pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10476 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

Luis A. Anchordoqui , Dieter Lust
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-th
keywords de Sitter swamplanddark energyDESIstring theorycosmologyLambda CDMbaryon acoustic oscillationsdynamical dark energy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Recent DESI measurements favoring evolving dark energy may allow string theory to escape the de Sitter swampland.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the long-standing difficulty string theory faces in constructing stable de Sitter vacua with constant dark energy, which would place the standard Lambda CDM model in the swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories. DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data combined with other surveys indicate a preference for dark energy whose density has decreased by roughly ten percent over the past several billion years. This review connects those observational hints to string-inspired models of dynamical dark energy. A sympathetic reader would care because the result offers a potential observational escape route for string theory from one of its sharpest conflicts with cosmology.

Core claim

The central claim is that the apparent preference in recent DESI data for a time-evolving dark energy density, rather than a constant Lambda, opens a pathway for string theory to describe our universe without violating the de Sitter swampland conjectures that forbid stable de Sitter spaces.

What carries the argument

The de Sitter swampland conjecture, which states that effective field theories admitting stable de Sitter vacua cannot arise from consistent string theory compactifications.

If this is right

  • Constant dark energy models such as Lambda CDM become harder to reconcile with string theory.
  • Dynamical dark energy scenarios gain support as more likely to be consistent with quantum gravity.
  • String theory models incorporating quintessence-like fields can now be confronted directly with cosmological data.
  • The observed reduction in dark energy density over the last several billion years supplies a concrete target for string constructions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the DESI trend holds, next-generation surveys such as Euclid or the Rubin Observatory could further test whether the evolution matches specific string-theory predictions for the dark energy equation of state.
  • Any alternative Lambda CDM explanation for the DESI results would have to be exhaustively excluded before the string-theory compatibility argument can be considered robust.
  • Explicit model-building efforts could now focus on string compactifications that naturally produce a slowly rolling scalar field whose energy density drops by about ten percent in the recent past.

Load-bearing premise

The preference for evolving dark energy reported by DESI reflects the true expansion history rather than unaccounted systematics or alternative explanations still allowed inside Lambda CDM.

What would settle it

Future surveys returning a clear confirmation of constant dark energy density, or an explicit construction of a stable de Sitter vacuum within string theory, would remove the proposed resolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10476 by Dieter Lust, Luis A. Anchordoqui.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Modular invariant potential (91) in the s-a plane (left) and along the axionic direction for s = 1 (right). At a = 0 and s = 1 the potential has a minimum which persists for s ≥ 1. 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Modular Invariant S-dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the S-dual (orange) and modular-invariant (blue) potentials in the s (left) and ϕ (right) coordinates. is at the self-dual point. With the minimum persisting at the self-dual point ∀s ≥ 1, the axion a is effectively frozen at the potential’s minimum. The modular invariant potential shares key characteristics with the S-dual potential (83) at both the self-dual point and in the large-s limit. … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The persistent challenge of creating stable de Sitter vacua within string theory undermines the observational validity of the $\Lambda$ cold dark matter (CDM) model. This difficulty suggests that the concordance model of cosmology, characterized by a constant dark energy $\Lambda$, may reside in the swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories rather than the string landscape of consistent ones. Recent observational data, particularly from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), have significantly challenged $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Specifically, the combination of DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements with cosmological surveys seem to indicate a preference for a dynamic, time-evolving dark energy rather than a constant, with roughly 10\% reduction in density over the last several billion years. This review summarizes significant advancements made over the past two years in linking DESI findings to string-inspired scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing the string-theory de Sitter swampland problem for constant-Lambda cosmologies and recent DESI BAO measurements (combined with other surveys) that appear to favor time-evolving dark energy with an approximately 10% density reduction over the last several billion years. It compiles advancements from the past two years that connect these observations to string-inspired models with dynamic dark energy, thereby offering a potential route out of the swampland.

Significance. If the cited DESI preference for evolving dark energy is robust, the review usefully consolidates literature at the interface of observational cosmology and string theory. Its value lies in synthesizing external results rather than deriving new ones; credit is due for focusing on falsifiable observational inputs (DESI BAO) and for avoiding internal derivations that could introduce circularity.

minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the quantitative claim of a 'roughly 10% reduction in density' should be tied explicitly to a cited DESI analysis or table in the main text so readers can trace the origin of the number without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a timely review synthesizing DESI observations with string-theory swampland considerations, and for recommending minor revision. We agree that the value lies in consolidating external results rather than new derivations, and we have prepared minor updates to improve clarity and completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review of external data and literature

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review that summarizes existing DESI BAO results from external surveys and prior string-theory constructions for time-varying dark energy. No new derivations, parameter fits, predictions, or model-building equations are introduced whose validity depends on quantities defined inside the manuscript. All central claims rest on cited external analyses rather than self-referential definitions or internal reductions, satisfying the default expectation of no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard assumptions of string theory and cosmology without introducing new free parameters or invented entities in the abstract itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stable de Sitter vacua are difficult or impossible to construct in string theory (swampland conjecture).
    Invoked in the opening paragraph as the persistent challenge undermining Lambda CDM.
  • domain assumption DESI BAO measurements combined with other surveys genuinely favor evolving dark energy.
    Stated as the observational input that challenges constant Lambda.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5440 in / 1213 out tokens · 40422 ms · 2026-05-12T04:18:40.845042+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

296 extracted references · 296 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riesset al.[Supernova Search Team], Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009-1038 (1998) doi:10.1086/300499 [arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  2. [2]

    1999, , 517, 565, 10.1086/307221

    S. Perlmutteret al.[Supernova Cosmology Project], Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J.517, 565-586 (1999) doi:10.1086/307221 [arXiv:astro- ph/9812133 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  3. [3]

    Efstathiou, W

    G. Efstathiou, W. J. Sutherland and S. J. Maddox, The cosmological constant and cold dark matter, Nature348, 705-707 (1990) doi:10.1038/348705a0

    work page doi:10.1038/348705a0 1990

  4. [4]

    2013, , 208, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    G. Hinshawet al.[WMAP], Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013) doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 [arXiv:1212.5226 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results VI: Cosmological parameters, Astron. As- trophys.641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004- 2018

  6. [6]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], DESI DR2 results II: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscilla- tions and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083515 (2025) doi:10.1103/tr6y- kpc6 [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]. 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/tr6y- 2025

  7. [7]

    M. A. Sabogal and R. C. Nunes, Robust evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI galaxy-CMB lensing cross-correlation and geometric probes, JCAP09, 084 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/084 [arXiv:2505.24465 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/084 2025

  8. [8]

    Ishak and L

    M. Ishak and L. Medina-Varela, Persistent and serious challenge to the ΛCDM throne: Ev- idence for dynamical dark energy rising from combinations of different types of datasets, [arXiv:2507.22856 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant, Astrophys. J. Lett.325, L17 (1988) doi:10.1086/185100

    work page doi:10.1086/185100 1988

  10. [10]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 1988

  11. [11]

    The cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time-dependent cosmological ``constant''

    C. Wetterich, The Cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time dependent cosmolog- ical ’constant’, Astron. Astrophys.301, 321-328 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9408025 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  12. [12]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1582-1585 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582 [arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582 1998

  13. [13]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  14. [14]

    Palti, The swampland: introduction and review, Fortsch

    E. Palti, The swampland: introduction and review, Fortsch. Phys.67, no.6, 1900037 (2019) doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 [arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 2019

  15. [15]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swampland Program in string compactifications, Phys. Rept.989, 1-50 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 [arXiv:2102.01111 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 2022

  16. [16]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez, The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics, Universe7, no.8, 273 (2021) doi:10.3390/universe7080273 [arXiv:2107.00087 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7080273 2021

  17. [17]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, Landscape, Swampland, and Extra Dimen- sions, PoSCORFU2023, 215 (2024) doi:10.22323/1.463.0215 [arXiv:2405.04427 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.463.0215 2024

  19. [19]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753-1936 (2006) doi:10.1142/S021827180600942X [arXiv:hep-th/0603057 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x 1936

  20. [20]

    Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

    D. Andriot, Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review, [arXiv:2603.25797 [hep- 42 th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Annalen der Physik , year = 1916, volume = 354, pages =

    A. Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity, Annalen Phys.49, no.7, 769-822 (1916) doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702 1916

  22. [22]

    Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1917, 142-152 (1917)

    work page 1917

  23. [23]

    Friedmann, On the Curvature of space, Z

    A. Friedmann, On the Curvature of space, Z. Phys.10, 377-386 (1922) doi:10.1007/BF01332580

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01332580 1922

  24. [24]

    Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z

    A. Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z. Phys.21, 326-332 (1924) doi:10.1007/BF01328280

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01328280 1924

  25. [25]

    Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A47, 49-59 (1927) doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3 1927

  26. [26]

    H. P. Robertson, Kinematics and World-Structure, Astrophys. J.82, 284-301 (1935) doi:10.1086/143681

    work page doi:10.1086/143681 1935

  27. [27]

    A. G. Walker, On Milne’s Theory of World-Structure, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-42, no.1, 90-127 (1937) doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90

    work page doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90 1937

  28. [28]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =

    E. Hubble, A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA1929,15, 168–173. doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

  29. [29]

    Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 030001 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.03 0001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.03 2024

  30. [30]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10, 213-224 (2001) doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 2001

  31. [31]

    E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 2003

  32. [32]

    D. H. Weinberg, M. J. Mortonson, D. J. Eisenstein, C. Hirata, A. G. Riess and E. Rozo, Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration, Phys. Rept.530, 87-255 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 [arXiv:1201.2434 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 2013

  33. [33]

    Brieden, H

    S. Brieden, H. Gil-Mar´ ın and L. Verde, A tale of two (or more)h’s, JCAP04, 023 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/023 [arXiv:2212.04522 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/023 2023

  34. [34]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, JCAP04, 012 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 [arXiv:2404.03000 [astro- 43 ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 2024

  35. [35]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 II: sample definitions, characteristics, and two-point clustering statistics, JCAP07, 017 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/017 [arXiv:2411.12020 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/017 2024

  36. [36]

    D. W. Hogg, Distance measures in cosmology, [arXiv:astro-ph/9905116 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  37. [37]

    2000, , 538, 473, 10.1086/309179

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J.538, 473-476 (2000) doi:10.1086/309179 [arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1086/309179 2000

  38. [38]

    2021, JCAP, 05, 057, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 van Eerten, H

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP05, 057 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 [arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 2021

  39. [39]

    A. J. Rosset al.[eBOSS], The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectro- scopic Survey: Large-scale structure catalogues for cosmological analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, no.2, 2354-2371 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 [arXiv:2007.09000 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 2020

  40. [40]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP02, 021 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 [arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024

  41. [41]

    2020b, Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results V: CMB power spectra and likelihoods, As- tron. Astrophys.641, A5 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 [arXiv:1907.12875 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 2018

  42. [42]

    F. J. Quet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth, Astrophys. J.962, no.2, 112 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 [arXiv:2304.05202 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 2024

  43. [43]

    MacCrannet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis, Astrophys

    N. MacCrannet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis, Astrophys. J.966, no.1, 138 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2610 [arXiv:2304.05196 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2610 2024

  44. [44]

    M. S. Madhavacherilet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravita- tional Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J.962, no.2, 113 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f [arXiv:2304.05203 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f 2024

  45. [45]

    Carron, M

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis, CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps, JCAP09, 44 039 (2022) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 [arXiv:2206.07773 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 2022

  46. [46]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a

    D. Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938, no.2, 113 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a [arXiv:2112.03863 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a 2022

  47. [47]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Broutet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys. J.938, no.2, 110 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 [arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 2022

  48. [48]

    Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys

    D. Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys. J.986, no.2, 231 (2025) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 [arXiv:2311.12098 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 2025

  49. [49]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.[DES], The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set, Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, no.1, L14 (2024) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f [arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f 2024

  50. [50]

    B. Popovicet al.[DES], The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration, [arXiv:2511.07517 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    T. J. Hoyt, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, S. Perlmutter, A. Cuceu and R. Gupta, Union3.1: Self-consistent Measurements of Host Galaxy Properties for 2000 Type Ia Supernovae, [arXiv:2601.19424 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv 2000

  52. [52]

    Rubin, T

    D. Rubin, T. Hoyt, G. Aldering and S. Perlmutter, Banana Split: Improved Cosmological Constraints with Two Light-Curve-Shape and Color Populations Using Union3.1+UNITY1.8, [arXiv:2601.19854 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and J. T. Firouzjaee, Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements, JCAP10, 035 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 [arXiv:2407.16689 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 2024

  54. [54]

    Cortˆ es and A

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle, On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.544, L121-L125 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108 [arXiv:2504.15336 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108 2025

  55. [55]

    Shlivko, P

    D. Shlivko, P. J. Steinhardt and C. L. Steinhardt, Optimal parameterizations for observational constraints on thawing dark energy, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/054 [arXiv:2504.02028 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/054 2025

  56. [56]

    Shlivko and P

    D. Shlivko and P. J. Steinhardt, Assessing observational constraints on dark energy, Phys. Lett. B855, 138826 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138826 [arXiv:2405.03933 [astro- 45 ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138826 2024

  57. [57]

    M. L. Abreu and M. S. Turner, DESI Dark Secrets, [arXiv:2502.08876 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    A. J. Shajib and J. A. Frieman, Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast con- straints, Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 063508 (2025) doi:10.1103/kjpb-r698 [arXiv:2502.06929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/kjpb-r698 2025

  59. [59]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 12, 216 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216 [arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)216 2024

  60. [60]

    No νs is Good News

    N. Craig, D. Green, J. Meyers and S. Rajendran, Noνs is Good News, JHEP09, 097 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)097 [arXiv:2405.00836 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)097 2024

  61. [61]

    Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass

    D. Green and J. Meyers, Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D111, no.8, 083507 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507 [arXiv:2407.07878 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083507 2025

  62. [62]

    Elbers, C

    W. Elbers, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, B. Li and S. Pascoli, Negative neutrino masses as a mirage of dark energy, Phys. Rev. D111, no.6, 063534 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063534 [arXiv:2407.10965 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063534 2025

  63. [63]

    J. Q. Jiang, W. Giar` e, S. Gariazzo, M. G. Dainotti, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi, Neutrino cosmology after DESI: tightest mass upper limits, preference for the normal ordering, and tension with terrestrial observations, JCAP01, 153 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153 [arXiv:2407.18047 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153 2025

  64. [64]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, D. Marfatia and J. F. Soriano, Massive neutrinos and interacting dark matter look alike through the lens of lensing, Phys. Rev. D (in press) doi:10.1103/r89c-jtp2 [arXiv:2511.01048 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/r89c-jtp2

  65. [65]

    Elbers, A

    W. Elbers, A. Aviles, H. E. Noriega, D. Chebat, A. Menegas, C. S. Frenk, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Gonzalez, M. Ishak and O. Lahav,et al.Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083513 (2025) doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 [arXiv:2503.14744 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 2025

  66. [66]

    S. P. Ahlenet al.[DESI], Positive Neutrino Masses with DESI DR2 via Matter Conver- sion to Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, no.8, 081003 (2025) doi:10.1103/yb2k-kn7h [arXiv:2504.20338 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/yb2k-kn7h 2025

  67. [67]

    G. H. Du, T. N. Li, P. J. Wu, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, Cosmological Preference for a 46 Positive Neutrino Mass at 2.7σ: A Joint Analysis of DESI DR2, DESY5, and DESY1 Data, [arXiv:2507.16589 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E. V. Linder, S. Zhang and S. Pan, When One-Parameter Dark Energy Makes Neutrinos Physical Again, [arXiv:2603.15422 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Patel, A

    V. Patel, A. Chakraborty and L. Amendola, The prior dependence of the DESI results, [arXiv:2407.06586 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Efstathiou, Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?, Mon

    G. Efstathiou, Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.538, no.2, 875-882 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnras/staf301 [arXiv:2408.07175 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf301 2025

  71. [71]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, Ωm Tension or Systematics?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.542, no.1, L24-L30 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf042 [arXiv:2412.12905 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf042 2025

  72. [72]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and L. Yin, How much has DESI dark en- ergy evolved since DR1?, Phys. Dark Univ.52, 102268 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102268 [arXiv:2504.04417 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102268 2026

  73. [73]

    Wang and D

    D. Wang and D. Mota, Did DESI DR2 truly reveal dynamical dark energy?, Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.11, 1356 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15076-y [arXiv:2504.15222 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15076-y 2025

  74. [74]

    Efstathiou, Baryon acoustic oscillations from a different angle, Mon

    G. Efstathiou, Baryon acoustic oscillations from a different angle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 540, no.3, 2844-2852 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnras/staf906 [arXiv:2505.02658 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf906 2025

  75. [75]

    D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup and W. Handley, A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy, [arXiv:2511.10631 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  76. [76]

    D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup and W. Handley, The Bayesian view of DESI DR2: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models, [arXiv:2603.05472 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    E. Abdalla, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. Aboubrahim, A. Agnello, O. Akarsu, Y. Akrami, G. Alestas, D. Aloni, L. Amendola and L. A. Anchordoqui,et al.Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmo- logical tensions and anomalies, JHEAp34, 49-211 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 [arXiv:2203.06...

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  78. [78]

    The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision

    S. Casertanoet al.[H0DN], The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision, Astron. Astrophys.708, A166 47 (2026) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557993 [arXiv:2510.23823 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557993 2026

  79. [79]

    Di Valentino, J

    E. Di Valentinoet al.[CosmoVerse Network], The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 [arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 2025

  80. [80]

    Y. H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q. G. Huang, The impact of the Hubble tension on the evi- dence for dynamical dark energy, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, no.8, 280410 (2025) doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2713-8 [arXiv:2503.21600 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2713-8 2025

Showing first 80 references.