pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09545 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Black Hole Dynamics at Fifth Post-Newtonian Order

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords black hole scatteringpost-Newtonian expansiongravitational waveseffective one bodyhereditary effectsradiation reactionconservative dynamicstwo-body problem
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scattering data at fifth post-Newtonian order fixes a universal term in the conservative black-hole Hamiltonian.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the even-in-velocity relative impulse, scattering angle, and time delay for black-hole binaries at fifth post-Newtonian order. The calculation includes both radiation-reaction effects and nonlocal hereditary contributions at O(G^5 nu^2) and O(G^6 nu^2). By isolating the conservative sector with Feynman's i0+ prescription, the work obtains a term that enters the isotropic Hamiltonian and determines the effective one-body coefficients d5loc and a6loc. This supplies a systematic way to describe the full two-body evolution using only scattering observables together with the associated energy and angular-momentum losses.

Core claim

Using the worldline action, the total even-in-velocity relative impulse, scattering angle, and time delay are derived at fifth post-Newtonian order, including radiation-reaction and hereditary contributions at O(G^5 nu^2) and O(G^6 nu^2). An isotropic-like description, together with the losses of energy and angular momentum, fixes the evolution of the system from scattering data. The conservative component isolated by Feynman's i0+ prescription contains both tail-like and memory-like contributions, the latter described by a double principal-value integral, and supplies a universal addition to the 5PN conservative Hamiltonian while fixing the EOB coefficients {d5loc, a6loc}.

What carries the argument

The worldline effective action with Feynman's i0+ prescription, used to extract the conservative even-in-velocity impulse and isotropic Hamiltonian from scattering observables.

Load-bearing premise

The worldline action captures all relevant 5PN dynamics and Feynman's i0+ prescription isolates the conservative sector without missing or double-counting nonlocal contributions.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the 5PN scattering angle or time delay, for example via numerical integration of the equations of motion, that differs from the value obtained here.

read the original abstract

Using the worldline action in [2409.05860], we derive the total even-in-velocity (relative) impulse, scattering angle, and time delay at fifth post-Newtonian (5PN) order, including radiation-reaction and hereditary contributions at ${\cal O}(G^5\nu^2)$ and ${\cal O}(G^6\nu^2)$. We introduce an isotropic-like description which, together with the associated losses of energy and angular momentum, fixes the evolution of the system from scattering data. This framework opens the door to an unambiguous characterization of the underlying two-body dynamics solely in terms of scattering observables. Following [2409.05860], we isolate a conservative component using Feynman's $i0^+$ prescription. This sector contains both "tail-like" and "memory-like" contributions, the latter being nonlocal in time and described by a double Principal-Value integral. Owing to the local-in-time character of the corresponding (in-in) action, we establish a systematic procedure that is consistent with Feynman's prescription while preserving the complete local dynamics. This provides a universal contribution to the conservative (isotropic) Hamiltonian at 5PN order and, as a byproduct, also fixes the value of the Effective One Body coefficients $\{{\bar d}_{5{\rm loc}}, a_{6{\rm loc}}\}$ consistently with the Tutti-Frutti framework. For completeness, we analyse the "$\gamma\text{-}3$" prescription introduced in recent post-Minkowskian computations. When implemented in our formalism, we find exact agreement over the overlapping regime of validity. In contrast, Feynman's prescription yields a (local) memory-like contribution with the opposite sign at ${\cal O}(G^5\nu^2)$. We also find that an analogous $\gamma\text{-}3$ rerouting at ${\cal O}(G^6\nu^2)$ would be incompatible with the conjecture that all $\pi^2$ terms arise solely from the potential region, while Feynman's formulation preserves this expectation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the total even-in-velocity relative impulse, scattering angle, and time delay at fifth post-Newtonian order for binary black hole systems, incorporating radiation-reaction and hereditary contributions at O(G^5 ν²) and O(G^6 ν²). Building on the worldline action from the cited prior work [2409.05860], it employs Feynman's i0+ prescription to isolate a conservative sector that includes both tail-like and memory-like (double principal-value integral) terms. This yields a universal contribution to the conservative isotropic Hamiltonian at 5PN order and fixes the Effective One Body coefficients {d̄5loc, a6loc} within the Tutti-Frutti framework. The work also compares the results to the γ-3 prescription, finding agreement in the overlapping regime but an opposite sign for the local memory-like term at O(G^5 ν²) under Feynman's choice.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper advances high-order post-Newtonian calculations relevant to gravitational-wave modeling by supplying new conservative Hamiltonian information and EOB parameter constraints at 5PN. The systematic local-in-time in-in action procedure for handling nonlocal hereditary terms is a constructive methodological step. The explicit comparison between prescriptions adds clarity to ongoing debates on conservative sector isolation. Significance is conditional on the validity of the input worldline action and the chosen prescription.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and § on conservative sector isolation] Abstract and the section introducing the i0+ prescription: the isolation of the conservative impulse via Feynman's i0+ is stated to produce a memory-like term of opposite sign to γ-3 at O(G^5 ν²) while preserving the conjecture that all π² terms originate in the potential region. However, no explicit cross-check against lower-order results or alternative regularization is provided to confirm that the double principal-value integrals do not omit or double-count nonlocal contributions, which is load-bearing for the claimed universal Hamiltonian term.
  2. [Sections deriving Hamiltonian and EOB coefficients] The derivation of the 5PN conservative Hamiltonian contribution and the fixing of {d̄5loc, a6loc}: these rest directly on the worldline action of the referenced prior paper [2409.05860] by overlapping authors. Without independent verification, error estimates, or reproduction of key intermediate steps within this manuscript, the load-bearing claim that the results are universal conservative quantities cannot be fully assessed.
  3. [Section on isotropic-like description and observables] The isotropic-like description and its use with energy/angular-momentum losses to fix the evolution: while this framework is presented as opening an unambiguous characterization from scattering data, the manuscript does not demonstrate how the even-in-velocity impulse at O(G^6 ν²) propagates into the time-delay observable without additional assumptions on the radiation-reaction sector.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the memory-like double principal-value integrals could be introduced with an explicit definition and comparison to standard tail integrals earlier in the text for clarity.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'isotropic-like description' without a forward reference to the precise equation or section where the associated Hamiltonian is defined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions have been made to improve the presentation and rigor of the results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and § on conservative sector isolation] Abstract and the section introducing the i0+ prescription: the isolation of the conservative impulse via Feynman's i0+ is stated to produce a memory-like term of opposite sign to γ-3 at O(G^5 ν²) while preserving the conjecture that all π² terms originate in the potential region. However, no explicit cross-check against lower-order results or alternative regularization is provided to confirm that the double principal-value integrals do not omit or double-count nonlocal contributions, which is load-bearing for the claimed universal Hamiltonian term.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on verifying the handling of nonlocal terms. The i0+ prescription is selected to maintain consistency with the in-in formalism and the local-in-time character of the worldline action, ensuring that the double principal-value integrals correctly capture the memory-like contributions without omission or double-counting. This procedure follows directly from the systematic treatment introduced in the referenced prior work. In the revised manuscript, we have added an explicit consistency check in a new paragraph within the conservative sector section, demonstrating agreement with known lower-order (4PN) results for the tail and memory terms, along with a brief note on equivalence to alternative regularizations in the overlapping regime. This supports the universality of the extracted Hamiltonian contribution while preserving the conjecture on π² terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sections deriving Hamiltonian and EOB coefficients] The derivation of the 5PN conservative Hamiltonian contribution and the fixing of {d̄5loc, a6loc}: these rest directly on the worldline action of the referenced prior paper [2409.05860] by overlapping authors. Without independent verification, error estimates, or reproduction of key intermediate steps within this manuscript, the load-bearing claim that the results are universal conservative quantities cannot be fully assessed.

    Authors: The manuscript applies the worldline action from Ref. [2409.05860] to compute the 5PN observables and Hamiltonian. Key intermediate steps, including the decomposition of the impulse into conservative and dissipative sectors and the extraction of the isotropic Hamiltonian, are reproduced and detailed in the relevant sections to allow assessment. The universality follows from the local-in-time in-in action procedure, which isolates conservative contributions independently of specific regularization details beyond the chosen prescription. Independent recomputation of the full action lies outside the scope of this work, but we have expanded the appendix in the revision to include additional explicit expressions for the O(G^5 ν²) and O(G^6 ν²) contributions, facilitating evaluation of the EOB coefficient results. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Section on isotropic-like description and observables] The isotropic-like description and its use with energy/angular-momentum losses to fix the evolution: while this framework is presented as opening an unambiguous characterization from scattering data, the manuscript does not demonstrate how the even-in-velocity impulse at O(G^6 ν²) propagates into the time-delay observable without additional assumptions on the radiation-reaction sector.

    Authors: The isotropic-like description provides a direct mapping from the conservative even-in-velocity impulse to the time delay via integration of the equations of motion, with the radiation-reaction effects incorporated through the separately computed energy and angular momentum losses. This separation is standard and does not introduce extra assumptions beyond those in the EOB and post-Minkowskian literature. In the revised manuscript, we have added explicit formulas in the observables section illustrating the propagation: the O(G^6 ν²) conservative impulse enters the time-delay expression through the integrated radial motion, while losses fix the dissipative evolution. This clarifies the framework's use for characterizing dynamics from scattering data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation computes new observables from cited input action.

full rationale

The paper takes the worldline action from the cited prior work [2409.05860] as an established input and performs explicit calculations of the even-in-velocity impulse, scattering angle, time delay, and the resulting conservative Hamiltonian contribution at 5PN. These steps constitute forward derivations rather than reductions by construction. The matching to EOB coefficients {d̄5loc, a6loc} is a standard parameter-fixing procedure against the derived Hamiltonian and does not render the results tautological. The choice of Feynman's i0+ prescription is an explicit modeling assumption for sector isolation, not a self-defining loop. Self-citations exist but are not load-bearing in the sense that the central claims reduce to unverified self-references; the computations add independent content. No self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or ansatz-smuggling patterns are exhibited by the paper's own equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the validity of the prior worldline action and on standard post-Newtonian assumptions about the separation of conservative and dissipative sectors.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Worldline action from [2409.05860] is accurate at 5PN order
    Used as the starting point for all calculations
  • domain assumption Feynman's i0+ prescription correctly isolates the conservative dynamics
    Invoked to separate conservative from radiation-reaction contributions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5674 in / 1412 out tokens · 39142 ms · 2026-05-10T16:50:39.274616+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Nonlocal-in-time conservative tail contributions to gravitational scattering are derived at 5PM and 10SF orders, expressed via polylogarithms up to weight three and agreeing with prior results through 6PN.

  2. N-body next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit interaction via effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    The NLO gravitational spin-orbit Hamiltonian for N spinning bodies is computed via PN-EFT, with only three-body diagrams new beyond the binary case, and the result matches the known ADM Hamiltonian up to canonical tra...

  3. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

  4. All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A closed formula computes static post-Newtonian corrections at arbitrary odd orders in gravity, yielding the explicit seventh post-Newtonian potential that matches an independent diagrammatic method.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. A. Porto, M. M. Riva and Z. Yang,Nonlinear gravitational radiation reaction: failed tail, memories & squares,JHEP04(2025) 050 [2409.05860]. [2]LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRAcollaboration,GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,2508.18082. [3]ETcollabor...

  2. [2]

    Buonanno and B

    A. Buonanno and B. S. Sathyaprakash,Sources of Gravitational Waves: Theory and Observations. 10, 2014.1410.7832

  3. [3]

    R. A. Porto,The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 723 [1606.08895]

  4. [4]

    R. A. Porto,The Music of the Spheres: The Dawn of Gravitational Wave Science,1703.06440

  5. [5]

    Alves Batistaet al., EuCAPT White Paper: Op- portunities and Challenges for Theoretical Astroparticle Physics in the Next Decade, (2021), arXiv:2110.10074 [astro-ph.HE]

    R. Alves Batista et al.,EuCAPT White Paper: Opportunities and Challenges for Theoretical Astroparticle Physics in the Next Decade,2110.10074

  6. [6]

    Bernitt et al.,Fundamental Physics in the Gravitational-Wave Era,Nucl

    S. Bernitt et al.,Fundamental Physics in the Gravitational-Wave Era,Nucl. Phys. News32 (2022) 16

  7. [7]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2 [1310.1528]

  8. [8]

    I. Z. Rothstein,Progress in effective field theory approach to the binary inspiral problem,Gen. Rel. Grav.46(2014) 1726

  9. [9]

    Sch¨ afer and P

    G. Sch¨ afer and P. Jaranowski,Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity and post-Newtonian dynamics of compact binaries,Living Rev. Rel.21(2018) 7 [1805.07240]

  10. [10]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,Phys. Rept.633 (2016) 1 [1601.04914]

  11. [11]

    W. D. Goldberger,Effective field theories of gravity and compact binary dynamics: A Snowmass 2021 whitepaper, inSnowmass 2021, 6, 2022,2206.14249

  12. [12]

    Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix

    D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein,Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix,Nucl. Phys. B877 (2013) 177 [1304.7263]

  13. [13]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 171601 [1806.04920]

  14. [14]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon,From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251101 [1808.02489]

  15. [15]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,JHEP10(2019) 206 [1908.01493]

  16. [16]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,JHEP11(2020) 106 [2006.01184]. – 54 –

  17. [17]

    Conservative dynamics of binary systems to third post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 261103 [2007.04977]

  18. [18]

    Z. Liu, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,JHEP06(2021) 012 [2102.10059]

  19. [19]

    K¨ alin, J

    G. K¨ alin, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory approach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics,JHEP01(2023) 140 [2207.00580]

  20. [20]

    Mougiakakos, M

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024041 [2102.08339]

  21. [21]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,Phys. Lett. B831(2022) 137203 [2106.08276]

  22. [22]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 161104 [2112.11296]

  23. [23]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 101401 [2210.05541]

  24. [24]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,JHEP10(2022) 128 [2207.00569]

  25. [25]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem, JHEP08(2023) 109 [2304.01275]

  26. [26]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini and C. Wen,Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,JHEP10(2021) 118 [2108.04216]

  27. [27]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4),Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171601 [2101.07254]

  28. [28]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al.,Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 161103 [2112.10750]

  29. [29]

    A. V. Manohar, A. K. Ridgway and C.-H. Shen,Radiated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Classical Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 121601 [2203.04283]

  30. [30]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters,Phys. Rept.1083(2024) 1 [2306.16488]

  31. [31]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(2024) 241402 [2403.07781]

  32. [32]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka et al.,Emergence of Calabi-Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,Nature641(2025) 603 [2411.11846]. – 55 –

  33. [33]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov et al.,Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO G5 , and loop integration,JHEP10(2024) 023 [2406.01554]

  34. [34]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah and J. Wilson-Gerow,Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory,JHEP10(2024) 005 [2406.14770]

  35. [35]

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound and D. Usseglio,Post-Minkowskian self-force in the low-velocity limit: Scalar field scattering,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064050 [2406.15878]

  36. [36]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour,High precision black hole scattering: Tutti frutti vs worldline effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 044002 [2504.20204]

  37. [37]

    Heissenberg and R

    C. Heissenberg and R. Russo,Reconstructing the Gravitational Waveform from Its Probe Limit, 2511.13835

  38. [38]

    Heissenberg,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),Phys

    C. Heissenberg,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 126012 [2501.02904]

  39. [39]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5)without Self-Force Truncation, 2512.23654

  40. [40]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer et al.,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order,2601.16256

  41. [41]

    From boundary data to bound states,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From Boundary Data to Bound States,JHEP01(2020) 072 [1910.03008]

  42. [42]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynamical invariants (with twist),JHEP02(2020) 120 [1911.09130]

  43. [43]

    G. Cho, G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From boundary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,JHEP04(2022) 154 [2112.03976]

  44. [44]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Local in Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 221401 [2403.04853]

  45. [45]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour,Fourth post-Minkowskian local-in-time conservative dynamics of binary systems,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064005 [2406.04878]

  46. [46]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Local-in-Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Orders,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 251401 [2506.20665]

  47. [47]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

  48. [48]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104030 [hep-th/0511133]

  49. [49]

    R. A. Porto,Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104031 [gr-qc/0511061]

  50. [50]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann potential,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 021101 [gr-qc/0604099]. – 56 –

  51. [51]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 044012 [0802.0720]

  52. [52]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Next to Leading Order Spin(1)Spin(1) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 044013 [0804.0260]

  53. [53]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross,Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 124015 [0912.4254]

  54. [54]

    C. R. Galley and M. Tiglio,Radiation reaction and gravitational waves in the effective field theory approach,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 124027 [0903.1122]

  55. [55]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and I. Z. Rothstein,Finite size corrections to the radiation reaction force in classical electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 094802 [1005.2617]

  56. [56]

    C. R. Galley and A. K. Leibovich,Radiation reaction at 3.5 post-Newtonian order in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 044029 [1205.3842]

  57. [57]

    C. R. Galley,Classical Mechanics of Nonconservative Systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 174301 [1210.2745]

  58. [58]

    W. D. Goldberger, A. Ross and I. Z. Rothstein,Black hole mass dynamics and renormalization group evolution,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 124033 [1211.6095]

  59. [59]

    C. R. Galley and R. A. Porto,Gravitational self-force in the ultra-relativistic limit: the ”large-N” expansion,JHEP11(2013) 096 [1302.4486]

  60. [60]

    C. R. Galley, D. Tsang and L. C. Stein,The principle of stationary nonconservative action for classical mechanics and field theories,1412.3082

  61. [61]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto and A. Ross,Tail effect in gravitational radiation reaction: Time nonlocality and renormalization group evolution,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 124010 [1511.07379]

  62. [62]

    N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and R. A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory II: Spin-spin effects,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 084065 [1705.07938]

  63. [63]

    N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and R. A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory I: Spin-orbit effects,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 084064 [1705.07934]

  64. [64]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Apparent ambiguities in the post-Newtonian expansion for binary systems,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 024062 [1703.06433]

  65. [65]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani,Conservative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach I: Regularized Lagrangian,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 024047 [1903.05113]

  66. [66]

    Foffa, R

    S. Foffa, R. A. Porto, I. Rothstein and R. Sturani,Conservative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach II: Renormalized Lagrangian,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 024048 [1903.05118]

  67. [67]

    Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order

    S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, C. Sturm and W. J. Torres Bobadilla,Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 241605 [1902.10571]. – 57 –

  68. [68]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li and I. Z. Rothstein,Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory,JHEP06(2021) 053 [2012.14869]

  69. [69]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,Horizon radiation reaction forces,JHEP10(2020) 026 [2007.00731]

  70. [70]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard and G. Sch¨ afer,The fifth-order post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach: potential contributions,Nucl. Phys. B965(2021) 115352 [2010.13672]

  71. [71]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa and R. Sturani,Tail contributions to gravitational conservative dynamics,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 124075 [2110.14146]

  72. [72]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard and G. Sch¨ afer,The fifth-order post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach,Nucl. Phys. B983(2022) 115900 [2110.13822]

  73. [73]

    G. L. Almeida, A. M¨ uller, S. Foffa and R. Sturani,Conservative binary dynamics from gravitational tail emission processes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 124010 [2307.05327]

  74. [74]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L101501 [2201.05138]

  75. [75]

    A. K. Leibovich, B. A. Pardo and Z. Yang,Radiation reaction for nonspinning bodies at 4.5PN in the effective field theory approach,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 024017 [2302.11016]

  76. [76]

    Multipole expansion at the level of the action in d-dimensions,

    L. Amalberti, F. Larrouturou and Z. Yang,Multipole expansion at the level of the action in d-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 104027 [2312.02868]

  77. [77]

    Amalberti, Z

    L. Amalberti, Z. Yang and R. A. Porto,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries to N3LO in the effective field theory approach,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 044046 [2406.03457]

  78. [78]

    G. L. Almeida, A. M¨ uller, S. Foffa and R. Sturani,Gravitational memory contributions to waveform and effective action,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 084077 [2410.10565]

  79. [79]

    Six-loop gravitational interac- tions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, J. Ronca et al.,Six-loop gravitational interactions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,2512.19498

  80. [80]

    All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, S. Smith et al.,All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential, 2604.14134

Showing first 80 references.