pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12214 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

Gustav Uhre Jakobsen , Kathrin Stoldt
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords angular momentum fluxblack hole scatteringstatic correlatorsone-loop integralspost-Minkowskian regimegravitational scatteringelectromagnetic scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Static correlators reduce the angular momentum flux in black hole scattering to a family of one-loop integrals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a direct diagrammatic approach to the total angular momentum carried away during black hole scattering in the post-Minkowskian regime. It observes that the core calculation aligns with existing impulse computations except for additional static contributions arising from zero-frequency effects. These static parts are organized by defining static correlators as n-point functions, which collapse to a single family of one-loop integrals that are evaluated explicitly through integration-by-parts relations and differential equations. The method yields an explicit result for the angular momentum flux at order G cubed that matches known values and extends without change to the electromagnetic case at order alpha cubed. Static contributions are shown to vanish completely when the spacetime dimension exceeds four.

Core claim

By establishing a one-to-one correspondence between the diagrammatic structure for angular momentum flux and that for black hole impulses, aside from zero-frequency gravitons, the static integration region is captured by static correlators that reduce to a simple one-loop integral family; these integrals are solved using integration-by-parts and the method of differential equations, with the concrete outcome that static terms disappear for spacetime dimensions D greater than 4, and the full O(G^3) flux is obtained explicitly.

What carries the argument

Static correlators, n-point functions that isolate the static integration region and reduce the entire static sector to a single one-loop integral family solved by integration-by-parts relations and differential equations.

If this is right

  • The O(G^3) total flux of angular momentum is obtained explicitly and reproduces known results.
  • Static contributions vanish identically in spacetime dimensions greater than four.
  • The identical method produces the O(alpha^3) angular momentum flux in electromagnetism.
  • Techniques already available for impulse calculations can be carried over directly to the flux problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reduction to one-loop integrals opens a route to automated evaluation of angular momentum dissipation at higher post-Minkowskian orders.
  • The clean dimensional dependence may supply guidance for regularization choices when extracting four-dimensional physics from higher-dimensional calculations.
  • The same static-correlator organization could be tested on other conserved quantities such as linear momentum or energy flux in scattering events.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the diagrammatic and integrational challenges for angular momentum flux match those of the black hole impulse calculation except for the zero-frequency gravitons.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the O(G^3) angular momentum flux performed without using the impulse correspondence; disagreement with the known result reproduced by the static correlators would falsify the claimed one-to-one mapping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12214 by Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Kathrin Stoldt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The first row are “geodesic” and scale as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Diagrams constituting the static loss of angular momentum at 3PM order. The first row of diagrams (a)-(g) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Diagrams contributing to the dynamical loss of angular momentum at 3PM order. Only 1SF diagrams are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We extend the worldline quantum field theory formalism to include a direct diagrammatic method of computing the total flux of angular momentum from a black hole scattering event in the post-Minkowskian regime. Remarkably, except for subtle zero-frequency gravitons, the diagrammatic and integrational challenge is in a one-to-one correspondence with the analogous calculation of the black hole impulses -- and the well-developed WQFT methodologies for the impulse may thus be directly imported to this problem. Zero-frequency gravitons appear in this calculation as a "static" integration region in addition to the "dynamical" region usually encountered for the impulse. We show that a large class of static contributions can be organized systematically by introducing $n$-point functions referred to as "static correlators". They reduce to a simple one-loop integral family which we compute explicitly using integration-by-parts relations and the method of differential equations. In passing, our analysis shows that static contributions disappear in space-time dimensions $D>4$. As a concrete application of our new method, we compute explicitly the $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$ total flux of angular momentum reproducing known results. Further, we apply the same method to electromagnetism where we compute the analogous $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^3)$ result.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the worldline quantum field theory (WQFT) formalism to compute the total flux of angular momentum emitted in black hole scattering events in the post-Minkowskian regime. It argues that the diagrammatic structure maps directly onto existing impulse calculations except in the zero-frequency static region, which is organized using newly introduced n-point static correlators. These correlators reduce to a one-loop integral family that is evaluated explicitly via integration-by-parts relations and the method of differential equations. The paper reports that static contributions vanish for D>4, provides an explicit O(G^3) result that reproduces known values, and applies the same framework to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a systematic and reusable method for calculating angular momentum dissipation in gravitational scattering, a quantity relevant to radiation reaction and gravitational-wave modeling. The reduction of a class of static contributions to explicitly solvable one-loop integrals, together with the reproduction of prior O(G^3) results and the dimensional vanishing statement, constitutes a concrete technical advance. The parallel treatment of the electromagnetic case further broadens the utility of the approach.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract asserts that the O(G^3) result reproduces known values, but a brief explicit comparison (e.g., numerical coefficient or reference to the prior expression) would strengthen immediate verifiability for readers.
  2. The definition and diagrammatic representation of the static correlators should be introduced with a short equation or figure early in the text to distinguish them clearly from the dynamical correlators already used in impulse calculations.
  3. The statement that static contributions disappear in D>4 is presented in passing; a short derivation sketch or reference to the relevant integral property would improve clarity without lengthening the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, recognition of the technical advance in the static correlators, and recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the provided report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation introduces independent static correlators and validates against known results

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain centers on extending WQFT to angular momentum flux via a stated diagrammatic correspondence to impulse calculations (except for zero-frequency gravitons), with the novel element being static correlators that reduce to an explicit one-loop integral family. These are computed from first principles using integration-by-parts relations and differential equations, yielding an O(G^3) flux that reproduces known results as validation. No quoted step shows a prediction reducing by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the static contributions are handled independently and shown to vanish for D>4, with an analogous EM computation. The chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on standard perturbative QFT and post-Minkowskian assumptions; the only new organizational device is the static correlator, which has no independent evidence outside the paper.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of quantum field theory in the post-Minkowskian expansion around flat space
    The entire calculation is performed within the perturbative expansion in G (or α) for scattering events.
invented entities (1)
  • static correlators no independent evidence
    purpose: To systematically organize and compute static (zero-frequency) contributions to angular momentum flux
    New n-point functions introduced in the paper; no external falsifiable handle is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5527 in / 1328 out tokens · 69462 ms · 2026-05-13T04:40:40.050931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    geodesic

    Cutting the third propagator, it becomes clear that the second propagator turns into a constant factor ofω IR. Further the second boundary integralI (101) is a simple (massive) tadpole after cutting the third propagator. Having determined the radiative boundary conditions, the dissipative solutions of the integrals read, ⃗Idis(γ, ϵ) = i 4π (γ2 −1) − 1 2 a...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ra- diative

    Gravitons with double black and blue coloring may be either dynamic or static. Further, only diagrams (c) and (d) may be static and radiative. At the 2PM order, it is known from the impulse that the gravitons cannot go on-shell in the dynamical region. Therefore any dissipative effects will originate from static contributions and we have, ∆b(2PM)µ i,dis =...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    In particular, the third propagator involvingk µ is the “active graviton” highlighted in red in the diagrams of Fig. 3. The factors of 2πin front of the delta functions are for convenience. 10 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) FIG. 2: Diagrams constituting the static loss of angular momentum at 3PM order. The first row of diagrams (a)-(g) co...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    S. W. Ballmer et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Future Gravitational-Wave Detector Facilities, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022,2203.08228

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour,Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 064015 [gr-qc/0001013]

    work page arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Pretorius,Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys

    F. Pretorius,Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 121101 [gr-qc/0507014]

    work page arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    M. A. Scheel et al.,The SXS collaboration’s third catalog of binary black hole simulations,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) 195017 [2505.13378]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2 [1310.1528]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    R. A. Porto and M. M. Riva,Black Hole Dynamics at Fifth Post-Newtonian Order,2604.09545

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Six-loop gravitational interac- tions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, J. Ronca et al.,Six-loop gravitational interactions at the sixth post-Newtonian order, 2512.19498

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, S. Smith et al.,All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential,2604.14134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Quadrupolar bremsstrahlung waveform at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian accuracy,2604.21522

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Radiative contributions to gravitational scattering,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 084031 [2107.08896]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Radiated momentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 024012 [2210.07165]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory

    T. Damour,Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104015 [1609.00354]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

    T. Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 044038 [1710.10599]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443014 [2203.13024]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    D. A. Kosower, R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443015 [2203.13025]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    From boundary data to bound states,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From Boundary Data to Bound States,JHEP01(2020) 072 [1910.03008]. 15

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    M. V. S. Saketh, J. Vines, J. Steinhoff and A. Buonanno,Conservative and radiative dynamics in classical relativistic scattering and bound systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 013127 [2109.05994]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    G. Cho, G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From boundary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,JHEP 04(2022) 154 [2112.03976]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,Phys. Rept.633(2016) 1 [1601.04914]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Levi, Rep

    M. Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,Rept. Prog. Phys.83 (2020) 075901 [1807.01699]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    M. V. S. Saketh, J. Steinhoff, J. Vines and A. Buonanno,Modeling horizon absorption in spinning binary black holes using effective worldline theory, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 084006 [2212.13095]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme,JHEP09(2015) 219 [1501.04956]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Renormalizing Love: tidal effects at the third post-Newtonian order,2308.01865

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff, Radiating Love: adiabatic tidal fluxes and modes up to next-to-next-to-leading post-Newtonian order,JHEP 05(2025) 008 [2412.01706]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Beneke and V

    M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold,Nucl. Phys. B 522(1998) 321 [hep-ph/9711391]

    work page arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 251601 [1304.1806]

    work page arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033]

    work page arXiv 2000

  33. [33]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory, JHEP02(2021) 048 [2010.02865]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    G. U. Jakobsen,Gravitational Scattering of Compact Bodies from Worldline Quantum Field Theory, other thesis, 8, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Haddad, G

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull and J. Plefka, Unitarity and the On-Shell Action of Worldline Quantum Field Theory,JHEP02(2026) 008 [2510.00988]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,JHEP10(2022) 128 [2207.00569]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and K. Stoldt,Radiated angular momentum from spinning black hole scattering trajectories,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 124076 [2506.20643]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Gonzo and G

    R. Gonzo and G. Mogull,Canonical Quantisation of Bound and Unbound WQFT,2603.05237

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit

    L. Bohnenblust, C. Jordan Eriksen, J. Hoogeveen, G. U. Jakobsen and J. Plefka,Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit,2604.22009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Bastianelli, F

    F. Bastianelli, F. Comberiati and L. de la Cruz,Light bending from eikonal in worldline quantum field theory, JHEP02(2022) 209 [2112.05013]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Wang,Binary dynamics from worldline QFT for scalar QED,Phys

    T. Wang,Binary dynamics from worldline QFT for scalar QED,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 085011 [2205.15753]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Comberiati and L

    F. Comberiati and L. de la Cruz,Classical off-shell currents,JHEP03(2023) 068 [2212.09259]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, C. J. Eriksen and N. Shah,The gravitational Compton amplitude from flat and curved spacetimes at second post-Minkowskian order,JHEP10(2025) 235 [2506.19705]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    V. F. He and J. Parra-Martinez,Generalized Unitarity Method for Worldline Field Theory,2510.00989

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Bohnenblust, H

    L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus and J. Schlenk, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering atO G3 : linear-in-spin effects,JHEP11(2024) 109 [2312.14859]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Bohnenblust, H

    L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus and J. Schlenk, Gravitational bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering at O G3 : quadratic-in-spin effects,JHEP12(2025) 100 [2505.15724]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka et al.,Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering, Nature641(2025) 603 [2411.11846]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 241402 [2403.07781]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer et al.,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order,2601.16256

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and Y. Xu,Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 151401 [2306.01714]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer, Dissipative scattering of spinning black holes at fourth post-Minkowskian order,2308.11514

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer, Tidal effects and renormalization at fourth post-Minkowskian order,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L041504 [2312.00719]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Spinning the probe in Kerr with WQFT,

    J. Hoogeveen, G. U. Jakobsen and J. Plefka,Spinning the probe in Kerr with WQFT,JHEP10(2025) 201 [2506.14626]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics, JHEP11(2020) 106 [2006.01184]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Mougiakakos, M

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024041 [2102.08339]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto, Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 101401 [2210.05541]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders, 2604.25916

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, Local-in-Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fifth 16 Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Orders,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 251401 [2506.20665]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5)without Self-Force Truncation,2512.23654

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 171601 [1806.04920]

    work page arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon,From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 251101 [1808.02489]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell, Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP02(2019) 137 [1811.10950]

    work page arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201603 [1901.04424]

    work page arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini,One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,JHEP06(2023) 048 [2303.06111]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The gravitational eikonal: from particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters, 2306.16488

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    On-shell heavy particle effective theories,

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,On-shell heavy particle effective theories,JHEP05(2020) 051 [2001.09164]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove,On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,JHEP11(2021) 213 [2107.12891]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,JHEP09 (2023) 059 [2306.11454]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 201602 [2101.07255]

    work page arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2021) 148 [2104.03957]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad and A. Helset,Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,JHEP11(2019) 070 [1908.10308]

    work page arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,Classical gravity from loop amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 026009 [2104.04510]

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Cheung and M

    C. Cheung and M. P. Solon,Classical gravitational scattering atO(G 3) from Feynman diagrams,JHEP 06(2020) 144 [2003.08351]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour,High precision black hole scattering: Tutti frutti vs worldline effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 044002 [2504.20204]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,Phys

    T. Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 124008 [2010.01641]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(2021) 201103 [2101.12688]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    A. V. Manohar, A. K. Ridgway and C.-H. Shen, Radiated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Classical Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 121601 [2203.04283]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 138049 [2210.12118]

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Heissenberg,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),Phys

    C. Heissenberg,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 126012 [2501.02904]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(2022) 011101 [2106.10256]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.