arxiv: 2509.08099 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration , the Virgo Collaboration , the KAGRA Collaboration

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

keywords black hole spectroscopyquasi-normal modesgravitational wave ringdowntests of general relativityKerr metricGW250114LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA

0 comments

The pith

The loudest gravitational wave event GW250114 confirms the Kerr nature of the remnant black hole and general relativity to few-percent precision in a single detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the post-merger ringdown of GW250114 to extract quasi-normal modes and test whether the remnant follows the Kerr metric. At least two modes are required to fit the data, with their frequencies and damping times matching Kerr predictions to tens of percent at multiple times after peak. Parameterized waveform fits bound the dominant quadrupolar frequency within a few percent of the general relativity value. These single-event constraints match or exceed those from combining dozens of prior events across inspiral, merger, and ringdown stages. A reader cares because the result directly probes the strong-field, high-velocity regime where general relativity makes its sharpest predictions for black hole behavior.

Core claim

The post-merger signal requires at least two quasi-normal modes, with the most damped overtone remaining significant for roughly one cycle. The spectroscopic pattern of the dominant quadrupolar mode and its first overtone matches the Kerr prediction to tens of percent. Amplitudes and phases align with numerical-relativity simulations near the event parameters. A parameterized inspiral-merger-ringdown fit constrains the fundamental ell equals m equals 4 mode to tens of percent and bounds the quadrupolar frequency to within a few percent of the general relativity prediction, while a full suite of tests yields constraints comparable to or 2-3 times tighter than those from the fourth Gravitation

What carries the argument

Black hole spectroscopy, the extraction of the spectrum of damped sinusoids (quasi-normal modes) from the post-merger signal to check whether the remnant obeys the Kerr metric.

If this is right

The remnant black hole properties are consistent with a numerical-relativity simulation whose parameters match GW250114.
The quadrupolar frequency is bounded to within a few percent of the general relativity value.
The fundamental ell equals m equals 4 mode is constrained to tens of percent.
The full set of inspiral-merger-ringdown tests yields single-event limits comparable to or tighter than multi-event catalog results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Louder future events could extend the same spectroscopic test to higher overtones and additional multipoles.
A clear mismatch in the observed pattern would immediately point to either nonlinear effects or a departure from the Kerr solution.
The method supplies an independent, high-precision handle on remnant spin and mass that can be cross-checked against the inspiral and merger phases.

Load-bearing premise

The post-merger waveform is accurately captured by linear perturbation theory around a Kerr background and the numerical-relativity simulations used for comparison contain no systematic errors at the reported precision.

What would settle it

A measured quadrupolar frequency lying more than a few percent outside the general relativity prediction, or a mode amplitude-phase pattern that deviates from the Kerr spectroscopic template by more than the stated tens-of-percent tolerance at multiple post-peak times.

read the original abstract

The binary black hole signal GW250114, the loudest gravitational wave detected to date, offers a unique opportunity to test Einstein's general relativity (GR) in the high-velocity, strong-gravity regime and probe whether the remnant conforms to the Kerr metric. Upon perturbation, black holes emit a spectrum of damped sinusoids with specific, complex frequencies. Our analysis of the post-merger signal shows that at least two quasi-normal modes are required to explain the data, with the most damped remaining statistically significant for about one cycle. We probe the remnant's Kerr nature by constraining the spectroscopic pattern of the dominant quadrupolar ($\ell = m = 2$) mode and its first overtone to match the Kerr prediction to tens of percent at multiple post-peak times. The measured mode amplitudes and phases agree with a numerical-relativity simulation having parameters close to GW250114. By fitting a parameterized waveform that incorporates the full inspiral-merger-ringdown sequence, we constrain the fundamental $(\ell=m=4)$ mode to tens of percent and bound the quadrupolar frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction. We perform a suite of tests -- spanning inspiral, merger, and ringdown -- finding constraints that are comparable to, and in some cases 2-3 times more stringent than those obtained by combining dozens of events in the fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. These results constitute the most stringent single-event verification of GR and the Kerr nature of black holes to date, and outline the power of black-hole spectroscopy for future gravitational-wave observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

GW250114 delivers the tightest single-event ringdown constraints yet, mainly because its SNR lets them push the quadrupolar frequency bound to a few percent while still needing two modes.

read the letter

The main thing here is that one very loud event now gives single-event bounds on the dominant QNM frequency and the spectroscopic pattern that are tighter than what the whole GWTC-4 stack delivered. They fit the post-merger data with at least two modes, show the first overtone stays significant for roughly one cycle, and report that the measured amplitudes and phases line up with an NR simulation whose parameters are close to the event. The parameterized IMR waveform fit then tightens the (ℓ=m=4) mode to tens of percent and the main quadrupolar frequency to within a few percent of the Kerr value, with the full suite of inspiral-merger-ringdown tests coming out comparable to or better than the catalog results in places. That single-event reach is the concrete advance. The comparisons to independent NR runs give some external anchor, and the claim that two modes are required is data-driven rather than assumed. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags: the few-percent frequency bound rests on the full-sequence parameterized fit recovering clean QNM parameters without offset from the merger-ringdown transition or start-time choice. The abstract says the overtone is significant for about one cycle and that they check multiple post-peak times, but it does not spell out the start-time stability tests or residual checks against the NR waveform at the precision needed. If those checks are only marginal, the central claim could shift. Linear perturbation theory on Kerr is the usual working assumption, but at this SNR any early nonlinear contamination would matter. This paper is for people who care about strong-field tests and ringdown spectroscopy; the event is special enough that a serious referee should see the full error budgets and fitting details. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the gravitational-wave event GW250114 to perform black hole spectroscopy and test general relativity. It finds that at least two quasi-normal modes are needed to describe the post-merger signal, with the dominant quadrupolar mode and its overtone matching Kerr predictions to tens of percent. A parameterized inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform is used to constrain the (ℓ=m=4) mode to tens of percent and the quadrupolar frequency to within a few percent of the GR value. Mode amplitudes and phases are shown to agree with numerical-relativity simulations, and a suite of tests across inspiral, merger, and ringdown yield constraints more stringent than those from combining multiple events in GWTC-4.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work would provide the most stringent single-event verification of the Kerr nature of black holes and general relativity in the strong-field regime to date. The high signal-to-noise ratio of GW250114 enables precise constraints on quasi-normal mode frequencies and amplitudes, highlighting the potential of black-hole spectroscopy for future observations with next-generation detectors.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and ringdown analysis] The claim that the quadrupolar frequency is bounded to within a few percent of the GR prediction relies on the parameterized IMR waveform fit accurately isolating the ringdown phase without merger contamination or start-time bias. Explicit start-time stability tests and residual checks against the NR simulation are needed to confirm that the fit recovers the true QNM parameters at the reported precision, as any residual nonlinearities could introduce systematic offsets.
[Parameterized waveform fit] The analysis assumes linear perturbation theory on a Kerr background holds sufficiently early in the post-peak regime. The manuscript should quantify the impact of possible nonlinear effects or model mismatches in the early ringdown on the inferred frequencies and amplitudes, particularly since the overtone is significant for only about one cycle.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract does not detail the error budgets, data-selection cuts, or possible waveform systematics that could affect the central claims; including a brief mention would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and positive recommendation of minor revision. The comments identify valuable opportunities to strengthen the robustness of our ringdown analysis and parameterized waveform results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested tests and quantifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and ringdown analysis] The claim that the quadrupolar frequency is bounded to within a few percent of the GR prediction relies on the parameterized IMR waveform fit accurately isolating the ringdown phase without merger contamination or start-time bias. Explicit start-time stability tests and residual checks against the NR simulation are needed to confirm that the fit recovers the true QNM parameters at the reported precision, as any residual nonlinearities could introduce systematic offsets.

Authors: We agree that explicit verification of start-time stability and residuals is important for supporting the reported precision. The current manuscript already shows constraints at multiple post-peak times and demonstrates agreement of amplitudes and phases with NR. In the revision we will add dedicated start-time stability tests (varying the ringdown onset over a range of times) and direct residual comparisons between the parameterized IMR fit and the NR waveform. These will confirm that the recovered quadrupolar frequency remains consistent within the quoted few-percent bound and that merger contamination does not bias the result at the reported level. revision: yes
Referee: [Parameterized waveform fit] The analysis assumes linear perturbation theory on a Kerr background holds sufficiently early in the post-peak regime. The manuscript should quantify the impact of possible nonlinear effects or model mismatches in the early ringdown on the inferred frequencies and amplitudes, particularly since the overtone is significant for only about one cycle.

Authors: We acknowledge the value of quantifying possible nonlinear contributions, especially given the short duration of the overtone. The manuscript already cross-validates the extracted amplitudes and phases against NR simulations (which include nonlinearities) and shows consistency at multiple times. To directly address the referee's point, the revision will include an explicit quantification: we will report the variation in inferred frequencies and amplitudes when the ringdown start time is shifted earlier (into the regime where nonlinear effects may be stronger) and will bound the systematic offset relative to the linear Kerr prediction. This will provide a concrete estimate of any model-mismatch impact on the reported constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; claims grounded in independent NR comparisons

full rationale

The paper's central results rely on fitting parameterized IMR waveforms to the GW250114 data and comparing extracted QNM frequencies, amplitudes, and phases directly to predictions from independent numerical-relativity simulations with matching parameters. The abstract states that mode amplitudes and phases 'agree with a numerical-relativity simulation' and that constraints are obtained 'by fitting a parameterized waveform', with tests spanning inspiral-merger-ringdown. No quoted step reduces the GR/Kerr bounds to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the parameterized fit explicitly allows deviation testing rather than assuming the GR outcome. External NR grounding and multi-mode, multi-time checks keep the derivation self-contained against benchmarks outside the present fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that linear black-hole perturbation theory applies to the post-merger phase and that numerical-relativity waveforms accurately capture the expected Kerr ringdown; no new free parameters are introduced beyond standard fitting coefficients for amplitudes, phases, and deviations.

free parameters (2)

mode amplitudes and phases
Fitted directly to the post-merger data segment to extract the observed spectrum.
deviation parameters in the parameterized waveform
Introduced to quantify possible departures from GR predictions for the quadrupolar frequency.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The remnant black hole is described by the Kerr metric of general relativity
Invoked when comparing measured frequencies and damping times to the expected Kerr spectrum.
domain assumption Linear perturbation theory accurately describes the ringdown phase after merger
Required to interpret the signal as a sum of quasi-normal modes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1530 out tokens · 30731 ms · 2026-05-15T16:40:44.930117+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Foundation.DimensionForcing dimension_forced echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

By fitting a parameterized waveform that incorporates the full inspiral-merger-ringdown sequence, we constrain the fundamental (ℓ=m=4) mode to tens of percent and bound the quadrupolar frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction.
Foundation.LedgerForcing conservation_from_balance echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

We probe the remnant’s Kerr nature by constraining the spectroscopic pattern of the dominant quadrupolar (ℓ = m = 2) mode and its first overtone to match the Kerr prediction to tens of percent at multiple post-peak times.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.
Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.
Properties of natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr quasinormal modes are Pollaczek-Jacobi polynomials with complex parameters, with recurrence peaking at the physical overtone index for Schwarzschild.
Physics informed operator learning of parameter dependent spectra
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

DeepOPiraKAN learns parameter-to-spectrum mappings via operator learning and achieves relative errors of O(10^{-6}) to O(10^{-4}) for Kerr black hole quasinormal modes up to n=7 when benchmarked against Leaver's method.
How lonely are the Binary Compact Objects Detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration?
astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

No three-body encounter signatures detected in GW170817, GW190814, and GW230627_015337, constraining intermediate-mass black holes above 100 solar masses within roughly 0.1 AU of these binaries.
Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.
Quadratic gravity corrections to scalar QNMs of rapidly rotating black holes
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Leading-order deviations from general relativity in scalar quasinormal modes of rotating black holes are computed numerically up to dimensionless spins of 0.99 in quadratic-curvature scalar-tensor theories.
Accelerated Time-domain Analysis for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Presents a practical fully time-domain end-to-end likelihood for gravitational-wave inference with structured linear algebra and GPU acceleration.
A cosmology-to-ringdown EFT consistency map for scalar-tensor gravity
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

An EFT consistency map transports cosmology-conditioned posteriors from scalar-tensor FLRW backgrounds to black-hole quasinormal-mode kernels, showing tensor-speed effects fall below ringdown detectability while other...
Cracking Gravitational Wave Multiple Ringdown Modes in Space
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

FIREFLY algorithm enables 200-fold faster multi-mode ringdown analysis for space-borne gravitational wave detectors while remaining compatible with time-delay interferometry.
Ringing of rapidly rotating black holes in effective field theory
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Leading-order cubic-curvature corrections to scalar quasinormal modes of black holes with spins up to 0.99M are computed numerically for modes up to l=5 with relative errors below 10^{-4}.
Energy-momentum and dark energy in $\boldsymbol{SU(\infty)}$-QGR quantum gravity
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

SU(∞)-QGR yields an Einstein-like energy-momentum constraint that includes spin-1 gravitons and treats inflation and accelerating expansion as order parameters tracking the evolution of the universe's quantum states u...
Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.
Spectroscopy of analogue black holes using simulation-based inference
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Simulation-based inference reliably extracts physical parameters from noisy spectra of analogue black holes.
Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

LISA EMRIs can constrain deviations from Kerr equatorial symmetry to 10^{-2} and axial symmetry to 10^{-3} using Analytic Kludge waveforms and Fisher analysis.
Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.
Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data
astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Parametric models incorporating waveform phase and amplitude uncertainties mitigate systematic errors in gravitational wave parameter estimation, producing consistent results across models and raw/deglitched data for ...
GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog
astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Two asymmetric BBH mergers are characterized with mass ratios 0.35 and ≤0.20; one shows high spins, negative χ_eff, and strong precession, suggesting an emerging population of massive rapidly spinning systems.
On the impossibility of observational confirmation of black holes
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

No observational data can confirm the existence of black holes because general relativity imposes fundamental limits on what can be established about them.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

229 extracted references · 229 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 66 internal anchors

[1]

:H ′(220)] relative to the 1% FAP threshold evaluated on background noise, while the green plus indicate the offset ofD[H(220+221+222) :H ′(220+221)] relative to its corresponding threshold. For each ringdown model hypothesis, we also compute the joint posterior quantilep(M IMR f , χIMR f ) of the remnant BH mass and spin, inferred from the full IMR analy...

work page
[2]

Similarly, when the three-mode modelH(220+221+222) is preferred overH ′(220+221) withD>D 1% from starting times 1t Mf to 5t Mf, we observe a reduction inp(M IMR f , χIMR f )

:H ′(220)]>D 1%, we find that the corresponding joint posterior quantilep(M IMR f , χIMR f ) also decreases across start- ing times from 4t Mf to 10t Mf, indicating improved consis- tency with the IMR-inferred remnant parameters. Similarly, when the three-mode modelH(220+221+222) is preferred overH ′(220+221) withD>D 1% from starting times 1t Mf to 5t Mf,...

work page
[3]

Advanced LIGO

J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Ad- vanced LIGO, Class. Quantum Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[5]

Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quantum Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[6]

Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Einstein, On the General Thoery of Relativity, Sitzungsber

A. Einstein, On the General Thoery of Relativity, Sitzungsber. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.49, 778 (1915)

work page 1915
[8]

R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an exam- ple of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

work page 1963
[9]

R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The Dynamics of general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav.40, 1997 (2008), arXiv:gr- qc/0405109

work page arXiv 1997
[10]

Foures-Bruhat, Theoreme d’existence pour certains sys- temes derivees partielles non lineaires, Acta Mat.88, 141 (1952)

Y . Foures-Bruhat, Theoreme d’existence pour certains sys- temes derivees partielles non lineaires, Acta Mat.88, 141 (1952)

work page 1952
[11]

On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory

K. Schwarzschild, On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916, 189 (1916), arXiv:physics/9905030

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1916
[12]

E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass, J. Math. Phys.6, 918 (1965)

work page 1965
[13]

Israel, Event horizons in static electrovac space-times, Commun

W. Israel, Event horizons in static electrovac space-times, Commun. Math. Phys.8, 245 (1968)

work page 1968
[14]

Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom, Phys

B. Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 331 (1971)

work page 1971
[15]

S. W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys.25, 152 (1972)

work page 1972
[16]

D. C. Robinson, Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 905 (1975)

work page 1975
[17]

P. O. Mazur, Proof of uniqueness of the Kerr-Newman black hole solution, J. Phys. A15, 3173 (1982)

work page 1982
[18]

Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys

B. Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys. Rev.174, 1559 (1968)

work page 1968
[19]

Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativ- ity, Riv

R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativ- ity, Riv. Nuovo Cim.1, 252 (1969)

work page 1969
[20]

Penrose and R

R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nature229, 177 (1971)

work page 1971
[21]

J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The Four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

work page 1973
[22]

Schmidt, 3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red- Shift, Nature197, 1040 (1963)

M. Schmidt, 3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red- Shift, Nature197, 1040 (1963)

work page 1963
[23]

Dafermos, G

M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, and I. Rodnianski, The linear sta- bility of the Schwarzschild solution to gravitational perturba- tions, Acta Mat.222, 1 (2019), arXiv:1601.06467 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[24]

Teixeira da Costa, Mode stability for the Teukolsky equa- tion on extremal and subextremal Kerr spacetimes, Commun

R. Teixeira da Costa, Mode stability for the Teukolsky equa- tion on extremal and subextremal Kerr spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys.378, 705 (2020), arXiv:1910.02854 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[25]

Klainerman and J

S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel, Kerr stability for small an- gular momentum, Pure Appl. Math. Quart.19, 791 (2023), arXiv:2104.11857 [math.AP]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Dafermos, G

M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, and M. Taylor, The non-linear stability of the Schwarzschild family of black holes, arXiv:2104.08222 [gr-qc] (2021)

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The Singularities of gravita- tional collapse and cosmology, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314, 529 (1970)

work page 1970
[28]

Almheiri, T

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, The entropy of Hawking radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035002 (2021), arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[29]

Raju, Lessons from the information paradox, Phys

S. Raju, Lessons from the information paradox, Phys. Rept. 943, 1 (2022), arXiv:2012.05770 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativ- ity and Experiment, Living Rev. Relativity17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[31]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

E. Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quantum Grav.32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[32]

Yunes, X

N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar-Timing Arrays, Living Rev. Relativity28, 3 (2025), arXiv:2408.05240 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KA- GRA), GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 15 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, (2025), arXiv:2508.18080 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Cata- log with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[35]

Blanchet and B

L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Detecting a Tail Effect in Gravitational-Wave Experiments, Physical Review Letters 74, 1067 (1995)

work page 1995
[37]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of gen- eral relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[38]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration), GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Cata- log of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[39]

GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Com- pact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo Dur- ing the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[40]

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[42]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of Gen- eral Relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[43]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration), Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[44]

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient cat- alog, Phys. Rev. D103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr- qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[45]

Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc] (2021)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[46]

P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, G. Esposito-Farese, J. P. W. Verbiest, M. Bailes, B. A. Jacoby, M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, J. Anto- niadis, and G. H. Janssen, The relativistic pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR J1738+0333 II. The most stringent test of scalar- tensor gravity, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423, 3328 (2012), arXiv:1205.1450 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[47]

Krameret al., Strong-Field Gravity Tests with the Dou- ble Pulsar, Phys

M. Krameret al., Strong-Field Gravity Tests with the Dou- ble Pulsar, Phys. Rev. X11, 041050 (2021), arXiv:2112.06795 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[48]

Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole

R. Abuteret al.(GRA VITY), Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic cen- tre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018), arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[49]

Doet al., Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic center supermassive black hole, Science365, 664 (2019), arXiv:1907.10731 [astro-ph.GA]

T. Doet al., Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic center supermassive black hole, Science365, 664 (2019), arXiv:1907.10731 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2019
[50]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Su- permassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[51]

Modified Gravity and Cosmology

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Mod- ified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rep.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[52]

Einstein, ¨Uber Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber

A. Einstein, ¨Uber Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1918, 154 (1918)

work page 1918
[53]

Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys

F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 121101 (2005), arXiv:0507014 [gr-qc]

work page 2005
[54]

Campanelli, C

M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, Y . Zlochower, B. Krishnan, and D. Merritt, Spin Flips and Precession in Black-Hole- Binary Mergers, Phys. Rev. D75, 064030 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0612076

work page arXiv 2007
[55]

J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling con- figuration of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 111102 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511103

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[56]

C. V . Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radiation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole, Nature227, 936 (1970)

work page 1970
[57]

W. H. Press, Long Wave Trains of Gravitational Waves from a Vibrating Black Hole, Astrophys. J.170, L105 (1971)

work page 1971
[58]

Regge, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys

T. Regge, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957)

work page 1957
[59]

F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

work page 1970
[60]

S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fun- damental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neu- trino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

work page 1973
[61]

Chandrasekhar and S

S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. R. Soc. A344, 441 (1975)

work page 1975
[62]

S. L. Detweiler, Resonant oscillations of a rapidly rotating black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A352, 381 (1977)

work page 1977
[63]

S. L. Detweiler, Black holes and gravitational waves. III. The resonant frequencies of rotating holes, Astrophys. J.239, 292 (1980)

work page 1980
[64]

E. W. Leaver, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A402, 285 (1985)

work page 1985
[65]

R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravita- tional collapse. 1. Scalar and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972)

work page 1972
[66]

R. H. Price, Nonspherical Perturbations of Relativistic Grav- itational Collapse. II. Integer-Spin, Zero-Rest-Mass Fields, Phys. Rev. D5, 2439 (1972)

work page 1972
[67]

Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class

H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

work page 1999
[68]

K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/9909058

work page arXiv 1999
[69]

Black Hole Spectroscopy: Testing General Relativity through Gravitational Wave Observations

O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Garrison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Black hole spectroscopy: Testing gen- eral relativity through gravitational wave observations, Class. Quantum Grav.21, 787 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0309007

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[70]

Berti, V

E. Berti, V . Cardoso, and C. M. Will, On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space inter- ferometer LISA, Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0512160

work page arXiv 2006
[71]

Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns

S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ring- downs, Phys. Rev. D85, 124056 (2012), arXiv:1111.5819 [gr- 16 qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[72]

Testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns using TIGER

J. Meidam, M. Agathos, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns using TIGER, Phys. Rev. D90, 064009 (2014), arXiv:1406.3201 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[73]

Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

E. Berti, V . Cardoso, G. Carullo,et al., Black hole spec- troscopy: from theory to experiment, arXiv:2505.23895 [gr- qc] (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[74]

Golden Oldie

R. Penrose, “Golden Oldie”: Gravitational Collapse: The Role of General Relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.34, 1141 (2002)

work page 2002
[75]

Klainerman, Mathematical Challenges of General Relativ- ity, inThe Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, edited by V

S. Klainerman, Mathematical Challenges of General Relativ- ity, inThe Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, edited by V . G. Gurzadyan, R. T. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (2002) pp. 28–43

work page 2002
[76]

P. T. Chru ´sciel, J. Lopes Costa, and M. Heusler, Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond, Living Rev. Relativity 15, 7 (2012), arXiv:1205.6112 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[77]

G. W. Gibbons, Vacuum Polarization and the Spontaneous Loss of Charge by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.44, 245 (1975)

work page 1975
[78]

R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic extractions of energy from Kerr black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433 (1977)

work page 1977
[79]

R. S. Hanni, Limits on the charge of a collapsed object, Phys. Rev. D25, 2509 (1982)

work page 1982
[80]

Carullo, D

G. Carullo, D. Laghi, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, W. Del Pozzo, O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Con- straints on Kerr-Newman black holes from merger-ringdown gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D105, 062009 (2022), arXiv:2109.13961 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[81]

Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914

G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914, Phys. Rev. D99, 123029 (2019), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D100, 089903(E) (2019)], arXiv:1902.07527 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[82]

M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukol- sky, Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 111102 (2019), arXiv:1905.00869 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.