Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models

Canonical reference. 73% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

17 Pith papers citing it
Background 73% of classified citations
abstract

We apply the $\texttt{unimpeded}$ framework to perform a fully Bayesian reanalysis of the DESI DR2 data, using nested sampling with $\texttt{PolyChord}$ to compute evidences for $\Lambda$CDM and seven extensions across combinations of DESI DR1/DR2, Planck CMB, supernovae (Pantheon+, Union3, DES-SN5YR, DES-Dovekie), and DES-Y1 weak lensing. The Bayesian Ockham's razor penalises extended models, yielding weaker or opposite preferences compared to $\Delta\chi^2$-based analyses. For DESI DR2 BAO combined with Planck CMB alone, the DESI collaboration's $3.1\sigma$ frequentist preference for $w_0w_a$CDM is eliminated entirely: we obtain ${\ln B = -0.57{\scriptstyle\pm0.26}}$, modestly favouring $\Lambda$CDM. Adding DES-Dovekie, the recalibration of DES-SN5YR, maintains this concordance (${\ln B = -0.30{\scriptstyle\pm0.19}}$). However, when the earlier DES-SN5YR calibration is included instead, the DESI collaboration's $4.2\sigma$ result survives the Bayesian Ockham penalty as a $3.07{\scriptstyle\pm0.10},\sigma$ preference (${\ln B = +3.32{\scriptstyle\pm0.27}}$). That this signal persists despite the Ockham penalty makes the role of tension quantification essential: our analysis traced the preference to the earlier DES-SN5YR calibration, which introduced a $2.95{\scriptstyle\pm 0.04},\sigma$ conflict with DESI DR2 within $\Lambda$CDM -- a tension that stands out from the grid -- reduced to $1.96{\scriptstyle\pm 0.04},\sigma$ with the DES-Dovekie recalibration. With DES-Dovekie, the Bayesian evidence for dynamical dark energy vanishes.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 8 baseline 1 dataset 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 17

representative citing papers

Evolving Dark Energy Is Vacuum Energy After All

astro-ph.CO · 2026-06-18 · conditional · novelty 5.0

A QCD-vacuum dark-energy model with a two-parameter switch reproduces the DESI-preferred late-time expansion and is mildly favoured over ΛCDM by Bayesian evidence (lnB≈2.7).

Cosmological intercept tension

astro-ph.CO · 2026-04-30 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support for dynamical dark energy.

Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction

astro-ph.CO · 2026-04-28 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

Generalized interacting dark energy models with constant or dynamical couplings yield analytical density expressions but are not preferred over LambdaCDM by Bayesian evidence from DESI, Pantheon+, and CMB data.

The Status of Single Scalar Field Dark Energy

astro-ph.CO · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 4.5

Cosmological data can constrain only a handful of EFT parameters for single-scalar dark energy; extended models show modest preference over Λ but remain underdetermined and challenged by fifth forces and screening.

citing papers explorer

Showing 17 of 17 citing papers.