pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.23823 · v1 · submitted 2025-10-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision

H0DN Collaboration: Stefano Casertano (1) , Gagandeep Anand (1) , Richard I. Anderson (2) , Rachael Beaton (1) , Anupam Bhardwaj (3) , John P. Blakeslee (4) , Paula Boubel (5) , Louise Breuval (1
show 113 more authors
6) Dillon Brout (7) Michele Cantiello (8) Mauricio Cruz Reyes (2) Geza Cs\"ornyei (9) Thomas de Jaeger (10) Suhail Dhawan (11) Eleonora Di Valentino (12) Llu\'is Galbany (13 14) H\'ector Gil-Mar\'in (15 16 Dariusz Graczyk (17) Caroline Huang (18) Joseph B. Jensen (19) Pierre Kervella (20 21) Bruno Leibundgut (22) Bastian Lengen (2) Siyang Li (23 24) Lucas Macri (25) Emre \"Oz\"ulker (12) Dominic W. Pesce (18) Adam Riess (1 23) Martino Romaniello (22) Khaled Said (26) Nils Sch\"oneberg (27 28) Dan Scolnic (29) Teresa Sicignano (22 30 31) Dorota M. Skowron (32) Syed A. Uddin (33) Licia Verde (35 15) Antonella Nota (36) ((1) Space Telescope Science Institute (2) Institute of Physics \'Ecole polytechnique f\'ed\'erale de Lausanne (EPFL) Observatoire de Sauverny (3) Inter-University Centre for Astronomy Astrophysics (IUCAA) (4) NSF NOIRLab (5) Research School of Astronomy \& Astrophysics Australian National University (6) European Space Agency (ESA) ESA Office Space Telescope Science Institute (7) Boston University Departments of Astronomy Physics (8) INAF -- Astronomical Observatory of Abruzzo (9) Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics Garching (10) Sorbonne Universit\'e CNRS Laboratoire de Physique Nucl\'eaire et de Hautes Energies (11) School of Physics Astronomy University of Birmingham (12) School of Mathematical Physical Sciences University of Sheffield (13) Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC) (14) Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) (15) Institut de Ci\`encies del Cosmos (ICCUB) Universitat de Barcelona (UB) (16) Departament de F\'isica Qu\`antica i Astrof\'isica Universitat de Barcelona (17) Polish Academy of Sciences Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center Department of Astrophysics (18) Center for Astrophysics | Harvard \& Smithsonian (19) Department of Physics Utah Valley University (20) LIRA Observatoire de Paris Universit\'e PSL Sorbonne Universit\'e Universit\'e Paris Cit\'e (21) French-Chilean Laboratory for Astronomy IRL 3386 U. de Chile (22) European Southern Observatory (23) Department of Physics \& Astronomy Johns Hopkins University (24) Department of Astronomy University of California Berkeley (25) Department of Physics \& Astronomy College of Sciences University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (26) School of Mathematics University of Queensland (27) University Observatory Faculty of Physics Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit\"at (28) Excellence Cluster ORIGINS (29) Department of Physics Duke University (30) Scuola Superiore Meridionale (31) INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte (32) Astronomical Observatory University of Warsaw (33) American Public University System (34) Center for Astronomy Space Science Astrophysics Independent University Bangladesh (35) Instituci\'o Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avan\c{c}ats (36) International Space Science Institute)
Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords localbaselinedistanceestimatorsindicatorsuncertaintycepheidscommunity
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The direct, empirical determination of the local value of the Hubble constant (H0) has markedly advanced thanks to improved instrumentation, measurement techniques, and distance estimators. However, combining determinations from different estimators is non-trivial, due to correlated calibrations and different analysis methodologies. Using covariance weighting and leveraging the broad and comprehensive community of experts, we constructed a rigorous and transparent Distance Network (DN) to find a consensus value and uncertainty for the local H0. All critically reviewed the available data sets, spanning parallaxes, detached eclipsing binaries, masers, Cepheids, the TRGB, Miras, JAGB stars, SN Ia, Surface Brightness Fluctuations, SN II, the Fundamental Plane, and Tully-Fisher relations and voted for indicators to define a `baseline' DN and others to assess robustness and sensitivity of the results. We provide open-source software and data products to support full transparency and future extensions of this effort. Our conclusions: 1) Local H0 is robustly determined, with first-rank indicators internally consistent within their uncertainties; 2) A covariance-weighted combination yields an uncertainty of 1.1% (baseline) or 0.9% (all estimators); 3) The contribution from SNe Ia is consistent across four current compilations of optical magnitudes or using NIR-only magnitudes; 4) Removing either Cepheids or TRGB has minimal effect; 5) Replacing SNe Ia with galaxy-based indicators changes H0 by less than 0.1 km/s/Mpc, while doubling its uncertainty; 6) The baseline result is H0=73.50+/-0.81 km/s/Mpc. Compared to early Universe results, our result differs by 7.1sigma from flat {\Lambda}CDM with Planck+SPT+ACT and 5.0 sigma with BBN+BAO (DESI2). A networked approach is invaluable for enabling further progress in accuracy and precision without overreliance on any single method, sample or group.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dispersion Measure Distribution of Unlocalized Fast Radio Bursts as a Probe of the Hubble Constant

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The DM distribution of unlocalized FRBs yields H0 = 73.8 +14.0/-12.3 km/s/Mpc with 18% uncertainty.

  2. Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.

  3. Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.

  4. On the origin of the BAOtr-DESI tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    No CMB-consistent CPL dark energy model can simultaneously fit both the BAOtr and DESI datasets; the 3.7-sigma disagreement at z=0.51 sets an irreducible floor.

  5. Energy-momentum and dark energy in $\boldsymbol{SU(\infty)}$-QGR quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SU(∞)-QGR yields an Einstein-like energy-momentum constraint that includes spin-1 gravitons and treats inflation and accelerating expansion as order parameters tracking the evolution of the universe's quantum states u...

  6. Finding the one: identifying the host of compact binary mergers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Restricting analysis to the top 1% most luminous galaxies in GW localization volumes yields 1-4 candidate hosts for three specific events, with 29-36% probability of random association.

  7. Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dynamical couplings in interacting dark energy models reduce deviations from LambdaCDM to 1.3-1.5 sigma and yield no Bayesian preference over the standard model.

  8. Do equation of state parametrizations of dark energy faithfully capture the dynamics of the late universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Node-based reconstruction of cosmic expansion prefers stronger deceleration at z≈1.7 than smooth DE EoS parametrizations, isolating z~1.5-2 as a window where the latter may compress localized kinematic features permit...

  9. Disentangling cosmic distance tensions with early and late dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Early dark energy resolves CMB-BAO tension and, combined with thawing quintessence, reduces overall cosmological tensions without phantom crossing.

  10. Joint Curvature and Growth Rate measurements with Supernova Peculiar Velocities and the CMB

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SN peculiar velocities plus Planck CMB data give joint constraints on σ8, γ, and Ωk, with hints of positive curvature (Ωk ≈ -0.01) at 2-3σ and γ values consistent with GR.

  11. Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New cosmological data mildly favor a small coupling between dark matter and a scalar dark energy field at |β| ≈ 0.03 while allowing an effective phantom-crossing equation of state.

  12. Probing the Evolution of Dark Energy: A Joint Analysis of DESI DR2, Pantheon+, and Cosmic Chronometers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Joint analysis of DESI DR2, Pantheon+, and cosmic chronometers yields a mild statistical preference for time-varying dark energy over LambdaCDM, though constraints on the evolution remain moderate.

  13. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.