pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.23687 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-24 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Review of strongly coupled regimes in gravity with Dyson-Schwinger approach

Marco Frasca , Anish Ghoshal
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-phhep-th
keywords Dyson-Schwinger equationsconformally flat metricscosmological phase transitionsnon-minimal couplingquadratic gravityde Sitter gravityYang-Mills mappingstrong coupling regimes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dyson-Schwinger equations mapped from Yang-Mills theory yield conformally flat metrics in gravity and a sequence of cosmological phase transitions hindered by non-minimal scalar coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the Dyson-Schwinger technique with exact background Green's function solutions to gravity theories including de Sitter, quadratic R squared, and non-minimally coupled scalars. It identifies conformally flat metric solutions as a direct outcome of the mapping theorem familiar from Yang-Mills studies. This setup permits a quantum treatment of the theories and produces a sequence of cosmological phase transitions that begin when conformal invariance breaks. The non-minimal coupling term can block or weaken these transitions. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach supplies a concrete route to strong-coupling regimes in gravity and possible early-universe dynamics without standard perturbative assumptions.

Core claim

We denote specific set of solutions for the metric to move towards a quantum analysis of the theory. This kind of solutions is identified as conformally flat metric. Such a conclusion naturally arises in the use of the Dyson-Schwinger equations in the study of the Yang-Mills theory through the mapping theorem. We show a sequence of cosmological phase transitions starting from the breaking of such conformal invariance that can be hindered by the presence of the non-minimal coupling.

What carries the argument

The mapping theorem from Yang-Mills theory that, when combined with the Dyson-Schwinger equations and an exact background Green's function, identifies conformally flat metric solutions in gravity models.

If this is right

  • Conformally flat metrics supply a consistent background for quantum analysis of de Sitter, quadratic, and scalar-tensor gravity.
  • Breaking of conformal invariance triggers a sequence of cosmological phase transitions.
  • Non-minimal coupling between scalar and curvature can suppress or eliminate these transitions.
  • The same mapping yields concrete metric solutions usable for further dynamical studies in each theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may allow strong-coupling tools developed for particle physics to address cosmological questions in gravity.
  • If the mapping holds, early-universe phase transitions could appear in a wider class of modified gravity models than previously expected.
  • Numerical solution of the Green's functions on these backgrounds would provide a direct test of the phase-transition sequence.
  • Similar mappings could be applied to black-hole or compact-object regimes to look for analogous transition phenomena.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping theorem from Yang-Mills theory directly identifies conformally flat metric solutions when the Dyson-Schwinger technique is applied to gravity with an exact background Green's function solution.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that the exact Green's function solutions for de Sitter or quadratic gravity do not produce conformally flat metrics, or cosmological data indicating that non-minimal coupling fails to hinder the predicted phase transitions.

read the original abstract

We analyze various gravity theories involving de-Sitter, quadratic $\mathcal{R}^2$ and non-minimally coupled scalar in the light of application of the Dyson-Schwinger technique involving exact background solution of the Green's function. We denote specific set of solutions for the metric to move towards a quantum analysis of the theory. This kind of solutions is identified as conformally flat metric. Such a conclusion naturally arises in the use of the Dyson-Schwinger equations in the study of the Yang-Mills theory through the mapping theorem. We show a sequence of cosmological phase transitions starting from the breaking of such conformal invariance that can be hindered by the presence of the non-minimal coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the application of the Dyson-Schwinger technique to gravity theories including de Sitter, quadratic R², and non-minimally coupled scalar fields. It identifies conformally flat metric solutions via a mapping theorem from Yang-Mills theory and discusses a sequence of cosmological phase transitions arising from the breaking of conformal invariance, which can be hindered by non-minimal coupling.

Significance. If the mapping theorem is shown to transfer rigorously and the phase transitions are derived explicitly, the work could bridge gauge-theory methods to quantum gravity and early-universe cosmology by supplying exact background Green's functions. The absence of these derivations in the current text, however, prevents the result from being load-bearing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that conformally flat metrics 'naturally arise' via the Dyson-Schwinger mapping theorem from Yang-Mills is asserted without deriving the Dyson-Schwinger equations for the de Sitter, R², or non-minimally coupled actions, nor demonstrating why the background Green's function remains exact once the metric deviates from conformal flatness.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The asserted 'sequence of cosmological phase transitions' and its hindrance by the non-minimal coupling term are presented as results, yet no explicit Dyson-Schwinger solution, order-parameter evolution, or equation showing the obstruction is supplied.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'We denote specific set of solutions' should read 'We denote a specific set of solutions'; 'This kind of solutions is identified' should read 'These kinds of solutions are identified'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that the abstract presents several claims without the supporting derivations and will revise the text to address this. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that conformally flat metrics 'naturally arise' via the Dyson-Schwinger mapping theorem from Yang-Mills is asserted without deriving the Dyson-Schwinger equations for the de Sitter, R², or non-minimally coupled actions, nor demonstrating why the background Green's function remains exact once the metric deviates from conformal flatness.

    Authors: We accept the observation. The current text relies on the mapping theorem without spelling out the explicit Dyson-Schwinger equations for the three gravity actions or the precise conditions under which the background Green's function stays exact. In the revised manuscript we will derive the Dyson-Schwinger equations for the de Sitter, R² and non-minimally coupled scalar cases, state the mapping theorem in detail, and clarify the domain of validity of the exact background solution, including the consequences of small deviations from conformal flatness. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The asserted 'sequence of cosmological phase transitions' and its hindrance by the non-minimal coupling term are presented as results, yet no explicit Dyson-Schwinger solution, order-parameter evolution, or equation showing the obstruction is supplied.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract states the existence of a sequence of phase transitions and the suppressing role of the non-minimal coupling without displaying the corresponding solutions. The revised version will include the explicit Dyson-Schwinger solutions, the evolution equation for the order parameter, and the explicit obstruction term generated by the non-minimal coupling, so that the claims become self-contained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Conformally flat metric solutions and exact Green's functions in gravity rest on direct transfer of Yang-Mills mapping theorem without independent DS derivation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "Such a conclusion naturally arises in the use of the Dyson-Schwinger equations in the study of the Yang-Mills theory through the mapping theorem. We show a sequence of cosmological phase transitions starting from the breaking of such conformal invariance that can be hindered by the presence of the non-minimal coupling."

    The conformally flat metric solutions with exact background Green's function are obtained solely by invoking the mapping theorem from Yang-Mills; the gravity results are thereby reduced to a relabeling of the established YM property rather than an independent derivation of the DS equations for the gravitational actions.

full rationale

The paper identifies conformally flat metrics and exact background Green's functions for de Sitter, R² and non-minimally coupled scalar gravity by invoking the Dyson-Schwinger mapping theorem originally developed for Yang-Mills. No explicit derivation of the gravitational DS equations is provided, nor is it shown why the Green's function remains exact once the metric deviates from conformal flatness or when non-minimal coupling is active. The claimed sequence of phase transitions and its hindrance by the non-minimal term therefore reduces to relabeling the prior YM construction rather than an independent solution of the gravitational system.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the direct transfer of the Yang-Mills mapping theorem to gravity without additional justification or independent evidence; no free parameters are introduced in the abstract, but the mapping itself functions as an unverified domain assumption.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The mapping theorem from Yang-Mills theory applies unchanged to gravity theories when using Dyson-Schwinger equations with an exact background Green's function
    Invoked to identify the metric solutions as conformally flat and to generate the phase-transition sequence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5408 in / 1306 out tokens · 64063 ms · 2026-05-15T00:17:54.712213+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.6, 061102 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Super- massive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  3. [3]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, no.1, L6 (2019) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 [arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 2019

  4. [4]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L12 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ac6674 [arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041- 2022

  5. [5]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Imaging of the Galactic Center Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Imaging of the Galactic Center Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L14 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6429 [arXiv:2311.09479 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6429 2022

  6. [6]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L17 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 [arXiv:2311.09484 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 2022

  7. [7]

    QUANTUM GRAVITY AT TWO LOOPS,

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, “QUANTUM GRAVITY AT TWO LOOPS,” Phys. Lett. B160, 81-86 (1985) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91470-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91470-4 1985

  8. [8]

    The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity,

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, “The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B266, 709-736 (1986) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90193-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90193-8 1986

  9. [9]

    Quadratic Gravity,

    A. Salvio, “Quadratic Gravity,” Front. in Phys.6, 77 (2018) doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00077 [arXiv:1804.09944 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00077 2018

  10. [10]

    Problems in Gauge Field Theories,

    S. Weinberg, “Problems in Gauge Field Theories,” PRINT-74-1313 (HARVARD)

  11. [11]

    The State of Quantum Gravity,

    S. Deser, “The State of Quantum Gravity,” Conf. Proc. C750926, 229-254 (1975)

    1975

  12. [12]

    Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D16, 953-969 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.953

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.953 1977

  13. [13]

    Renormalization of gauge theories in the background-field approach

    A. O. Barvinsky, D. Blas, M. Herrero-Valea, S. M. Sibiryakov and C. F. Steinwachs, “Renormalization of gauge theories in the background-field approach,” JHEP07, 035 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)035 [arXiv:1705.03480 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)035 2018

  14. [14]

    Euclidean quantum gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Euclidean quantum gravity,”

  15. [15]

    NONPERTURBATIVE QUANTUM GRAVITY,

    P. Menotti, “NONPERTURBATIVE QUANTUM GRAVITY,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.17, 29-38 (1990) doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90218-J

    work page doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90218-j 1990

  16. [16]

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Nucl. Phys. B9, 209-243 (1969) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(69)90098-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(69)90098-4 1969

  17. [17]

    New infra-red enhancements in 4-derivative gravity

    A. Salvio, A. Strumia and H. Veerm¨ ae, “New infra-red enhancements in 4-derivative gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.10, 842 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6311-1 [arXiv:1808.07883 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6311-1 2018

  18. [18]

    Unitarity, stability and loops of unstable ghosts,

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, “Unitarity, stability and loops of unstable ghosts,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.10, 105006 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.105006 [arXiv:1908.02416 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.105006 2019

  19. [19]

    Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity,

    B. Holdom, “Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.4, 046008 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.046008 [arXiv:2107.01727 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.046008 2022

  20. [20]

    On the quantum field theory of the gravitational interactions

    D. Anselmi, “On the quantum field theory of the gravitational interactions,” JHEP06, 086 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)086 [arXiv:1704.07728 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2017)086 2017

  21. [21]

    Effective action in quantum gravity,

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro, “Effective action in quantum gravity,” 1992 IOP and CRC Press

    1992

  22. [22]

    Schwinger-Dyson equations in 2-D induced gravity in covariant gauges,

    E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov and Y. I. Shilnov, “Schwinger-Dyson equations in 2-D induced gravity in covariant gauges,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A9(1994), 2681-2690. doi:10.1142/S0217732394002525

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732394002525 1994

  23. [23]

    Dyson-Schwinger equations and dynamical symmetry breaking in two-dimensional induced gravity,

    S. D. Odintsov and Y. I. Shilnov, “Dyson-Schwinger equations and dynamical symmetry breaking in two-dimensional induced gravity,” Phys. Atom. Nucl.60(1997), 675-680

    1997

  24. [24]

    Mass gap in strongly coupled infinite derivative non-local Higgs: Dyson–Schwinger approach,

    M. Frasca and A. Ghoshal, “Mass gap in strongly coupled infinite derivative non-local Higgs: Dyson–Schwinger approach,” Class. Quant. Grav.38, no.17, 17 (2021) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac161b [arXiv:2011.10586 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac161b 2021

  25. [25]

    Diluted mass gap in strongly coupled non-local Yang-Mills,

    M. Frasca and A. Ghoshal, “Diluted mass gap in strongly coupled non-local Yang-Mills,” JHEP21, 226 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)226 [arXiv:2102.10665 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)226 2020

  26. [26]

    Confinement and renormalization group equations in string-inspired nonlocal gauge theories,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and N. Okada, “Confinement and renormalization group equations in string-inspired nonlocal gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.9, 096010 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.096010 [arXiv:2106.07629 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.096010 2021

  27. [27]

    Non-perturbative Lee-Wick gauge theory: Towards Confinement & RGE with strong couplings,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and A. S. Koshelev, “Non-perturbative Lee-Wick gauge theory: Towards Confinement & RGE with strong couplings,” Class. Quant. Grav.41, no.1, 015014 (2024) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad0a51 [arXiv:2202.09578 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad0a51 2024

  28. [28]

    Confining complex ghost degrees of freedom,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and A. S. Koshelev, “Confining complex ghost degrees of freedom,” Phys. Lett. B841, 137924 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137924 [arXiv:2207.06394 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137924 2023

  29. [29]

    A non-perturbative and background-independent formulation of quadratic gravity,

    A. Salvio, “A non-perturbative and background-independent formulation of quadratic gravity,” JCAP07, 092 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/092 [arXiv:2404.08034 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/092 2024

  30. [30]

    Mass gap in non-perturbative quadratic R2 gravity via Dyson-Schwinger,

    S. Choudhury, M. Frasca and A. Ghoshal, “Mass gap in non-perturbative quadratic R2 gravity via Dyson-Schwinger,” Nucl. Phys. B1022, 117269 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117269 [arXiv:2501.16445 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117269 2026

  31. [31]

    Solution of Schwinger-Dyson Equations for ${\cal PT}$-Symmetric Quantum Field Theory

    C. M. Bender, K. A. Milton and V. M. Savage, “Solution of Schwinger-Dyson equations for PT symmetric quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D62, 085001 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.085001 [arXiv:hep-th/9907045 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.085001 2000

  32. [32]

    Quantum Yang-Mills field theory

    M. Frasca, “Quantum Yang-Mills field theory,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus132, no.1, 38 (2017) [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. Plus132, no.5, 242 (2017)] doi:10.1140/epjp/i2017-11321-4 [arXiv:1509.05292 [math-ph]]. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjp/i2017-11321-4 2017

  33. [33]

    Condition for confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories

    M. Chaichian and M. Frasca, “Condition for confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B781, 33-39 (2018) [arXiv:1801.09873 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Quark confinement in QCD in the ’t Hooft limit,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and S. Groote, “Quark confinement in QCD in the ’t Hooft limit,” Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.324-329, 85-89 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2023.01.019 [arXiv:2210.02701 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2023.01.019 2023

  35. [35]

    Novel evaluation of the hadronic contribution to the muon’s g-2 from QCD,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and S. Groote, “Novel evaluation of the hadronic contribution to the muon’s g-2 from QCD,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.11, 114036 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114036 [arXiv:2109.05041 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.114036 2021

  36. [36]

    Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model correlation functions from QCD,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and S. Groote, “Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model correlation functions from QCD,” Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.318-323, 138-141 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2022.09.029 [arXiv:2109.06465 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2022.09.029 2022

  37. [37]

    Confinement in QCD and generic Yang-Mills theories with matter representations,

    M. Frasca, A. Ghoshal and S. Groote, “Confinement in QCD and generic Yang-Mills theories with matter representations,” Phys. Lett. B846, 138209 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138209 [arXiv:2202.14023 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138209 2023

  38. [38]

    Yukawa theory in non-perturbative regimes: towards confinement, exactβ-function and conformal phase,

    M. Frasca and A. Ghoshal, “Yukawa theory in non-perturbative regimes: towards confinement, exactβ-function and conformal phase,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.10, 1101 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13458-2 [arXiv:2306.17818 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13458-2 2024

  39. [39]

    Non-perturbative quantum Yang-Mills at finite temperature beyond lattice: Dyson-Schwinger approach,

    M. Frasca and A. Ghoshal, “Non-perturbative quantum Yang-Mills at finite temperature beyond lattice: Dyson-Schwinger approach,” [arXiv:2311.15258 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    On the formulation of quantized field theories,

    H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik and W. Zimmermann, “On the formulation of quantized field theories,” Nuovo Cim.1, 205-225 (1955) doi:10.1007/BF02731765

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02731765 1955

  41. [41]

    Simulation of Binary Black Hole Spacetimes with a Harmonic Evolution Scheme

    F. Pretorius, “Simulation of binary black hole spacetimes with a harmonic evolution scheme,” Class. Quant. Grav.23, S529-S552 (2006) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/16/S13 [arXiv:gr-qc/0602115 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/16/s13 2006

  42. [42]

    Starobinsky, Phys

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99-102 (1980) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x 1980

  43. [43]

    Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett.33, 532-535 (1981)

    1981

  44. [44]

    Fourth-order gravity as the inflationary model revisited

    S. Kaneda, S. V. Ketov and N. Watanabe, “Fourth-order gravity as the inflationary model revisited,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 2753-2762 (2010) doi:10.1142/S0217732310033918 [arXiv:1001.5118 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732310033918 2010

  45. [45]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    B. Whitt, “Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter,” Phys. Lett. B145, 176-178 (1984) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(84)90332-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1984

  46. [46]

    Comments on the Starobinsky Model of Inflation and its Descendants

    A. Kehagias, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah and A. Riotto, “Remarks on the Starobinsky model of inflation and its descendants,” Phys. Rev. D89, no.4, 043527 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.043527 [arXiv:1312.1155 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.043527 2014

  47. [47]

    Proof of the Triviality of phi d4 Field Theory and Some Mean-Field Features of Ising Models for d>4,

    M. Aizenman, “Proof of the Triviality of phi d4 Field Theory and Some Mean-Field Features of Ising Models for d>4,” Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 886-886 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.886

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.886 1981

  48. [48]

    Geometric Analysis of phi**4 Fields and Ising Models (Parts 1 & 2),

    M. Aizenman, “Geometric Analysis of phi**4 Fields and Ising Models (Parts 1 & 2),” Commun. Math. Phys.86, 1 (1982) doi:10.1007/BF01205659

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01205659 1982

  49. [49]

    Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising andϕ 4 4 models,

    M. Aizenman and H. Duminil-Copin, “Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising andϕ 4 4 models,” Annals Math.194, no.1, 163 (2021) doi:10.4007/annals.2021.194.1.3 [arXiv:1912.07973 [math-ph]]

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2021.194.1.3 2021

  50. [50]

    Fate of false vacuum in non-perturbative regimes: Gravity effects,

    G. Calcagni, M. Frasca and A. Ghoshal, “Fate of false vacuum in non-perturbative regimes: Gravity effects,” to appear in International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics. doi:10.1142/S0219887826500908 [arXiv:2206.09965 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887826500908

  51. [51]

    On the Conformal Frames in f(R) Gravity,

    Y. Shtanov, “On the Conformal Frames in f(R) Gravity,” Universe8, no.2, 69 (2022) doi:10.3390/universe8020069 [arXiv:2202.00818 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8020069 2022

  52. [52]

    Scalaron from $R^2$-gravity as a Heavy Field

    S. Pi, Y. l. Zhang, Q. G. Huang and M. Sasaki, “Scalaron fromR 2-gravity as a heavy field,” JCAP05, 042 (2018) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/042 [arXiv:1712.09896 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/042 2018

  53. [53]

    Critical collapse for the Starobinsky R 2 model,

    Y. R. Baez, “Critical collapse for the Starobinsky R 2 model,” JHEP05, 019 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)019 [arXiv:2212.14805 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)019 2023

  54. [54]

    Unification of inflation and dark matter in the Higgs-Starobinsky model

    D. Samart and P. Channuie, “Unification of inflation and dark matter in the Higgs–Starobinsky model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.4, 347 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6864-7 [arXiv:1812.11180 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6864-7 2019

  55. [55]

    Cosmology in scalar tensor gravity,

    V. Faraoni, “Cosmology in scalar tensor gravity,” Fundam.Theor.Phys. Series (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 141–195. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0 2004

  56. [56]

    f(R) theories

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “f(R) theories,” Living Rev. Rel.13, 3 (2010) doi:10.12942/lrr-2010-3 [arXiv:1002.4928 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2010-3 2010

  57. [57]

    The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,

    S. P. Klevansky, “The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 649-708 (1992) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.649

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.649 1992

  58. [58]

    Im- plications for First-Order Cosmological Phase Transitions from the Third LIGO-Virgo Observing Run,

    A. Romero, K. Martinovic, T. A. Callister, H. K. Guo, M. Mart´ ınez, M. Sakellariadou, F. W. Yang and Y. Zhao, “Im- plications for First-Order Cosmological Phase Transitions from the Third LIGO-Virgo Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.15, 151301 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.151301 [arXiv:2102.01714 [hep-ph]]. [59]https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P200...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.151301 2021