pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11238 · v1 · submitted 2019-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 11:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords M87black hole shadowEvent Horizon Telescopegeneral relativitysupermassive black holeVLBI imagingKerr metricgalactic center
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Event Horizon Telescope has imaged the shadow of the supermassive black hole in M87, matching general relativity predictions for a Kerr black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the first event-horizon-scale image of the black hole candidate at the center of galaxy M87. The image shows a bright asymmetric ring with a diameter of 42 microarcseconds enclosing a central dark region. This structure arises from gravitational deflection of light and the capture of photons at the event horizon. The observations are consistent with a spinning black hole of mass 6.5 billion solar masses surrounded by relativistic plasma. Such an image directly supports the existence of supermassive black holes and opens a new window for testing gravity under extreme conditions.

Core claim

Using a global array of radio telescopes operating at 1.3 mm wavelength, the central compact source in M87 is resolved into an asymmetric bright emission ring of diameter 42 ± 3 μas with a central brightness depression of flux ratio ~10:1. This image remains stable across four observing days and different processing methods. It matches ray-traced simulations of general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic flows around a Kerr black hole, yielding a mass estimate of (6.5 ± 0.7) × 10^9 solar masses. The brightness asymmetry is attributed to relativistic beaming from plasma orbiting near the speed of light.

What carries the argument

The black hole shadow, formed by the gravitational bending of light rays and the capture of photons within the event horizon, which creates a dark central region surrounded by a bright photon ring in the observed image.

If this is right

  • The derived black hole mass provides an independent measurement consistent with stellar dynamics estimates.
  • Relativistic effects in the plasma explain the observed ring asymmetry without additional assumptions.
  • This imaging technique can be extended to probe black hole properties in other galaxies.
  • It establishes very long baseline interferometry at millimeter wavelengths as a tool for direct tests of general relativity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar shadows might be detectable in other active galactic nuclei with sufficient resolution.
  • Time-lapse observations could reveal the dynamics of the accretion flow and test for deviations from Kerr geometry.
  • Polarization measurements in future data could constrain the magnetic field structure near the black hole.

Load-bearing premise

The dark central region results from photon capture at the event horizon instead of being obscured by dense, non-emitting plasma features not included in the simulation models.

What would settle it

Detection of significant emission filling the central depression at 1.3 mm wavelength, or a ring diameter that deviates substantially from the size expected for a black hole of the estimated mass under general relativity.

read the original abstract

When surrounded by a transparent emission region, black holes are expected to reveal a dark shadow caused by gravitational light bending and photon capture at the event horizon. To image and study this phenomenon, we have assembled the Event Horizon Telescope, a global very long baseline interferometry array observing at a wavelength of 1.3 mm. This allows us to reconstruct event-horizon-scale images of the supermassive black hole candidate in the center of the giant elliptical galaxy M87. We have resolved the central compact radio source as an asymmetric bright emission ring with a diameter of 42+/-3 micro-as, which is circular and encompasses a central depression in brightness with a flux ratio ~10:1. The emission ring is recovered using different calibration and imaging schemes, with its diameter and width remaining stable over four different observations carried out in different days. Overall, the observed image is consistent with expectations for the shadow of a Kerr black hole as predicted by general relativity. The asymmetry in brightness in the ring can be explained in terms of relativistic beaming of the emission from a plasma rotating close to the speed of light around a black hole. We compare our images to an extensive library of ray-traced general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of black holes and derive a central mass of M = (6.5+/-0.7) x 10^9 Msun. Our radio-wave observations thus provide powerful evidence for the presence of supermassive black holes in centers of galaxies and as the central engines of active galactic nuclei. They also present a new tool to explore gravity in its most extreme limit and on a mass scale that was so far not accessible.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) observations at 1.3 mm of the supermassive black hole candidate in M87. It reconstructs an asymmetric bright emission ring of diameter 42 ± 3 μas that is circular and encloses a central brightness depression with a flux ratio of ~10:1. The ring diameter and width are recovered consistently across four observations on different days and multiple independent calibration and imaging pipelines. Comparison to an extensive library of ray-traced GRMHD simulations supports consistency with the expected shadow of a Kerr black hole, with the ring asymmetry attributed to relativistic beaming from near-light-speed plasma rotation, and yields a central mass of M = (6.5 ± 0.7) × 10^9 M⊙.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, this is a landmark result providing the first resolved image of event-horizon-scale structure around a supermassive black hole and direct evidence supporting the Kerr-shadow prediction of general relativity. The multi-pipeline and multi-epoch consistency strengthens the robustness of the image reconstruction itself. The simulation comparison enables a mass estimate that is independent of stellar dynamics, reinforcing the identification of supermassive black holes as AGN central engines and opening a new regime for strong-field gravity tests.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5 and §6] §5 and §6: The central claim that the observed ~10:1 central depression and 42 ± 3 μas ring are consistent with the Kerr shadow (arising from photon capture inside the unstable photon orbit) depends on the GRMHD simulation library spanning all plausible 1.3 mm emission geometries. The manuscript should explicitly quantify the coverage of the library with respect to optical depth, electron distribution functions, and inner-disk structures, and discuss whether unmodeled optically thick plasma could produce an equivalent ring-plus-depression morphology without invoking photon capture.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the ring is 'circular' while the main text notes asymmetry in brightness; a brief clarification on the distinction between geometric circularity and brightness asymmetry would improve precision.
  2. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the exact number of independent imaging pipelines and the quantitative stability metrics (e.g., rms variation in diameter) across the four epochs to allow readers to assess robustness without cross-referencing supplementary material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point on the GRMHD simulation library coverage below and agree that additional explicit quantification and discussion will strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§5 and §6] §5 and §6: The central claim that the observed ~10:1 central depression and 42 ± 3 μas ring are consistent with the Kerr shadow (arising from photon capture inside the unstable photon orbit) depends on the GRMHD simulation library spanning all plausible 1.3 mm emission geometries. The manuscript should explicitly quantify the coverage of the library with respect to optical depth, electron distribution functions, and inner-disk structures, and discuss whether unmodeled optically thick plasma could produce an equivalent ring-plus-depression morphology without invoking photon capture.

    Authors: The simulation library spans a broad range of 1.3 mm emission geometries, including variations in optical depth (from optically thin to moderately optically thick regimes), electron distribution functions (thermal Maxwell-Jüttner distributions as well as hybrid thermal/non-thermal models), and inner-disk structures (different magnetic field topologies, accretion rates, and disk inclinations). These parameters are described in the companion simulation papers referenced in §5. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit quantitative summary (e.g., a table or paragraph listing the explored ranges of optical depth at 1.3 mm and electron temperature) in §6. On the question of unmodeled optically thick plasma, our library already includes models with significant optical depth; in those cases the central depression persists due to gravitational lensing and photon capture at the photon orbit, while the ring diameter and asymmetry remain consistent with the observed image. Emission geometries lacking strong lensing and photon capture (e.g., purely optically thick disks without relativistic beaming) do not reproduce the measured ring diameter of 42 μas or the ~10:1 brightness contrast. We will add a concise discussion paragraph in §6 making these points explicit while noting that the library covers the main physically plausible parameter space for M87 at 1.3 mm. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The image reconstruction proceeds directly from raw VLBI visibility data via multiple independent calibration and imaging pipelines, producing a stable 42±3 μas ring and ~10:1 central depression without reference to the final mass or GR shadow interpretation. The mass M=(6.5±0.7)×10^9 M⊙ is obtained by scaling the observed angular diameter against an external library of ray-traced GRMHD simulations whose size-to-mass relation is fixed by general relativity and the independently measured distance to M87; this is a standard parameter estimation step, not a prediction that feeds back into the data reduction or assumes the conclusion by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or ansätze imported from prior author work appear in the provided derivation chain. The consistency claim follows from morphological match to the predicted photon-orbit shadow rather than definitional equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that general relativity accurately describes light propagation near the horizon and that the observed emission can be adequately modeled by existing GRMHD simulations of accretion flows.

free parameters (1)
  • Black hole mass M = (6.5 +/- 0.7) x 10^9 Msun
    Fitted by matching the observed ring diameter to the shadow size in a library of GRMHD simulations; value reported as (6.5 +/- 0.7) x 10^9 solar masses.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity holds in the strong-field regime and predicts a photon ring and shadow for a Kerr black hole.
    Invoked to interpret the central depression as the black hole shadow and to predict its expected diameter.
  • domain assumption The radio emission originates from a transparent plasma region whose brightness distribution is well approximated by the GRMHD simulation library.
    Required to link the observed image morphology to the underlying black hole parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5606 in / 1388 out tokens · 56621 ms · 2026-05-12T11:20:25.125355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    We have resolved the central compact radio source as an asymmetric bright emission ring with a diameter of 42±3 μas, which is circular and encompasses a central depression in brightness with a flux ratio ≳10:1. ... the observed image is consistent with expectations for the shadow of a Kerr black hole as predicted by general relativity.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We compare our images to an extensive library of ray-traced general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of black holes and derive a central mass of M = (6.5±0.7)×10^9 M⊙.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 44 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spin-Induced Nonlinear Scalarization of Kerr Black Holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Kerr black holes in an EsGB model without linear instability undergo nonlinear scalarization above spin 0.5, existing in a finite low-mass high-spin wedge rather than a narrow band.

  2. GRMHD accretion beyond the black hole paradigm: Light from within the shadow

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    3D GRMHD simulations of accretion onto a JMN-1 horizonless singularity produce a magnetically arrested disk with an accretion rate of ~3e-6 Eddington matching M87* observations and EHT-consistent images, plus central ...

  3. Analog regular black holes and black hole mimickers for surface-gravity waves in fluids

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Surface-gravity waves in shallow water can be configured with central and graded drainage to analogize regular black holes and mimickers, enabling lab study of their instabilities.

  4. Kinetic magnetohydrodynamics and Landau fluid closure in relativity

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The authors derive relativistic drift-kinetic moment equations and a new analytic Landau fluid closure that incorporates anisotropic heat conduction and Landau damping without assuming collisional thermalization.

  5. Strong-deflection expansion of the deflection angle near a degenerate photon sphere

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives a factorized leading term for the strong deflection angle near degenerate photon spheres using local expansion of the effective potential and Weyl tensor measures.

  6. Scattering from compact objects: Debye series and Regge-Debye poles

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    An exact Debye-series decomposition of the scattering matrix for waves on compact stars reveals distinct Regge-Debye pole families that dominate amplitudes differently in neutron-star-like and ultracompact regimes.

  7. Demagnetizing KBR and New Ricci-flat Rotating Metric

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Demagnetizing the KBR solution produces a new Ricci-flat rotating metric with deformation parameter B that preserves key Kerr thermodynamic relations despite non-asymptotically flat boundaries.

  8. Magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Magnetic reconnection enables higher energy extraction efficiency from singly-rotating five-dimensional Kerr black holes than from doubly-rotating ones and can exceed the Blandford-Znajek process in the single-rotation case.

  9. A Complete Invariant Analysis of the Kerr Spacetime and its Photon Region

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An invariant function is derived whose zeros identify spherical photon orbits in Kerr spacetime, parameterized by an inclination angle, enabling invariant characterization of the photon region and constants of motion.

  10. Shadow dependent phenomenology framework for rotating black hole metric

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A thermodynamic-optical duality reparameterizes black hole mass via observable shadow radius to derive lensing angles, Hawking temperature, and luminosity for Kerr, Kerr-MOG, and rotating Horndeski metrics, yielding m...

  11. Reshaping the inner shadow of a Kerr black hole by a torn accretion disk

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Torn accretion disks around Kerr black holes erode the inner shadow and create bifurcated, crescent, and multi-ring shadow features driven by sub-disk discontinuities and outer tilt angle.

  12. Photon rings and shadows of black holes with non-minimal couplings between curvature and electromagnetic field

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Three distinct non-minimal curvature-EM couplings produce different enlargements or reductions of black hole shadows and alter photon ring separations in characteristic ways.

  13. Relative Magnification Factor of Point Sources on Accretion Disks

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Corotating point sources on accretion disks near black holes distort the relative magnification factor distribution, modulating caustics and encoding accretion flow kinematics via time-delayed images.

  14. Gravity/thermodynamics correspondence via black hole shadows

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Cuspy black hole shadows correspond to swallowtail thermodynamic free energy, with boundary self-intersections marking geometric phase transitions whose critical exponents fall in the mean-field class.

  15. Superradiant Suppression of Non-minimally Coupled Scalar fields for a Rotating Charged dS Black Hole in Conformal Weyl Gravity

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Superradiant amplification of charged scalar fields around rotating charged de Sitter black holes is suppressed in conformal Weyl gravity relative to general relativity, with strong exponential suppression for massive...

  16. Shadows of quintessence black holes: spherical accretion, photon trajectories, and geodesic observers

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Quintessence black holes produce observer-dependent shadow angular sizes, with infalling observers seeing smaller shadows than static ones, yielding stronger equation-of-state constraints from M87* observations.

  17. Quasinormal modes of massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations for Euler Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quasinormal frequencies and greybody factors for massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations in Euler-Heisenberg black holes with perfect fluid dark matter are calculated via AIM and sixth-order WKB, showing tha...

  18. Jet-driven shocks and turbulence in radio-loud Active Galactic Nuclei observed with JWST MIRI/MRS

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    JWST spectroscopy reveals radio jets in nearby AGN drive multiphase ISM turbulence and shock-dominated H2 excitation both along and perpendicular to the jet direction.

  19. The properties and predictions of quasi-periodic oscillations around a black hole in nonlocal gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nonlocal gravity shrinks the ISCO radius, boosts QPO frequencies, and constrains α/M ≤ 0.452 with M ≲ 43.6 M_⊙ for observed high-frequency QPOs under resonance models.

  20. Photon Surfaces in Higher-Curvature Gravity: Implications for Quasinormal Modes and Gravitational Lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Higher-curvature EFT terms modify the photon sphere radius, critical impact parameter, and strong deflection coefficients, providing sensitive probes for constraints on quantum gravity effects via lensing and QNM spectra.

  21. Effective null geodesics and black hole images in Kruglov nonlinear electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In Kruglov nonlinear electrodynamics, small positive values of the parameter q produce stable photon orbits outside the event horizon and modify black hole shadows and relativistic images even when the spacetime metri...

  22. Effective null geodesics and black hole images in Kruglov nonlinear electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In Kruglov's Born-Infeld-type nonlinear electrodynamics, the effective photon geometry around a charged black hole produces q-dependent shifts in light deflection, shadow radius, and accretion disk images, including s...

  23. Regular Black Holes in General Relativity from Nonlinear Electrodynamics with de Sitter Cores

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New regular black hole metrics in GR arise from a magnetic monopole NLED configuration with de Sitter cores, are fitted to Sgr A* shadow size, and remain stable under scalar perturbations.

  24. Macroscopic Optical Nonreciprocity: A Black Hole as an Optical Diode

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rotating black holes with a nonminimally coupled Lorentz-violating background act as optical diodes by producing direction-dependent shadows that morph from quasi-symmetric to teardrop upon path reversal.

  25. Scalarizations of magnetized Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes induced by parity-violating and parity-preserving interactions

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Magnetic fields lower the scalarization threshold for electromagnetic and gravitational Chern-Simons couplings but produce opposite trends on the two Gauss-Bonnet branches, with nonlinear terms converting exponential ...

  26. Topologically equivalent yet radiatively distinct orbits in EMRI system

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In dyonic black holes, periodic orbits with identical rotation numbers but spanning different curvature regions generate radiatively distinct gravitational waveforms in EMRIs.

  27. Observational constraints on nonlocal black holes via gravitational lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nonlocal black holes remain consistent with general relativity at the 1.13-sigma level after joint lensing and quasinormal-mode constraints.

  28. Spectroscopy of analogue black holes using simulation-based inference

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulation-based inference reliably extracts physical parameters from noisy spectra of analogue black holes.

  29. Black Hole-Boson Star Binaries: Gravitational Wave Signals and Tidal Disruption

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations of black hole-boson star binaries show that scalar self-interactions can suppress tidal disruption while radiative efficiency depends on the chosen potential.

  30. Dynamical Black Hole Thermodynamics in Modified Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In modified gravity, dynamical Schwarzschild black holes under scalar waves exhibit non-thermal particle creation while preserving the generalized second law and forming stable zero-temperature remnants at the extremal bound.

  31. Cosmological coupled black holes immersed in dark sector

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exact solution for a black hole whose mass co-evolves with Hubble expansion via radius-dependent coupling to an anisotropic dark halo in FLRW spacetime.

  32. Long-lived quasinormal modes, shadows and particle motion in four-dimensional quasi-topological gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Massive scalar quasinormal modes in quasi-topological black holes become long-lived as scalar mass grows, while photon-sphere radius, shadow size, and ISCO exhibit moderate deviations from Schwarzschild.

  33. Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.

  34. Thin Accretion Disks around Rotating Charged Black Holes in an Effective Higher-Curvature Spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    An effective Gauss-Bonnet-like deformation of the Kerr-Newman metric moves the ISCO inward, raises radiative efficiency, flux, and temperature, while charge suppresses these quantities.

  35. Optical Appearance of the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson Black Hole with a Magnetically Driven Synchrotron Emissivity Model

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Kerr-BR black hole images with magnetically coupled synchrotron emissivity show spin- and B-dependent shifts in the inner disk edge, altered lensing rings, and Doppler asymmetries, with retrograde cases displaying wid...

  36. Probing Gravitational Wave Signatures from Periodic Orbits of Regular Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The quantum parameter ξ in an asymptotically safe regular black hole shifts the innermost stable orbit, enhances whirl behavior in periodic geodesics, and produces amplitude-modulated millihertz gravitational-wave str...

  37. Jet-driven shocks and turbulence in radio-loud Active Galactic Nuclei observed with JWST MIRI/MRS

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Radio jets drive shocks and turbulence in multiphase gas of nearby radio-loud AGN as mapped by JWST spectroscopy.

  38. Thermodynamics and orbital structure of anti-de Sitter black holes in Palatini-inspired nonlinear electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    An exact AdS extension of the PINLED black hole is derived from the Einstein-Hilbert action plus nonlinear EM sector, preserving the original parametric form while adding the standard AdS lapse term, followed by full ...

  39. Observational Signatures of Rotating Ay\'{o}n-Beato-Garc\'{i}a Black Holes: Shadows, Accretion Disks and Images

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Rotating Ayón-Beato-García black holes produce smaller and sometimes D-shaped shadows whose size constrains the charge parameter ζ to the range 0.132811M–0.213607M when matched to EHT observations of M87* and Sgr A*.

  40. On the impossibility of observational confirmation of black holes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    No observational data can confirm the existence of black holes because general relativity imposes fundamental limits on what can be established about them.

  41. Photon Sphere and Shadow of a Perturbative Black Hole in $f(R,\mathcal{G})$ Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Perturbative higher-curvature corrections in f(R,G) gravity shift the photon-sphere radius and black-hole shadow size away from Schwarzschild values, with the Gauss-Bonnet sector contributing more than mixed terms.

  42. Probing Kalb-Ramond gravity with charged rotating black holes: constraints from EHT observations

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    EHT shadow observations constrain the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ in Kalb-Ramond gravity for charged rotating black holes to roughly |ℓ| ≲ 0.1-0.2, with an upper bound ℓ ≲ 0.19 from Sgr A*.

  43. Review of strongly coupled regimes in gravity with Dyson-Schwinger approach

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Dyson-Schwinger methods applied to gravity theories produce conformally flat metrics and a sequence of cosmological phase transitions from conformal symmetry breaking that non-minimal scalar couplings can suppress.

  44. Polarization Signatures from GRMHD Simulations of Black Hole Accretion

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Polarization signatures from GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion can help probe disk, corona, and jet properties when combined with X-ray polarimetry observations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

168 extracted references · 168 canonical work pages · cited by 42 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, PhRvL, 116, 061102

  2. [2]

    2012, ApJ, 746, 151

    Abramowski, A., Acero, F., Aharonian, F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 151

  3. [3]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 1

    Akiyama, K., Kuramochi, K., Ikeda, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 1

  4. [4]

    L., et al

    Akiyama, K., Lu, R.-S., Fish, V. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 150

  5. [5]

    2012, ApJL, 745, L28

    Asada, K., & Nakamura, M. 2012, ApJL, 745, L28

  6. [6]

    1954, ApJ, 119, 215

    Baade, W., & Minkowski, R. 1954, ApJ, 119, 215

  7. [7]

    Peters, W. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 627

  8. [8]

    A., & Hawley, J

    Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214

  9. [9]

    Balick, B., & Brown, R. L. 1974, ApJ, 194, 265

  10. [10]

    2013, PhRvD, 87, 107501

    Bambi, C. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 107501

  11. [11]

    2009, PhRvD, 79, 043002

    Bambi, C., & Freese, K. 2009, PhRvD, 79, 043002

  12. [12]

    Barausse, E., & Sotiriou, T. P. 2008, PhRvL, 101, 099001

  13. [13]

    Bardeen, J. M. 1973, in Black Holes, ed. C. DeWitt & B. S. DeWitt (New York: Gordon and Breach ), 215

  14. [14]

    2015, CQGra, 32, 243001

    Berti, E., Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., et al. 2015, CQGra, 32, 243001

  15. [15]

    E., Blakeslee, J

    Bird, S., Harris, W. E., Blakeslee, J. P., & Flynn, C. 2010, A&A, 524, A71

  16. [16]

    A., Sparks, W

    Biretta, J. A., Sparks, W. B., & Macchetto, F. 1999, ApJ, 520, 621

  17. [17]

    B., et al

    Blackburn, L., Chan, C.-K., Crew, G. B., et al. 2019, arXiv: 1903.08832

  18. [18]

    P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al

    Blakeslee, J. P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 556

  19. [19]

    D., & Begelman, M

    Blandford, R. D., & Begelman, M. C. 1999, MNRAS, 303, L1

  20. [20]

    D., & Königl, A

    Blandford, R. D., & Königl, A. 1979, ApJ, 232, 34

  21. [21]

    D., & Payne, D

    Blandford, R. D., & Payne, D. G. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883

  22. [22]

    D., & Znajek, R

    Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 433

  23. [23]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 143

    Blecher, T., Deane, R., Bernardi, G., & Smirnov, O. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 143

  24. [24]

    P., Ros, E., & Zensus, J

    Boccardi, B., Krichbaum, T. P., Ros, E., & Zensus, J. A. 2017, A&ARv, 25, 4

  25. [25]

    G., Stanley, G

    Bolton, J. G., Stanley, G. J., & Slee, O. B. 1949, Natur, 164, 101

  26. [26]

    L., Johnson, M

    Bouman, K. L., Johnson, M. D., Dalca, A. V., et al. 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , 4, 512

  27. [27]

    L., Johnson, M

    Bouman, K. L., Johnson, M. D., Zoran, D., et al. 2016, in The IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (New York: IEEE ), 913

  28. [28]

    C., Wright, M

    Bower, G. C., Wright, M. C. H., Falcke, H., & Backer, D. C. 2003, ApJ, 588, 331

  29. [29]

    H., & Perley, R

    Bridle, A. H., & Perley, R. A. 1984, ARA&A, 22, 319

  30. [30]

    E., Johannsen, T., Loeb, A., & Psaltis, D

    Broderick, A. E., Johannsen, T., Loeb, A., & Psaltis, D. 2014, ApJ, 784, 7

  31. [31]

    E., & Loeb, A

    Broderick, A. E., & Loeb, A. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 353

  32. [32]

    E., & Loeb, A

    Broderick, A. E., & Loeb, A. 2006, ApJL, 636, L109

  33. [33]

    E., & Loeb, A

    Broderick, A. E., & Loeb, A. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1164

  34. [34]

    E., & Narayan, R

    Broderick, A. E., & Narayan, R. 2006, ApJL, 638, L21

  35. [35]

    E., Narayan, R., Kormendy, J., et al

    Broderick, A. E., Narayan, R., Kormendy, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 179

  36. [36]

    C., Melia, F., & Liu, S

    Bromley, B. C., Melia, F., & Liu, S. 2001, ApJL, 555, L83

  37. [37]

    2018, A&A, 613, A2

    Bronzwaer, T., Davelaar, J., Younsi, Z., et al. 2018, A&A, 613, A2

  38. [38]

    P., Ferrarese, L., et al

    Cantiello, M., Blakeslee, J. P., Ferrarese, L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 126

  39. [39]

    Chael, A., Narayan, R., & Johnson, M. D. 2018a, arXiv: 1810.01983

  40. [40]

    2015, ApJ, 799, 1

    Chan, C.-K., Psaltis, D., Özel, F., Narayan, R., & Saowski, A. 2015, ApJ, 799, 1

  41. [41]

    Chirenti, C. B. M. H., & Rezzolla, L. 2007, CQGra, 24, 4191

  42. [42]

    Clark, B. G. 1980, A&A, 89, 377

  43. [43]

    H., Moffet, A

    Cohen, M. H., Moffet, A. T., Shaffer, D., et al. 1969, ApJL, 158, L83

  44. [44]

    Cunha, P. V. P., Grover, J., Herdeiro, C., et al. 2016, PhRvD, 94, 104023

  45. [45]

    Curtis, H. D. 1918, PLicO, 13, 9

  46. [46]

    2019, A&A, submitted de Gasperin, F., Orrú, E., Murgia, M., et al

    Davelaar, J., Olivares, H., Porth, O., et al. 2019, A&A, submitted de Gasperin, F., Orrú, E., Murgia, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A56

  47. [47]

    T., Tingay, S

    Deller, A. T., Tingay, S. J., Bailes, M., & West, C. 2007, PASP, 119, 318

  48. [48]

    C., & Agol, E

    Dexter, J., McKinney, J. C., & Agol, E. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1517

  49. [49]

    C., Markoff, S., & Dexter, J

    Dibi, S., Drappeau, S., Fragile, P. C., Markoff, S., & Dexter, J. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1928

  50. [50]

    2009a, astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Vol

    Doeleman, S., Agol, E., Dacker, D., et al. 2009a, astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Vol. 2010

  51. [51]

    S., Fish, V

    Doeleman, S. S., Fish, V. L., Schenck, D. E., et al. 2012, Sci, 338, 355

  52. [52]

    S., Shen, Z.-Q., Rogers, A

    Doeleman, S. S., Shen, Z.-Q., Rogers, A. E. E., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 2610

  53. [53]

    S., Weintroub, J., Rogers, A

    Doeleman, S. S., Weintroub, J., Rogers, A. E. E., et al. 2008, Natur, 455, 78

  54. [54]

    1997, MNRAS, 284, 576 EHT Collaboration et al

    Eckart, A., & Genzel, R. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 576 EHT Collaboration et al. 2019a, ApJL, 875, L2 (Paper II ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019b, ApJL, 875, L3 (Paper III ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019c, ApJL, 875, L4 (Paper IV ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019d, ApJL, 875, L5 (Paper V ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019e, ApJL, 875, L6 (Paper VI )

  55. [55]

    1915, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin )

    Einstein, A. 1915, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin )

  56. [56]

    2004, A&A, 414, 895

    Falcke, H., Körding, E., & Markoff, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 895

  57. [57]

    Falcke, H., Mannheim, K., & Biermann, P. L. 1993, A&A, 278, L1

  58. [58]

    2019, AdSpR, in press (arXiv:1903.09539)

    Fish, V., Shea, M., & Akiyama, K. 2019, AdSpR, in press (arXiv:1903.09539)

  59. [59]

    L., Johnson, M

    Fish, V. L., Johnson, M. D., Doeleman, S. S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 90

  60. [60]

    C., Harms, R

    Ford, H. C., Harms, R. J., Tsvetanov, Z. I., et al. 1994, ApJL, 435, L27

  61. [61]

    F., McKinney, J

    Gammie, C. F., McKinney, J. C., & Tóth, G. 2003, ApJ, 589, 444

  62. [62]

    2011, ApJ, 729, 119

    Gebhardt, K., Adams, J., Richstone, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 119

  63. [63]

    2009, ApJ, 700, 1690

    Gebhardt, K., & Thomas, J. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1690

  64. [64]

    M., Klein, B

    Ghez, A. M., Klein, B. L., Morris, M., & Becklin, E. E. 1998, ApJ, 509, 678

  65. [65]

    Giddings, S. B. 2017, NatAs, 1, 0067

  66. [66]

    2019, PASP, in press

    Goddi, C., Marti-Vidal, I., Messias, H., et al. 2019, PASP, in press

  67. [67]

    2019, ApJS Gravity Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al

    Gold, R., Broderick, A., Younsi, Z., et al. 2019, ApJS Gravity Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2018a, A&A, 615, L15 Gravity Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2018b, A&A, 618, L10

  68. [68]

    Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Information Handling in Astronomy —Historical

  69. [69]

    2014, PhRvD, 89, 124004

    Grenzebach, A., Perlick, V., & Lämmerzahl, C. 2014, PhRvD, 89, 124004

  70. [70]

    E., et al

    Greve, A., Torres, M., Wink, J. E., et al. 1995, A&A, 299, L33

  71. [71]

    2011, Natur, 477, 185

    Hada, K., Doi, A., Kino, M., et al. 2011, Natur, 477, 185

  72. [72]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 70

    Hada, K., Kino, M., Doi, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 70

  73. [73]

    2016, ApJ, 817, 131

    Hada, K., Kino, M., Doi, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 131

  74. [74]

    J., Ford, H

    Harms, R. J., Ford, H. C., Tsvetanov, Z. I., et al. 1994, ApJL, 435, L35

  75. [75]

    Hawking, S. W. 1976, PhRvD, 14, 2460

  76. [76]

    1917, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen —Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse (Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung )

    Hilbert, D. 1917, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen —Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse (Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung )

  77. [77]

    Ho, L. C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 672 Högbom, J. A. 1974, A&AS, 15, 417

  78. [78]

    2014, PASJ, 66, 95

    Honma, M., Akiyama, K., Uemura, M., & Ikeda, S. 2014, PASJ, 66, 95

  79. [79]

    1977, ApJ, 214, 840

    Ichimaru, S. 1977, ApJ, 214, 840

  80. [80]

    M., et al

    Janssen, M., Goddi, C., van Bemmel, I. M., et al. 2019, A&A, submitted (arXiv:1902.01749)

Showing first 80 references.