Recognition: unknown
Spectroscopy of analogue black holes using simulation-based inference
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:00 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Simulation-based inference extracts physical parameters from noisy spectra of analogue black holes
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We model the spectral properties of analogue black holes sourced by broadband stochastic noise and use simulation-based inference to demonstrate that the physical parameters encoded in the resulting noisy spectra can be reliably extracted, thereby providing a tool for studying both spacetime properties and boundary effects in gravity simulators.
What carries the argument
Simulation-based inference applied to spectra generated from broadband stochastic noise in analogue black hole systems
If this is right
- Physical parameters of analogue black holes remain recoverable even when spectra contain realistic broadband noise.
- Spacetime properties encoded in analogue systems become accessible through spectral measurements.
- Boundary effects in gravity simulators can be quantified using the same noisy data.
- Simulation-based inference supplements or replaces conventional fitting methods for these laboratory spectra.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The approach may connect laboratory spectra to the spectral signatures discussed for real black holes and exotic compact objects.
- It could be tested by feeding the method actual experimental spectra from existing fluid or quantum simulators and checking consistency with independent parameter measurements.
- Extensions might examine whether the same inference pipeline distinguishes different analogue models or detects deviations from ideal black-hole behavior.
Load-bearing premise
The broadband stochastic noise model together with the underlying simulations must accurately represent the physics and noise present in actual laboratory analogue gravity experiments.
What would settle it
Apply the trained inference pipeline to many independent realizations of noisy spectra generated with known input parameters; systematic failure to recover those known parameters within the reported uncertainties would falsify the claim of reliable extraction.
Figures
read the original abstract
The emergence of precision gravity simulators in quantum and fluid systems is opening new avenues for probing curved-spacetime physics and black-hole phenomenology under controlled laboratory conditions. In parallel, advances in understanding how fundamental physics can be probed in the spectral signatures of black holes and exotic compact objects motivate the development of modern spectroscopic techniques within analogue-gravity experiments. In this work, we model the spectral properties of analogue black holes sourced by broadband stochastic noise, a crucial aspect in realistic experiments that poses substantial challenges for established data-analysis techniques. Using simulation-based inference, we demonstrate that the physical parameters encoded in noisy spectra can be reliably extracted, showing that these techniques provide a powerful tool for studying both spacetime properties and boundary effects in gravity simulators.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper models the spectral properties of analogue black holes driven by broadband stochastic noise and applies simulation-based inference (SBI) to recover the underlying physical parameters. It claims that SBI enables reliable parameter extraction from noisy spectra, offering a tool for studying spacetime properties and boundary effects in laboratory gravity simulators.
Significance. If the SBI posteriors prove robust, the work could provide a practical advance for parameter estimation in analogue-gravity experiments where traditional fitting struggles with stochastic noise, potentially enabling quantitative tests of analogue black-hole phenomenology.
major comments (1)
- [Results (demonstration of reliable extraction)] The central claim that parameters 'can be reliably extracted' from noisy spectra rests on training and validation performed exclusively within the chosen broadband stochastic noise model. No misspecification tests (e.g., injection of held-out noise families with different correlations or power-law indices followed by checks of posterior coverage or bias) are reported, which is required to support applicability to real laboratory data.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract states that SBI provides a 'powerful tool' without quoting quantitative figures of merit (e.g., bias, coverage probability, or comparison to MCMC baselines) that would allow readers to judge the strength of the demonstration.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of robustness under noise-model variations for real laboratory applications. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Results (demonstration of reliable extraction)] The central claim that parameters 'can be reliably extracted' from noisy spectra rests on training and validation performed exclusively within the chosen broadband stochastic noise model. No misspecification tests (e.g., injection of held-out noise families with different correlations or power-law indices followed by checks of posterior coverage or bias) are reported, which is required to support applicability to real laboratory data.
Authors: We agree that the reported validation is performed within the broadband stochastic noise model adopted for training and that explicit misspecification tests with alternative noise families (different correlation structures or spectral indices) are not included. This model was selected because it captures the dominant noise characteristics encountered in current analogue-gravity platforms. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that demonstrating coverage and bias under held-out noise families would provide stronger evidence for applicability to real data. In the revised manuscript we will (i) add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly states the scope of the current validation, (ii) include a qualitative analysis of how changes in noise correlation length or power-law index are expected to affect the recovered posteriors, and (iii) identify misspecification tests as an important direction for future work. These additions will clarify the present limitations without altering the core demonstration that SBI recovers parameters reliably inside the chosen noise class. revision: partial
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; SBI is an external inference method applied to forward simulations
full rationale
The paper trains an SBI network on spectra produced by analogue black-hole simulations plus a chosen broadband stochastic noise model, then uses the trained network to infer physical parameters from (held-out) noisy spectra. This is a standard forward-model + amortized-inference workflow whose central demonstration does not reduce to any of the enumerated circular patterns: the noise model is an explicit modeling choice, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; no self-citation chain or author-derived uniqueness theorem is invoked to justify the method; the inference network is not defined in terms of its own outputs. The derivation therefore remains self-contained and relies on independently established SBI techniques and numerical simulation.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Analogue systems can faithfully mimic aspects of black-hole spacetime physics
- domain assumption Simulation-based inference can invert noisy spectral data when trained on sufficiently accurate forward models
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018), arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[2]
R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Astron. Astrophys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]
-
[3]
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole
K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro- ph.GA]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
-
[4]
K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro- ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
-
[5]
B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
-
[6]
Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114 (2025), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
-
[7]
Regge and J
T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)
1957
-
[8]
F. J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)
1970
-
[9]
C. V. Vishveshwara, Nature227, 936 (1970)
1970
-
[10]
S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)
1973
-
[11]
Chandrasekhar and S
S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A344, 441 (1975)
1975
-
[12]
K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
-
[13]
Nollert, Class
H.-P. Nollert, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)
1999
-
[14]
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2009
-
[15]
R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
-
[16]
Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment
E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, J. Abedi, N. Afshordi, S. Albanesi, V. Baibhav, S. Bhagwat, J. L. Bl´ azquez- Salcedo, B. Bonga,et al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
-
[17]
W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351 (1981)
1981
-
[18]
Barcel´ o, S
C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living Rev. Rel- ativ.14, 3 (2011)
2011
-
[19]
Sch¨ utzhold and W
R. Sch¨ utzhold and W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D66, 044019 (2002)
2002
-
[20]
Weinfurtner, E
S. Weinfurtner, E. W. Tedford, M. C. J. Penrice, W. G. Unruh, and G. A. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 021302 (2011)
2011
-
[21]
Steinhauer, Nat
J. Steinhauer, Nat. Phys.10, 864 (2014)
2014
-
[22]
Steinhauer, Nat
J. Steinhauer, Nat. Phys.12, 959–965 (2016)
2016
-
[23]
Euv´ e, F
L.-P. Euv´ e, F. Michel, R. Parentani, T. G. Philbin, and G. Rousseaux, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 121301 (2016)
2016
-
[24]
J. R. Mu˜ noz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer, Nature569, 688 (2019)
2019
-
[25]
Steinhauer, Phys
J. Steinhauer, Phys. Rev. D106, 102007 (2022)
2022
-
[26]
Visser and S
M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, Class. Quantum Gravity 22, 2493 (2005). 7
2005
-
[27]
T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford, and S. Weinfurtner, Nature Physics13, 10.1038/nphys4151 (2017)
-
[28]
D. D. Solnyshkov, C. Leblanc, S. V. Koniakhin, O. Bleu, and G. Malpuech, Phys. Rev. B99, 214511 (2019)
2019
-
[29]
Cromb, G
M. Cromb, G. M. Gibson, E. Toninelli, M. J. Pad- gett, E. M. Wright, and D. Faccio, Nat. Phys.16, 1069 (2020)
2020
-
[30]
M. C. Braidotti, R. Prizia, C. Maitland, F. Marino, A. Prain, I. Starshynov, N. Westerberg, E. M. Wright, and D. Faccio, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 013901 (2022)
2022
-
[31]
Berti, V
E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and J. P. S. Lemos, Physical Re- view D70, 124006 (2004)
2004
-
[32]
Cardoso, J
V. Cardoso, J. P. S. Lemos, and S. Yoshida, Physical Review D70, 124032 (2004)
2004
-
[33]
S. R. Dolan, E. S. Oliveira, and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys- ical Review D79, 064014 (2009)
2009
-
[34]
Torres, A
T. Torres, A. Coutant, S. Dolan, and S. Weinfurtner, J. Fluid Mech.857, 291–311 (2018)
2018
-
[35]
S. R. Dolan, L. A. Oliveira, and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys- ical Review D85, 044031 (2012)
2012
-
[36]
M. J. Jacquet, L. Giacomelli, Q. Valnais, M. Joly, F. Claude, E. Giacobino, Q. Glorieux, I. Carusotto, and A. Bramati, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 111501 (2023)
2023
-
[37]
K. Guerrero, K. Falque, E. Giacobino, A. Bramati, and M. J. Jacquet, Multiply quantized vortex spectroscopy in a quantum fluid of light (2025), arXiv:2507.14539 [cond-mat.quant-gas]
-
[38]
C. Burgess, S. Patrick, T. Torres, R. Gregory, and F. Koenig, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 053802 (2024), arXiv:2309.10622 [physics.optics]
- [39]
-
[40]
Patrick, A
S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurt- ner, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061101 (2018)
2018
-
[41]
Torres, S
T. Torres, S. Patrick, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 011301 (2020)
2020
-
[42]
ˇSvanˇ cara, P
P. ˇSvanˇ cara, P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, J. F. MacDon- ald, S. Patrick, R. Gregory, C. F. Barenghi, and S. We- infurtner, Nature628, 66 (2024)
2024
-
[43]
Black-hole spectroscopy from a giant quantum vortex
P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, P. ˇSvanˇ cara, S. Patrick, M. Richartz, C. F. Barenghi, R. Gregory, and S. Wein- furtner, Black-hole spectroscopy from a giant quantum vortex (2025), arXiv:2502.11209 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[44]
V. I. Kolobov, K. Golubkov, J. R. M. de Nova, and J. Steinhauer, Nature Physics17, 362 (2021)
2021
-
[45]
Geelmuyden, S
A. Geelmuyden, S. Erne, S. Patrick, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023099 (2022)
2022
-
[46]
Patrick and S
S. Patrick and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. D102, 084041 (2020)
2020
-
[47]
Patrick and L
S. Patrick and L. Solidoro, Phys. Rev. D111, 104048 (2025)
2025
-
[48]
L. Solidoro, S. Patrick, S. Weinfurtner, and R. Gregory, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 051401 (2025), arXiv:2406.11013 [gr-qc]
-
[49]
Patrick, A
S. Patrick, A. Geelmuyden, S. Erne, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033117 (2022)
2022
-
[50]
K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916, 424 (1916), arXiv:physics/9912033
-
[51]
K. A. Bronnikov, Acta Phys. Polon. B4, 251 (1973)
1973
-
[52]
H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys.14, 104 (1973)
1973
- [53]
-
[54]
P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.101, 9545 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407075
work page Pith review arXiv 2004
-
[55]
T. Damour and S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D76, 024016 (2007), arXiv:0704.2667 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2007
-
[56]
Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, JHEP02, 062, arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]
-
[57]
V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palen- zuela, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D94, 084031 (2016), arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2016
- [58]
-
[59]
V. Cardoso, V. F. Foit, and M. Kleban, JCAP08, 006, arXiv:1902.10164 [hep-th]
- [60]
- [61]
-
[62]
Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report
V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
-
[63]
Chandrasekhar and V
S. Chandrasekhar and V. Ferrari, Proceedings: Mathe- matical and Physical Sciences434, 449 (1991)
1991
-
[64]
K. D. Kokkotas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268, 1015 (1994)
1994
-
[65]
K. D. Kokkotas, inLes Houches School of Physics: As- trophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation(1995) pp. 89–102, arXiv:gr-qc/9603024
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1995
-
[66]
Scattering of particles by neutron stars: Time-evolutions for axial perturbations
V. Ferrari and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D62, 107504 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0008057
work page Pith review arXiv 2000
-
[67]
Gravitational waves from a test particle scattered by a neutron star: Axial mode case
K. Tominaga, M. Saijo, and K.-i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 60, 024004 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9901040
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
-
[68]
Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?
V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 171101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 089902 (2016)], arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2016
-
[69]
Parameter estimation of gravitational wave echoes from exotic compact objects
A. Maselli, S. H. V¨ olkel, and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D96, 064045 (2017), arXiv:1708.02217 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[70]
A. Testa and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D98, 044018 (2018), arXiv:1806.04253 [gr-qc]
- [71]
- [72]
- [73]
-
[74]
K. Destounis, R. P. Macedo, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and J. L. Jaramillo, Phys. Rev. D104, 084091 (2021), arXiv:2107.09673 [gr-qc]
- [75]
- [76]
-
[77]
V. Boyanov, K. Destounis, R. Panosso Macedo, V. Car- doso, and J. L. Jaramillo, Phys. Rev. D107, 064012 (2023), arXiv:2209.12950 [gr-qc]
- [78]
- [79]
-
[80]
Quantifying excita tions of quasinormal mode systems
H.-P. Nollert and R. H. Price, J. Math. Phys.40, 980 8 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810074
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.