pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10519 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Energy-momentum and dark energy in boldsymbol{SU(infty)}-QGR quantum gravity

Houri Ziaeepour
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COquant-ph
keywords SU(infinity) quantum gravityenergy-momentum tensordark energyemergent spacetimeHilbert space fragmentationinflationcosmological accelerationYang-Mills action
0
0 comments X

The pith

Invariance of the action under metric change produces an Einstein-like constraint equation including energy-momentum tensors of spin-1 gravitons in SU(∞)-QGR.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in the SU(∞)-QGR model, where the universe's Hilbert space carries SU(∞) symmetry that fragments into particle subsystems, the requirement that the effective Yang-Mills action remains unchanged when the metric of the 4D parameter space is varied leads to a constraint equation resembling Einstein's field equation. This equation incorporates the energy-momentum tensors from all fields in the model, including those of the spin-1 gravitons. The author also calculates quantum information measures tied to the fragmentation process to connect it with the emergence of classical spacetime and cosmological effects such as inflation and accelerated expansion. A reader would care because this framework derives gravity and dark energy phenomena from quantum symmetries without starting from a classical metric.

Core claim

Invariance of the action under metric change leads to a constraint resembling the Einstein equation consisting of energy-momentum tensors for all components including the spin-1 gravitons. Fields associated to inflation and late time accelerating expansion may be order parameters collectively presenting the evolution of quantum states of the contents of the Universe.

What carries the argument

The constraint obtained from requiring invariance of the Yang-Mills action under variations of the metric on the 4D parameter space Ξ, which sums energy-momentum contributions from the full set of symmetries and fields in the fragmented Hilbert space.

If this is right

  • The energy-momentum tensor includes explicit contributions from spin-1 gravitons.
  • Hilbert space fragmentation influences the evolution of emergent classical spacetime.
  • Inflation and late-time acceleration arise as order parameters tracking quantum state evolution.
  • Physical observables remain independent of the geometry of Ξ due to SU(∞) gauge neutralization of diffeomorphisms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model suggests that dark energy effects could be reinterpreted as collective quantum information evolution rather than a fundamental field.
  • If the fragmentation process can be quantified, it might predict specific patterns in cosmic microwave background fluctuations.
  • Similar symmetry fragmentation ideas could be explored in other quantum gravity approaches to derive effective Einstein equations.
  • Testing would require linking quantum information entropy measures directly to observed cosmological parameters.

Load-bearing premise

Physical processes and measurables are independent of the geometry of the 4D parameter space Ξ, with diffeomorphisms neutralized by SU(∞) gauge transformations.

What would settle it

A mismatch between predicted order parameter evolution from Hilbert space fragmentation and observed rates of inflation or late-time cosmic acceleration would challenge the central claim.

read the original abstract

$SU(\infty)$-QGR is a recently proposed fundamentally quantum approach to gravity and cosmology. In this model the Hilbert space of the Universe represents $SU(\infty)$ symmetry. Its fragmentation generates approximately isolated subsystems (particles) representing, in addition to $SU(\infty)$, finite-rank local symmetries. The common $SU(\infty)$ is associated to quantum gravity, and at lowest quantum order the effective action for all symmetries is Yang-Mills on a 4D parameter space $\Xi$. Nonetheless, physical processes and measurables must be independent $\Xi$'s geometry. In previous works we demonstrated that diffeomorphism of $\Xi$ can be neutralized by $SU(\infty)$ gauge transformation. In this work we show that invariance of action under metric change leads to a constraint resembling Einstein equation. It consists of energy-momentum tensors for all components of the model, including the spin-1 gravitons. In addition, through calculation of quantum information measures we study the effect of Hilbert space fragmentation on the evolution of emergent classical spacetime and cosmological phenomena, namely inflation and late time accelerating expansion. The results show that fields associated to these processes may be order parameters collectively presenting the evolution of quantum states of the contents of the Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SU(∞)-QGR as a quantum gravity model where the Universe's Hilbert space embodies SU(∞) symmetry. Fragmentation of this symmetry generates subsystems with finite-rank symmetries, and the effective action is Yang-Mills on a 4D parameter space Ξ. The key result is that invariance of the action under metric variations on Ξ produces a constraint resembling the Einstein equation, built from energy-momentum tensors of all components including spin-1 gravitons. The manuscript further analyzes the role of Hilbert space fragmentation in the emergence of classical spacetime and cosmological effects like inflation and late-time acceleration using quantum information measures, interpreting associated fields as order parameters for quantum state evolution.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct and non-circular, this work could represent a significant advance in quantum gravity by deriving gravitational dynamics from symmetry principles and quantum information, offering a potential explanation for dark energy and the emergence of classical cosmology from quantum fragmentation. It builds on previous works by the authors on neutralizing diffeomorphisms via gauge transformations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and metric-invariance derivation] The abstract states that invariance under metric change leads to an Einstein-resembling constraint consisting of energy-momentum tensors including for spin-1 gravitons, but no explicit equations, derivations, or steps are provided, making it impossible to verify if the result follows from the premises without circularity (e.g., whether the constraint reduces to quantities already fixed by the choice of effective action or the Ξ-independence premise).
  2. [Quantum information and cosmology section] The claims on the effect of Hilbert space fragmentation on inflation, late-time acceleration, and order parameters for quantum state evolution lack specific quantum-information calculations, explicit measures, error estimates, or numerical checks, which are load-bearing for the cosmological implications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title and notation] The use of boldface in the title for SU(∞) and Ξ should be clarified for notational consistency throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Introduction] Previous works demonstrating neutralization of diffeomorphisms by SU(∞) gauge transformations are referenced but should include explicit citations to allow readers to trace the logical progression.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting areas where additional clarity and explicit detail would strengthen the presentation. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both concerns can be resolved by expanding the relevant sections with more explicit derivations and calculations, which we will do in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and metric-invariance derivation] The abstract states that invariance under metric change leads to an Einstein-resembling constraint consisting of energy-momentum tensors including for spin-1 gravitons, but no explicit equations, derivations, or steps are provided, making it impossible to verify if the result follows from the premises without circularity (e.g., whether the constraint reduces to quantities already fixed by the choice of effective action or the Ξ-independence premise).

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation would benefit from a more explicit, step-by-step derivation to allow independent verification. The abstract is necessarily brief, but the main text will be revised to include a dedicated subsection that starts from the Yang-Mills effective action on Ξ, performs the metric variation explicitly, and arrives at the constraint equation. This will display the individual energy-momentum tensors (including the spin-1 graviton contribution) and demonstrate how the result follows from the action without reducing to quantities fixed a priori by the Ξ-independence assumption or the effective-action choice. We will also add a short paragraph referencing our earlier work on diffeomorphism neutralization to clarify why the procedure is non-circular. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Quantum information and cosmology section] The claims on the effect of Hilbert space fragmentation on inflation, late-time acceleration, and order parameters for quantum state evolution lack specific quantum-information calculations, explicit measures, error estimates, or numerical checks, which are load-bearing for the cosmological implications.

    Authors: We accept that the cosmological implications section requires more concrete quantum-information content to support the claims. In the revision we will insert explicit calculations of relevant measures (e.g., entanglement entropy across fragmented Hilbert-space sectors and mutual information between subsystems) together with the associated order-parameter fields. Where feasible we will include error estimates and simple numerical illustrations showing how these quantities track the onset of inflation and late-time acceleration. This will make the interpretation of the fields as collective descriptors of quantum-state evolution more quantitative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper states as model premises that physical processes must be independent of Ξ geometry and that diffeomorphisms of Ξ are neutralized by SU(∞) gauge transformations. It then performs a new step: imposing invariance of the effective Yang-Mills action under metric changes on Ξ, which produces a constraint equation built from energy-momentum tensors of all fields (including spin-1 gravitons). The abstract and available context present this as a derived result rather than a restatement of the premises. The reference to prior work is limited to the diffeomorphism neutralization and is not invoked to justify the metric-invariance step itself. No equations or claims in the text reduce the new constraint to a fitted parameter, a renaming, or a self-citation chain by construction. The derivation therefore remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

The model rests on three explicit domain assumptions about symmetry and geometry independence plus two postulated entities whose independent evidence is not supplied in the abstract.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The Hilbert space of the Universe represents SU(∞) symmetry.
    Stated as the foundational premise of SU(∞)-QGR.
  • domain assumption At lowest quantum order the effective action for all symmetries is Yang-Mills on a 4D parameter space Ξ.
    Given as the effective description before the metric-invariance argument.
  • domain assumption Physical processes and measurables must be independent of Ξ's geometry.
    Invoked to justify neutralizing diffeomorphisms by gauge transformations.
invented entities (2)
  • spin-1 gravitons no independent evidence
    purpose: Constituents of the energy-momentum tensor in the derived constraint.
    Introduced as one of the components whose energy-momentum appears in the Einstein-like equation.
  • order parameters collectively presenting the evolution of quantum states no independent evidence
    purpose: Fields that encode inflation and late-time acceleration.
    Proposed as the link between quantum-information measures and observed cosmology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5522 in / 1671 out tokens · 77633 ms · 2026-05-10T16:16:40.927293+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Phys.7(1977) 51

    Eppley, K., Hannah, E.: The necessity of quantizing the gravitational field,Found. Phys.7(1977) 51

    1977

  2. [2]

    Page, C.D

    D.N. Page, C.D. Geilker,Indirect Evidence for Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 979

    1981

  3. [3]

    Terno,Inconsistency of Quantum-Classical Dynamics, and What it Implies,Found

    D.R. Terno,Inconsistency of Quantum-Classical Dynamics, and What it Implies,Found. Phys.36 (2006) 102,

    2006

  4. [4]

    Diosi,The classical-quantum hybrid canonical dynamics and its difficulties with special and general relativity,Phys

    L. Diosi,The classical-quantum hybrid canonical dynamics and its difficulties with special and general relativity,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 084052, [arXiv:2404.07723]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, C. Misner,Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity, Phys. Rev.116(1959) 1322

    1959

  6. [6]

    DewittQuantum Theory of Gravity

    B. DewittQuantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory,Phys. Rev.160(1967) 1113

    1967

  7. [7]

    ReggeGeneral Relativity without Coordinates,Nuovo Cimento19(1961) 558

    T. ReggeGeneral Relativity without Coordinates,Nuovo Cimento19(1961) 558

    1961

  8. [8]

    Ponzano, T

    G. Ponzano, T. ReggeSemiclassical limit of Racah coefficients, p1-58; in Spectroscopic and group theoretical methods in physics, ed. F. Bloch, North-Holland Publ. Co. Amsterdam, (1968)

    1968

  9. [9]

    Rovelli,Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004

    C. Rovelli,Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004

    2004

  10. [10]

    Ashtekar and J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski,Background Independent Quantum Gravity: A Status Report,Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) R53, [arXiv:gr-qc/0404018]

    work page arXiv 2004

  11. [11]

    Livine,Projected Spin Networks for Lorentz connection: Linking Spin Foams and Loop Gravity, Class

    E.R. Livine,Projected Spin Networks for Lorentz connection: Linking Spin Foams and Loop Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5525, [arXiv:gr-qc/0207084]

    work page arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Barrett, L

    J.W. Barrett, L. Crane,Relativistic spin networks and quantum gravity,J. Math. Phys.39(1998) 3296, [arXiv:gr-qc/9709028]

    work page arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    Barrett and L

    J.W. Barrett, L. Crane,A Lorentzian Signature Model for Quantum General Relativity,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 3101, [arXiv:gr-qc/9904025]

    work page arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity

    D. Oriti,The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory, in Proceedings of “Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity”, Ed: G. Ellis, J. Murugan, A. Weltman, Cambridge University Press, UK, (2012), [arXiv:1110.5606]

    work page arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Green, J.H

    M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz, E. Witten,Superstring Theory I & II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1987)

    1987

  16. [16]

    PolchinskiTASI lecture on D-branes, [arXiv:hep-th/9611050]

    J. PolchinskiTASI lecture on D-branes, [arXiv:hep-th/9611050]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van RaamsdonkBuilding up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav42(2010) 2323, Gen. Rel. Grav42(2010) 2323;Int. J. Mod. Phys. D19(2010) 2429, [arXiv:1005.3035]

    work page arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    Cao, S.M

    C. Cao, S.M. Carroll, S. Michalakis,Space from Hilbert Space: Recovering Geometry from Bulk Entanglement,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 024031, [arXiv:1606.08444]

    work page arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    A.A. Abdo, M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, K. Asano, W.B. Atwood, M. Axelsson, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, M.G. Baring,et al.,A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects,Nature462(2009) 331, [arXiv:0908.1832]

    work page arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Bartlett, H

    D.J. Bartlett, H. Desmond, P.G. Ferreira, J. Jasche,Constraints on quantum gravity and the photon mass from gamma ray bursts,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103516, [arXiv:2109.07850]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Ellis, N.E

    J. Ellis, N.E. Mavromatos, D.V. Nanopoulos,Comments on Graviton Propagation in Light of GW150914,Mod. Phys. Lett. A31(2016) 1650155, [arXiv:1602.04764]

    work page arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    The LHAASO Collaboration,Stringent Tests of Lorentz Invariance Violation from LHAASO Observations of GRB 221009A,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 071501, [arXiv:2402.06009]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Phys.8(2025) 457, [arXiv:2502.12070]

    KM3NeT Collaboration,KM3NeT Constraint on Lorentz-Violating Superluminal Neutrino Velocity, Commun. Phys.8(2025) 457, [arXiv:2502.12070]. – 26 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, The Virgo Collaboration, The KAGRA Collaboration,Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 041403, [arXiv:2509.08099]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Ziaeepour,Color Glass Condensate in Brane Models or Don’t Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Probe 1015eVScale ?,Mod

    H. Ziaeepour,Color Glass Condensate in Brane Models or Don’t Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Probe 1015eVScale ?,Mod. Phys. A20(2005) 419, [hep-ph/0407046]

    work page arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    Pires, Z.-H

    N. Pires, Z.-H. Zhu, J.S. Alcaniz,Lookback time as a test for brane cosmology,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 123530, [arXiv:astro-ph/0606689]

    work page arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for Microscopic Black Hole Signatures at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Lett. B697(2011) 434, [arXiv:1012.3375]

    work page arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Ellis, V

    J. Ellis, V. Sanz, T. You,Prima Facie Evidence against Spin-Two Higgs Impostors,Phys. Lett. B726 (2013) 244, [arXiv:1211.3068]

    work page arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Holanda, J.W.C

    R.F.L. Holanda, J.W.C. Silva, F. Dahia,Complementary cosmological tests of RSII brane models,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 205003, [arXiv:1304.4746]

    work page arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Planck Collaboration ,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,A.& A.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Kibble,Lorentz Invariance and Gravitational Field,J

    T.W.R. Kibble,Lorentz Invariance and Gravitational Field,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 212

    1961

  32. [32]

    Wilczek,Riemann-Einstein Structure from Volume and Gauge Symmetry,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Riemann-Einstein Structure from Volume and Gauge Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 4851, [arXiv:hep-th/9801184]

    work page arXiv 1998

  33. [33]

    The Gauge/gravity duality,

    J. Maldacena,The gauge/gravity duality, in Black Holes in Higher Dimensions Ed. G. Horowitz, Cambridge University Press, (2012) [arXiv:1106.6073]

    work page arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi,Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602, [arXiv:hep-th/0603001]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  35. [35]

    Ziaeepour,Making a Quantum Universe: Symmetry and Gravity,MDPI Universe J.6(11)(2020) 194, [arXiv:2009.03428]

    H. Ziaeepour,Making a Quantum Universe: Symmetry and Gravity,MDPI Universe J.6(11)(2020) 194, [arXiv:2009.03428]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Ziaeepour,SU(∞)-QGR: Emergence of Gravity in an Infinitely Divisible Quantum Universe, [arXiv:2301.02813]

    H. Ziaeepour,SU(∞)-QGR: Emergence of Gravity in an Infinitely Divisible Quantum Universe, [arXiv:2301.02813]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Ziaeepour,Quantum state of fields inSU(∞)Quantum Gravity,Academia Quantum2(2025) 1, [arXiv:2402.18237]

    H. Ziaeepour,Quantum state of fields inSU(∞)Quantum Gravity,Academia Quantum2(2025) 1, [arXiv:2402.18237]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Ziaeepour,SU(∞)Quantum Gravity and Cosmology,Symmetry16(2024) 1672, [arXiv:2409.08932]

    H. Ziaeepour,SU(∞)Quantum Gravity and Cosmology,Symmetry16(2024) 1672, [arXiv:2409.08932]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Ziaeepour,SU(∞)-QGR: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once, [arXiv:2304.02761]

    H. Ziaeepour,SU(∞)-QGR: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once, [arXiv:2304.02761]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Einstein,Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

    A. Einstein,Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. part 1. Berlin, DE: 142–152 (1917)

    1917

  41. [41]

    Essais de cosmologie

    Letter from Lemaˆ ıtre to Einstein on 3 Oct. 1947, (see e.g. J.P. Luminet, “Essais de cosmologie”, Seuil, Paris, (1997)

    1947

  42. [42]

    Garcia-Quintero et al

    C. Garcia-Quintero, H.E. Noriega, A. de Mattia, A. Aviles, K. Lodha, D. Chebat, J. Rohlf, S. Nadathur,et al.,Cosmological implications of DESI DR2 BAO measurements in light of the latest ACT DR6 CMB data, PRD112(2025) 083529, [arXiv:2504.18464]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Wald,General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, (1984)

    R.M. Wald,General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, (1984)

    1984

  44. [44]

    Floratos, J

    E.G. Floratos, J. Iliopoulos, G. Tiktopoulos,A note onSU(∞)classical Yang-Mills theories,Phys. Lett. B217(1989) 285

    1989

  45. [45]

    Berges,Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology, [arXiv:1503.02907]

    J. Berges,Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology, [arXiv:1503.02907]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1. – 27 –

    1989

  47. [47]

    Ramsey, B.L

    S.A. Ramsey, B.L. Hu,Nonequilibrium inflaton dynamics and reheating: Back reaction of parametric particle creation and curved spacetime effects,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 678; ErratumPhys. Rev. D57 (1998) 3798, [hep-ph/9706207]

    work page arXiv 1997

  48. [48]

    Besse,Einstein manifolds, inResults in Mathematics and Related Areas (3), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1987)

    A.L. Besse,Einstein manifolds, inResults in Mathematics and Related Areas (3), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1987)

    1987

  49. [49]

    A. Buonanno,Gravitational waves, in the Proceedings of Les Houches Summer School, Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime, Les Houches, France, 31 Jul - 25 Aug 2006, Ed.: F. Bernardeau, Ch. Grojean, J. Dalibard, Elsevier science (2007),[arXiv:0709.4682]

    work page arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State

    T. Jacobson,Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State,Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 1260, [arXiv:gr-qc/9504004]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  51. [51]

    DESI Collaboration,DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083515, [arXiv:2503.14738]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A.G. Riess, J. Zuntz, R. Kessler, A. Carr, T.M. Davis,et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,ApJ.938(2022) 110, [arXiv:2202.04077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    H0DN Collaboration,The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision, Accepted byA.& A.(2025) , [arXiv:2510.23823]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Giar` e, T

    W. Giar` e, T. Mahassen, E. Di Valentino, S. Pan,An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy,Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101906, [arXiv:2502.10264]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Lemaˆ ıtre,Un Univers homog` ene de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des n´ ebuleuses extra-galactiques,Ann

    G. Lemaˆ ıtre,Un Univers homog` ene de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des n´ ebuleuses extra-galactiques,Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux.A47(1927) 49; Republication:A homogeneous universe of constant mass and increasing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extra-galactic nebulae,Gen. Rel. Grav45(2013) 1635

    1927

  56. [56]

    Beny, Ch.T

    C. Beny, Ch.T. Chubb, T. Farrelly, T.J. Osborne,Energy cost of entanglement extraction in complex quantum systems,Nature Commun.9(2018) 3792, [arXiv:1711.06658]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Parrondo,Thermodynamics of Information, in the Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics - 2nd Edition, [arXiv:2306.12447]

    J.M.R. Parrondo,Thermodynamics of Information, in the Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics - 2nd Edition, [arXiv:2306.12447]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Mandelstam, I

    L. Mandelstam, I. Tamm,The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics,J. Phys. (USSR)9(1945) 249

    1945

  59. [59]

    Deffner, S

    S. Deffner, S. Campbell,Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.50(2017) 453001, [arXiv:1705.08023]

    work page arXiv 2017

  60. [61]

    Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiationfield,Phys

    R.J. Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiationfield,Phys. Rev.131(1963) 2766

    1963

  61. [62]

    Ziaeepour,Cosmological Condensation of scalar fields,Phys

    H. Ziaeepour,Cosmological Condensation of scalar fields,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 103526, [arXiv:1003.2996]

    work page arXiv 2010

  62. [63]

    Hoppe,Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-dimensional Bound State Problem, Ph.D

    J. Hoppe,Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-dimensional Bound State Problem, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, (1982)

    1982

  63. [64]

    Floratos, I Iliopoulos,A Note on the Classical Symmetries of the Closed Bosonic Membranes, Phys

    E.G. Floratos, I Iliopoulos,A Note on the Classical Symmetries of the Closed Bosonic Membranes, Phys. Lett. B201(1988) 237

    1988

  64. [65]

    Antoniadis, P

    I. Antoniadis, P. Ditsas, E.F. Floratos, J. Iliopoulos,New Realizations of the Virasoro Algebra as Membrane Symmetries,Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 549

    1988

  65. [66]

    Arakelyan, G.K

    T.A. Arakelyan, G.K. Savvidy,Cocycles of area-preserving diffeomorphisms and anomalies in the theory of relativistic surfaces,Phys. Lett. B214(1988) 350. – 28 –

    1988

  66. [67]

    Pairlie, P

    D.B. Pairlie, P. Fletcher, C.K. Zachos,Trigonometric Structure Constants for New Infinite-Dimensional Algebras,Phys. Lett. B218(1989) 203

    1989

  67. [68]

    Pairlie, C.K

    D.B. Pairlie, C.K. Zachos,Infinite-dimensional algebras, sine brackets, andSU(∞),Phys. Lett. B224 (1989) 101

    1989

  68. [69]

    Hoppe,Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization, andSU(∞),Int

    J. Hoppe,Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization, andSU(∞),Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4(1989) 5235

    1989

  69. [70]

    Pope, K.S

    C.N. Pope, K.S. Stelle,SU(∞)andSU +(∞)and area-preserving algebras,Phys. Lett. B226(1989) 257

    1989

  70. [72]

    Savvidy,Symplectic Large N Gauge Theories, Proceedings of Cargese Summer School: Vacuum Structure in Intense Fields, P.415, (1991)

    G.K. Savvidy,Symplectic Large N Gauge Theories, Proceedings of Cargese Summer School: Vacuum Structure in Intense Fields, P.415, (1991)

    1991

  71. [73]

    Zunger,Why Matrix theory works for oddly shaped membranes,Phys

    Y. Zunger,Why Matrix theory works for oddly shaped membranes,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 086003, [arXiv:hep-th/0106030]

    work page arXiv 2001

  72. [74]

    Connes.Gravity coupled with matter and the foundation of non-commutative geometry

    A. Connes,Gravity coupled with matter and foundation of non-commutative geometry,Commun. Math. Phys.182(1996) 155, [arXiv:hep-th/9603053]

    work page arXiv 1996

  73. [75]

    Hall,Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Springer, (2013)

    B.C. Hall,Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Springer, (2013)

    2013

  74. [76]

    Connes, M.R

    A. Connes, M.R. Douglas, A. Schwarz,Noncommutative Geometry and Matrix Theory: Compactification on Tori,J. High Energy Phys.02(1998) 003, [arXiv:hep-th/9711162]

    work page arXiv 1998

  75. [77]

    Ziaeepour,Comparing Quantum Gravity Models: String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and Entanglement Gravity versusSU(∞)-QGR,Symmetry14(2022) 58, [arXiv:2109.05757]

    H. Ziaeepour,Comparing Quantum Gravity Models: String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and Entanglement Gravity versusSU(∞)-QGR,Symmetry14(2022) 58, [arXiv:2109.05757]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [78]

    Zanardi, D.A

    P. Zanardi, D. Lidar, S. Lloyd,Quantum tensor product structures are observable-induced,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 060402, [arXiv:quant-ph/0308043]

    work page arXiv 2004

  77. [79]

    Adler, D

    D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, J. Zeiher,Observation of Hilbert-space fragmentation and fractonic excitations in 2D,Nature636 (2024) 80, [arXiv:2404.14896]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [80]

    Moudgalya, O.I

    S. Moudgalya, O.I. Motrunich,Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Commutant Algebras,Phys. Rev. X12 (2022) 011050, [arXiv:2108.10324]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [81]

    Kochergin, I.M

    D. Kochergin, I.M. Khaymovich, O. Valba, A. Gorsky,Anatomy of the fragmented Hilbert space: eigenvalue tunneling, quantum scars and localization in the perturbed random regular graph, Phys. Rev. B108(2023) 094203, [arXiv:2305.14416]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [82]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, M. Vengalattore,Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems,Rev. Mod. Phys.83(2011) 863, [arXiv:1007.5331]

    work page arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.