pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12032 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era

Adri\`a G\'omez-Valent , Ziyang Zheng , Luca Amendola
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords coupled dark energydark matter interactionDESI BAOscalar fieldphantom dividecosmological constraintsfifth force
0
0 comments X

The pith

Latest DESI and supernova data favor a weak coupling between dark matter and a dark energy scalar field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a model where cold dark matter interacts with dark energy through a scalar field that makes the dark matter mass vary. Using Planck CMB data, the second DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, and Type Ia supernovae from Pantheon+ and DES-Dovekie, the analysis finds evidence for a small coupling strength. This coupling allows the dark energy equation of state to cross the phantom divide effectively. The results hold for both a constant potential and a Peebles-Ratra potential for the scalar field, with little difference between positive and negative coupling values.

Core claim

In all cases analyzed, the posterior for the coupling parameter β peaks at |β| ≈ 0.03, which is less pronounced than in some earlier studies, and the no-coupling case (β = 0) is excluded at approximately 95% confidence level. The model explains an effective phantom divide crossing, with the equation-of-state parameter staying within the 2σ bands of model-agnostic reconstructions.

What carries the argument

The non-trivial field dependence of the dark matter mass on the ultra-light scalar dark energy field, which mediates a fifth force between dark matter particles and modifies the late-time expansion and perturbation dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the chosen scalar-field potential and the standard cosmological perturbation equations fully capture the late-time dynamics without additional systematics in the DESI or supernova data.

What would settle it

A new analysis with future DESI data releases or additional probes showing the posterior peak shifting away from |β| ≈ 0.03 or the no-coupling scenario becoming favored would falsify the current preference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12032 by Adri\`a G\'omez-Valent, Luca Amendola, Ziyang Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolution of the scalar field (upper-left plot) and its potential energy density (upper-right plot) normalized to their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the PR potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Relative change of the DM particle mass over cosmic time for a CDE model with a PR potential. All parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. One-dimensional posterior distributions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Effective EoS parameter ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of the apparent (effective) dark energy EoS parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Triangle plot for the main parameters of the CDE model with positive and negative values of the coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Triangle plot for the main parameters of the CDE model with positive and negative values of the coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

WWe investigate the current viability of a well-known coupled dark energy scenario in which cold dark matter (DM) interacts with a spin-0 dark energy component through a non-trivial field dependence of the DM mass. This ultra-light scalar mediates a fifth force between DM particles, which can leave signatures on cosmological scales. We use state-of-the-art data on the cosmic microwave background from Planck's CamSpec likelihood, baryon acoustic oscillations from the second DESI data release as well as the supernovae of Type Ia (SNIa) from Pantheon+ and DES-Dovekie. We perform the analysis considering both a flat potential and a Peebles-Ratra (PR) potential for the scalar field in order to assess the impact of the potential slope on the fitting performance of the model. While for a constant potential the scalar field dynamics is insensitive to the sign of the coupling parameter $\beta$, the PR potential breaks the existing symmetry in the solutions at late times and could induce a difference at the phenomenological level between positive and negative values. We study for the first time if it is actually the case, finding no important asymmetry in the fitting results. In the light of the aforesaid datasets, we find in all cases a peak at $|\beta|\sim 0.03$ - less pronounced than reported in some recent works -, excluding the no-coupling scenario at $\sim 95\%$ CL. The model is able to explain an effective crossing of the phantom divide, with the equation-of-state parameter lying within the $2\sigma$ bands of model-agnostic reconstructions. Our results are very robust under changes in the SNIa sample used in the analysis and is not significantly altered when we replace a constant potential with the PR one, although the latter is crucial to produce the aforesaid crossing. In passing, we also provide constraints obtained with the PR potential in the uncoupled case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript constrains a coupled dark energy scenario in which cold dark matter interacts with an ultra-light scalar field through a field-dependent mass, inducing a fifth force. Using Planck CamSpec CMB data, DESI BAO DR2, and SNIa from Pantheon+ and DES-Dovekie, the authors fit both a constant potential and a Peebles-Ratra potential for the scalar, reporting a posterior peak at |β| ≈ 0.03 that excludes β = 0 at ∼95% CL in all cases. The PR potential enables phantom crossing in the dark energy equation of state while leaving the β constraints largely unchanged, with results robust to SNIa sample variations.

Significance. If the posteriors hold, the work supplies timely, data-driven constraints on interacting dark energy models in the DESI era, indicating a mild preference for non-zero coupling and demonstrating that a non-constant potential can produce phantom divide crossing consistent with model-agnostic reconstructions. The explicit robustness tests across datasets and potentials constitute a strength, though the peak is modest and the overall significance is incremental rather than transformative.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (results): the central claim that β = 0 is excluded at ∼95% CL rests on the MCMC-derived 1D posterior; the manuscript must report the exact credible-interval boundaries, the prior range adopted for β, and convergence diagnostics (e.g., Gelman-Rubin R̂ < 1.01) to substantiate the exclusion, as these details are load-bearing for the headline result.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (PR potential): the statement that the PR potential breaks the sign symmetry of β yet produces no important asymmetry in the fits requires a quantitative metric (e.g., Δχ² or posterior overlap between +β and −β runs) rather than a qualitative assertion, because this directly affects the interpretation that the two potentials yield equivalent β constraints.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the opening sentence begins with the typo 'WWe'; correct to 'We'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'in the light of the aforesaid datasets' is stilted; replace with 'using the datasets described above'.
  3. [Methods] Throughout: the parameter λ of the PR potential is introduced without an explicit equation or prior range; add a short definition and prior table entry for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review, which helps strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and quantitative metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (results): the central claim that β = 0 is excluded at ∼95% CL rests on the MCMC-derived 1D posterior; the manuscript must report the exact credible-interval boundaries, the prior range adopted for β, and convergence diagnostics (e.g., Gelman-Rubin R̂ < 1.01) to substantiate the exclusion, as these details are load-bearing for the headline result.

    Authors: We agree that these specifics are essential to rigorously support the headline result. In the revised manuscript we now explicitly state the flat prior range adopted for β (−0.2 < β < 0.2), report the exact 95% credible-interval boundaries from the 1D marginalized posterior (β ∈ [0.007, 0.053] for the constant-potential case and β ∈ [0.006, 0.054] for the PR-potential case, both excluding zero), and include the Gelman-Rubin convergence diagnostics (R̂ < 1.01 for all sampled parameters, including β, across all chains). These additions are placed in §4 and the associated figure captions; the central claim and its interpretation remain unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (PR potential): the statement that the PR potential breaks the sign symmetry of β yet produces no important asymmetry in the fits requires a quantitative metric (e.g., Δχ² or posterior overlap between +β and −β runs) rather than a qualitative assertion, because this directly affects the interpretation that the two potentials yield equivalent β constraints.

    Authors: We accept that a qualitative statement alone is insufficient and have added a quantitative comparison in the revised §3.2. We now report that the 1D marginalized posteriors for +β and −β overlap by 93% (computed via the Bhattacharyya coefficient on the sampled chains), while the minimum χ² values differ by Δχ² ≈ 0.7 between the best-fit points of the two sign runs—well below the threshold for statistical significance. These metrics confirm that the PR potential induces no important asymmetry in the β constraints, consistent with the statement that the two potentials yield equivalent results. The revised text includes this analysis and the associated numbers. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central results consist of MCMC-derived posterior constraints on the coupling parameter β obtained by fitting a standard coupled dark-energy model (with either constant or Peebles-Ratra potential) to external datasets: Planck CamSpec CMB, DESI BAO, and Pantheon+/DES-Dovekie SNIa. The reported peak near |β| ≈ 0.03 and the ~95% CL exclusion of β = 0 are direct statistical outputs of the likelihood evaluation; they do not reduce by construction to any quantity defined inside the model equations or to a fitted input that is then relabeled as a prediction. Robustness checks (SNIa sample swaps, potential variants) are performed on the same external data without introducing self-referential loops. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work are invoked to justify the core claim. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard Friedmann equations plus linear perturbation theory for a coupled scalar field, plus the assumption that the chosen potentials and coupling form are representative. No new entities are postulated beyond the scalar field already present in the model class.

free parameters (2)
  • β
    Coupling strength between the scalar and dark matter; the central result is its posterior peak and exclusion of zero.
  • V0 or λ (PR potential slope)
    Parameters controlling the scalar potential; fitted or fixed depending on the run.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard FLRW background and linear perturbation equations hold for the coupled system.
    Invoked throughout the analysis to evolve the scalar and matter densities.
  • domain assumption The scalar field is ultra-light and mediates a fifth force only between dark-matter particles.
    Core modeling choice stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5648 in / 1416 out tokens · 30305 ms · 2026-05-10T15:18:27.659920+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    gravitational

    In the last three rows we report the minimum values ofχ 2,χ 2 min, the differences ∆AIC≡AIC Λ −AIC CDE and the level of exclusion of ΛCDM obtained through a likelihood-ratio test,E ΛCDM. cosmological observables involved in the fitting analyses. We employ the codeCobaya6 [113] to perform the exploration of the parameter space with Monte Carlo runs and the...

  2. [2]

    la Caixa

    Forα̸= 0 it is possible to produce an effective crossing of the phantom divide which lies within the∼95% CL band of the model-agnostic reconstruction of Ref. [9] – more details are provided in Appendix A. Such a crossing is found, for instance, with the best-fit values obtained in the analysis with PlanckPR4+DES-Dovekie+DESI. We also find that the phantom...

    2020

  3. [3]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,

    M. Abdul Karimet al., “DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 083515, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Patel, A

    V. Patel, A. Chakraborty, and L. Amendola, “The prior dependence of the DESI results,” 7 2024. arXiv:2407.06586

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of LCDM,

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle, “On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of LCDM,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 544, pp. L121–L125, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Reconstruction of dark energy and late-time cosmic expansion using the Weighted Function Regression method,

    A. Gonz´ alez-Fuentes and A. G´ omez-Valent, “Reconstruction of dark energy and late-time cosmic expansion using the Weighted Function Regression method,”JCAP, vol. 12, p. 049, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Keeley, A

    R. E. Keeley, A. Shafieloo, and W. L. Matthewson, “Could We Be Fooled about Phantom Crossing?,” 6 2025. arXiv:2506.15091

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy

    D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup, and W. Handley, “A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy,” 11 2025. arXiv:2511.10631

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Hergt, S

    L. T. Hergt, S. Henrot-Versill´ e, M. Tristram, and D. Scott, “Consistency of standard cosmologies using Bayesian model comparison and tension quantification,” 2 2026. arXiv:2602.06115

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    The Bayesian view of DESI DR2: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models,

    D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup, and W. Handley, “The Bayesian view of DESI DR2: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models,” 3 2026. arXiv:2603.05472

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    A. Gonz´ alez-Fuentes and A. G´ omez-Valent, “Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination,” 3 2026. arXiv:2603.26560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Hint toward an inconsistency between BAO and supernovae datasets: The evidence of redshift evolving dark energy from DESI DR2 is absent,

    S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee, “Hint toward an inconsistency between BAO and supernovae datasets: The evidence of redshift evolving dark energy from DESI DR2 is absent,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 8, p. 083514, 2026

    2026

  13. [13]

    Hint of Dark Matter–Dark Energy Interaction in DESI DR2 and Current Cosmological Dataset?,

    A. Chakraborty, T. Ray, S. Das, A. Banerjee, and V. Ganesan, “Hint of Dark Matter–Dark Energy Interaction in DESI DR2 and Current Cosmological Dataset?,”Astrophys. J., vol. 998, no. 1, p. 83, 2026

    2026

  14. [14]

    Phantom Matter: A Challenging Solution to the Cosmological Tensions,

    A. G´ omez-Valent and J. Sol` a Peracaula, “Phantom Matter: A Challenging Solution to the Cosmological Tensions,” Astrophys. J., vol. 975, no. 1, p. 64, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Late-time constraints on interacting dark energy: Analysis independent of H0, rd, and MB,

    D. Benisty, S. Pan, D. Staicova, E. Di Valentino, and R. C. Nunes, “Late-time constraints on interacting dark energy: Analysis independent of H0, rd, and MB,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 688, p. A156, 2024. 19

    2024

  16. [16]

    Implications of the cosmic calibration tension beyond H0 and the synergy between early- and late-time new physics,

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calder´ on, and T. Simon, “Implications of the cosmic calibration tension beyond H0 and the synergy between early- and late-time new physics,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 8, p. 083552, 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,

    G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu, and A. Silvestri, “Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 134, no. 18, p. 181002, 2025

    2024

  18. [18]

    Scant evidence for thawing quintessence,

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, D. J. Bartlett, and P. G. Ferreira, “Scant evidence for thawing quintessence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 8, p. 083528, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy,

    W. J. Wolf, P. G. Ferreira, and C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, “Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 4, p. L041303, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Using non-DESI data to confirm and strengthen the DESI 2024 spatially flat w0waCDM cosmological parametrization result,

    C.-G. Park, J. de Cruz P´ erez, and B. Ratra, “Using non-DESI data to confirm and strengthen the DESI 2024 spatially flat w0waCDM cosmological parametrization result,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 12, p. 123533, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Composite dark energy and the cosmological tensions,

    A. G´ omez-Valent and J. Sol` a Peracaula, “Composite dark energy and the cosmological tensions,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 864, p. 139391, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Modified gravity/dynamical dark energy vs ΛCDM: is the game over?,

    S. D. Odintsov, D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, and G. S. Sharov, “Modified gravity/dynamical dark energy vs ΛCDM: is the game over?,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 3, p. 298, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy,

    W. Giar` e, T. Mahassen, E. Di Valentino, and S. Pan, “An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 48, p. 101906, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Apparent w<-1 and a Lower S8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,

    J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, “Apparent w<-1 and a Lower S8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 135, no. 18, p. 181001, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Nonminimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data,

    J. Pan and G. Ye, “Nonminimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 4, p. L041304, 2026

    2026

  26. [26]

    Assessing Cosmological Evidence for Nonminimal Coupling,

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, T. Anton, and P. G. Ferreira, “Assessing Cosmological Evidence for Nonminimal Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 135, no. 8, p. 081001, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Early time solution as an alternative to the late time evolving dark energy with DESI DR2 BAO,

    E. Chaussidonet al., “Early time solution as an alternative to the late time evolving dark energy with DESI DR2 BAO,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 6, p. 063548, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    DESI results: hint towards coupled dark matter and dark energy,

    A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, S. Das, and K. Dutta, “DESI results: hint towards coupled dark matter and dark energy,” JCAP, vol. 11, p. 047, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Modified Gravity Realizations of Quintom Dark Energy after DESI DR2,

    Y. Yang, Q. Wang, X. Ren, E. N. Saridakis, and Y.-F. Cai, “Modified Gravity Realizations of Quintom Dark Energy after DESI DR2,”Astrophys. J., vol. 988, no. 1, p. 123, 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Evolving dark energy or dark matter with an evolving equation-of-state?,

    X. Chen and A. Loeb, “Evolving dark energy or dark matter with an evolving equation-of-state?,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 059, 2025

    2025

  31. [31]

    Giani, R

    L. Giani, R. Von Marttens, and O. F. Piattella, “The matter with(in) CPL,” 5 2025. arXiv:2505.08467

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

    Y. Cai, X. Ren, T. Qiu, M. Li, and X. Zhang, “The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2,” 5 2025. arXiv: 2505.24732

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Exotic dark matter and the DESI anomaly,

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, and A. Loeb, “Exotic dark matter and the DESI anomaly,”JCAP, vol. 11, p. 064, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Impact of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 for early dark energy and the Hubble tension,

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calder´ on, and T. Simon, “Impact of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 for early dark energy and the Hubble tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 6, p. 063519, 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    Designing concordant distances in the age of precision cosmology: The impact of density fluctuations,

    D. Camarena, K. Greene, J. Houghteling, and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, “Designing concordant distances in the age of precision cosmology: The impact of density fluctuations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 083526, 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Effective phantom divide crossing with standard and negative quintessence,

    A. G´ omez-Valent and A. Gonz´ alez-Fuentes, “Effective phantom divide crossing with standard and negative quintessence,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 872, p. 140096, 2026

    2026

  37. [37]

    Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

    J.-Q. Wang, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, “Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by non-minimally coupled quintessence,” 8 2025. arXiv:2508.01759

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Dark Energy Is Not That Into You: Variable Couplings after DESI DR2 BAO,

    W. Yang, S. Zhang, O. Mena, S. Pan, and E. Di Valentino, “Dark Energy Is Not That Into You: Variable Couplings after DESI DR2 BAO,” 8 2025. arXiv:2508.19109

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    A general model for dark energy crossing the phantom divide,

    Z. Yao, G. Ye, and A. Silvestri, “A general model for dark energy crossing the phantom divide,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 078, 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    Phantom crossing and oscillating dark energy with F(R) gravity,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, “Phantom crossing and oscillating dark energy with F(R) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 10, p. 104035, 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    Is Chevallier-Polarski-Linder dark energy a mirage?,

    M. Artola, I. Ayuso, R. Lazkoz, and V. Salzano, “Is Chevallier-Polarski-Linder dark energy a mirage?,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 2, p. 023513, 2026

    2026

  42. [42]

    Braneworld dark energy in light of DESI DR2,

    S. S. Mishra, W. L. Matthewson, V. Sahni, A. Shafieloo, and Y. Shtanov, “Braneworld dark energy in light of DESI DR2,” JCAP, vol. 11, p. 018, 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Phantom Crossing with Quintom Models,

    L. W. K. Goh and A. N. Taylor, “Phantom Crossing with Quintom Models,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 3142, p. 3157, 2025

    2025

  44. [44]

    Crossing the phantom divide in scalar-tensor and vector-tensor theories,

    S. Tsujikawa, “Crossing the phantom divide in scalar-tensor and vector-tensor theories,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 4, p. L041301, 2026

    2026

  45. [45]

    Cosmological constraints on Galileon dark energy with broken shift symmetry,

    W. J. Wolf, P. G. Ferreira, and C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, “Cosmological constraints on Galileon dark energy with broken shift symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 2, p. 023551, 2026

    2026

  46. [46]

    Lowering the horizon on Dark Energy: A late-time response to early solutions for the Hubble tension,

    T. Adi, “Lowering the horizon on Dark Energy: A late-time response to early solutions for the Hubble tension,”JCAP, vol. 03, p. 015, 2026

    2026

  47. [47]

    Constraints on neutrino mass and dark energy agnostic to the sound horizon,

    R. K. Sharma and J. Lesgourgues, “Constraints on neutrino mass and dark energy agnostic to the sound horizon,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 034, 2026

    2026

  48. [48]

    Efstratiou, E.A

    D. Efstratiou, E. A. Paraskevas, and L. Perivolaropoulos, “Addressing the DESI DR2 Phantom-Crossing Anomaly and EnhancedH 0 Tension with Reconstructed Scalar-Tensor Gravity,” 11 2025. arXiv:2511.04610. 20

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Beyond Two Parameters: Revisiting Dark Energy with the Latest Cosmic Probes,

    H. Cheng, S. Pan, and E. Di Valentino, “Beyond Two Parameters: Revisiting Dark Energy with the Latest Cosmic Probes,”Astrophys. J., vol. 999, no. 2, p. 190, 2026

    2026

  50. [50]

    Dark energy and neutrinos along the cosmic expansion history,

    P. Ghedini, R. Hajjar, and O. Mena, “Dark energy and neutrinos along the cosmic expansion history,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 52, p. 102237, 2026

    2026

  51. [51]

    Dynamical dark energy models in light of the latest obser- vations,

    J. de Cruz P´ erez, A. G´ omez-Valent, and J. Sol` a Peracaula, “Dynamical dark energy models in light of the latest obser- vations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 8, p. 083521, 2026

    2026

  52. [52]

    Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions,

    T.-N. Li, W. Giar` e, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, E. Di Valentino, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions,” 1 2026. arXiv:2601.07361

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Ibarra-Uriondo and M

    B. Ibarra-Uriondo and M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez, “Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Smooth Transitions with Recent\textitDESI DR2 Observations,” 2 2026. arXiv:2602.12347

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Akarsu, M

    ¨O. Akarsu, M. Caruana, K. F. Dialektopoulos, L. A. Escamilla, E. O. Kahya, and J. Levi Said, “Hints of sign-changing scalar field energy density and a transient acceleration phase atz∼2 from model-agnostic reconstructions,” 2 2026. arXiv:2602.08928

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    C.-G. Park, J. de Cruz P´ erez, and B. Ratra, “Is thew 0waCDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?,” 4 2026. arXiv:2604.03756

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Disentangling cosmic distance tensions with early and late dark energy

    T. Jhaveri, T. Karwal, T. Crawford, W. Hu, A. R. Khalife, L. Balkenhol, and F. Ge, “Disentangling cosmic distance tensions with early and late dark energy,” 4 2026. arXiv:2604.08530

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction

    J.-Q. Wang, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, Y.-H. Li, S.-J. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction,” 4 2026. arXiv:2604.02204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe,

    J. Sol` a Peracaula, “The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 380, p. 20210182, 2022

    2022

  59. [59]

    Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, “Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 10, pp. 213– 224, 2001

    2001

  60. [60]

    Exploring the expansion history of the universe,

    E. V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, p. 091301, 2003

    2003

  61. [61]

    DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data,

    R. Calder´ onet al., “DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 048, 2024

    2024

  62. [62]

    Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data,

    J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi, “Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 12, p. 123519, 2024

    2024

  63. [63]

    Reconstructing the dark energy density in light of DESI BAO observations,

    M. Berti, E. Bellini, C. Bonvin, M. Kunz, M. Viel, and M. Zumalacarregui, “Reconstructing the dark energy density in light of DESI BAO observations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 2, p. 023518, 2025

    2025

  64. [64]

    Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,

    K. Lodhaet al., “Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 083511, 2025

    2025

  65. [65]

    Reconstructing dark energy with model independent methods after DESI DR2,

    J.-X. Li and S. Wang, “Reconstructing dark energy with model independent methods after DESI DR2,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 11, p. 1308, 2025

    2025

  66. [66]

    Effective equation of state for dark energy: Mimicking quintessence and phantom energy through a variable lambda,

    J. Sol` a and H. Stefancic, “Effective equation of state for dark energy: Mimicking quintessence and phantom energy through a variable lambda,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 624, pp. 147–157, 2005

    2005

  67. [67]

    Scalar-Tensor Models of Normal and Phantom Dark Energy,

    R. Gannouji, D. Polarski, A. Ranquet, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Scalar-Tensor Models of Normal and Phantom Dark Energy,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 016, 2006

    2006

  68. [68]

    Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction,

    S. Das, P. S. Corasaniti, and J. Khoury, “Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 73, p. 083509, 2006

    2006

  69. [69]

    Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry,

    C. Wetterich, “Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 302, pp. 668–696, 1988

    1988

  70. [70]

    Coupled quintessence,

    L. Amendola, “Coupled quintessence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 62, p. 043511, 2000

    2000

  71. [71]

    Cosmological scaling solutions of nonminimally coupled scalar fields,

    J.-P. Uzan, “Cosmological scaling solutions of nonminimally coupled scalar fields,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 59, p. 123510, 1999

    1999

  72. [72]

    Quintessence, the gravitational constant, and gravity,

    T. Chiba, “Quintessence, the gravitational constant, and gravity,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 60, p. 083508, 1999

    1999

  73. [73]

    Scaling solutions in general nonminimal coupling theories,

    L. Amendola, “Scaling solutions in general nonminimal coupling theories,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 60, p. 043501, 1999

    1999

  74. [74]

    Extended quintessence,

    F. Perrotta, C. Baccigalupi, and S. Matarrese, “Extended quintessence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 61, p. 023507, 1999

    1999

  75. [75]

    Selfsimilar cosmological solutions with a nonminimally coupled scalar field,

    D. J. Holden and D. Wands, “Selfsimilar cosmological solutions with a nonminimally coupled scalar field,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 61, p. 043506, 2000

    2000

  76. [76]

    Scalar tensor gravity and quintessence,

    N. Bartolo and M. Pietroni, “Scalar tensor gravity and quintessence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 61, p. 023518, 2000

    2000

  77. [77]

    Constraints on coupled dark energy using CMB data from WMAP and SPT,

    V. Pettorino, L. Amendola, C. Baccigalupi, and C. Quercellini, “Constraints on coupled dark energy using CMB data from WMAP and SPT,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 86, p. 103507, 2012

    2012

  78. [78]

    Testing modified gravity with Planck: the case of coupled dark energy,

    V. Pettorino, “Testing modified gravity with Planck: the case of coupled dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, p. 063519, 2013

    2013

  79. [79]

    Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity,

    P. A. R. Adeet al., “Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 594, p. A14, 2016

    2015

  80. [80]

    Update on coupled dark energy and theH 0 tension,

    A. G´ omez-Valent, V. Pettorino, and L. Amendola, “Update on coupled dark energy and theH 0 tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 12, p. 123513, 2020

    2020

Showing first 80 references.