pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22009 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords worldline quantum field theoryblack hole responseshockwave metricpost-Minkowskian resummationgravitational self-forcegravitational wave scatteringultra high-energy limit
0
0 comments X

The pith

The one-point graviton response function resums exactly to the shockwave metric of an ultra-boosted black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a black hole response formulation of worldline quantum field theory adapted to the gravitational self-force expansion. Integrating out the worldline and graviton fluctuations produces connected graviton response functions, where the one-point function encodes the background metric and the two-point function describes gravitational wave scattering. For a massless primary source corresponding to an ultra-boosted black hole, these functions resum to exact nonlinear results including the shockwave metric, geodesics, and the full scattering transfer matrix. The post-Minkowskian series for the two-point response exponentiates into a compact form with a phase factor dressing the Born term. If correct, this supplies exact all-order results in the gravitational coupling for high-energy black hole interactions and supplies ingredients for systematic self-force computations of impulses and waveforms.

Core claim

In the black hole response formulation of worldline quantum field theory, integrating out the worldline and graviton fluctuations yields connected graviton response functions. The zeroth response or one-point function encodes the exact background metric. For a massless primary source corresponding to the Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave or ultra-boosted black hole, the one-point response resums to the exact shockwave metric and the resummed probe vertices reproduce the exact geodesics in this background. The first response or off-shell graviton two-point function is computed exactly in the gravitational coupling G by resumming the full post-Minkowskian series. For on-shell external gravitons this y

What carries the argument

Connected graviton response functions obtained by integrating out the worldline and graviton fluctuations in the adapted worldline quantum field theory

Load-bearing premise

That integrating out the worldline and graviton fluctuations in the adapted WQFT yields connected graviton response functions whose resummation exactly reproduces the full nonlinear shockwave metric, geodesics, and scattering transfer matrix without hidden approximations or additional assumptions.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the resummed one-point response function against the known closed-form shockwave metric, or independent computation of the on-shell graviton scattering transfer matrix off the shockwave and verification that it matches the resummed two-point response including the phase factor.

read the original abstract

We develop a black hole response formulation of worldline quantum field theory (WQFT) adapted to the gravitational self-force expansion. Integrating out the worldline and graviton fluctuations yields connected graviton response functions: the "zeroth response" one-point function encodes the exact background metric, the "first response" two-point function describes the scattering of a gravitational wave off the black hole, and higher-point functions provide effective vertices for a systematic gravitational self-force (SF) expansion. As a first application, we consider a massless primary source, corresponding to the Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave or an ultra-boosted black hole. We show that the one-point response resums to the exact shockwave metric and that the resummed probe vertices reproduce the exact geodesics in this background. We then compute the off-shell graviton two-point response exactly in the gravitational coupling $G$ by resumming the full post-Minkowskian series. For on-shell external gravitons this yields the exact transfer matrix for gravitational-wave scattering off the shockwave, including recoil. The PM expansion exponentiates to a compact form in which the Born term is dressed by an overall phase which includes the Weinberg phase. Our results provide the basic WQFT ingredients for future 1SF computations of observables such as the impulse and waveform in the ultra high-energy regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a black hole response formulation of worldline quantum field theory (WQFT) adapted to the gravitational self-force expansion. Integrating out worldline and graviton fluctuations produces connected graviton response functions, where the zeroth-order one-point function encodes the exact background metric, the first-response two-point function describes gravitational-wave scattering off the black hole, and higher-point functions supply effective vertices for a systematic self-force expansion. As a concrete application, the authors consider a massless ultra-boosted primary source (Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave), demonstrate that the one-point response resums exactly to the shockwave metric, that resummed probe vertices recover exact geodesics, and that the off-shell two-point response yields an exact all-orders-in-G transfer matrix for on-shell graviton scattering (including recoil). The post-Minkowskian series is shown to exponentiate into a compact form in which the Born term is dressed by a phase containing the Weinberg phase.

Significance. If the claimed exact resummations are verified, the work supplies a new, systematically improvable framework that directly connects WQFT response functions to known exact solutions in the ultra-high-energy limit and furnishes the basic building blocks for future 1SF computations of impulse and waveform observables. The explicit recovery of the Aichelburg-Sexl metric, geodesics, and the all-orders transfer matrix from the same set of Feynman rules constitutes a strong non-trivial consistency check and may prove useful for high-energy gravitational scattering studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (one-point response): the resummation of the connected one-point function to the exact Aichelburg-Sexl metric is presented as following directly from the WQFT Feynman rules in the ultra-boosted limit; an explicit term-by-term comparison with the standard linearized-to-nonlinear shockwave construction (including the precise identification of the delta-function source) would make the exactness claim fully transparent.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (two-point response): the statement that the PM series exponentiates to a phase-dressed Born term for on-shell gravitons is central to the transfer-matrix result; the derivation of the overall phase factor (including the Weinberg phase) should be shown to arise without additional truncation or choice of contour, with an explicit check against the known eikonal phase in the shockwave background.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The distinction between off-shell and on-shell external gravitons in the two-point response is introduced early but the precise kinematic restrictions are only clarified later; a short paragraph in the introduction summarizing the on-shell projection would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the connected response functions (zeroth, first, …) is compact but occasionally overlaps with standard WQFT correlator symbols; a brief glossary or footnote distinguishing them from the usual worldline correlators would prevent confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity of our results on the exact resummations in black hole response theory. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (one-point response): the resummation of the connected one-point function to the exact Aichelburg-Sexl metric is presented as following directly from the WQFT Feynman rules in the ultra-boosted limit; an explicit term-by-term comparison with the standard linearized-to-nonlinear shockwave construction (including the precise identification of the delta-function source) would make the exactness claim fully transparent.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit term-by-term comparison would enhance transparency for readers. Although the resummation to the exact Aichelburg-Sexl metric follows directly from the WQFT Feynman rules in the ultra-boosted limit (as the connected one-point function encodes the full nonlinear background), we will add a dedicated paragraph in §3 (or a short appendix) providing the term-by-term matching to the standard linearized-to-nonlinear shockwave construction, with explicit identification of the delta-function source. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (two-point response): the statement that the PM series exponentiates to a phase-dressed Born term for on-shell gravitons is central to the transfer-matrix result; the derivation of the overall phase factor (including the Weinberg phase) should be shown to arise without additional truncation or choice of contour, with an explicit check against the known eikonal phase in the shockwave background.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The exponentiation arises directly from the exact all-orders resummation of the off-shell two-point response without truncation or contour choices, as the PM series is summed to all orders in G before imposing on-shell conditions. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the derivation in §4.2 to show the phase factor (including the Weinberg phase) step by step and include an explicit comparison to the known eikonal phase for graviton scattering in the shockwave background. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation not load-bearing; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces an adapted WQFT for black hole response, derives connected graviton response functions by integrating out fluctuations, and performs explicit resummations of the PM series for the shockwave limit. These steps rely on the WQFT Feynman rules and the delta-function source rather than fitted parameters or prior results by construction. Any self-citations to earlier WQFT formulations are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or to justify the central resummations to the exact Aichelburg-Sexl metric, geodesics, or transfer matrix. The claims remain independent of the inputs and are externally falsifiable via the explicit all-orders expressions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claims rest on the applicability of worldline QFT to black-hole responses and the validity of exact resummation of the PM series; no explicit free parameters or new entities with independent evidence are stated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Worldline quantum field theory can be adapted to gravitational self-force expansions for black holes by integrating out worldline and graviton fluctuations to obtain connected response functions.
    The paper develops the entire formulation on this premise.
invented entities (1)
  • Connected graviton response functions (zeroth, first, and higher-point) no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode the exact background metric, gravitational-wave scattering, and effective vertices for systematic self-force expansion.
    Introduced as the core objects of the new black-hole response theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1638 out tokens · 60782 ms · 2026-05-09T20:38:15.060716+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

  2. [2]

    S. W. Ballmer et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Future Gravitational-Wave Detector Facilities, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022,2203.08228. [8]ETcollaboration, A. Abac et al.,The Science of the Einstein Telescope, 2503.12263

  3. [3]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2 [1310.1528]

  4. [4]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,Phys. Rept.633(2016) 1 [1601.04914]

  5. [5]

    Levi, Rep

    M. Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,Rept. Prog. Phys.83(2020) 075901 [1807.01699]

  6. [6]

    Six-loop gravitational interac- tions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, J. Ronca et al., Six-loop gravitational interactions at the sixth post-Newtonian order,2512.19498

  7. [7]

    All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, M. Pegorin, S. Smith et al., All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential,2604.14134

  8. [8]

    D. A. Kosower, R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55 (2022) 443015 [2203.13025]

  9. [9]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove,The SAGEX 57 review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443014 [2203.13024]

  10. [10]

    Snowmass white pa- per: Gravitational waves and scattering amplitudes,

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, Snowmass White Paper: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes, in Snowmass 2021, 4, 2022,2204.05194

  11. [11]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters,Phys. Rept.1083(2024) 1 [2306.16488]

  12. [12]

    G. U. Jakobsen,Gravitational Scattering of Compact Bodies from Worldline Quantum Field Theory, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, Humboldt U., Berlin (main), 2023.2308.04388. 10.18452/27075

  13. [13]

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne,The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung,Astrophys. J.224(1978) 62

  14. [14]

    Westpfahl and M

    K. Westpfahl and M. Goller,Gravitational scattering of two relativistic particles in postlinear approximation,Lett. Nuovo Cim.26(1979) 573

  15. [15]

    L. Bel, T. Damour, N. Deruelle, J. Ibanez and J. Martin,Poincaré-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The postlinear approximation of general relativity,Gen. Rel. Grav.13(1981) 963

  16. [16]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

    T. Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 044038 [1710.10599]

  17. [17]

    Hopper, A

    S. Hopper, A. Nagar and P. Rettegno,Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerics versus analytics,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 124034 [2204.10299]

  18. [18]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto,Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,JHEP11(2020) 106 [2006.01184]

  19. [19]

    Conservative dynamics of binary systems to third post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,

    G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 261103 [2007.04977]

  20. [20]

    K¨ alin, Z

    G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Tidal Effects in Compact Binary Systems to Next-to-Leading Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 124025 [2008.06047]

  21. [21]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,JHEP02(2021) 048 [2010.02865]

  22. [22]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 201103 [2101.12688]

  23. [23]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,Phys. Lett. B831 (2022) 137203 [2106.08276]. 58

  24. [24]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 161104 [2112.11296]

  25. [25]

    Mougiakakos, M

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024041 [2102.08339]

  26. [26]

    M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi,Radiated momentum in the post-Minkowskian worldline approach via reverse unitarity,JHEP11(2021) 228 [2110.10140]

  27. [27]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 101401 [2210.05541]

  28. [28]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem,JHEP08(2023) 109 [2304.01275]

  29. [29]

    Z. Liu, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,JHEP06(2021) 012 [2102.10059]

  30. [30]

    Mougiakakos, M

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung with Tidal Effects in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 121101 [2204.06556]

  31. [31]

    M. M. Riva, F. Vernizzi and L. K. Wong,Gravitational bremsstrahlung from spinning binaries in the post-Minkowskian expansion,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 044013 [2205.15295]

  32. [32]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 011101 [2106.10256]

  33. [33]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,SUSY in the sky with gravitons,JHEP01(2022) 027 [2109.04465]

  34. [34]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull,Conservative and Radiative Dynamics of Spinning Bodies at Third Post-Minkowskian Order Using Worldline Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 141102 [2201.07778]

  35. [35]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull,Linear response, Hamiltonian, and radiative spinning two-body dynamics,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 044033 [2210.06451]

  36. [36]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,JHEP10(2022) 128 [2207.00569]

  37. [37]

    Shi and J

    C. Shi and J. Plefka,Classical double copy of worldline quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 026007 [2109.10345]

  38. [38]

    Bastianelli, F

    F. Bastianelli, F. Comberiati and L. de la Cruz,Light bending from eikonal in worldline quantum field theory,JHEP02(2022) 209 [2112.05013]. 59

  39. [39]

    Comberiati and C

    F. Comberiati and C. Shi,Classical Double Copy of Spinning Worldline Quantum Field Theory,JHEP04(2023) 008 [2212.13855]

  40. [40]

    Wang,Binary dynamics from worldline QFT for scalar QED,Phys

    T. Wang,Binary dynamics from worldline QFT for scalar QED,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 085011 [2205.15753]

  41. [41]

    Ben-Shahar,Scattering of spinning compact objects from a worldline EFT, JHEP03(2024) 108 [2311.01430]

    M. Ben-Shahar,Scattering of spinning compact objects from a worldline EFT, JHEP03(2024) 108 [2311.01430]

  42. [42]

    Bhattacharyya, D

    A. Bhattacharyya, D. Ghosh, S. Ghosh and S. Pal,Observables from classical black hole scattering in Scalar-Tensor theory of gravity from worldline quantum field theory,JHEP04(2024) 015 [2401.05492]

  43. [43]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and Y. Xu,Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 151401 [2306.01714]

  44. [44]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,Dissipative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 241402 [2308.11514]

  45. [45]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,Tidal effects and renormalization at fourth post-Minkowskian order,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L041504 [2312.00719]

  46. [46]

    Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix

    D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein,Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix,Nucl. Phys. B877(2013) 177 [1304.7263]

  47. [47]

    A. Luna, I. Nicholson, D. O’Connell and C. D. White,Inelastic Black Hole Scattering from Charged Scalar Amplitudes,JHEP03(2018) 044 [1711.03901]

  48. [48]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,JHEP02(2019) 137 [1811.10950]

  49. [49]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower and D. O’Connell,Waveforms from amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 056007 [2107.10193]

  50. [50]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue and P. Vanhove,On-shell Techniques and Universal Results in Quantum Gravity,JHEP02(2014) 111 [1309.0804]

  51. [51]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 171601 [1806.04920]

  52. [52]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201603 [1901.04424]

  53. [53]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,JHEP10(2019) 206 [1908.01493]. 60

  54. [54]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, L. Planté and P. Vanhove,Post-Minkowskian radial action from soft limits and velocity cuts,JHEP03(2022) 071 [2111.02976]

  55. [55]

    Cheung and M

    C. Cheung and M. P. Solon,Classical gravitational scattering atO(G3) from Feynman diagrams,JHEP06(2020) 144 [2003.08351]

  56. [56]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté and P. Vanhove,The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,JHEP08 (2021) 172 [2105.05218]

  57. [57]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,Universality of ultra-relativistic gravitational scattering,Phys. Lett. B811(2020) 135924 [2008.12743]

  58. [58]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G3),JHEP07(2021) 169 [2104.03256]

  59. [59]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,Phys. Lett. B818(2021) 136379 [2101.05772]

  60. [60]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 138049 [2210.12118]

  61. [61]

    Heissenberg,Angular Momentum Loss due to Tidal Effects in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys

    C. Heissenberg,Angular Momentum Loss due to Tidal Effects in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 011603 [2210.15689]

  62. [62]

    Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,Phys

    T. Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 124008 [2010.01641]

  63. [63]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G3) from scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2021) 148 [2104.03957]

  64. [64]

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad and A. Helset,Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory, JHEP11(2019) 070 [1908.10308]

  65. [65]

    P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove,On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,JHEP11(2021) 213 [2107.12891]

  66. [66]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté and P. Vanhove,The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,JHEP09(2023) 059 [2306.11454]

  67. [67]

    On-shell heavy particle effective theories,

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,On-shell heavy particle effective theories, JHEP05(2020) 051 [2001.09164]

  68. [68]

    Accettulli Huber, A

    M. Accettulli Huber, A. Brandhuber, S. De Angelis and G. Travaglini,From amplitudes to gravitational radiation with cubic interactions and tidal effects,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 045015 [2012.06548]

  69. [69]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini and C. Wen,Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,JHEP10(2021) 118 [2108.04216]. 61

  70. [70]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al., Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G4),Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171601 [2101.07254]

  71. [71]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al., Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 161103 [2112.10750]

  72. [72]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban and F. Teng,Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 201402 [2203.06202]

  73. [73]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner, F. Teng et al., Quantum field theory, worldline theory, and spin magnitude change in orbital evolution,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 045011 [2308.14176]

  74. [74]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté and P. Vanhove,Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,JHEP09(2023) 183 [2307.04746]

  75. [75]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini, One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,JHEP06(2023) 048 [2303.06111]

  76. [76]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini,Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,JHEP02(2024) 026 [2310.04405]

  77. [77]

    De Angelis, P

    S. De Angelis, P. P. Novichkov and R. Gonzo,Spinning waveforms from the Kosower-Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L041502 [2309.17429]

  78. [78]

    Herderschee, R

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng,The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,JHEP06(2023) 004 [2303.06112]

  79. [79]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,What can be measured asymptotically?,JHEP01(2024) 139 [2308.02125]

  80. [80]

    Febres Cordero, M

    F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, G. Lin, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 021601 [2205.07357]

Showing first 80 references.