pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25254 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

The properties and predictions of quasi-periodic oscillations around a black hole in nonlocal gravity

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords nonlocal gravityblack holesquasi-periodic oscillationsepicyclic frequenciesresonance conditioneffective potentialISCO radiusradiative efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlocal gravity reduces energies of circular orbits around black holes and increases their QPO frequencies, limiting the parameter α to at most 0.452M.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores the dynamics of test particles around a black hole in nonlocal gravity and the resulting high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations. It finds that the nonlocal parameter α strengthens the effective potential, reducing the energy and angular momentum of circular orbits and shrinking the ISCO while raising radiative efficiency to 8.9%. The radial epicyclic frequency increases with α while the orbital and vertical frequencies decrease, leading to higher predicted QPO frequencies under resonance. With the 2:3 resonance, the upper frequency spans 673/M to 4360/M Hz, implying black hole masses below 43.6 solar masses for frequencies above 100 Hz and negligible time delays. Readers might care because these calculations offer specific, testable predictions for distinguishing nonlocal gravity using X-ray observations of black holes.

Core claim

In the spacetime of a static black hole in nonlocal gravity, the parameter α increases the effective potential for massive test particles. This leads to a systematic reduction in the energy and angular momentum of circular orbits, a monotonic decrease in the ISCO radius, and an increase in radiative efficiency up to approximately 8.9%. The Keplerian frequency and vertical epicyclic frequency are suppressed by α, while the radial epicyclic frequency is enhanced. Imposing the 2ν_U = 3ν_L resonance condition on twin-peak HF QPO models shows that the resonant radius decreases with α, the upper QPO frequency increases spanning ν_U ∼ (673/M − 4360/M) Hz, and the black hole mass must satisfy M ≲ 43

What carries the argument

The effective potential V_eff in the nonlocal black hole metric, which governs circular orbits and the epicyclic frequencies Ω_r, Ω_θ, Ω_φ used to compute QPO resonances under the 2:3 condition.

Load-bearing premise

The 2:3 resonance condition between upper and lower QPO frequencies remains valid for twin-peak models in this nonlocal spacetime, and the static black hole solution correctly describes the background for the orbital dynamics.

What would settle it

Observation of an upper QPO frequency above 4360 Hz divided by the black hole mass in solar units, or a black hole mass above 43.6 solar masses with ν_U above 100 Hz, would contradict the model's constraints under the resonance assumption.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25254 by Chen Long, Tao-Tao Sui, Ye Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The event horizon of the NLG black hole with differ view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: illustrates the influences of nonlocal parameter α on the effective potential Veff. The result shows that the overall height of Veff increase with α. Additionally, the peak of Veff shifts to smaller radial values as α increases. This behavior indicates that nonlocal parameters exert a significant influence on other kinematic properties of particle motion, which we will explore in the subsequent chapters. B… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The influence of the nonlocal parameter view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: As shown, the radiative efficiency ϵ increases monotonically with α, reaching a maximum value of ap￾proximately 8.9%. 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 10α/M ℒisco / M 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 9.10 9.15 9.20 9.25 9.30 9.35 9.40 10α/M 10 ℰisco FIG. 5: The variation of the angular momentum LISCO and total energy EISCO at the ISCO with respect to the nonlocal parameter α. … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The Keplerian frequency Ω view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the relationship between the upper and lower frequencies of twin-peak HF QPOs for the seven models, assuming a black hole mass of M = 20M⊙. From view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The Resonant radii view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The limit of black hole mass view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The intervals ∆ view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: The time delay ∆ view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the dynamics of massive test particles around a static black hole in nonlocal gravity and examine the corresponding properties of HF QPOs, constraining the nonlocal parameter to $\alpha/M \leq 0.452$. The nonlocal parameter $\alpha$ enhances the effective potential $V_{eff}$ and leads to a systematic reduction in the energy E and angular momentum L of circular orbits. Consequently, the ISCO radius, along with the associated energy and angular momentum, decreases monotonically with $\alpha$, while the radiative efficiency increases, reaching a maximum of approximately $8.9\%$. Due to the spherical symmetry of the spacetime, the Keplerian frequency $\Omega_{\phi}$ and the vertical epicyclic frequency $\Omega_{\theta}$ coincide and are suppressed by $\alpha$, whereas the radial epicyclic frequency $\Omega_{r}$ is enhanced. The impact of $\alpha$ on several twin-peak HF QPO models is examined, revealing that $\alpha$ increases both the lower and upper bounds of the predicted QPO frequency ranges. By imposing the $2\nu_U = 3\nu_L$ resonance condition, we analyze the resonant radius, upper QPO frequency, maximum allowed black hole mass, and the time delay between the shadow and QPO signals. We find that the resonant radius decreases with $\alpha$, while the upper QPO frequency increases, spanning the range $\nu_U \sim(673/M-4360/M)$Hz. When the TOV imit is imposed, the upper frequency is further constrained to $\nu_U \lesssim 1450$Hz. Combining astronomical observations for the classification of QPOs, where $\nu_U \geq 100$Hz, the black hole mass in the nonlocal gravity should satisfy $M \lesssim 43.6M_\odot$. Although the radial separation between the resonant radius and the photon sphere decreases with $\alpha$, the associated gravitational time delay increases, remaining below $\sim 1.3$ms and thus negligible for current observational capabilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates geodesic motion of massive test particles around a static black hole in nonlocal gravity, showing that the nonlocal parameter α enhances the effective potential, reduces the energy E and angular momentum L of circular orbits, decreases the ISCO radius, and increases radiative efficiency up to ~8.9%. Due to spherical symmetry, Ω_φ = Ω_θ are suppressed while Ω_r is enhanced by α. The work then examines twin-peak HF QPO models and imposes the 2ν_U = 3ν_L resonance to derive constraints α/M ≤ 0.452, upper QPO frequency ranges ν_U ∼ (673/M − 4360/M) Hz, and black-hole mass limits M ≲ 43.6 M_⊙ when combined with ν_U ≥ 100 Hz and TOV bounds; it also computes the time delay between shadow and QPO signals.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper supplies concrete, observationally testable constraints on nonlocal gravity from HF QPOs, including monotonic trends in orbital quantities and falsifiable frequency spans that could be confronted with X-ray timing data. The inclusion of gravitational time-delay estimates between photon-sphere and resonant-radius signals adds a multi-messenger element. However, the overall significance is limited by the absence of explicit derivations or error analysis for the reported numerical bounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on twin-peak HF QPO models] The section discussing the impact of α on several twin-peak HF QPO models: the 2ν_U = 3ν_L resonance condition is applied directly to the α-modified epicyclic frequencies Ω_r and Ω_φ (with resonant radius determined by the GR-standard ratio) without re-derivation or justification that the underlying parametric-resonance or disk-oscillation mechanism continues to select precisely this commensurability in the nonlocal metric. Because α raises Ω_r while lowering Ω_φ, this modeling choice is load-bearing for every subsequent bound (α/M ≤ 0.452, the ν_U range, and M ≲ 43.6 M_⊙).
  2. [Abstract and numerical-results sections] Abstract and the sections presenting numerical results for circular orbits and epicyclic frequencies: the manuscript states monotonic trends (e.g., ISCO radius and E, L decreasing with α; radiative efficiency reaching 8.9%) and specific bounds (α/M ≤ 0.452) but supplies neither analytic expressions for Ω_r(α), Ω_φ(α), nor error estimates, convergence checks, or tabulated data from the numerical integrations. This absence undermines reproducibility of the central constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and metric section] Clarify the precise definition and numerical implementation of the nonlocal parameter α (including its relation to the metric function) in the opening sections to aid readers unfamiliar with the specific nonlocal gravity model.
  2. [References] Add references to standard GR QPO resonance literature and prior works on epicyclic frequencies in modified gravity to contextualize the choice of the 2:3 model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The 2ν_U = 3ν_L resonance condition is applied directly to the α-modified epicyclic frequencies Ω_r and Ω_φ (with resonant radius determined by the GR-standard ratio) without re-derivation or justification that the underlying parametric-resonance or disk-oscillation mechanism continues to select precisely this commensurability in the nonlocal metric. Because α raises Ω_r while lowering Ω_φ, this modeling choice is load-bearing for every subsequent bound.

    Authors: We agree that the resonance model is phenomenological and that a full re-derivation of the disk-oscillation mechanism in the nonlocal spacetime would be ideal. In the literature on modified gravity, it is standard to compute the geodesic frequencies from the new metric and then impose the same commensurability ratios (e.g., 2:3) that are observationally motivated in GR; this allows direct comparison with data while testing the modified dynamics. The spherical symmetry ensures Ω_φ = Ω_θ, and the effective-potential derivation of Ω_r remains valid. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript explicitly stating this assumption, citing prior works that apply identical resonance models to non-GR metrics, and noting that a complete hydrodynamical treatment of the disk lies beyond the present scope. The bounds therefore remain conditional on the resonance hypothesis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The manuscript states monotonic trends (e.g., ISCO radius and E, L decreasing with α; radiative efficiency reaching 8.9%) and specific bounds (α/M ≤ 0.452) but supplies neither analytic expressions for Ω_r(α), Ω_φ(α), nor error estimates, convergence checks, or tabulated data from the numerical integrations. This absence undermines reproducibility.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for greater transparency in the numerical results. The metric function in nonlocal gravity precludes simple closed-form expressions for the epicyclic frequencies; we will therefore insert the explicit general-relativistic formulas for Ω_r and Ω_φ in terms of the metric components and their derivatives, evaluated at the circular-orbit radius. In addition, we will include a table of representative numerical values for E, L, ISCO radius, and frequencies at several α/M values, together with the integration tolerances (typically 10^{-8}) and root-finding convergence criteria used. We performed convergence tests by varying step sizes and initial guesses; the reported trends are stable to better than 0.1% and the bound α/M ≤ 0.452 is insensitive to these choices within the explored range. These additions will be placed in the revised numerical-results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation computes modified frequencies from the metric then applies external resonance assumption and observational bounds

full rationale

The paper starts from the static nonlocal metric (presumably taken as given from prior literature), derives the effective potential and epicyclic frequencies Ω_r, Ω_θ=Ω_φ directly from the geodesic Lagrangian, and obtains explicit α-dependent expressions for E, L, ISCO, and the frequencies. It then imposes the external 2ν_U=3ν_L commensurability condition to locate a resonant radius, evaluates ν_U(M,α) at that radius, and intersects the resulting range with independent observational cuts (ν_U≥100 Hz) and the TOV mass limit to produce the quoted bounds on α/M and M. None of these steps reduces the final constraints to the inputs by algebraic identity, by fitting a parameter and relabeling it a prediction, or by a self-citation chain that supplies the load-bearing premise; the resonance condition is an additional modeling assumption whose validity is not re-derived but is not required for the frequency expressions themselves to be well-defined.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents full enumeration; the nonlocal parameter α is treated as an input from the gravity model, and standard assumptions of test-particle motion in a static spherically symmetric spacetime are used without independent verification here.

free parameters (1)
  • α
    Nonlocal gravity parameter whose value is constrained rather than derived; appears as the central variable controlling all reported trends.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The background is the exact static black-hole solution of nonlocal gravity.
    Invoked for all orbital and frequency calculations.
  • domain assumption The 2ν_U = 3ν_L resonance condition applies to the twin-peak HF QPO models.
    Used to define the resonant radius and frequency relations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5669 in / 1496 out tokens · 61415 ms · 2026-05-07T15:21:21.065726+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Rela- tivity and Experiment , Living Rev. Rel. 17, (2014) 4, arXiv:1403.7377

  2. [2]

    Abuter et al., Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole , Astron

    GRA VITYcollaboration, R. Abuter et al., Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole , Astron. As- trophys. 636, (2020) L5, arXiv:2004.07187

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837

  4. [4]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Tests of general relativity with GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, (2016) 221101, arXiv:1602.03841

  5. [5]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, (2016) 241103, arXiv:1606.04855

  6. [6]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1 , Phys. Rev. D 100, (2019) 104036, arXiv:1903.04467

  7. [7]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA collaboration, A. G. Abac et al., GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, (2025) 111403, arXiv:2509.08054

  8. [8]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, (2019) L1, arXiv:1906.11238

  9. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, (2019) L4, arXiv:1906.11241

  10. [10]

    Akiyama et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way , Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, (2022) L12

  11. [11]

    Akiyama et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric , Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, (2022) L17

  12. [12]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- larities, Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- larities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, (1965) 57–59

  13. [13]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1, (1969) 252–276

  14. [14]

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The Singularities of grav- itational collapse and cosmology , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 314, (1970) 529–548

  15. [15]

    Rovelli, Quantum gravity

    C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity. Cambridge university press, 2004

  16. [16]

    Ashtekar and J

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Background indepen- dent quantum gravity: A Status report , Class. Quant. Grav. 21, (2004) R53, gr-qc/0404018

  17. [17]

    Masood, M

    S. Masood, M. Faizal, Z. Zaz, A. F. Ali, J. Raza and M. B. Shah, The most general form of deforma- tion of the Heisenberg algebra from the generalized un- certainty principle, Phys. Lett. B 763, (2016) 218–227, arXiv:1611.00001

  18. [18]

    Modesto and I

    L. Modesto and I. L. Shapiro, Superrenormalizable quan- tum gravity with complex ghosts , Phys. Lett. B 755, (2016) 279–284, arXiv:1512.07600

  19. [19]

    Modesto, Super-renormalizable or finite Lee–Wick quantum gravity , Nucl

    L. Modesto, Super-renormalizable or finite Lee–Wick quantum gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 909, (2016) 584–606, arXiv:1602.02421

  20. [20]

    Faizal, A

    M. Faizal, A. F. Ali and A. Nassar, Generalized uncertainty principle as a consequence of the effec- tive field theory , Phys. Lett. B 765, (2017) 238–243, arXiv:1701.00341

  21. [21]

    Elizalde and S

    E. Elizalde and S. D. Odintsov, A Renormaliza- tion group improved nonlocal gravitational effective La- grangian, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, (1995) 1821–1828, gr-qc/9508041. 9

  22. [22]

    Modesto, J

    L. Modesto, J. W. Moffat and P. Nicolini, Black holes in an ultraviolet complete quantum gravity , Phys. Lett. B 695, (2011) 397–400, arXiv:1010.0680

  23. [23]

    Chicone and B

    C. Chicone and B. Mashhoon, Linearized Gravitational Waves in Nonlocal General Relativity , Phys. Rev. D 87, (2013) 064015, arXiv:1210.3860

  24. [24]

    Joshi, U

    P. Joshi, U. Kumar and S. Panda,Hamiltonian formalism for nonlocal gravity models , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 19, (2022) 2250036, arXiv:1909.10295

  25. [25]

    J. W. Moffat, Ultraviolet Complete Quantum Gravity , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 126, (2011) 43, arXiv:1008.2482

  26. [26]

    Biswas, T

    T. Biswas, T. Koivisto and A. Mazumdar, Towards a res- olution of the cosmological singularity in non-local higher derivative theories of gravity , JCAP 11, (2010) 008, arXiv:1005.0590

  27. [27]

    Modesto,Super-renormalizable quantum gravity,Phys

    L. Modesto, Super-renormalizable Quantum Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 86, (2012) 044005, arXiv:1107.2403

  28. [28]

    Modesto and L

    L. Modesto and L. Rachwal, Super-renormalizable and finite gravitational theories , Nucl. Phys. B 889, (2014) 228–248, arXiv:1407.8036

  29. [29]

    Deser and R

    S. Deser and R. P. Woodard, Nonlocal Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, (2007) 111301, arXiv:0706.2151

  30. [30]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Modified non-local-F(R) gravity as the key for the inflation and dark energy , Phys. Lett. B 659, (2008) 821–826, arXiv:0708.0924

  31. [31]

    Jhingan, S

    S. Jhingan, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, M. Sami, I. Thongkool and S. Zerbini, Phantom and non-phantom dark energy: The Cosmological relevance of non-locally corrected gravity, Phys. Lett. B 663, (2008) 424–428, arXiv:0803.2613

  32. [32]

    Capozziello, E

    S. Capozziello, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Accelerating cosmologies from non-local higher- derivative gravity , Phys. Lett. B 671, (2009) 193–198, arXiv:0809.1535

  33. [33]

    Bahamonde, S

    S. Bahamonde, S. Capozziello and K. F. Dialektopou- los, Constraining Generalized Non-local Cosmology from Noether Symmetries , Eur. Phys. J. C 77, (2017) 722, arXiv:1708.06310

  34. [34]

    Deser and R

    S. Deser and R. P. Woodard, Nonlocal Cosmology II — Cosmic acceleration without fine tuning or dark energy , JCAP 06, (2019) 034, arXiv:1902.08075

  35. [35]

    Non-local gravity and dark energy

    M. Maggiore and M. Mancarella, Nonlocal gravity and dark energy , Phys. Rev. D 90, (2014) 023005, arXiv:1402.0448

  36. [36]

    Dirian, S

    Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, N. Khosravi, M. Kunz and M. Mag- giore, Cosmological perturbations and structure forma- tion in nonlocal infrared modifications of general relativ- ity, JCAP 06, (2014) 033, arXiv:1403.6068

  37. [37]

    Dirian, S

    Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, M. Kunz, M. Maggiore and V. Pet- torino, Non-local gravity and comparison with observa- tional datasets, JCAP 04, (2015) 044, arXiv:1411.7692

  38. [38]

    Dirian, S

    Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, M. Kunz, M. Maggiore and V. Pet- torino, Non-local gravity and comparison with obser- vational datasets. II. Updated results and Bayesian model comparison with ΛCDM, JCAP 05, (2016) 068, arXiv:1602.03558

  39. [39]

    Nicolini, Nonlocal and generalized uncertainty princi- ple black holes , arXiv:1202.2102

    P. Nicolini, Nonlocal and generalized uncertainty princi- ple black holes , arXiv:1202.2102

  40. [40]

    M. Isi, J. Mureika and P. Nicolini, Self-Completeness and the Generalized Uncertainty Principle, JHEP 11, (2013) 139, arXiv:1310.8153

  41. [41]

    V. P. Frolov, Mass-gap for black hole formation in higher derivative and ghost free gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, (2015) 051102, arXiv:1505.00492

  42. [42]

    Knipfer, S

    M. Knipfer, S. K¨ oppel, J. Mureika and P. Nicolini,Gen- eralized Uncertainty Principle and Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Self-Complete Gravity , JCAP 08, (2019) 008, arXiv:1905.03233

  43. [43]

    D’Agostino and V

    R. D’Agostino and V. De Falco, Black hole solutions in the revised Deser-Woodard nonlocal theory of gravity , JCAP 07, (2025) 046, arXiv:2502.15460

  44. [44]

    Fu, S.-W

    Q.-M. Fu, S.-W. Wei, L. Zhao, Y.-X. Liu and X. Zhang, Shadow and Weak Deflection Angle of a Black Hole in Nonlocal Gravity , Universe 8, (2022) 341, arXiv:2203.05157

  45. [45]

    Fujita and W

    R. Fujita and W. Hikida, Analytical solutions of bound timelike geodesic orbits in Kerr spacetime , Class. Quant. Grav. 26, (2009) 135002, arXiv:0906.1420

  46. [46]

    Pugliese, H

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo and R. Ruffini, Equatorial circular orbits of neutral test particles in the Kerr- Newman spacetime , Phys. Rev. D 88, (2013) 024042, arXiv:1303.6250

  47. [47]

    R. A. Hennigar, M. B. Jahani Poshteh and R. B. Mann, Shadows, Signals, and Stability in Einsteinian Cubic Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 97, (2018) 064041

  48. [48]

    Gao, T.-T

    X.-J. Gao, T.-T. Sui, X.-X. Zeng, Y.-S. An and Y.- P. Hu, Investigating shadow images and rings of the charged Horndeski black hole illuminated by various thin accretions , Eur. Phys. J. C 83, (2023) 1052, arXiv:2311.11780

  49. [49]

    Shaikh, P

    R. Shaikh, P. Banerjee, S. Paul and T. Sarkar, Strong gravitational lensing by wormholes , JCAP 07, (2019) 028, arXiv:1905.06932

  50. [50]

    Zhang, S.-W

    Y.-P. Zhang, S.-W. Wei, W.-D. Guo, T.-T. Sui and Y.-X. Liu, Innermost stable circular orbit of spinning particle in charged spinning black hole background , Phys. Rev. D 97, (2018) 084056, arXiv:1711.09361

  51. [51]

    Motion of test particle in rotating boson star,

    Y.-P. Zhang, Y.-B. Zeng, Y.-Q. Wang, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Motion of test particle in rotating boson star , Phys. Rev. D 105, (2022) 044021, arXiv:2107.04848

  52. [52]

    Yang, B.-M

    K. Yang, B.-M. Gu and Y.-P. Zhang, Motion of spin- ning particles around electrically charged black hole in Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, (2022) 293, arXiv:2111.00864

  53. [53]

    Q. Tan, W. Deng, S. Long and J. Jing,Motion of spinning particles around black hole in a dark matter halo , JCAP 05, (2025) 044, arXiv:2409.17760

  54. [54]

    A. B. Joshi, D. Dey, P. S. Joshi and P. Bambhaniya, Shadow of a Naked Singularity without Photon Sphere , Phys. Rev. D 102, (2020) 024022, arXiv:2004.06525

  55. [55]

    Yang, B.-M

    K. Yang, B.-M. Gu, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Born–Infeld black holes in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, (2020) 662, arXiv:2004.14468

  56. [56]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Rotat- ing black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy ex- traction, and scalar synchrotron radiation , Astrophys. J. 178, (1972) 347

  57. [57]

    Syunyaev, Variability of x rays from black holes with accretion disks , Astronomicheskii Zhurnal 49, (1972) 1153

    R. Syunyaev, Variability of x rays from black holes with accretion disks , Astronomicheskii Zhurnal 49, (1972) 1153

  58. [58]

    Stella, M

    L. Stella, M. Vietri and S. Morsink, Correlations in the qpo frequencies of low mass x-ray binaries and the rela- tivistic precession model, Astrophys. J. Lett. 524, (1999) L63–L66, astro-ph/9907346

  59. [59]

    Kluzniak and M

    W. Kluzniak and M. A. Abramowicz, The physics of khz qpos–strong gravity’s coupled anharmonic oscillators, astro-ph/0105057. 10

  60. [60]

    M. A. Abramowicz, T. Bulik, M. Bursa and W. Kluzniak, Evidence for a 2:3 resonance in Sco X-1 kHz QPOs , As- tron. Astrophys. 404, (2003) L21, astro-ph/0206490

  61. [61]

    M. A. Abramowicz, W. Kluzniak, J. E. McClintock and R. A. Remillard, The Importance of discovering a 3:2 twin - peak QPO in a ULX or how to solve the puzzle of intermediate mass black holes , Astrophys. J. Lett. 609, (2004) L63–L65, astro-ph/0402012

  62. [62]

    S. Chen, Z. Wang and J. Jing, Testing gravity of a dis- formal Kerr black hole in quadratic degenerate higher- order scalar-tensor theories by quasi-periodic oscillations, JCAP 06, (2021) 043, arXiv:2103.11788

  63. [63]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Yang and H. Wu, Testing Kerr black hole mimickers with quasi-periodic oscillations from GRO J1655-40 , Eur. Phys. J. C 81, (2021) 1043, arXiv:2107.10758

  64. [64]

    C. Liu, H. Siew, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, Y. Sun, Y. Zhao et al., Constraints on the rotating self-dual black hole with quasi-periodic oscillations , JCAP 11, (2023) 096, arXiv:2305.12323

  65. [65]

    S. Riaz, A. B. Abdikamalov and C. Bambi, Testing Regular Black Holes with X-ray data of GX˜339–4 , arXiv:2306.09673

  66. [66]

    Rayimbaev, K

    J. Rayimbaev, K. F. Dialektopoulos, F. Sarikulov and A. Abdujabbarov, Quasiperiodic oscillations around hairy black holes in Horndeski gravity , Eur. Phys. J. C 83, (2023) 572, arXiv:2307.03019

  67. [67]

    Abdulkhamidov, P

    F. Abdulkhamidov, P. Nedkova, J. Rayimbaev, J. Kunz and B. Ahmedov, Parameter constraints on traversable wormholes within beyond Horndeski theories through quasiperiodic oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 109, (2024) 104074, arXiv:2403.08356

  68. [68]

    Jumaniyozov, S

    S. Jumaniyozov, S. U. Khan, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdu- jabbarov, S. Urinbaev and S. Murodov, Circular motion and QPOs near black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, (2024) 964

  69. [69]

    Guo, M.-H

    M.-Y. Guo, M.-H. Wu, X.-M. Kuang and H. Guo, Pa- rameter constraints on a black hole with Minkowski core through quasiperiodic oscillations , Eur. Phys. J. C 85, (2025) 95, arXiv:2504.00360

  70. [70]

    Zhang, Y.-P

    H.-Y. Zhang, Y.-P. Hu and Y.-S. An, Curled orbit and epicyclic oscillation of charged particles around the weakly magnetized black hole in the presence of Lorentz violation , Eur. Phys. J. C 85, (2025) 725, arXiv:2503.02323

  71. [71]

    Sui and X.-Y

    T.-T. Sui and X.-Y. Wang, The characteristics of cir- cular motion and quasiperiodic oscillations around ac- celerating black hole , Eur. Phys. J. C 85, (2025) 1112, arXiv:2509.23187

  72. [72]

    Shahzadi, M

    M. Shahzadi, M. Koloˇ s, R. Saleem and Z. Stuchl´ ık, Testing alternative spacetimes by high-frequency quasi- periodic oscillations observed in microquasars and active galactic nuclei , Class. Quant. Grav. 41, (2024) 075014, arXiv:2309.09712

  73. [73]

    L. G. Collodel, D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Cir- cular Orbit Structure and Thin Accretion Disks around Kerr Black Holes with Scalar Hair , Astrophys. J. 910, (2021) 52, arXiv:2101.05073

  74. [74]

    Y. Wu, H. Feng and W.-Q. Chen, Thin accretion disk around black hole in Einstein–Maxwell-scalar theory , Eur. Phys. J. C 84, (2024) 1075, arXiv:2410.14113

  75. [75]

    Kurmanov, K

    Y. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, O. Lu- ongo, N. Saiyp, A. Urazalina et al., Accretion disks prop- erties around regular black hole solutions obtained from non-linear electrodynamics, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, (2024) 101566, arXiv:2404.15437

  76. [76]

    Liu, T.-Y

    A. Liu, T.-Y. He, M. Liu, Z.-W. Han and R.-J. Yang, Possible signatures of higher dimension in thin accretion disk around brane world black hole, JCAP 07, (2024) 062, arXiv:2404.14131

  77. [77]

    Stuchl´ ık and M

    Z. Stuchl´ ık and M. Koloˇ s,Models of quasi-periodic oscil- lations related to mass and spin of the gro j1655-40 black hole, Astronomy & Astrophysics 586, (Feb., 2016) A130

  78. [78]

    M. A. Abramowicz and W. Kluzniak, A Precise deter- mination of angular momentum in the black hole candi- date GRO J1655-40, Astron. Astrophys. 374, (2001) L19, astro-ph/0105077

  79. [79]

    Kato, Excitation of disk oscillations by warps: A Model of kHz QPOs , Publ

    S. Kato, Excitation of disk oscillations by warps: A Model of kHz QPOs , Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 56, (2004) 905, astro-ph/0409051

  80. [80]

    Kato, Frequency Correlation of QPOs Based on a Resonantly-Excited Disk-Oscillation Model , Publ

    S. Kato, Frequency Correlation of QPOs Based on a Resonantly-Excited Disk-Oscillation Model , Publ. As- tron. Soc. Jap. 60, (2008) 889, arXiv:0803.2384

Showing first 80 references.