whose mass co-evolves with Hubble expansion via radius-dependent coupling to an anisotropic dark halo in FLRW spacetime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · cited by 80 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Einstein, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1, 688 (1916)

    work page 1916

  2. [2]

    Einstein, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1, 154 (1918)

    work page 1918

  3. [3]

    P . R. Saulson, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 3289 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Schwarzschild, Sitzungsber

    K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsber. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1, 189 (1916)

    work page 1916

  5. [5]

    Finkelstein, Phys

    D. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. 110, 965 (1958)

    work page 1958

  6. [6]

    M. D. Kruskal, Phys. Rev. 119, 1743 (1960)

    work page 1960

  7. [7]

    R. P . Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963)

    work page 1963

  8. [8]

    C. V . Vishveshwara, Nature (London) 227, 936 (1970)

    work page 1970

  9. [9]

    W. H. Press, Astrophys. J. 170, L105 (1971)

    work page 1971

  10. [10]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Proc. R. Soc. A 344, 441 (1975)

    work page 1975

  11. [11]

    Blanchet, T

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3515 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    Blanchet, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 2 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999)

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    Pretorius, Phys

    F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Campanelli, C

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P . Marronetti, and Y . Zlochower, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102 (2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    B. L. Webster and P . Murdin, Nature (London) 235,3 7 (1972)

    work page 1972

  18. [18]

    C. T. Bolton, Nature (London) 240, 124 (1972)

    work page 1972

  19. [19]

    Casares and P

    J. Casares and P . G. Jonker, Space Sci. Rev. 183, 223 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J. 195, L51 (1975)

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, Astrophys. J. 253, 908 (1982)

    work page 1982

  22. [22]

    Press and K

    W. Press and K. Thorne, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 335 (1972)

    work page 1972

  23. [23]

    Weber, Phys

    J. Weber, Phys. Rev. 117, 306 (1960)

    work page 1960

  24. [24]

    Astone et al

    P . Astone et al. , Phys. Rev. D 82, 022003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    M. E. Gertsenshtein and V . I. Pustovoit, Sov. Phys. JETP 16, 433 (1962)

    work page 1962

  26. [26]

    G. E. Moss, L. R. Miller, and R. L. Forward, Appl. Opt. 10, 2495 (1971)

    work page 1971

  27. [27]

    Weiss, Electromagnetically coupled broadband gravi- tational antenna, Quarterly Report of the Research Labo- ratory for Electronics, MIT Report No

    R. Weiss, Electromagnetically coupled broadband gravi- tational antenna, Quarterly Report of the Research Labo- ratory for Electronics, MIT Report No. 105, 1972, https:// dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P720002/public/main

    work page 1972

  28. [28]

    R. W. P . Drever, in Gravitational Radiation , edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), p. 321

    work page 1983

  29. [29]

    R. W. P . Drever, F. J. Raab, K. S. Thorne, R. V ogt, and R. Weiss, Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observa- tory (LIGO) Technical Report, 1989, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO‑M890001/public/main

    work page 1989

  30. [30]

    Abramovici et al

    A. Abramovici et al. , Science 256, 325 (1992)

    work page 1992

  31. [31]

    Brillet, A

    A. Brillet, A. Giazotto et al. , Virgo Project Technical Report No. VIR-0517A-15, 1989, https://tds.ego‑gw.it/ql/? c=11247

    work page 1989

  32. [32]

    Hough et al

    J. Hough et al. , Proposal for a joint German-British interferometric gravitational wave detector, MPQ Techni- cal Report 147, No. GWD/137/JH(89), 1989, http://eprints .gla.ac.uk/114852

    work page 1989

  33. [33]

    Aasi et al., Classical Quantum Gravity32, 074001 (2015)

    J. Aasi et al., Classical Quantum Gravity32, 074001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Acernese et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015)

    F. Acernese et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Affeldt et al

    C. Affeldt et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 224002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Y . Aso, Y . Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Y amamoto, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043007 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    The waveform shown is SXS:BBH:0305, available for download at http://www.black‑holes.org/waveforms

    work page

  38. [38]

    A. H. Mroué et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 241104 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500218/ public/main

    work page

  40. [40]

    N. J. Cornish and T. B. Littenberg, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 135012 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500229/ public/main

    work page

  42. [42]

    Chatterji, L

    S. Chatterji, L. Blackburn, G. Martin, and E. Katsavounidis, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1809 (2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors

    S. Klimenko et al., arXiv:1511.05999 [Phys. Rev. D (to be published)]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  44. [44]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500269/ public/main

    work page

  45. [45]

    S. A. Usman et al. , arXiv:1508.02357

    work page Pith review arXiv

  46. [46]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500227/ public/main

    work page

  47. [47]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500237/ public/main

    work page

  48. [48]

    R. W. P . Drever, The Detection of Gravitational Waves , edited by D. G. Blair (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1991)

    work page 1991

  49. [49]

    R. W. P . Drever et al. ,i n Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravity, and Measurement Theory , edited by P . Meystre and M. O. Scully, NA TO ASI, Ser. B, V ol. 94 (Plenum Press, New Y ork, 1983), pp. 503 –514

    work page 1983

  50. [50]

    Schilling (unpublished)

    R. Schilling (unpublished)

    work page

  51. [51]

    B. J. Meers, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2317 (1988) . PRL 116, 061102 (2016) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending 12 FEBRUARY 2016 061102-9

    work page 1988

  52. [52]

    Mizuno, K

    J. Mizuno, K. A. Strain, P . G. Nelson, J. M. Chen, R. Schilling, A. Rüdiger, W. Winkler, and K. Danzmann, Phys. Lett. A 175, 273 (1993)

    work page 1993

  53. [53]

    Kwee et al

    P . Kwee et al. , Opt. Express 20, 10617 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    C. L. Mueller et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 014502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    T. T. Fricke et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 065005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    S. M. Aston et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 235004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Matichard et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 185003 (2015)

    F. Matichard et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 185003 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    G. M. Harry et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 405 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    Granata et al

    M. Granata et al. , Phys. Rev. D 93, 012007 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    A. V . Cumming et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 035003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    Staley et al

    A. Staley et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 31,2 4 5 0 1 0 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Barsotti, M

    L. Barsotti, M. Evans, and P . Fritschel, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084026 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500248/ public/main

    work page

  64. [64]

    Goetz et al

    E. Goetz et al. ,i n Gravitational Waves: Proceedings, of the 8th Edoardo Amaldi Conference, Amaldi, New York, 2009; E. Goetz and R. L. Savage Jr., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084024 (2010)

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    Effler, R

    A. Effler, R. M. S. Schofield, V . V . Frolov, G. González, K. Kawabe, J. R. Smith, J. Birch, and R. McCarthy, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 035017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Bartos, R

    I. Bartos, R. Bork, M. Factourovich, J. Heefner, S. Márka, Z. Márka, Z. Raics, P . Schwinberg, and D. Sigg, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084025 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    Aasi et al., Classical Quantum Gravity32, 115012 (2015)

    J. Aasi et al., Classical Quantum Gravity32, 115012 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. , Phys. Rev. D 87, 022002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. , https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO‑P1500238/ public/main

    work page

  70. [70]

    Nuttall et al

    L. Nuttall et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 245005 (2015)

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    Lyons, Ann

    L. Lyons, Ann. Appl. Stat. 2, 887 (2008)

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    Klimenko, I

    S. Klimenko, I. Y akushin, A. Mercer, and G. Mitselmakher, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 114029 (2008)

    work page 2008

  73. [73]

    Lynch, S

    R. Lynch, S. Vitale, R. Essick, E. Katsavounidis, and F. Robinet, arXiv:1511.05955

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Kanner, T

    J. Kanner, T. B. Littenberg, N. Cornish, M. Millhouse, E. Xhakaj, F. Salemi, M. Drago, G. V edovato, and S. Klimenko, Phys. Rev. D 93, 022002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064015 (2000)

    work page 2000

  76. [76]

    Blanchet, T

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farèse, and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 091101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  77. [77]

    Taracchini et al

    A. Taracchini et al. , Phys. Rev. D 89, 061502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    Pürrer, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 195010 (2014)

    M. Pürrer, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 195010 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Allen, W

    B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P . R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    B. S. Sathyaprakash and S. V . Dhurandhar, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3819 (1991)

    work page 1991

Showing first 80 references.