arxiv: 2604.09046 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Relative Magnification Factor of Point Sources on Accretion Disks

Qing-Hua Zhu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

keywords relative magnification factoraccretion diskcorotating sourcesgravitational lensingcaustic structuretime-delayed imagesaccretion kinematicsblack hole

0 comments

The pith

Corotating point sources on black hole accretion disks distort the distribution of their relative magnification factor, encoding flow kinematics via time-delayed images.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper defines a relative magnification factor to describe point sources on accretion disks near black holes. It shows that while static sources follow familiar gravitational lensing behavior, corotating sources cause clear distortions in the magnification maps on both the image and source planes. These changes mean that the caustic networks are altered by the source motion. Including the time delays between different light paths lets the magnification pattern reveal details about the accretion disk's movement. Such patterns could help future observations distinguish how spacetime and disk dynamics interact.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the relative magnification factor for point sources on the accretion disk exhibits significant distortions when the sources corotate with the disk, unlike the static case. This modulation of the caustic structure by source motion allows the magnification pattern, when combined with time-delayed images, to carry signatures of the accretion flow's kinematics, providing a potential new way to investigate the connection between the black hole's geometry and the properties of the surrounding disk.

What carries the argument

The relative magnification factor, introduced to quantify the lensing effect on point sources distributed across the accretion disk surface, which captures motion-induced changes in image brightness distributions.

Load-bearing premise

That the point sources stay fixed on the disk surface during corotation and that time-delayed images from various paths can be observed separately and combined to reveal the kinematic signals without being dominated by other variability.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of computed magnification maps for static versus corotating point sources on a model accretion disk, checking whether the predicted distortions in caustic structure and the encoding of motion signatures appear as described.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09046 by Qing-Hua Zhu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Top-left panel: the source, denoted as brown region, distribution on the thin accretion disk presented on the projected source plane. Bottom-left panel: corresponding images of the source, denoted as blue region, distribution on the thin accretion disk presented on image plane. Here, we set the center of the source region located at rs = 14M, accretion disk at the inclination angle θo = 4π/9 and observers’… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Relative magnification factor of point sources statically distributed on the accretion disk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Top-left panel: the source (brown region) is distributed on the accretion disk in the projected source plane, denoted by x (i) s (real source), and x (i) s,∗ (time delayed source). Bottom-left panel: Corresponding image of the source (blue region) distributed on the accretion disk. Right panel: illustration of the relationship between the x (i) s and the x (i) s,∗ on the source plane. Points A and B corres… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Relative magnification factor of corotating point sources distributed on the accretion disk on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: A comparison of the projection coefficients, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

With the Event Horizon Telescope and future Very Long Baseline Interferometry arrays poised to image supermassive black holes, there is an urgent need to understand dynamic aspects of small-scale structure near the supermassive black hole. In this study, we introduce the relative magnification factor to characterize point sources distributed on the surface of the accretion disk near a black hole. We investigate the influence of source motion on this factor, comparing static sources with those corotating with the disk. In contrast to the static case, which can be well-understood in the standard framework of gravitational lensing, corotating sources exhibit significant distortions in the distribution of the magnification factor on both the image and source planes, indicating that the caustic structure is substantially modulated by source motion. This magnification factor pattern encodes signatures of the kinematics of accretion flow when the time-delayed images are incorporated. This potentially offers a novel probe for investigating the interplay between spacetime geometry and properties of accretion flow.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces a relative magnification factor for point sources on accretion disks and argues corotation distorts it enough to encode flow kinematics via time-delayed images, but supplies no equations, methods, or checks against turbulence.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work defines a relative magnification factor for point sources on black hole accretion disks and reports that corotating sources produce clear distortions in the magnification patterns on both image and source planes, with those patterns potentially carrying kinematic information once time-delayed images are folded in. The static case is said to fit ordinary lensing, while motion modulates the caustics in a new way. That is the central claim and the only real novelty on offer. The abstract does a reasonable job flagging why this might matter for EHT and future VLBI work on near-horizon flow. It correctly notes that dynamic effects near supermassive black holes are under-studied and that a new diagnostic tied to source motion could be useful. Beyond that, the paper does little else well because almost nothing else is shown. The soft spots are large and central. No equations, no derivation of the relative factor, no ray-tracing setup, no error analysis, and no figures appear in the text. The claim that the distortions survive superposition with disk turbulence, emission variability, or other noise sources is stated without any quantitative test or budget. The stress-test concern lands directly: without an estimate of how big the motion-induced signal is compared with realistic contaminants, it is impossible to know whether the kinematic signatures remain extractable. The assumption that point sources stay on the disk surface and that multiple light paths can be cleanly combined is left unexamined. This paper is aimed at theorists and observers working on strong-field lensing and accretion-disk dynamics who are already thinking about new VLBI observables. A reader hunting for fresh ideas might skim it for the concept, but anyone needing reproducible methods or validated predictions will get nothing usable. The work is too preliminary for a serious referee in its current form. I would recommend asking the authors for the full calculations, simulations, and noise analysis before considering peer review; once those exist the topic is important enough that a referee should see it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a 'relative magnification factor' to characterize point sources distributed on the surface of an accretion disk near a black hole. It compares the factor for static sources (which follow standard gravitational lensing) against corotating sources, claiming that the latter produce significant distortions in the magnification distribution on both image and source planes. These distortions indicate that source motion substantially modulates the caustic structure, and the resulting pattern is said to encode kinematic signatures of the accretion flow once time-delayed images are incorporated, offering a potential new probe of spacetime-accretion interplay for EHT and VLBI observations.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated with quantitative validation, the work could provide a useful extension of gravitational lensing to dynamic sources, potentially allowing extraction of accretion-flow kinematics from future high-resolution images. The focus on motion-induced caustic modulation is timely given ongoing EHT developments. However, the significance is limited by the lack of demonstrated robustness against realistic astrophysical noise, and the novelty of the relative magnification factor requires clearer differentiation from existing lensing quantities.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and concluding discussion] The claim that time-delayed images allow the magnification pattern to encode clean kinematic signatures (Abstract) is load-bearing for the paper's main conclusion, yet no quantitative error budget, noise model, or comparison of motion-induced changes versus turbulent/variability contributions is supplied. This leaves open whether the signatures remain extractable under realistic accretion conditions.
[Definition and methodology sections] The definition and construction of the relative magnification factor (introduced to characterize point sources on the disk) is not shown to reduce to the standard magnification μ = 1/|det A| in the static limit, nor is its precise mathematical relation to conventional lensing quantities provided. Without this, it is unclear whether the reported distortions are new or artifacts of the chosen normalization.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figures illustrating the magnification distributions for static versus corotating cases would benefit from explicit parameter values, axis labels, and direct overlays to highlight the claimed distortions.
[Introduction] The manuscript should include a brief comparison to prior literature on dynamic gravitational lensing or ray-tracing in accretion disks to clarify the incremental contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and concluding discussion] The claim that time-delayed images allow the magnification pattern to encode clean kinematic signatures (Abstract) is load-bearing for the paper's main conclusion, yet no quantitative error budget, noise model, or comparison of motion-induced changes versus turbulent/variability contributions is supplied. This leaves open whether the signatures remain extractable under realistic accretion conditions.

Authors: We agree that the absence of a quantitative error budget, noise model, or direct comparison to turbulent variability leaves the extractability under realistic conditions unproven. The manuscript is a theoretical exploration of the relative magnification factor for point sources and demonstrates the modulation of caustics by corotating motion, with the encoding of kinematics via time delays presented as a potential rather than a fully validated observational tool. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the concluding discussion that explicitly acknowledges this limitation, notes that realistic accretion turbulence and observational noise could degrade the signatures, and identifies a full error analysis as an important direction for future work. We have also softened the abstract wording from 'encodes signatures' to 'may encode signatures' to better reflect the current scope. revision: partial
Referee: [Definition and methodology sections] The definition and construction of the relative magnification factor (introduced to characterize point sources on the disk) is not shown to reduce to the standard magnification μ = 1/|det A| in the static limit, nor is its precise mathematical relation to conventional lensing quantities provided. Without this, it is unclear whether the reported distortions are new or artifacts of the chosen normalization.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. In the original manuscript the static limit was stated to recover standard lensing but without an explicit derivation. We have now added a short subsection in the methodology section that defines the relative magnification factor mathematically and demonstrates that, when the source four-velocity is set to zero, it reduces identically to the standard magnification μ = 1/|det A|. We further derive its relation to the conventional magnification matrix, showing that the extra terms for corotating sources arise solely from the inclusion of finite light-travel time and the resulting differential time delays. This establishes that the reported distortions are physical effects of source motion rather than normalization artifacts. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

A complete quantitative error budget and noise model that compares motion-induced caustic modulation against realistic turbulent variability and instrumental noise; such an assessment requires new, extensive numerical simulations that lie outside the scope of the present theoretical study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new factor introduced and compared without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper introduces the relative magnification factor as a characterization tool for point sources on accretion disks and compares its distribution for static versus corotating sources. The abstract and available text present this as an extension of standard gravitational lensing applied to dynamic cases, with claims about caustic modulation and kinematic encoding arising from the analysis rather than from redefining inputs or fitting parameters that are then relabeled as predictions. No equations, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing way that collapses the result to its own premises by construction. The derivation chain remains independent of the target claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review; ledger is inferred from stated claims. The work assumes standard gravitational lensing in black hole spacetimes but introduces a new diagnostic without specifying its exact definition or computational details.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard gravitational lensing applies to static point sources on accretion disks in black hole spacetimes
Invoked when contrasting the static case with the corotating case.

invented entities (1)

relative magnification factor no independent evidence
purpose: To characterize the brightness boost of point sources on the accretion disk surface
Newly introduced quantity whose distribution is studied for static versus corotating sources.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1444 out tokens · 72344 ms · 2026-05-10T17:22:43.316956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[2]

First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[3]

Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*

R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Astron. Astrophys.618, L10 (2018), arXiv:1810.12641 [astro-ph.GA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[4]

Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Astron

R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Astron. Astrophys.677, L10 (2023), arXiv:2307.11821 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

M. J. Valtonenet al., Astrophys. J.992, 110 (2025), arXiv:2510.06744 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Kimet al., Astrophys

J.-Y. Kimet al., Astrophys. J.952, 34 (2023), arXiv:2304.09816 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2023
[7]

M. D. Johnsonet al., Galaxies11, 61 (2023), arXiv:2304.11188 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

M. D. Johnsonet al., Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.13092, 130922D (2024), arXiv:2406.12917 [astro- ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2024
[9]

Kumar and S

R. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh, Astrophys. J.892, 78 (2020), arXiv:1811.01260 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[10]

Shaikh and P

R. Shaikh and P. S. Joshi, JCAP10, 064 (2019), arXiv:1909.10322 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[11]

No-hair theorem in the wake of event horizon telescope,

M. Khodadi, A. Allahyari, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, JCAP09, 026 (2020), arXiv:2005.05992 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[12]

Psaltis et al

D. Psaltiset al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 141104 (2020), arXiv:2010.01055 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[13]

Wielgus, Physical Review D104, 124058 (2021), arXiv:2109.10840 [gr-qc]

M. Wielgus, Phys. Rev. D104, 124058 (2021), arXiv:2109.10840 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

Kocherlakotaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Phys

P. Kocherlakotaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Phys. Rev. D103, 104047 (2021), arXiv:2105.09343 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

Vagnozzi et al.,Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A,Class

S. Vagnozziet al., Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022), arXiv:2311.09484 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Narayan, M.D

R. Narayan, M. D. Johnson, and C. F. Gammie, Astrophys. J. Lett.885, L33 (2019), arXiv:1910.02957 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[18]

Two-temperature, Magnetically Arrested Disc simulations of the jet from the supermassive black hole in M87

A. Chael, R. Narayan, and M. D. Johnson, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 2873 (2019), arXiv:1810.01983 [astro-ph.HE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[19]

S. M. Ressler, C. J. White, E. Quataert, and J. M. Stone, Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L6 (2020), arXiv:2006.00005 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection,

B. Ripperda, M. Liska, K. Chatterjee, G. Musoke, A. A. Philippov, S. B. Markoff, A. Tchekhovskoy, and Z. Younsi, Astrophys. J. Lett.924, L32 (2022), arXiv:2109.15115 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon,

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L13 (2021), arXiv:2105.01173 [astro-ph.HE]. 15

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Narayan, A

R. Narayan, A. Chael, K. Chatterjee, A. Ricarte, and B. Curd, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.511, 3795 (2022), arXiv:2108.12380 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L16 (2022), arXiv:2311.09478 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

Photon Ring Autocorrelations,

S. Hadar, M. D. Johnson, A. Lupsasca, and G. N. Wong, Phys. Rev. D103, 104038 (2021), arXiv:2010.03683 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L15 (2022), arXiv:2311.08697 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Millimeter Light Curves of Sagittarius A* Observed during the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope Campaign,

M. Wielguset al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L19 (2022), arXiv:2207.06829 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Georgievet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys

B. Georgievet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L20 (2022)

2022
[28]

N. S. Conroy, M. Baub¨ ock, V. Dhruv, D. Lee, A. E. Broderick, C.-k. Chan, B. Georgiev, A. V. Joshi, B. Prather, and C. F. Gammie, Astrophys. J.951, 46 (2023), arXiv:2304.03826 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Explanation for the Absence of Secondary Peaks in Black Hole Light Curve Autocorrelations,

A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, C. Gammie, and A. Lupsasca, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 131402 (2024), arXiv:2406.04176 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Zhu, Phys

Q.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D112, 064021 (2025), arXiv:2503.22343 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Autocorrelation signatures in time-resolved black hole flare images: Secondary peaks and convergence structure,

Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, M. Guo, Y. Mizuno, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D112, 083024 (2025), arXiv:2503.17200 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 509 (2021), arXiv:1908.04527 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[33]

Zhu, Phys

Q.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D109, 064031 (2024), arXiv:2301.00913 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Dynamical Lensing Tomography of Black Hole Ringdowns,

Z. Zhong, V. Cardoso, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211402 (2025), arXiv:2408.10303 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Davelaar and Z

J. Davelaar and Z. Haiman, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 191101 (2022), arXiv:2112.05829 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

Davelaar and Z

J. Davelaar and Z. Haiman, Phys. Rev. D105, 103010 (2022), arXiv:2112.05828 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

H. Wang, M. Zumalac´ arregui, and B. Kocsis, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 061403 (2026), arXiv:2506.16544 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

The origin of hotspots around Sgr A*: Orbital or pattern motion?,

T. Matsumoto, C.-H. Chan, and T. Piran, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 2385 (2020), arXiv:2004.13029 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[39]

Parameter study for hot spot trajectories around SgrA*,

E. Antonopoulou and A. Nathanail, Astron. Astrophys.690, A240 (2024), arXiv:2405.10115 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

A. I. Yfantis, M. A. Mo´ scibrodzka, M. Wielgus, J. T. Vos, and A. Jimenez-Rosales, Astron. Astrophys. 685, A142 (2024), arXiv:2310.07762 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

A. I. Yfantis, M. Wielgus, and M. A. Mo´ scibrodzka, Astron. Astrophys.691, A327 (2024), arXiv:2408.07120 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Non-linear x-ray variability in x-ray binaries and active galaxies,

M. Baub¨ ocket al.(GRAVITY), Astron. Astrophys.635, A143 (2020), arXiv:2002.08374 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[43]

Investigating non-Keplerian motion in flare events with astrometric data,

F. Xie, Q.-H. Zhu, and X. Li, Phys. Rev. D112, 104056 (2025), arXiv:2507.07411 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Bao, Astron

G. Bao, Astron. Astrophys.257, 594 (1992)

1992
[45]

G. Bao, P. Hadrava, and E. Ostgaard, Astrophys. J.425, 63 (1994). 16

1994
[46]

A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.367, 905 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0509237

work page arXiv 2006
[47]

A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.363, 353 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0506433

work page arXiv 2005
[48]

Z. Li, L. Kong, and C. Bambi, Astrophys. J.787, 152 (2014), arXiv:1401.1282 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[49]

Magnetic Reconnection and Hot Spot Formation in Black Hole Accretion Disks,

B. Ripperda, F. Bacchini, and A. Philippov, Astrophys. J.900, 100 (2020), arXiv:2003.04330 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[50]

J. L. Rosa, P. Garcia, F. H. Vincent, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D106, 044031 (2022), arXiv:2205.11541 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[51]

Genzel, F

R. Genzel, F. Eisenhauer, and S. Gillessen, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.32, 3 (2024), arXiv:2404.03522 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

Schneider, J

P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco,Gravitational Lenses, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer, 1992)

1992
[53]

Perlick, Living Rev

V. Perlick, Living Rev. Rel.7, 9 (2004)

2004
[54]

P. Saha, D. Sluse, J. Wagner, and L. L. R. Williams, Space Sci. Rev.220, 12 (2024), arXiv:2401.04165 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit

V. Bozza, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0208075

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[56]

S. U. Islam, R. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, JCAP09, 030 (2020), arXiv:2004.01038 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Furtado, J

C. Furtado, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, P. J. Porf´ ırio, and A. R. Soares, Phys. Rev. D103, 044047 (2021), arXiv:2010.11452 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

Atamurotov, A

F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and W.-B. Han, Phys. Rev. D104, 084015 (2021)

2021
[59]

M. S. Ali and S. Kauhsal, Phys. Rev. D105, 024062 (2022), arXiv:2106.08464 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

Fu and X

Q.-M. Fu and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D105, 064020 (2022), arXiv:2111.07223 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

Constraining a modified gravity theory in strong gravitational lensing and black hole shadow observations,

X.-M. Kuang, Z.-Y. Tang, B. Wang, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D106, 064012 (2022), arXiv:2206.05878 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

Kumar, S

J. Kumar, S. U. Islam, and S. G. Ghosh, Astrophys. J.938, 104 (2022), arXiv:2209.04240 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

E. L. B. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, and H. A. Vieira, Phys. Rev. D109, 024004 (2024), arXiv:2309.02658 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

C.-H. Xie, Y. Zhang, Q. Sun, Q.-Q. Li, and P.-F. Duan, JCAP05, 121 (2024), arXiv:2401.05454 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[65]

Lan, Y.-F

Y.-L. Lan, Y.-F. Qu, J. Hu, and H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D111, 084079 (2025), arXiv:2502.11813 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Strong gravitational lensing effects of black holes with quantum hair,

S. Cheong and W. Kim, Phys. Rev. D112, 124041 (2025), arXiv:2508.07565 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

S. X. Tian and Z.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D100, 064011 (2019), arXiv:1908.11794 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[68]

E. F. Boero and O. M. Moreschi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, 1879 (2024), arXiv:2603.12402 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[69]

T. C. Frost, Phys. Rev. D112, 084003 (2025), arXiv:2507.00274 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[70]

Perlick, Phys

V. Perlick, Phys. Rev. D69, 064017 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0307072

work page arXiv 2004
[71]

Gravitational Lensing by Black Holes

V. Bozza, Gen. Rel. Grav.42, 2269 (2010), arXiv:0911.2187 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[72]

De Villiers and J

J.-P. De Villiers and J. F. Hawley, Astrophys. J.589, 458 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210518. 17

work page arXiv 2003
[73]

C. F. Gammie, J. C. McKinney, and G. Toth, Astrophys. J.589, 444 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301509

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[74]

Zhu, Phys

Q.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D111, 044010 (2025), arXiv:2411.04001 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025