pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2010.14529 · v3 · submitted 2020-10-27 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 1 theorem link

Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration , the Virgo Collaboration: R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , S. Abraham , F. Acernese , K. Ackley , A. Adams , C. Adams
show 1338 more authors
R. X. Adhikari V. B. Adya C. Affeldt M. Agathos K. Agatsuma N. Aggarwal O. D. Aguiar L. Aiello A. Ain P. Ajith G. Allen A. Allocca P. A. Altin A. Amato S. Anand A. Ananyeva S. B. Anderson W. G. Anderson S. V. Angelova S. Ansoldi J. M. Antelis S. Antier S. Appert K. Arai M. C. Araya J. S. Areeda M. Ar\`ene N. Arnaud S. M. Aronson K. G. Arun Y. Asali S. Ascenzi G. Ashton S. M. Aston P. Astone F. Aubin P. Aufmuth K. AultONeal C. Austin V. Avendano S. Babak F. Badaracco M. K. M. Bader S. Bae A. M. Baer S. Bagnasco J. Baird M. Ball G. Ballardin S. W. Ballmer A. Bals A. Balsamo G. Baltus S. Banagiri D. Bankar R. S. Bankar J. C. Barayoga C. Barbieri B. C. Barish D. Barker P. Barneo S. Barnum F. Barone B. Barr L. Barsotti M. Barsuglia D. Barta J. Bartlett I. Bartos R. Bassiri A. Basti M. Bawaj J. C. Bayley M. Bazzan B. R. Becher B. B\'ecsy V. M. Bedakihale M. Bejger I. Belahcene D. Beniwal M. G. Benjamin R. Benkel T. F. Bennett J. D. Bentley F. Bergamin B. K. Berger G. Bergmann S. Bernuzzi C. P. L. Berry D. Bersanetti A. Bertolini J. Betzwieser R. Bhandare A. V. Bhandari D. Bhattacharjee J. Bidler I. A. Bilenko G. Billingsley R. Birney O. Birnholtz S. Biscans M. Bischi S. Biscoveanu A. Bisht M. Bitossi M.-A. Bizouard J. K. Blackburn J. Blackman C. D. Blair D. G. Blair R. M. Blair O. Blanch F. Bobba N. Bode M. Boer Y. Boetzel G. Bogaert M. Boldrini F. Bondu E. Bonilla R. Bonnand P. Booker B. A. Boom S. Borhanian R. Bork V. Boschi N. Bose S. Bose V. Bossilkov V. Boudart Y. Bouffanais A. Bozzi C. Bradaschia P. R. Brady A. Bramley M. Branchesi J. E. Brau M. Breschi T. Briant J. H. Briggs F. Brighenti A. Brillet M. Brinkmann P. Brockill A. F. Brooks J. Brooks D. D. Brown S. Brunett G. Bruno R. Bruntz A. Buikema T. Bulik H. J. Bulten A. Buonanno D. Buskulic R. L. Byer M. Cabero L. Cadonati M. Caesar G. Cagnoli C. Cahillane J. Calder\'on Bustillo J. D. Callaghan T. A. Callister E. Calloni J. B. Camp M. Canepa K. C. Cannon H. Cao J. Cao G. Carapella F. Carbognani M. F. Carney M. Carpinelli G. Carullo T. L. Carver J. Casanueva Diaz C. Casentini S. Caudill M. Cavagli\`a F. Cavalier R. Cavalieri G. Cella P. Cerd\'a-Dur\'an E. Cesarini W. Chaibi K. Chakravarti C.-L. Chan C. Chan K. Chandra P. Chanial S. Chao P. Charlton E. A. Chase E. Chassande-Mottin D. Chatterjee M. Chaturvedi K. Chatziioannou A. Chen H. Y. Chen X. Chen Y. Chen H.-P. Cheng C. K. Cheong H. Y. Chia F. Chiadini R. Chierici A. Chincarini A. Chiummo G. Cho H. S. Cho M. Cho S. Choate N. Christensen Q. Chu S. Chua K. W. Chung S. Chung G. Ciani P. Ciecielag M. Cie\'slar M. Cifaldi A. A. Ciobanu R. Ciolfi F. Cipriano A. Cirone F. Clara E. N. Clark J. A. Clark L. Clarke P. Clearwater S. Clesse F. Cleva E. Coccia P.-F. Cohadon D. E. Cohen M. Colleoni C. G. Collette C. Collins M. Colpi M. Constancio Jr. L. Conti S. J. Cooper P. Corban T. R. Corbitt I. Cordero-Carri\'on S. Corezzi K. R. Corley N. Cornish D. Corre A. Corsi S. Cortese C. A. Costa R. Cotesta M. W. Coughlin S. B. Coughlin J.-P. Coulon S. T. Countryman P. Couvares P. B. Covas D. M. Coward M. J. Cowart D. C. Coyne R. Coyne J. D. E. Creighton T. D. Creighton M. Croquette S. G. Crowder J.R. Cudell T. J. Cullen A. Cumming R. Cummings L. Cunningham E. Cuoco M. Curylo T. Dal Canton G. D\'alya A. Dana L. M. DaneshgaranBajastani B. D'Angelo S. L. Danilishin S. D'Antonio K. Danzmann C. Darsow-Fromm A. Dasgupta L. E. H. Datrier V. Dattilo I. Dave M. Davier G. S. Davies D. Davis E. J. Daw R. Dean D. DeBra M. Deenadayalan J. Degallaix M. De Laurentis S. Del\'eglise V. Del Favero F. De Lillo N. De Lillo W. Del Pozzo L. M. DeMarchi F. De Matteis V. D'Emilio N. Demos T. Denker T. Dent A. Depasse R. De Pietri R. De Rosa C. De Rossi R. DeSalvo O. de Varona A. Dhani S. Dhurandhar M. C. D\'iaz M. Diaz-Ortiz Jr. N. A. Didio T. Dietrich L. Di Fiore C. DiFronzo C. Di Giorgio F. Di Giovanni M. Di Giovanni T. Di Girolamo A. Di Lieto B. Ding S. Di Pace I. Di Palma F. Di Renzo A. K. Divakarla A. Dmitriev Z. Doctor L. D'Onofrio F. Donovan K. L. Dooley S. Doravari I. Dorrington T. P. Downes M. Drago J. C. Driggers Z. Du J.-G. Ducoin R. Dudi P. Dupej O. Durante D. D'Urso P.-A. Duverne S. E. Dwyer P. J. Easter G. Eddolls B. Edelman T. B. Edo O. Edy A. Effler J. Eichholz S. S. Eikenberry M. Eisenmann R. A. Eisenstein A. Ejlli L. Errico R. C. Essick H. Estell\'es D. Estevez Z. B. Etienne T. Etzel M. Evans T. M. Evans B. E. Ewing V. Fafone H. Fair S. Fairhurst X. Fan A. M. Farah S. Farinon B. Farr W. M. Farr E. J. Fauchon-Jones M. Favata M. Fays M. Fazio J. Feicht M. M. Fejer F. Feng E. Fenyvesi D. L. Ferguson A. Fernandez-Galiana I. Ferrante T. A. Ferreira F. Fidecaro P. Figura I. Fiori D. Fiorucci M. Fishbach R. P. Fisher J. M. Fishner R. Fittipaldi M. Fitz-Axen V. Fiumara R. Flaminio E. Floden E. Flynn H. Fong J. A. Font P. W. F. Forsyth J.-D. Fournier S. Frasca F. Frasconi Z. Frei A. Freise R. Frey V. Frey P. Fritschel V. V. Frolov G. G. Fronz\'e P. Fulda M. Fyffe H. A. Gabbard B. U. Gadre S. M. Gaebel J. R. Gair J. Gais S. Galaudage R. Gamba D. Ganapathy A. Ganguly S. G. Gaonkar B. Garaventa C. Garc\'ia-Quir\'os F. Garufi B. Gateley S. Gaudio V. Gayathri G. Gemme A. Gennai D. George J. George R. N. George L. Gergely S. Ghonge Abhirup Ghosh Archisman Ghosh S. Ghosh B. Giacomazzo L. Giacoppo J. A. Giaime K. D. Giardina D. R. Gibson C. Gier K. Gill P. Giri J. Glanzer A. E. Gleckl P. Godwin E. Goetz R. Goetz N. Gohlke B. Goncharov G. Gonz\'alez A. Gopakumar S. E. Gossan M. Gosselin R. Gouaty B. Grace A. Grado M. Granata V. Granata A. Grant S. Gras P. Grassia C. Gray R. Gray G. Greco A. C. Green R. Green E. M. Gretarsson H. L. Griggs G. Grignani A. Grimaldi E. Grimes S. J. Grimm H. Grote S. Grunewald P. Gruning J. G. Guerrero G. M. Guidi A. R. Guimaraes G. Guix\'e H. K. Gulati Y. Guo Anchal Gupta Anuradha Gupta P. Gupta E. K. Gustafson R. Gustafson F. Guzman L. Haegel O. Halim E. D. Hall E. Z. Hamilton G. Hammond M. Haney M. M. Hanke J. Hanks C. Hanna M. D. Hannam O. A. Hannuksela O. Hannuksela H. Hansen T. J. Hansen J. Hanson T. Harder T. Hardwick K. Haris J. Harms G. M. Harry I. W. Harry D. Hartwig R. K. Hasskew C.-J. Haster K. Haughian F. J. Hayes J. Healy A. Heidmann M. C. Heintze J. Heinze J. Heinzel H. Heitmann F. Hellman P. Hello A. F. Helmling-Cornell G. Hemming M. Hendry I. S. Heng E. Hennes J. Hennig M. H. Hennig F. Hernandez Vivanco M. Heurs S. Hild P. Hill A. S. Hines S. Hochheim E. Hofgard D. Hofman J. N. Hohmann A. M. Holgado N. A. Holland I. J. Hollows Z. J. Holmes K. Holt D. E. Holz P. Hopkins C. Horst J. Hough E. J. Howell C. G. Hoy D. Hoyland Y. Huang M. T. H\"ubner A. D. Huddart E. A. Huerta B. Hughey V. Hui S. Husa S. H. Huttner B. M. Hutzler R. Huxford T. Huynh-Dinh B. Idzkowski A. Iess S. Imperato H. Inchauspe C. Ingram G. Intini M. Isi B. R. Iyer V. JaberianHamedan T. Jacqmin S. J. Jadhav S. P. Jadhav A. L. James K. Jani K. Janssens N. N. Janthalur P. Jaranowski D. Jariwala R. Jaume A. C. Jenkins M. Jeunon J. Jiang G. R. Johns N. K. Johnson-McDaniel A. W. Jones D. I. Jones J. D. Jones P. Jones R. Jones R. J. G. Jonker L. Ju J. Junker C. V. Kalaghatgi V. Kalogera B. Kamai S. Kandhasamy G. Kang J. B. Kanner S. J. Kapadia D. P. Kapasi C. Karathanasis S. Karki R. Kashyap M. Kasprzack W. Kastaun S. Katsanevas E. Katsavounidis W. Katzman K. Kawabe F. K\'ef\'elian D. Keitel J. S. Key S. Khadka F. Y. Khalili I. Khan S. Khan E. A. Khazanov N. Khetan M. Khursheed N. Kijbunchoo C. Kim G. J. Kim J. C. Kim K. Kim W. S. Kim Y.-M. Kim C. Kimball P. J. King M. Kinley-Hanlon R. Kirchhoff J. S. Kissel L. Kleybolte S. Klimenko T. D. Knowles E. Knyazev P. Koch S. M. Koehlenbeck G. Koekoek S. Koley M. Kolstein K. Komori V. Kondrashov A. Kontos N. Koper M. Korobko W. Z. Korth M. Kovalam D. B. Kozak C. Kr\"amer V. Kringel N. V. Krishnendu A. Kr\'olak G. Kuehn A. Kumar P. Kumar Rahul Kumar Rakesh Kumar K. Kuns S. Kwang B. D. Lackey D. Laghi E. Lalande T. L. Lam A. Lamberts M. Landry B. B. Lane R. N. Lang J. Lange B. Lantz R. K. Lanza I. La Rosa A. Lartaux-Vollard P. D. Lasky M. Laxen A. Lazzarini C. Lazzaro P. Leaci S. Leavey Y. K. Lecoeuche H. M. Lee H. W. Lee J. Lee K. Lee J. Lehmann E. Leon N. Leroy N. Letendre Y. Levin A. Li J. Li K. J. L. Li T. G. F. Li X. Li F. Linde S. D. Linker J. N. Linley T. B. Littenberg J. Liu X. Liu M. Llorens-Monteagudo R. K. L. Lo A. Lockwood L. T. London A. Longo M. Lorenzini V. Loriette M. Lormand G. Losurdo J. D. Lough C. O. Lousto G. Lovelace H. L\"uck D. Lumaca A. P. Lundgren Y. Ma R. Macas M. MacInnis D. M. Macleod I. A. O. MacMillan A. Macquet I. Maga\~na Hernandez F. Maga\~na-Sandoval C. Magazz\`u R. M. Magee E. Majorana I. Maksimovic S. Maliakal A. Malik N. Man V. Mandic V. Mangano G. L. Mansell M. Manske M. Mantovani M. Mapelli F. Marchesoni F. Marion S. M\'arka Z. M\'arka C. Markakis A. S. Markosyan A. Markowitz E. Maros A. Marquina S. Marsat F. Martelli I. W. Martin R. M. Martin M. Martinez V. Martinez D. V. Martynov H. Masalehdan K. Mason E. Massera A. Masserot T. J. Massinger M. Masso-Reid S. Mastrogiovanni A. Matas M. Mateu-Lucena F. Matichard M. Matiushechkina N. Mavalvala E. Maynard J. J. McCann R. McCarthy D. E. McClelland S. McCormick L. McCuller S. C. McGuire C. McIsaac J. McIver D. J. McManus T. McRae S. T. McWilliams D. Meacher G. D. Meadors M. Mehmet A. K. Mehta A. Melatos D. A. Melchor G. Mendell A. Menendez-Vazquez R. A. Mercer L. Mereni K. Merfeld E. L. Merilh J. D. Merritt M. Merzougui S. Meshkov C. Messenger C. Messick R. Metzdorff P. M. Meyers F. Meylahn A. Mhaske A. Miani H. Miao I. Michaloliakos C. Michel H. Middleton L. Milano A. L. Miller M. Millhouse J. C. Mills E. Milotti M. C. Milovich-Goff O. Minazzoli Y. Minenkov Ll. M. Mir A. Mishkin C. Mishra T. Mistry S. Mitra V. P. Mitrofanov G. Mitselmakher R. Mittleman G. Mo K. Mogushi S. R. P. Mohapatra S. R. Mohite I. Molina M. Molina-Ruiz M. Mondin M. Montani C. J. Moore D. Moraru F. Morawski G. Moreno S. Morisaki B. Mours C. M. Mow-Lowry S. Mozzon F. Muciaccia Arunava Mukherjee D. Mukherjee Soma Mukherjee Subroto Mukherjee N. Mukund A. Mullavey J. Munch E. A. Mu\~niz P. G. Murray S. L. Nadji A. Nagar I. Nardecchia L. Naticchioni R. K. Nayak B. F. Neil J. Neilson G. Nelemans T. J. N. Nelson M. Nery A. Neunzert K. Y. Ng S. Ng C. Nguyen P. Nguyen T. Nguyen S. A. Nichols S. Nissanke F. Nocera M. Noh C. North D. Nothard L. K. Nuttall J. Oberling B. D. O'Brien J. O'Dell G. Oganesyan G. H. Ogin J. J. Oh S. H. Oh F. Ohme H. Ohta M. A. Okada C. Olivetto P. Oppermann R. J. Oram B. O'Reilly R. G. Ormiston N. Ormsby L. F. Ortega R. O'Shaughnessy S. Ossokine C. Osthelder D. J. Ottaway H. Overmier B. J. Owen A. E. Pace G. Pagano M. A. Page G. Pagliaroli A. Pai S. A. Pai J. R. Palamos O. Palashov C. Palomba H. Pan P. K. Panda T. H. Pang C. Pankow F. Pannarale B. C. Pant F. Paoletti A. Paoli A. Paolone W. Parker D. Pascucci A. Pasqualetti R. Passaquieti D. Passuello M. Patel B. Patricelli E. Payne T. C. Pechsiri M. Pedraza M. Pegoraro A. Pele S. Penn A. Perego C. J. Perez C. P\'erigois A. Perreca S. Perri\`es J. Petermann D. Petterson H. P. Pfeiffer K. A. Pham K. S. Phukon O. J. Piccinni M. Pichot M. Piendibene F. Piergiovanni L. Pierini V. Pierro G. Pillant F. Pilo L. Pinard I. M. Pinto K. Piotrzkowski M. Pirello M. Pitkin E. Placidi W. Plastino C. Pluchar R. Poggiani E. Polini D. Y. T. Pong S. Ponrathnam P. Popolizio E. K. Porter A. Poverman J. Powell M. Pracchia A. K. Prajapati K. Prasai R. Prasanna G. Pratten T. Prestegard M. Principe G. A. Prodi L. Prokhorov P. Prosposito A. Puecher M. Punturo F. Puosi P. Puppo M. P\"urrer H. Qi V. Quetschke P. J. Quinonez R. Quitzow-James F. J. Raab G. Raaijmakers H. Radkins N. Radulesco P. Raffai H. Rafferty S. X. Rail S. Raja C. Rajan B. Rajbhandari M. Rakhmanov K. E. Ramirez T. D. Ramirez A. Ramos-Buades J. Rana K. Rao P. Rapagnani U. D. Rapol B. Ratto V. Raymond M. Razzano J. Read T. Regimbau L. Rei S. Reid D. H. Reitze P. Rettegno F. Ricci C. J. Richardson J. W. Richardson L. Richardson P. M. Ricker G. Riemenschneider K. Riles M. Rizzo N. A. Robertson F. Robinet A. Rocchi J. A. Rocha S. Rodriguez R. D. Rodriguez-Soto L. Rolland J. G. Rollins V. J. Roma M. Romanelli R. Romano C. L. Romel A. Romero I. M. Romero-Shaw J. H. Romie S. Ronchini C. A. Rose D. Rose K. Rose D. Rosi\'nska S. G. Rosofsky M. P. Ross S. Rowan S. J. Rowlinson Santosh Roy Soumen Roy P. Ruggi K. Ryan S. Sachdev T. Sadecki M. Sakellariadou O. S. Salafia L. Salconi M. Saleem A. Samajdar E. J. Sanchez J. H. Sanchez L. E. Sanchez N. Sanchis-Gual J. R. Sanders K. A. Santiago E. Santos T. R. Saravanan N. Sarin B. Sassolas B. S. Sathyaprakash O. Sauter R. L. Savage V. Savant D. Sawant S. Sayah D. Schaetzl P. Schale M. Scheel J. Scheuer A. Schindler-Tyka P. Schmidt R. Schnabel R. M. S. Schofield A. Sch\"onbeck E. Schreiber B. W. Schulte B. F. Schutz O. Schwarm E. Schwartz J. Scott S. M. Scott M. Seglar-Arroyo E. Seidel D. Sellers A. S. Sengupta N. Sennett D. Sentenac V. Sequino A. Sergeev Y. Setyawati T. Shaffer M. S. Shahriar S. Sharifi A. Sharma P. Sharma P. Shawhan H. Shen M. Shikauchi R. Shink D. H. Shoemaker D. M. Shoemaker K. Shukla S. ShyamSundar M. Sieniawska D. Sigg L. P. Singer D. Singh N. Singh A. Singha A. Singhal A. M. Sintes V. Sipala V. Skliris B. J. J. Slagmolen T. J. Slaven-Blair J. Smetana J. R. Smith R. J. E. Smith S. N. Somala E. J. Son S. Soni B. Sorazu V. Sordini F. Sorrentino N. Sorrentino R. Soulard T. Souradeep E. Sowell A. P. Spencer M. Spera A. K. Srivastava V. Srivastava K. Staats C. Stachie D. A. Steer J. Steinhoff M. Steinke J. Steinlechner S. Steinlechner D. Steinmeyer G. Stolle-McAllister D. J. Stops M. Stover K. A. Strain G. Stratta A. Strunk R. Sturani A. L. Stuver J. S\"udbeck S. Sudhagar V. Sudhir H. G. Suh T. Z. Summerscales H. Sun L. Sun S. Sunil A. Sur J. Suresh P. J. Sutton B. L. Swinkels M. J. Szczepa\'nczyk M. Tacca S. C. Tait C. Talbot A. J. Tanasijczuk D. B. Tanner D. Tao A. Tapia E. N. Tapia San Martin J. D. Tasson R. Taylor R. Tenorio L. Terkowski M. P. Thirugnanasambandam L. Thomas M. Thomas P. Thomas J. E. Thompson S. R. Thondapu K. A. Thorne E. Thrane Shubhanshu Tiwari Srishti Tiwari V. Tiwari K. Toland A. E. Tolley M. Tonelli Z. Tornasi A. Torres-Forn\'e C. I. Torrie I. Tosta e Melo D. T\"oyr\"a A. T. Tran A. Trapananti F. Travasso G. Traylor M. C. Tringali A. Tripathee A. Trovato R. J. Trudeau D. S. Tsai K. W. Tsang M. Tse R. Tso L. Tsukada D. Tsuna T. Tsutsui M. Turconi A. S. Ubhi R. P. Udall K. Ueno D. Ugolini C. S. Unnikrishnan A. L. Urban S. A. Usman A. C. Utina H. Vahlbruch G. Vajente A. Vajpeyi G. Valdes M. Valentini V. Valsan N. van Bakel M. van Beuzekom J. F. J. van den Brand C. Van Den Broeck D. C. Vander-Hyde L. van der Schaaf J. V. van Heijningen M. Vardaro A. F. Vargas V. Varma S. Vass M. Vas\'uth A. Vecchio G. Vedovato J. Veitch P. J. Veitch K. Venkateswara J. Venneberg G. Venugopalan D. Verkindt Y. Verma D. Veske F. Vetrano A. Vicer\'e A. D. Viets A. Vijaykumar V. Villa-Ortega J.-Y. Vinet S. Vitale T. Vo H. Vocca C. Vorvick S. P. Vyatchanin A. R. Wade L. E. Wade M. Wade R. M. Wald R. C. Walet M. Walker G. S. Wallace L. Wallace S. Walsh J. Z. Wang S. Wang W. H. Wang Y. F. Wang R. L. Ward J. Warner M. Was N. Y. Washington J. Watchi B. Weaver L. Wei M. Weinert A. J. Weinstein R. Weiss F. Wellmann L. Wen P. We{\ss}els J. W. Westhouse K. Wette J. T. Whelan D. D. White L. V. White B. F. Whiting C. Whittle D. M. Wilken D. Williams M. J. Williams A. R. Williamson J. L. Willis B. Willke D. J. Wilson M. H. Wimmer W. Winkler C. C. Wipf G. Woan J. Woehler J. K. Wofford I. C. F. Wong J. Wrangel J. L. Wright D. S. Wu D. M. Wysocki L. Xiao H. Yamamoto L. Yang Y. Yang Z. Yang M. J. Yap D. W. Yeeles A. Yoon Hang Yu Haocun Yu S. H. R. Yuen A. Zadro\.zny M. Zanolin T. Zelenova J.-P. Zendri M. Zevin J. Zhang L. Zhang R. Zhang T. Zhang C. Zhao G. Zhao M. Zhou Z. Zhou X. J. Zhu A. B. Zimmerman M. E. Zucker J. Zweizig
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 03:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavesgeneral relativity testsbinary black holesLIGO-Virgo catalogringdown analysisgraviton mass boundwaveform consistency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Binary black hole gravitational waves match general relativity predictions with no deviations detected.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the signals from binary black hole mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo up to October 2019 are consistent with the predictions of general relativity in the strong-field, dynamical regime. It performs multiple independent checks, including waveform residuals against noise, parametrized changes to post-Newtonian coefficients, dispersion relations, ringdown frequencies of the remnant, and polarization content. All tests return results compatible with general relativity, improving prior bounds on possible modifications by factors of roughly two. This matters because it confirms that the theory holds without adjustment in the most extreme gravitational environments yet probed by direct observation. Joint analysis across multiple events strengthens the overall consistency statement.

Core claim

The data from the second LIGO-Virgo transient catalog are consistent with general relativity, showing no evidence for new physics, black hole mimickers, or unaccounted systematics; specific results include tightened bounds on Lorentz-violating coefficients, a graviton mass limit of 3.09 times 10 to the -23 eV over c squared, and fractional deviations in ringdown frequencies consistent with zero for the fundamental and first overtone modes.

What carries the argument

Parametrized tests that vary post-Newtonian and phenomenological coefficients in the waveform model, combined with separate measurements of ringdown frequencies, damping times, and dispersion relations.

If this is right

  • The remnant black holes are consistent with Kerr solutions within the measured precision.
  • No post-merger echoes are detected, disfavoring certain alternative compact-object models.
  • Polarization content is consistent with tensor modes only.
  • Joint analysis of multiple events yields stronger constraints than single-event tests.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • More events will allow these bounds to tighten further or expose small deviations if they exist.
  • The results support continued use of general-relativity templates for parameter estimation in future catalogs.
  • The same consistency checks can be applied to neutron-star events or mixed binaries when sufficient data arrive.

Load-bearing premise

The signals come from binary black hole mergers whose waveforms are accurately captured by the general-relativity-based templates, so that any true deviation would register in the specific parameters being varied.

What would settle it

A statistically significant nonzero value for the fractional deviation in the 220 ringdown frequency or a measured graviton mass exceeding 3.09 times 10 to the -23 eV over c squared at 90 percent credibility.

read the original abstract

Gravitational waves enable tests of general relativity in the highly dynamical and strong-field regime. Using events detected by LIGO-Virgo up to 1 October 2019, we evaluate the consistency of the data with predictions from the theory. We first establish that residuals from the best-fit waveform are consistent with detector noise, and that the low- and high-frequency parts of the signals are in agreement. We then consider parametrized modifications to the waveform by varying post-Newtonian and phenomenological coefficients, improving past constraints by factors of ${\sim}2$; we also find consistency with Kerr black holes when we specifically target signatures of the spin-induced quadrupole moment. Looking for gravitational-wave dispersion, we tighten constraints on Lorentz-violating coefficients by a factor of ${\sim}2.6$ and bound the mass of the graviton to $m_g \leq 3.09 \times 10^{-23} \mathrm{eV}/c^2$ with 90% credibility. We also analyze the properties of the merger remnants by measuring ringdown frequencies and damping times, constraining fractional deviations away from the Kerr frequency to $\delta \hat{f}_{220} = 0.03^{+0.38}_{-0.35}$ for the fundamental quadrupolar mode, and $\delta \hat{f}_{221} = 0.02^{+0.29}_{-0.33}$ for the first overtone; additionally, we find no evidence for postmerger echoes. Finally, we determine that our data are consistent with tensorial polarizations through a template-independent method. When possible, we assess the validity of general relativity based on collections of events analyzed jointly. We find no evidence for new physics beyond general relativity, for black hole mimickers, or for any unaccounted systematics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports tests of general relativity using the binary black hole events in the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog (GWTC-2). It performs residual consistency checks against detector noise, compares low- and high-frequency signal components, fits parametrized post-Newtonian and phenomenological waveform deviations, searches for gravitational-wave dispersion, measures ringdown frequencies and damping times of merger remnants, and performs a template-independent polarization analysis. All tests are found to be consistent with general relativity, with improved constraints reported on deviation parameters, Lorentz-violating coefficients, and the graviton mass; joint analyses of multiple events are used where possible.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides a substantial strengthening of empirical tests of GR in the strong-field dynamical regime. The breadth of orthogonal tests (residuals, parametrized deviations, dispersion, ringdown, polarization) applied to the public O1/O2 catalog, together with the use of joint-event combinations, yields tighter bounds (e.g., factor of ~2 improvement on parametrized coefficients and ~2.6 on Lorentz-violating terms) while finding no evidence for deviations, black-hole mimickers, or unaccounted systematics. This constitutes a high-value reference result for the field.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the statement that constraints are improved by factors of ~2 could usefully reference the specific prior works being compared (e.g., the O1-only analyses) for immediate clarity.
  2. Section on ringdown analysis: the reported credible intervals on δf̂220 and δf̂221 are given without explicit mention of the number of events contributing to the joint posterior; adding this would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The report accurately summarizes our tests of general relativity with the GWTC-2 events and correctly notes the improvements in constraints on deviation parameters, Lorentz-violating coefficients, and the graviton mass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical GR consistency tests

full rationale

The paper performs direct empirical comparisons of LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave signals to GR waveform models by fitting parametrized deviation coefficients to the data and checking residuals against detector noise. All tests (PN modifications, dispersion relations, ringdown frequencies, polarization checks) are falsifiable against external observations without any self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central consistency claim to its own inputs. The analysis is self-contained and relies on standard statistical methods applied to catalog events.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard GR waveform models (IMRPhenom, SEOBNR families) and the assumption that any beyond-GR effects appear in the chosen parametrizations; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • parametrized deviation coefficients (e.g., delta phi_i, delta alpha_i)
    Coefficients varied to test modifications to the waveform phase and amplitude.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption General relativity accurately describes the waveform generation and propagation for the events analyzed
    Used to generate the null hypothesis templates against which data are compared.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 13336 in / 1058 out tokens · 48084 ms · 2026-05-15T03:43:56.376061+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. Black-Hole Scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet: Numerical Relativity Meets Analytics

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of black hole scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity agree closely with effective-one-body analytic predictions.

  3. Properties of natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr quasinormal modes are Pollaczek-Jacobi polynomials with complex parameters, with recurrence peaking at the physical overtone index for Schwarzschild.

  4. Forecasting graviton-mass constraints from the full covariance of PTA-astrometry ORF estimators

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A full-covariance formalism for PTA-astrometry ORF estimators forecasts graviton-mass upper limits of 4.41e-24 eV/c2 for current-like setups and 0.48e-24 eV/c2 for SKA/Theia-like future setups, with astrometry adding ...

  5. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  6. Quadratic gravity corrections to scalar QNMs of rapidly rotating black holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Leading-order deviations from general relativity in scalar quasinormal modes of rotating black holes are computed numerically up to dimensionless spins of 0.99 in quadratic-curvature scalar-tensor theories.

  7. Testing General Relativity with Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework is developed to test beyond-GR effects in nanohertz continuous waves from individual SMBHBs, deriving modified inter-pulsar correlations, antenna responses, and phase delays for three deviation classes, va...

  8. Scalar emission from binary neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories with kinetic screening

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kinetic screening non-monotonically suppresses or enhances scalar quadrupolar emission from equal-mass neutron star binaries depending on screening radius versus wavelength, with a dipole re-emerging linearly with mas...

  9. All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A closed formula computes static post-Newtonian corrections at arbitrary odd orders in gravity, yielding the explicit seventh post-Newtonian potential that matches an independent diagrammatic method.

  10. Robust parameter inference for Taiji via time-frequency contrastive learning and normalizing flows

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A glitch-robust amortized inference framework combining normalizing flows, time-frequency multimodal fusion, and contrastive learning outperforms MCMC for Taiji massive black hole binary parameter estimation under noi...

  11. Relativistic signatures of scalar dark matter in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Relativistic metric backreaction from scalar dark matter clouds in EMRIs produces dominant polar gravitational wave corrections for Mμ ≲ 0.12, exceeding axial and scalar radiation channels at small separations.

  12. GW231123: False Massive Graviton Signatures from Unmodeled Point-Mass Lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unmodeled point-mass lensing produces a spurious nonzero graviton mass posterior in GW231123 that vanishes when lensing is included in the analysis.

  13. Particle motions and gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole spacetimes of loop quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The LQG parameter ξ enlarges equatorial bound orbit energy ranges, confines off-equatorial trajectories, and produces larger deviations from Kerr waveforms in EMRI models for two rotating LQG black holes, though signa...

  14. Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.

  15. Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

  16. GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.

  17. Total transmission modes in draining bathtub model with vorticity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Numerical spectra of total transmission modes in the draining bathtub model with vorticity can have positive or negative imaginary parts depending on parameters, with higher overtones exhibiting pronounced spectral mobility.

  18. Improved Constraints on Non-Kerr Deviations from Binary Black Hole Inspirals Using GWTC-4 Data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bayesian constraints from GWTC-4 binary black hole inspirals show Johannsen metric deformation parameters α13 and ε3 consistent with zero, supporting the Kerr hypothesis.

  19. Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    gr-qc 2021-12 accept novelty 3.0

    No evidence for physics beyond general relativity is found in the analysis of 15 GW events from GWTC-3, with consistency in residuals, PN parameters, and remnant properties.

  20. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

289 extracted references · 289 canonical work pages · cited by 20 Pith papers · 167 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    uncertainty in the true p-value for any specific event, due to the finite number of noise instantiations used to compute the background SNR90

  2. [2]

    These two types of ignorance translate into uncertainty in the abscissa and ordinate values in Fig

    uncertainty in the fraction of events yielding a p-value below any given benchmark, due to the finite number of events observed. These two types of ignorance translate into uncertainty in the abscissa and ordinate values in Fig. 2, respectively. We com- pute the corresponding credible band as explained below. The true (unknown) p-value for a given event i...

  3. [3]

    IV B may be strongly biased for heavy BBHs

    Redshifted total mass From the study of simulated signals, it is known that the IMR consistency test of Sec. IV B may be strongly biased for heavy BBHs. This is because sources with high redshifted mass lead to short signals in the detectors and do not contain sufficient information about the inspiral regime. For this reason, most of the results discussed...

  4. [4]

    Although SEOBNRv4 ROM is a non-precessing waveform approximant, we find that the posteriors are in broad agreement with no qualitative differences between the results (Fig

    Waveform modeling In order to gauge systematic errors arising from imperfect waveform modeling, we perform the IMR consistency test using both IMRPhenomPv2 and SEOBNRv4 ROM. Although SEOBNRv4 ROM is a non-precessing waveform approximant, we find that the posteriors are in broad agreement with no qualitative differences between the results (Fig. 18). Assum...

  5. [5]

    C. M. Will, Living Rev. Relativity17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    Testing Relativistic Gravity with Radio Pulsars

    N. Wex, Testing relativistic gravity with radio pulsars, inFron- tiers in Relativistic Celestial Mechanics Volume 2: Applications and Experiments, edited by S. M. Kopeikin (De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2014) pp. 39 – 102, arXiv:1402.5594 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Phys. Rep. 513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

  8. [8]

    P. G. Ferreira, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.57, 335 (2019), arXiv:1902.10503 [astro-ph.CO]

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 129902(E) (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. X8, 039903(E) (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D94, 084002 (2016), arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 221101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 129901(E) (2018)], arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]

  13. [13]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´arregui, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251304 (2017), arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO]

  14. [14]

    Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories

    J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251303 (2017), arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [16]

    Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251301 (2017), arXiv:1710.06394 [astro-ph.CO]

  17. [17]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141101 (2017), arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collabora- tion), Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro- ph.HE]

  22. [22]

    Blanchet and B

    L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1067 (1995)

  23. [23]

    Blanchet and B

    L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Classical Quantum Grav- ity11, 2807 (1994)

  24. [24]

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D74, 024006 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0604067

  25. [25]

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Classical Quantum Gravity23, L37 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604018

  26. [26]

    Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009), arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D82, 064010 (2010), arXiv:1005.0304 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, 28 ϕ□2 □0.02 □0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 δ ˆpi ϕ0 ϕ1 ϕ2 ϕ3 □0.4 □0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 ϕ4 ϕ5l ϕ6 □3 □2 □1 0 1 2 3 ϕ6l ϕ7 □6 □4 □2 0 2 4 6 β2 β3 □1.5 □1.0 □0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 α2 α3 α4 □10 □5 0 5 10 GW190412 GW190814 □1 PN 0 PN 0.5 PN 1 PN 1.5 PN 2 PN 2.5 PN (l) 3 PN 3 PN (l) 3.5 PN FIG. 19. Posteriors for parame...

  29. [29]

    T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Sturani, and A. Vecchio,Gravitational waves. Numerical relativity - data analysis. Proceedings, 9th Edoardo Amaldi Conference, Amaldi 9, and meeting, NRDA 2011, Cardiff, UK, July 10-15, 2011, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.363, 012028 (2012), arXiv:1111.5274 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]
  32. [32]

    Islam, A

    T. Islam, A. K. Mehta, A. Ghosh, V . Varma, P. Ajith, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D101, 024032 (2020), arXiv:1910.14259 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    C. D. Capano and A. H. Nitz, Phys. Rev. D102, 124070 (2020), arXiv:2008.02248 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Numerical binary black hole mergers in dynamical Chern-Simons: I. Scalar field

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, M. A. Scheel, and D. A. Hemberger, Phys. Rev. D96, 044020 (2017), arXiv:1705.07924 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    E. W. Hirschmann, L. Lehner, S. L. Liebling, and C. Palenzuela, Phys. Rev. D97, 064032 (2018), arXiv:1706.09875 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Black holes and binary mergers in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: scalar field dynamics

    H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064035 (2019), arXiv:1810.05177 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D101, 104016 (2020), arXiv:1911.02588 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Okounkova, Phys

    M. Okounkova, Phys. Rev. D102, 084046 (2020), arXiv:2001.03571 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    T. P. Sotiriou and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D75, 084007 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612065

  40. [40]

    K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D85, 064022 (2012), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D93, 029902(E) (2016)], arXiv:1110.5950 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity: Equations of motion to 2.5 post-Newtonian order

    S. Mirshekari and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D87, 084070 (2013), arXiv:1301.4680 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    R. N. Lang, Phys. Rev. D89, 084014 (2014), arXiv:1310.3320 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    R. N. Lang, Phys. Rev. D91, 084027 (2015), arXiv:1411.3073 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Gravitational waveforms in scalar-tensor gravity at 2PN relative order

    N. Sennett, S. Marsat, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D94, 084003 (2016), arXiv:1607.01420 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    Modeling dynamical scalarization with a resummed post-Newtonian expansion

    N. Sennett and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D93, 124004 (2016), arXiv:1603.03300 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    On the motion of hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories

    F.-L. Juli ´e, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.01, 026, arXiv:1711.10769 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Hairy binary black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory and their effective-one-body description

    M. Khalil, N. Sennett, J. Steinhoff, J. Vines, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D98, 104010 (2018), arXiv:1809.03109 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories

    F.-L. Juli ´e, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.10, 033, arXiv:1809.05041 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Bernard, Phys

    L. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D98, 044004 (2018), arXiv:1802.10201 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]
  51. [51]

    Juli´e and E

    F.-L. Juli´e and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D100, 104061 (2019), arXiv:1909.05258 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    Sennett, R

    N. Sennett, R. Brito, A. Buonanno, V . Gorbenko, and L. Sen- atore, Phys. Rev. D102, 044056 (2020), arXiv:1912.09917 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    R. Nair, S. Perkins, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 191101 (2019), arXiv:1905.00870 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    On combining information from multiple gravitational wave sources

    A. Zimmerman, C.-J. Haster, and K. Chatziioannou, Phys. Rev. D99, 124044 (2019), arXiv:1903.11008 [astro-ph.IM]

  55. [55]

    M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 121101 (2019), arXiv:1904.08011 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity34, 104002 (2017), arXiv:1611.07531 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Data release for Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-2, LIGO- P2000438 (2020)

  58. [58]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Open data from the first and second observing runs of Ad- vanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo (2019), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc]

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Open data from the first and second observing runs of Ad- vanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo (2019), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, Grav- itational Wave Open Science Center, https://www.gw- openscience.org (2018)

  60. [60]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quan- tum Gravity32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    The Advanced LIGO Photon Calibrators

    S. Karkiet al., Rev. Sci. Instrum.87, 114503 (2016), arXiv:1608.05055 [astro-ph.IM]

  63. [63]

    Calibration Uncertainty for Advanced LIGO's First and Second Observing Runs

    C. Cahillaneet al., Phys. Rev. D96, 102001 (2017), arXiv:1708.03023 [astro-ph.IM]

  64. [64]

    Reconstructing the calibrated strain signal in the Advanced LIGO detectors

    A. Vietset al., Classical Quantum Gravity35, 095015 (2018), arXiv:1710.09973 [astro-ph.IM]

  65. [65]

    Sunet al., Classical Quantum Gravity37, 225008 (2020), 29 arXiv:2005.02531 [astro-ph.IM]

    L. Sunet al., Classical Quantum Gravity37, 225008 (2020), 29 arXiv:2005.02531 [astro-ph.IM]

  66. [66]

    J. C. Driggerset al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration Instru- ment Science Authors), Phys. Rev. D99, 042001 (2019), arXiv:1806.00532 [astro-ph.IM]

  67. [67]

    Improving the Sensitivity of Advanced LIGO Using Noise Subtraction

    D. Davis, T. J. Massinger, A. P. Lundgren, J. C. Driggers, A. L. Urban, and L. K. Nuttall, Classical Quantum Gravity36, 055011 (2019), arXiv:1809.05348 [astro-ph.IM]

  68. [68]

    Vajente, Y

    G. Vajente, Y . Huang, M. Isi, J. C. Driggers, J. S. Kissel, M. J. Szczepanczyk, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D101, 042003 (2020), arXiv:1911.09083 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    N. J. Cornish and T. B. Littenberg, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 135012 (2015), arXiv:1410.3835 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

  71. [71]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett.892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro- ph.HE]

  72. [72]

    A. H. Nitzet al., PyCBC software, https://github.com/ ligo-cbc/pycbc(2018)

  73. [73]
  74. [74]

    S. A. Usmanet al., Classical Quantum Gravity33, 215004 (2016), arXiv:1508.02357 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]
  76. [76]

    Analysis Framework for the Prompt Discovery of Compact Binary Mergers in Gravitational-wave Data

    C. Messicket al., Phys. Rev. D95, 042001 (2017), arXiv:1604.04324 [astro-ph.IM]

  77. [77]

    B. S. Sathyaprakash and S. V . Dhurandhar, Phys. Rev. D44, 3819 (1991)

  78. [78]

    Gravitational-Radiation Damping of Compact Binary Systems to Second Post-Newtonian order

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wise- man, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3515 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9501027

  79. [79]

    Dimensional regularization of the third post-Newtonian gravitational wave generation from two point masses

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Far `ese, and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. D71, 124004 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0503044

  80. [80]

    Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors

    A. Buonanno, B. R. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y . Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D80, 084043 (2009), arXiv:0907.0700 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.