pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25797 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc· hep-ph· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

David Andriot
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords string theorydark energyde Sitter solutionsquintessencecosmological constantno-go theoremsstring cosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

String theory places strong constraints on producing the dark energy seen in our expanding universe.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines ways string theory might account for dark energy, either through a cosmological constant or dynamical quintessence. It first outlines proven or conjectured constraints in classical and asymptotic regimes that obstruct such solutions. Attempts to bypass these by shifting regimes or assumptions lead to various construction efforts, each facing specific difficulties. The paper details classical de Sitter solutions and single-field exponential quintessence models, including their coupling to matter and comparison with observational data, while noting the lack of a cosmological event horizon in some cases.

Core claim

Circumventing obstructions from constraints in classical or asymptotic regimes, string theory allows attempts to construct de Sitter solutions, but these face numerous difficulties. The review presents a long list of such attempts with focus on classical ones, alongside quintessence models from single-field exponentials, their matter couplings, and comparisons to data, noting the absence of cosmological event horizons.

What carries the argument

Constraints and no-go theorems on de Sitter solutions in string theory, along with alternative ansatze for their circumvention.

Load-bearing premise

The cited constraints, no-go theorems, and construction attempts from the string-theory literature are accurately represented and remain relevant for realistic cosmological regimes.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of a stable de Sitter solution in string theory that satisfies all current observational requirements while avoiding the reviewed obstructions would test the paper's overview of difficulties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25797 by David Andriot.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of a typical scalar potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Candidate realistic cosmological solution of single field exponential quintessence, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Cosmological solution of single field exponential quintessence, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Universal evolution of the scalar field (red dot), here at different e-folds, in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the equation of state parameter of dark energy in terms of the scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cosmological solutions for models with a coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p090_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the scalar field in the varying effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cosmological solution in a quintessence model similar to that of Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Warp factor H (normalised) along a transverse periodic coordinate σ = y 2πL , for an O6 located at σ = 0 and 2 D6 located at σ = ± 1 2 , with a transverse T 3 . The shaded region around σ = 0 corresponds to the orientifold hole, where H < 0. The figure is adapted from [63, Fig.2a]. We now come back to the smeared de Sitter solutions of type II supergravities found on 6d group manifolds, discussed in Sectio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dark energy, the main constituent in our expanding universe, responsible for its acceleration, is currently being observed with unprecedented precision through various experiments. While several cosmological models can fit this latest data, deriving some of them from string theory would provide a valuable theoretical prior, with information on the nature of dark energy. This article reviews the efforts towards such a derivation, namely the options from string theory to get a cosmological constant (a de Sitter solution) or a dynamical dark energy (via a quintessence model). After providing a brief historical perspective, we first review proven or conjectured constraints on obtaining dark energy from string theory, in classical or asymptotic regimes. Circumventing such obstructions, by changing regime or ansatz, one can try to construct a de Sitter solution: we present a long list of such attempts, and the difficulties encountered. Among them, we discuss in detail efforts towards classical de Sitter solutions. Then, we review quintessence from string theory, focusing on single-field exponential models. Related topics are discussed, including the coupling to matter, the comparison to observational data, and the absence of a cosmological event horizon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an introductory review on deriving dark energy from string theory, either as a cosmological constant via de Sitter solutions or as dynamical dark energy via quintessence. It opens with historical context, surveys proven or conjectured constraints and no-go theorems in classical and asymptotic regimes, compiles a list of de Sitter construction attempts together with the difficulties each encounters (with focused discussion of classical de Sitter solutions), and then examines quintessence models centered on single-field exponential potentials, including matter couplings, comparison with observational data, and the absence of cosmological event horizons.

Significance. If the cited theorems and constructions are represented with their original assumptions and regimes of validity, the review offers a structured compilation that can serve as a useful entry point for researchers entering string cosmology. It consolidates key obstructions and attempted circumventions, thereby clarifying the current state of attempts to connect string theory with the observed acceleration of the universe.

major comments (2)
  1. [Constraints section] In the section reviewing constraints and no-go theorems, each theorem must be accompanied by an explicit statement of its precise assumptions (e.g., classical supergravity, flux compactifications, asymptotic limits) and any documented loopholes; without this, the subsequent narrative of obstructions risks being applied outside its regime of validity when discussing construction attempts.
  2. [de Sitter construction attempts] In the long list of de Sitter construction attempts, every entry should state the original ansatz, the specific obstruction encountered, and the reference to the source paper so that readers can verify the reported difficulty; the current summary form leaves open the possibility that scope or updates in the literature have been misstated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Historical perspective] The historical perspective paragraph would benefit from one or two additional references to post-2020 developments to keep the timeline current.
  2. [Quintessence models] Notation for the single-field exponential quintessence potentials should be standardized across the relevant subsection to avoid ambiguity when comparing to observational bounds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive suggestions for improving the clarity of the review. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the recommended revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Constraints section] In the section reviewing constraints and no-go theorems, each theorem must be accompanied by an explicit statement of its precise assumptions (e.g., classical supergravity, flux compactifications, asymptotic limits) and any documented loopholes; without this, the subsequent narrative of obstructions risks being applied outside its regime of validity when discussing construction attempts.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly stating the assumptions and any known loopholes for each constraint and no-go theorem is essential to maintain accuracy and prevent misapplication outside the relevant regime. In the revised manuscript we will augment the constraints section with, for every theorem discussed, a concise statement of its precise assumptions (including classical supergravity, flux compactifications, or asymptotic limits) together with any documented loopholes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [de Sitter construction attempts] In the long list of de Sitter construction attempts, every entry should state the original ansatz, the specific obstruction encountered, and the reference to the source paper so that readers can verify the reported difficulty; the current summary form leaves open the possibility that scope or updates in the literature have been misstated.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the present condensed format of the de Sitter construction list may not supply sufficient detail for independent verification. We will revise this section so that each entry explicitly records the original ansatz, the precise obstruction reported, and the citation to the source paper, thereby allowing readers to consult the primary literature directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no self-referential derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a review article that compiles and discusses existing constraints (no-go theorems) and construction attempts from the string theory literature on dark energy. It performs no original derivations, fits no parameters, and introduces no ansatze or uniqueness claims of its own. All technical content is attributed to external citations whose validity is independent of the present paper. No step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, and self-citations (if present) are not load-bearing for any central derivation. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review article that summarizes existing literature. No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the author.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 992 out tokens · 43762 ms · 2026-05-15T00:12:39.764764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Axion-Scalar Dynamics: from the Distance Conjecture to Cosmic Acceleration

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In type IIB/F-theory models, axion-scalar systems in finite distance limits produce trajectories of infinite length that drive asymptotic cosmic acceleration.

  2. Bounding axion dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An analytic bound on axion parameters in thawing quintessence is derived independently of initial conditions and used with cosmological observations plus quantum gravity constraints to exclude large regions of axion d...

  3. de Sitter in String Theory vs. Gibbons & Hawking

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Perturbative string theory forbids de Sitter times closed manifold solutions under the assumption that the Euclidean sphere partition function receives a nonzero 1/G_N contribution.

  4. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 290 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 137 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles,Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3406

    1988

  2. [2]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra,Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant,Astrophys. J. Lett.325(1988) L17

    1988

  3. [3]

    The cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time-dependent cosmological ``constant''

    C. Wetterich,The Cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time dependent cosmological ’constant’,Astron. Astrophys.301(1995) 321–328, [hep-th/9408025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  4. [4]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 1582–1585, [astro-ph/9708069]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15(2006) 1753–1936, [hep-th/0603057]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037, [1903.06239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1–50, [2102.01111]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021) 273, [2107.00087]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187. [13]DEScollaboration, T. M. C. Abbott et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024) L14, [2401.02929]. [14]DESIcollaboration, A. G. Adame ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822–855, [hep-th/0007018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  12. [12]

    de Sitter Vacua in String Theory

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi,De Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 046005, [hep-th/0301240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    Systematics of Moduli Stabilisation in Calabi-Yau Flux Compactifications

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,JHEP03(2005) 007, [hep-th/0502058]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo and K. Suruliz,Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,JHEP08(2005) 007, [hep-th/0505076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala, String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1–155, [2303.04819]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo,Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,2310.20559

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    McAllister and A

    L. McAllister and A. Schachner,TASI Lectures on de Sitter Vacua, in , 12, 2025, 2512.17095

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    On the Cosmology of Type IIA Compactifications on SU(3)-structure Manifolds

    C. Caviezel, P. Koerber, S. Kors, D. Lust, T. Wrase and M. Zagermann,On the Cosmology of Type IIA Compactifications on SU(3)-structure Manifolds,JHEP04 (2009) 010, [0812.3551]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Bena and M

    I. Bena and M. Gra˜ na,String cosmology and the landscape,Comptes Rendus Physique 18(2017) 200–206

    2017

  20. [20]

    U. H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet,What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2018) 1830007, [1804.01120]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Quevedo, R. Savelli, A. Schachner and R. Valandro,Systematics of the α’ expansion in F-theory,JHEP08(2021) 099, [2106.04592]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion,JHEP12(2024) 019, [2310.07708]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Wulff,Tree-level R 4 correction from O(d, d): NS-NS five-point terms,JHEP09 (2024) 078, [2406.15240]

    L. Wulff,Tree-level R 4 correction from O(d, d): NS-NS five-point terms,JHEP09 (2024) 078, [2406.15240]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    M. R. Garousi,Type IIA supergravity at one loop:α’ 3 terms in the metric-dilaton-RR one-form sector,JHEP11(2025) 105, [2508.10529]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    M. R. Garousi,Dimensional reduction of the M-theory Chern-Simons term at order ℓp6,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 106019, [2509.13726]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Quantum obstructions for $N=1$ infinite distance limits -- Part I: $g_s$ obstructions

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions for N=1 infinite distance limits – Part I:g s obstructions,2603.12315. 152

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions for N= 1infinite distance limits – Part II: K¨ ahler obstructions,2603.13470

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    I. Bena, M. Gra˜ na and T. Van Riet,Trustworthy de Sitter compactifications of string theory: a comprehensive review,2303.17680

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    De Sitter Space and the Swampland

    G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa,De Sitter Space and the Swampland, 1806.08362

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Bedroya and C

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,JHEP09 (2020) 123, [1909.11063]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Rudelius,Dimensional reduction and (Anti) de Sitter bounds,JHEP08(2021) 041, [2101.11617]

    T. Rudelius,Dimensional reduction and (Anti) de Sitter bounds,JHEP08(2021) 041, [2101.11617]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Rudelius,Asymptotic observables and the swampland,Phys

    T. Rudelius,Asymptotic observables and the swampland,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 126023, [2106.09026]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Open problems on classical de Sitter solutions

    D. Andriot,Open problems on classical de Sitter solutions,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900026, [1902.10093]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Andriot and F

    D. Andriot and F. Ruehle,On classical de Sitter solutions and parametric control, JHEP06(2024) 101, [2403.07065]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1–23

    1989

  36. [36]

    Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask)

    J. Martin,Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask),Comptes Rendus Physique13(2012) 566–665, [1205.3365]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  37. [37]

    C. P. Burgess,The Cosmological Constant Problem: Why it’s hard to get Dark Energy from Micro-physics, in100e Ecole d’Ete de Physique: Post-Planck Cosmology, pp. 149–197, 2015,1309.4133, DOI. [43]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Dudas, S

    E. Dudas, S. Parameswaran and M. Serra,The Cosmological Constant and Dark Dimensions from Non-Supersymmetric Strings,2512.20570

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru,Flux compactification,Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 733–796, [hep-th/0610102]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua

    W. Taylor and Y.-N. Wang,The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua,JHEP12 (2015) 164, [1511.03209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Quantization of Four-form Fluxes and Dynamical Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant

    R. Bousso and J. Polchinski,Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,JHEP06(2000) 006, [hep-th/0004134]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  42. [42]

    Hebecker,Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse: A Modern Introduction with Exercises, vol

    A. Hebecker,Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse: A Modern Introduction with Exercises, vol. 979. Lect.Notes Phys., 3, 2021, 10.1007/978-3-030-65151-0. 153

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65151-0 2021

  43. [43]

    The Dark Dimension and the Swampland,

    M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,The dark dimension and the Swampland, JHEP02(2023) 022, [2205.12293]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    L¨ ust, E

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti and C. Vafa,AdS and the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B797(2019) 134867, [1906.05225]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Supersymmetry breaking with fields, strings and branes,

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti,Supersymmetry Breaking with Fields, Strings and Branes,2511.04367

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Coudarchet,Hiding the extra dimensions: A review on scale separation in string theory,Phys

    T. Coudarchet,Hiding the extra dimensions: A review on scale separation in string theory,Phys. Rept.1064(2024) 1–28, [2311.12105]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Marchesano, G

    F. Marchesano, G. Shiu and T. Weigand,The Standard Model from String Theory: What Have We Learned?,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.74(2024) 113–140, [2401.01939]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    D-Branes at del Pezzo Singularities: Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation

    M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,D-Branes at del Pezzo Singularities: Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP09(2012) 019, [1206.5237]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    D3/D7 Branes at Singularities: Constraints from Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation

    M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,D3/D7 Branes at Singularities: Constraints from Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP 07(2013) 150, [1304.0022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter

    M. Cicoli, D. Klevers, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro, Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter,JHEP05 (2014) 001, [1312.0014]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    Global Orientifolded Quivers with Inflation

    M. Cicoli, I. Garc` ıa-Etxebarria, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo, P. Shukla and R. Valandro, Global Orientifolded Quivers with Inflation,JHEP11(2017) 134, [1706.06128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Cicoli, I

    M. Cicoli, I. G. Etxebarria, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, P. Shukla and R. Valandro, The Standard Model quiver in de Sitter string compactifications,JHEP08(2021) 109, [2106.11964]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Kamionkowski and A

    M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess,The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.73(2023) 153–180, [2211.04492]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith and T. Karwal,The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: A review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023, Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101348, [2302.09032]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    String Cosmology: A Review

    L. McAllister and E. Silverstein,String Cosmology: A Review,Gen. Rel. Grav.40 (2008) 565–605, [0710.2951]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [56]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2015, 10.1017/CBO9781316105733

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781316105733 2015

  57. [57]

    Andriot and D

    D. Andriot and D. Tsimpis,Gravitational waves in warped compactifications,JHEP 06(2020) 100, [1911.01444]. 154

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Laplacian spectrum on a nilmanifold, truncations and effective theories

    D. Andriot and D. Tsimpis,Laplacian spectrum on a nilmanifold, truncations and effective theories,JHEP09(2018) 096, [1806.05156]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Tsimpis,Consistent truncation on Calabi-Yau and Nearly-K¨ ahler manifolds,PoS CORFU2019(2020) 122, [2002.09359]

    D. Tsimpis,Consistent truncation on Calabi-Yau and Nearly-K¨ ahler manifolds,PoS CORFU2019(2020) 122, [2002.09359]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    J. Lin, T. Skrzypek and K. S. Stelle,Compactification on Calabi-Yau threefolds: consistent truncation to pure supergravity,JHEP03(2025) 200, [2412.00186]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Andriot, P

    D. Andriot, P. Marconnet and T. Wrase,New de Sitter solutions of 10d type IIB supergravity,JHEP08(2020) 076, [2005.12930]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Stability Constraints on Classical de Sitter Vacua

    G. Shiu and Y. Sumitomo,Stability Constraints on Classical de Sitter Vacua,JHEP 09(2011) 052, [1107.2925]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    G. R. Smith, D. Tennyson and D. Waldram,All-orders moduli for type II flux backgrounds,2409.03847

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Flux compactifications in string theory: a comprehensive review

    M. Grana,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys. Rept.423(2006) 91–158, [hep-th/0509003]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  65. [65]

    Lectures on Generalized Complex Geometry for Physicists

    P. Koerber,Lectures on Generalized Complex Geometry for Physicists,Fortsch. Phys. 59(2011) 169–242, [1006.1536]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    Lectures on Gauged Supergravity and Flux Compactifications

    H. Samtleben,Lectures on Gauged Supergravity and Flux Compactifications,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 214002, [0808.4076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    Trigiante,Gauged Supergravities,Phys

    M. Trigiante,Gauged Supergravities,Phys. Rept.680(2017) 1–175, [1609.09745]

    work page arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    M. P. Hertzberg, S. Kachru, W. Taylor and M. Tegmark,Inflationary Constraints on Type IIA String Theory,JHEP12(2007) 095, [0711.2512]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  69. [69]

    Simple de Sitter Solutions

    E. Silverstein,Simple de Sitter Solutions,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 106006, [0712.1196]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    On classical de Sitter solutions in higher dimensions

    T. Van Riet,On classical de Sitter solutions in higher dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 055001, [1111.3154]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  71. [71]

    Andriot and L

    D. Andriot and L. Horer,(Quasi-) de Sitter solutions across dimensions and the TCC bound,JHEP01(2023) 020, [2208.14462]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and D. Erkinger,The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound,JHEP07(2020) 162, [2004.00030]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Andriot, M

    D. Andriot, M. Rajaguru and G. Tringas,Single versus multifield scalar potentials from string theory,JHEP05(2025) 046, [2501.17775]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Marconnet and D

    P. Marconnet and D. Tsimpis,Universal accelerating cosmologies from 10d supergravity,JHEP01(2023) 033, [2210.10813]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Andriot, D

    D. Andriot, D. Tsimpis and T. Wrase,Accelerated expansion of an open universe and string theory realizations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123515, [2309.03938]. 155

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    U. H. Danielsson, G. Shiu, T. Van Riet and T. Wrase,A note on obstinate tachyons in classical dS solutions,JHEP03(2013) 138, [1212.5178]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  77. [77]

    Andriot,New constraints on classical de Sitter: flirting with the swampland, Fortsch

    D. Andriot,New constraints on classical de Sitter: flirting with the swampland, Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1800103, [1807.09698]

    work page arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    On classical de Sitter and Minkowski solutions with intersecting branes

    D. Andriot,On classical de Sitter and Minkowski solutions with intersecting branes, JHEP03(2018) 054, [1710.08886]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Andriot, L

    D. Andriot, L. Horer and P. Marconnet,Exploring the landscape of (anti-) de Sitter and Minkowski solutions: group manifolds, stability and scale separation,JHEP08 (2022) 109, [2204.05327]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Andriot, L

    D. Andriot, L. Horer and G. Tringas,Negative scalar potentials and the swampland: an Anti-Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture,JHEP04(2023) 139, [2212.04517]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.