pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15160 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

N-body next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit interaction via effective field theory

Leonardo Wimmer , Hideyuki Tagoshi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords post-Newtonian effective field theoryspin-orbit interactionN-body problemgeneral relativityADM Hamiltonianthree-body interactionscanonical transformation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The NLO spin-orbit Hamiltonian for N spinning bodies matches the known ADM result after a canonical transformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the post-Newtonian effective field theory approach for spinning gravitating bodies from binary systems to arbitrary N. It computes the next-to-leading-order spin-orbit potential and Hamiltonian using two separate routes. One route works in a generalized canonical gauge; the other starts from a covariant spin supplementary condition and performs a transformation to canonical variables. In both routes the only new terms beyond the binary case are three-body interaction diagrams. The resulting canonical Hamiltonians agree with the established ADM N-body Hamiltonian of Hartung and Steinhoff once a canonical transformation is allowed.

Core claim

Using the post-Newtonian effective field theory formalism for spinning gravitating bodies, the NLO spin-orbit potential and Hamiltonian for a system of N spinning bodies is derived. Two derivations are presented: one in the generalized canonical gauge, and one based on the covariant spin supplementary condition followed by a noncanonical transformation to canonical variables. The only new contributions beyond the binary case are three-body interaction diagrams. The canonical Hamiltonians from both routes agree with the known ADM N-body Hamiltonian up to a canonical transformation.

What carries the argument

PN-EFT three-body interaction diagrams for the spin-orbit sector at next-to-leading order.

If this is right

  • The NLO spin-orbit interaction for any number of bodies is obtained from binary results plus three-body diagrams.
  • The EFT method reproduces the known ADM Hamiltonian, validating its extension beyond binaries.
  • Canonical transformations reconcile the two EFT derivation paths.
  • No four-body or higher interaction terms enter at this order in the spin-orbit sector.
  • The framework applies directly to multi-body systems such as triples or small clusters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same EFT route can be applied to higher post-Newtonian orders or other spin couplings in N-body problems.
  • Improved spin-precession modeling becomes feasible for gravitational-wave sources involving multiple compact objects.
  • Numerical relativity simulations of small-N systems could provide a direct cross-check of the derived Hamiltonian.
  • Similar three-body diagram counting may simplify calculations for other finite-N gravitational effects.

Load-bearing premise

The PN-EFT formalism for spinning bodies extends to arbitrary N with only three-body diagrams supplying the new contributions at NLO spin-orbit order.

What would settle it

An independent derivation of the NLO N-body spin-orbit Hamiltonian that differs from the EFT result even after any canonical transformation is applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15160 by Hideyuki Tagoshi, Leonardo Wimmer.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. LO spin-orbit Feynman diagrams. The black and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Generic worldline diagrams contributing to the LO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Generic worldline diagrams contributing to the NLO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Feynman diagrams contributing to the NLO spin-orbit interaction. The first two rows show the one-graviton diagrams, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. New three-body diagrams contributing to the NLO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Additional two-body and three-body diagrams con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Using the post-Newtonian effective field theory (PN-EFT) formalism for spinning gravitating bodies, we derive the next-to-leading-order (NLO) spin-orbit potential and Hamiltonian for a system of N spinning bodies in general relativity. This extends the EFT treatment of the binary case to arbitrary N. We present two derivations: one in the generalized canonical gauge, and one based on the covariant spin supplementary condition (SSC), followed by a noncanonical transformation to canonical variables. In both approaches, the only new contributions beyond the binary case are three-body interaction diagrams. The canonical Hamiltonians obtained from the two EFT routes agree with the known ADM N-body Hamiltonian of Hartung and Steinhoff up to a canonical transformation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives the next-to-leading-order (NLO) gravitational spin-orbit potential and Hamiltonian for an arbitrary number N of spinning bodies in general relativity using the post-Newtonian effective field theory (PN-EFT) formalism. Two independent derivations are presented: one in the generalized canonical gauge and one via the covariant spin supplementary condition followed by a non-canonical transformation to canonical variables. Both routes yield canonical Hamiltonians that agree with the known ADM N-body result of Hartung and Steinhoff up to a canonical transformation, with the only new contributions beyond the binary case being three-body interaction diagrams.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a systematic EFT confirmation of the N-body NLO spin-orbit Hamiltonian, extending prior binary results while validating the multi-body power counting at this order. The agreement between two distinct EFT implementations and an independent ADM calculation adds robustness to the PN framework for spinning systems. This is particularly useful for modeling hierarchical or multi-body gravitational-wave sources and for N-body simulations that incorporate spin-orbit effects at 1.5PN and 2.5PN orders.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation sections (around the discussion of diagram contributions and power counting)] The central claim that only three-body diagrams furnish new contributions at NLO rests on the assertion that the PN-EFT power counting for spinning bodies extends from the binary case without independent four-body (or higher) vertices. No explicit diagram classification, vertex enumeration, or scaling argument is supplied showing why a four-body diagram containing two spin-orbit insertions is either absent or reducible to three-body terms at this order. This justification is load-bearing for the completeness of the N-body result and for the reported agreement with the ADM Hamiltonian when N>3.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Section describing the covariant SSC route] Notation for the spin supplementary condition and the subsequent non-canonical transformation could be clarified with an explicit mapping between the two gauges used in the two derivations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for highlighting the importance of explicit power-counting justification. We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more detailed discussion of diagram topologies and scaling arguments to support the claim that only three-body diagrams contribute new terms at NLO. We will revise the derivation sections accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that only three-body diagrams furnish new contributions at NLO rests on the assertion that the PN-EFT power counting for spinning bodies extends from the binary case without independent four-body (or higher) vertices. No explicit diagram classification, vertex enumeration, or scaling argument is supplied showing why a four-body diagram containing two spin-orbit insertions is either absent or reducible to three-body terms at this order. This justification is load-bearing for the completeness of the N-body result and for the reported agreement with the ADM Hamiltonian when N>3.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. In the PN-EFT approach, the spin-orbit vertex enters at 1.5PN order with a definite velocity scaling (v^3 relative to the leading Newtonian term). At NLO (2.5PN), diagrams are built from one or two such vertices connected by graviton propagators whose momentum scaling is fixed by the PN power counting. For four or more bodies, any diagram involving two spin-orbit insertions requires additional graviton lines to connect the extra particles. These extra propagators each contribute at least an extra factor of v^2, pushing the contribution to 3.5PN or higher. Diagrams that appear to connect four bodies at NLO either factorize into products of two-body terms (which are already accounted for in the binary result) or can be reduced to three-body interactions via the leading-order equations of motion. We will add a new subsection in the derivation that enumerates all possible diagram classes at this order, provides the explicit scaling for each topology, and demonstrates the absence of independent four-body vertices. This addition will also make the agreement with the ADM Hamiltonian for N>3 fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; matches independent external ADM result

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that two EFT derivations reproduce the known N-body ADM Hamiltonian of Hartung and Steinhoff (different authors, different method) up to canonical transformation, with only three-body diagrams as new terms. This is an external benchmark rather than a self-referential fit or definition. No quoted equations reduce a prediction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain that bears the load; the extension from binary to N is presented as following from standard power counting without introducing new fitted parameters or renaming known results as derivations. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the cited external result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard post-Newtonian EFT framework for spinning bodies and the assumption that higher-than-three-body diagrams vanish at this order; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The post-Newtonian effective field theory formalism for spinning gravitating bodies applies without modification to systems of arbitrary N.
    Invoked to justify extending the binary derivation to N bodies and to assert that only three-body diagrams are new.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5415 in / 1255 out tokens · 43390 ms · 2026-05-15T02:58:40.876714+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized canonical gauge In the generalized canonical gauge, the spin gauge is fixed from the start, so the spin couplings are written only in terms of the 3 independent components ofS ij. Assum- ing minimal coupling, and after fixing the spin gauge of the rotational variables, the spin-dependent part of the worldline action in this gauge is given by [...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Spin supplementary conditions Alternatively, one can keep bothS ij and the 3 redun- dant componentsS 0i during the calculation, and remove the latter by imposing an SSC. The spin action takes the form [55] Spp(S) =− Z dλ1 2 SµνΩµν =− Z dλ 1 2 SabΩab flat + 1 2 Sabωab µ uµ .(16) Among the many different SSCs, the covariant SSC is given byS µνpν = 0 [103]. ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    For maxi- mally rotating compact objects,v rot ≲1

    Power counting The PN counting of spin follows from the relation S∼mv rotrs, wherev rot is the rotational velocity of the compact body andr s ∼Gmits size. For maxi- mally rotating compact objects,v rot ≲1. In the inspiral regime, the virial theorem givesGm/r∼v 2, and there- forer s ∼rv 2. Hence S mr ∼v 2.(19) In this sense, each spin counts as orderv 2 in...

    work page

  4. [4]

    con- nected

    Feynman diagrams In the PN regime, the gravitational field is weak, so we expand the metric around a flat background. We write gµν =η µν +H µν + ¯hµν,(20) whereH µν denotes potential gravitons and ¯hµν radia- tion gravitons. They scale as (k 0,k)∼(v/r,1/r) and (k0,k)∼(v/r, v/r), respectively. Potential gravitons me- diate the conservative orbital interact...

    work page

  5. [5]

    1− 1 2 v2 − 1 8 v4 +· · ·+ ϕ+ 3 2 ϕ v2 −A ivi − 1 2 Aiviv2 − 1 2 σijvivj + 1 2 ϕ2 −ϕA ivi +· · · # ,(33) Spp(S) = Z dt Sij

    Feynman rules The Feynman rules used to computeWare obtained by substituting the KS parametrization intoS GR and expanding in the NRG fields. We first consider the bulk term. After two integrations by parts, the part quadratic in the fields is S(quad) bulk = 1 32πG Z d4x −4(∂ iϕ)2 + 4(∂0ϕ)2 + (∂iAj)2 −(∂ 0Ai)2 + 1 4(∂iσjj)2 − 1 2(∂iσjk)2 − 1 4(∂0σii)2 + 1...

    work page

  6. [6]

    NLO two-body diagrams The two-body diagrams in the NLO spin-orbit sector are obtained by considering all possible attachments of two source worldlines to the generic worldline diagrams shown in Fig. 3. This gives 7 one-graviton diagrams, 3 two-graviton diagrams, and 7 three-graviton diagrams. These diagrams are shown in Fig. 4. Using the Feyn- man rules i...

    work page

  7. [7]

    3 gives the 6 three-body diagrams shown in Fig

    NLO three-body diagrams Attaching 3 source worldlines to the two-graviton and three-graviton generic worldline diagrams in Fig. 3 gives the 6 three-body diagrams shown in Fig. 5. They cor- respond to the new contributions specific to theN-body problem. Using the Feynman rules in Table I, we obtain L(e1) = X a X b̸=a X c̸=a,b 8G2mbmc r2 abrac Sa ·v b ×n ab...

    work page

  8. [8]

    This agreement is a nontrivial check of the ADM re- sult and of our independent PN-EFT derivation

    In both routes, the resulting canonical Hamiltonian agrees with theN-body ADM Hamiltonian of Hartung and Steinhoff after a canonical transformation. This agreement is a nontrivial check of the ADM re- sult and of our independent PN-EFT derivation. It also shows explicitly how the PN-EFT formalism extends be- yond the binary case in the spin-orbit sector. ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), “GWTC- 4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient cat- alog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Class. Quantum Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Class. Quan- tum Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO Sci- entific Collaboration, and Virgo Collaboration), Living Rev. Relativity21, 3 (2018), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativity27, 4 (2024), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Kimura, Prog

    T. Kimura, Prog. Theor. Phys.26, 157 (1961)

    work page 1961

  18. [18]

    Hiida and H

    K. Hiida and H. Okamura, Prog. Theor. Phys.47, 1743 (1972)

    work page 1972

  19. [19]

    T. Ohta, H. Okamura, T. Kimura, and K. Hiida, Prog. Theor. Phys.51, 1598 (1974)

    work page 1974

  20. [20]

    T. Ohta, H. Okamura, T. Kimura, and K. Hiida, Prog. Theor. Phys.51, 1220 (1974)

    work page 1974

  21. [21]

    Effective one body approach to the dynamics of two spinning black holes with next-to-leading order spin-orbit coupling

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D77, 064032 (2008), arXiv:0803.0915 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    ADM canonical formalism for gravitating spinning objects

    J. Steinhoff, G. Sch¨ afer, and S. Hergt, Phys. Rev. D 77, 104018 (2008), arXiv:0805.3136 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Next-to-leading order spin-orbit and spin(a)-spin(b) Hamiltonians for n gravitating spinning compact objects

    J. Hartung and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. D83, 044008 (2011), arXiv:1011.1179 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Towards the 4th post-Newtonian Hamiltonian for two-point-mass systems

    P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D86, 061503 (2012), arXiv:1207.5448 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Dimensional regularization of local singularities in the 4th post-Newtonian two-point-mass Hamiltonian

    P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D87, 081503 (2013), arXiv:1303.3225 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Derivation of local-in-time fourth post-Newtonian ADM Hamiltonian for spinless compact binaries

    P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D92, 124043 (2015), arXiv:1508.01016 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 2293 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605238 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rep.633, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Levi, Rep

    M. Levi, Rep. Prog. Phys.83, 075901 (2020), arXiv:1807.01699 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    C. R. Galley and B.-L. Hu, (2009), arXiv:0906.0968 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Bernard, S

    L. Bernard, S. Giri, L. Lehner, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D112, 124013 (2025), arXiv:2507.17143 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D81, 124015 (2010), arXiv:0912.4254 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Effective field theory approach to the gravitational two-body dynamics, at fourth post-Newtonian order and quintic in the Newton constant

    S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, and C. Sturm, Phys. Rev. D95, 104009 (2017), arXiv:1612.00482 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Snowmass white pa- per: Gravitational waves and scattering amplitudes,

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Snowmass white pa- per: Gravitational waves and scattering amplitudes,” (2022), arXiv:2204.05194

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D100, 024047 (2019), arXiv:1903.05113 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Foffa, R

    S. Foffa, R. A. Porto, I. Z. Rothstein, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D100, 024048 (2019), arXiv:1903.05118 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Nucl. Phys. B955, 115041 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    The dynamics of the gravitational two-body problem at fourth post-Newtonian order and at quadratic order in the Newton constant

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D87, 064011 (2013), arXiv:1206.7087 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Tail terms in gravitational radiation reaction via effective field theory

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D87, 044056 (2013), arXiv:1111.5488 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D96, 024063 (2017), arXiv:1703.06434 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D96, 024062 (2017), arXiv:1703.06433 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Nucl. Phys. B965, 115352 (2021), arXiv:2010.13672 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Nucl. Phys. B983, 115900 (2022), arXiv:2110.13822 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order

    S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, C. Sturm, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 241605 (2019), arXiv:1902.10571 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, and P. Marquard, Phys. Lett. B 800, 135100 (2020), arXiv:1902.11180 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D101, 064033 (2020), arXiv:1907.02869 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D104, 024069 (2021), arXiv:2103.03190 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124075 (2021), arXiv:2110.14146 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024020 (2023), arXiv:2209.11594 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Black Hole Dynamics at Fifth Post-Newtonian Order

    R. A. Porto and M. M. Riva, “Black hole dynamics at fifth post-Newtonian order,” (2026), arXiv:2604.09545 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Foffa, R

    S. Foffa, R. Sturani, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, J. High Energy Phys.02, 165 (2021), arXiv:2010.13730 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Lett. B807, 135496 (2020), arXiv:2003.07145 [gr- qc]. 25

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Lett. B816, 136260 (2021), arXiv:2101.08630 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Six-loop gravitational interac- tions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,

    G. Brunello et al., “Six-loop gravitational interac- tions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,” (2025), arXiv:2512.19498 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, S. Smith, and J. Steinhoff, “All-order struc- ture of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential,” (2026), arXiv:2604.14134 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D73, 104031 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0511061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 021101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604099 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  60. [60]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D78, 044013 (2008), arXiv:0804.0260 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D78, 044012 (2008), arXiv:0802.0720 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Next-to-leading order gravitational spin1-spin2 coupling with Kaluza-Klein reduction

    M. Levi, Phys. Rev. D82, 064029 (2010), arXiv:0802.1508 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling in an effective field theory approach

    M. Levi, Phys. Rev. D82, 104004 (2010), arXiv:1006.4139 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys.09, 219 (2015), arXiv:1501.04956 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order

    M. Levi, Phys. Rev. D85, 064043 (2012), arXiv:1107.4322 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Equivalence of ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 coupling of binary inspirals

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12, 003 (2014), arXiv:1408.5762 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Leading order finite size effects with spins for inspiralling compact binaries

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys.06, 059 (2015), arXiv:1410.2601 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01, 011 (2016), arXiv:1506.05056 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01, 008 (2016), arXiv:1506.05794 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    J.-W. Kim, M. Levi, and Z. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 098 (2023), arXiv:2209.09235 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    J.-W. Kim, M. Levi, and Z. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 184 (2023), arXiv:2208.14949 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys.07, 128 (2023), arXiv:2210.09176 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys.03, 130 (2023), arXiv:2209.00611 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    M. Levi, S. Mougiakakos, and M. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys.01, 036 (2021), arXiv:1912.06276 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Levi and F

    M. Levi and F. Teng, J. High Energy Phys.01, 066 (2021), arXiv:2008.12280 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Levi and Z

    M. Levi and Z. Yin, J. High Energy Phys.04, 079 (2023), arXiv:2211.14018 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpi et al., “LISA definition study report,” (2024), arXiv:2402.07571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Maggiore, C

    M. Maggiore et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.03, 050 (2020), arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evans et al., “A horizon study for Cosmic Ex- plorer: Science, observatories, and community,” (2021), arXiv:2109.09882

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Cardoso, F

    V. Cardoso, F. Duque, and G. Khanna, Phys. Rev. D 103, L081501 (2021), arXiv:2101.01186 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.