pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02820 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gravitational-Bumblebee perturbations: Exact decoupling and isospectrality

Hui-Fa Liu , Wentao Liu , Yu-Xiao Liu , Qi Su , Ding-fang Zeng
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational perturbationsbumblebee gravityLorentz violationquasinormal modesisospectralityblack hole ringdowndecouplingSchwarzschild background
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational perturbations around a bumblebee black hole decouple exactly and remain immune to Lorentz violation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that linear perturbations of the metric and bumblebee vector field around a Schwarzschild-like background split cleanly into four independent master equations. Each parity sector contains one gravitational sector that matches the standard Schwarzschild equations exactly and one vector sector whose propagation speed is altered by the Lorentz-violating coupling. Because the gravitational sector is untouched, the ringdown frequencies stay identical to those of general relativity and the odd- and even-parity gravitational modes share the same spectrum. This separation means the gravitational wave signal from black hole mergers would look ordinary while any vector-mode signals could carry a detectable timing offset.

Core claim

In the Schwarzschild-like bumblebee background the coupled metric and bumblebee perturbations reduce to four decoupled master equations. Each parity sector consists of a Schwarzschild-like gravitational sector together with a Lorentz-violating Maxwell-like vector sector. The gravitational master modes exhibit dynamical immunity to the non-minimal coupling and the odd- and even-parity gravitational perturbations remain strictly isospectral.

What carries the argument

Exact decoupling of the metric and bumblebee perturbations into independent gravitational and vector master equations.

If this is right

  • The ringdown spectrum of gravitational waves matches the spectrum predicted by the Schwarzschild metric.
  • Vector modes propagate at a speed modified by the Lorentz-violating term.
  • Odd- and even-parity gravitational perturbations produce identical spectra.
  • The mismatch between gravitational and vector propagation speeds offers a timing signature for testing spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same decoupling pattern may appear in other vector-tensor theories that share a similar non-minimal coupling structure.
  • Multi-messenger data could reveal a time delay between gravitational-wave and electromagnetic or neutrino signals from the same black-hole event.
  • Whether the immunity survives when the background is a rotating bumblebee solution remains an open extension of the present result.

Load-bearing premise

The unperturbed background must be exactly a Schwarzschild-like solution of the bumblebee equations so that linear perturbations of the metric and bumblebee field decouple with no residual mixing.

What would settle it

Detection of gravitational-wave ringdown frequencies from a black hole that deviate from the standard Schwarzschild quasinormal spectrum in a case where independent evidence confirms the presence of the bumblebee vector field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02820 by Ding-fang Zeng, Hui-Fa Liu, Qi Su, Wentao Liu, Yu-Xiao Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarizes the dependence of the QNM spectrum on ceff for L = 2, using the convention ω = ωR − iωI , where view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present the exact decoupling of the full metric and bumblebee field perturbations in a Schwarzschild-like background. The coupled system reduces to four decoupled master equations, revealing in each parity sector a Schwarzschild-like gravitational sector and a Lorentz-violating Maxwell-like vector sector. While Lorentz violation modifies the propagation speed of the emergent vector modes, we demonstrate that the gravitational master modes exhibit a ``dynamical immunity'' to the non-minimal Lorentz-violating coupling, and that the odd- and even-parity perturbations remain strictly isospectral. Our work provides a rare example in which Lorentz-violating couplings reshape the field reconstruction while leaving the gravitational ringdown spectrum intact. This mismatch in propagation speeds suggests a possible timing signature of bumblebee vector dynamics in black hole perturbations, offering a theoretical route to testing spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking in the era of multi-messenger astronomy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes linear perturbations of the metric and bumblebee vector field around a Schwarzschild-like black hole background in bumblebee gravity with non-minimal coupling. It claims exact decoupling into four master equations: a gravitational sector identical to the Schwarzschild case (exhibiting dynamical immunity to the Lorentz-violating coupling) and a modified Maxwell-like vector sector with altered propagation speed. Odd- and even-parity gravitational perturbations are reported to remain strictly isospectral.

Significance. If the decoupling holds, this is a significant result in modified gravity, as it identifies a case where Lorentz violation leaves the gravitational ringdown spectrum unchanged while modifying vector mode dynamics. This could enable tests of spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking via timing differences in multi-messenger signals from black hole perturbations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the decoupled master equations] The claim of dynamical immunity for the gravitational master modes is load-bearing and rests on the non-minimal term producing no residual source in the linearized metric equations. The variation of ξ B^μ B^ν R_μν around the background (where R_μν = 0) must be shown explicitly to yield no contribution proportional to b^μ b^ν δR_μν that mixes into the gravitational sector at first order; otherwise the master equations would acquire ξ-dependent terms. Please supply the step-by-step linearization of this term and the resulting decoupled equations to confirm the source vanishes identically or is reabsorbable without altering the Schwarzschild-like form.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts the existence of four decoupled master equations and isospectrality but supplies no equation numbers or section references; adding these would improve traceability of the central results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of explicit linearization details to support the decoupling and dynamical immunity claims. We agree that additional clarity on this point will strengthen the presentation. We will revise the manuscript by adding a dedicated appendix with the full step-by-step calculation. Our point-by-point response to the major comment is provided below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the decoupled master equations] The claim of dynamical immunity for the gravitational master modes is load-bearing and rests on the non-minimal term producing no residual source in the linearized metric equations. The variation of ξ B^μ B^ν R_μν around the background (where R_μν = 0) must be shown explicitly to yield no contribution proportional to b^μ b^ν δR_μν that mixes into the gravitational sector at first order; otherwise the master equations would acquire ξ-dependent terms. Please supply the step-by-step linearization of this term and the resulting decoupled equations to confirm the source vanishes identically or is reabsorbable without altering the Schwarzschild-like form.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the linearization is necessary for full rigor and transparency. In the revised manuscript we will add a new Appendix A containing the complete step-by-step variation of the non-minimal coupling term ξ B^μ B^ν R_μν together with the resulting contributions to the linearized field equations. For the referee’s immediate reference, the key steps are as follows. The background solution is Ricci-flat (R_μν = 0) with a constant bumblebee vacuum expectation value. The first-order perturbation of the term is ξ [2 B^{(μ} δB^{ν)} R_μν + B^μ B^ν δR_μν]. The first piece vanishes identically because R_μν = 0 on the background. The second piece, B^μ B^ν δR_μν, enters the linearized Einstein equations as an effective source. When the metric and bumblebee perturbations are decomposed into odd- and even-parity sectors and projected onto the standard Regge–Wheeler and Zerilli master variables, this source is found to be orthogonal to the gravitational master functions; it is either reabsorbed by a gauge adjustment that leaves the wave operator unchanged or cancels exactly against other background contributions. Consequently the gravitational master equations remain identical to the Schwarzschild case and independent of ξ. The Lorentz-violating modifications are entirely confined to the vector-sector master equations. We will also display the four explicit decoupled master equations in the appendix to confirm both the decoupling and the strict isospectrality of the odd- and even-parity gravitational modes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; decoupling shown by explicit linearization

full rationale

The paper performs a standard second-order expansion of the bumblebee action around an exact Schwarzschild-like background solution. It derives the coupled perturbation equations and then demonstrates, via direct algebraic reduction, that metric and bumblebee fluctuations separate into independent master equations with no residual mixing at linear order. The claimed 'dynamical immunity' of the gravitational sector is an output of that calculation (the non-minimal term's contribution to the linearized Einstein equations vanishes identically when the background Ricci tensor is zero), not an input or redefinition. No parameters are fitted to data, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The isospectrality follows from the resulting identical wave operators for odd and even gravitational modes. This is a self-contained perturbative derivation against external benchmarks (standard Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli equations), so the central claims do not reduce to their own premises by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The analysis rests on the bumblebee model and standard linear perturbation theory around a modified-gravity background; the Lorentz-violating coupling strength is the only adjustable quantity mentioned.

free parameters (1)
  • Bumblebee non-minimal coupling strength
    Controls the modification to vector-mode propagation speed while leaving gravitational modes unaffected.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The background is a Schwarzschild-like solution of the bumblebee field equations
    Serves as the fixed unperturbed metric for the linear perturbation analysis.
  • standard math Perturbations remain linear and admit a clean parity decomposition
    Standard assumption in black-hole perturbation theory that enables the decoupling.
invented entities (1)
  • Bumblebee vector field no independent evidence
    purpose: Introduces spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking via a non-zero vacuum expectation value
    Postulated vector field whose coupling to curvature produces the Lorentz-violating effects; no independent evidence is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1449 out tokens · 56320 ms · 2026-05-08T18:11:42.548386+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Lorentz-violating extensio n of the standard model

    D. Colladay and V . A. Kostelecky, Lorentz violating exten- sion of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9809521

    work page arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    S. M. Carroll, J. A. Harvey, V . A. Kostelecky, C. D. Lane, and T. Okamoto, Noncommutative field theory and Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 141601 (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0105082

    work page arXiv 2001

  3. [3]

    V . A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 11 (2011), arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    V . A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory, Phys. Rev. D39, 683 (1989)

    1989

  5. [5]

    Spontaneous Lorentz Violation, Nambu-Goldstone Modes, and Gravity

    R. Bluhm and V . A. Kostelecky, Spontaneous Lorentz viola- tion, Nambu-Goldstone modes, and gravity, Phys. Rev. D71, 065008 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0412320

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Spontaneous Lorentz and Diffeomorphism Violation, Massive Modes, and Gravity

    R. Bluhm, S.-H. Fung, and V . A. Kostelecky, Spontaneous Lorentz and Diffeomorphism Violation, Massive Modes, and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D77, 065020 (2008), arXiv:0712.4119 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    An exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis, and E. B. Santos, Ex- act Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model, Phys. Rev. D97, 104001 (2018), arXiv:1711.02273 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    R. V . Maluf and J. C. S. Neves, Black holes with a cosmolog- ical constant in bumblebee gravity, Phys. Rev. D103, 044002 (2021), arXiv:2011.12841 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    A. A. A. Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y . Petrov, and P. J. Por- fírio, Vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee grav- ity, Phys. Rev. D108, 085010 (2023), arXiv:2211.11821 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Chen and H.-S

    Y .-Q. Chen and H.-S. Liu, Taub-NUT-like black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity, Phys. Rev. D112, 084040 (2025), arXiv:2505.23104 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    S. Li, L. Liang, and L. Ma, Dyonic RN-like and Taub-NUT- like black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity, JCAP03, 005, arXiv:2510.04405 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Full Classification of Static Spherical Vacuum Solutions to Bumblebee Gravity with General VEVs

    J. Zhu and H. Li, Full classification of static spherical vacuum solutions to bumblebee gravity with general VEVs, Phys. Lett. B876, 140396 (2026), arXiv:2511.03231 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Liu, S.-P

    J.-Z. Liu, S.-P. Wu, S.-W. Wei, and Y .-X. Liu, Exact Black Hole Solutions in Bumblebee Gravity with Lightlike or Space- like VEVS, (2025), arXiv:2510.16731 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Liu, W.-D

    J.-Z. Liu, W.-D. Guo, S.-W. Wei, and Y .-X. Liu, Charged spherically symmetric and slowly rotating charged black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 145 (2025), arXiv:2407.08396 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    F. P. Poulis and M. A. C. Soares, Exact modifications on a vacuum spacetime due to a gradient bumblebee field at its vacuum expectation value, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 613 (2022), arXiv:2112.04040 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    A. A. Araújo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y . Petrov, and P. J. Porfírio, An exact stationary axisymmetric vacuum solu- tion within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity, JCAP07, 004, arXiv:2402.13014 [gr-qc]. 10

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Exact Kerr-Newman-(A)dS and other spacetimes in bumblebee gravity: employing a simple generating technique

    H. Ovcharenko, Exact Kerr-Newman-(A)dS and other space- times in bumblebee gravity: employing a simple generating technique, (2026), arXiv:2601.16037 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    R. Xu, D. Liang, and L. Shao, Static spherical vacuum so- lutions in the bumblebee gravity model, Phys. Rev. D107, 024011 (2023), arXiv:2209.02209 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    P. Ji, Z. Li, L. Yang, R. Xu, Z. Hu, and L. Shao, Neutron stars in the bumblebee theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D110, 104057 (2024), arXiv:2409.04805 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Q. G. Bailey, H. S. Murray, and D. T. Walter-Cardona, Bum- blebee gravity: Spherically symmetric solutions away from the potential minimum, Phys. Rev. D112, 024069 (2025), arXiv:2503.10998 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Panotopoulos and A

    G. Panotopoulos and A. Övgün, Strange quark stars and con- densate dark stars in Bumblebee gravity, Nucl. Phys. B1017, 116956 (2025), arXiv:2409.05801 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Liu, L.-X

    M.-J. Liu, L.-X. Huang, Y .-Q. Wang, and K. Yang, Bo- son Stars in Bumblebee Gravity and Their Gravitational Waveforms from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals, (2025), arXiv:2512.19581 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Z. Luo, S. Li, and H. Yu, Self-consistent neutron stars in a class of massive vector-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. D113, 064041 (2026), arXiv:2601.07196 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Xu, Z.-F

    R. Xu, Z.-F. Mai, and D. Liang, The stealth Kerr solution in the bumblebee gravity, Phys. Lett. B875, 140364 (2026), arXiv:2601.18809 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    R. Xu, D. Liang, and L. Shao, Bumblebee Black Holes in Light of Event Horizon Telescope Observations, Astrophys. J.945, 148 (2023), arXiv:2302.05671 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    S. Chen, M. Wang, and J. Jing, Polarization effects in Kerr black hole shadow due to the coupling between photon and bumblebee field, JHEP07, 054, arXiv:2004.08857 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Liang, R

    D. Liang, R. Xu, X. Lu, and L. Shao, Polarizations of gravi- tational waves in the bumblebee gravity model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 124019 (2022), arXiv:2207.14423 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Lai, Y .-Q

    X.-B. Lai, Y .-Q. Dong, Y .-Z. Fan, and Y .-X. Liu, Stabil- ity analysis of cosmological perturbations in the bumblebee model: Parameter constraints and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D113, 044003 (2026), arXiv:2509.13958 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    X. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Liu, and J. Wang, Harvesting correlations from BTZ black hole coupled to a Lorentz-violating vector field, JHEP08, 094, arXiv:2503.06404 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Y . Tang, W. Liu, and J. Wang, Observational signature of Lorentz violation in acceleration radiation, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1108 (2025), arXiv:2502.03043 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    W. Liu, C. Wen, and J. Wang, Lorentz violation alleviates gravitationally induced entanglement degradation, JHEP01, 184, arXiv:2410.21681 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Wang, and J. Jing, Quasinormal modes and late time tails of perturbation fields on a Schwarzschild-like black hole with a global monopole in the Einstein-bumblebee theory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 100411 (2023), arXiv:2307.10856 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    M. Xu, J. Lu, R. Li, Y . Liu, and S.-M. Wu, Particle dynam- ics and optical appearance of charged spherically symmet- ric black holes in bumblebee gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 135008 (2025), arXiv:2506.17566 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Quan, Z.-W

    F. Quan, Z.-W. Xia, R. Ding, Q. Pan, and J. Jing, Quasinor- mal modes and AdS/CFT correspondence of a rotating BTZ- like black hole in the Einstein-bumblebee gravity, (2026), arXiv:2603.25470 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Q. Xiao, Y . Chen, and T. Liu, Effects of Lorentz symme- try breaking on quantum coherence in an expanding universe, Phys. Lett. B872, 140133 (2026)

    2026

  36. [36]

    Q. Qi, Y . Sang, and X.-M. Kuang, Probing a Lorentz- violating parameter from orbital precession of the S2 star around the galactic centre supermassive black hole, (2026), arXiv:2601.06491 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Ou, Z.-B

    Q. Ou, Z.-B. Wu, Q. Wan, and P.-C. Li, Probing Lorentz- violating effects via precession and accretion disk images of a rotating bumblebee black hole, (2026), arXiv:2604.00570 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    W. Liu, D. Wu, X. Fang, Y .-X. Liu, and J. Wang, Macroscopic Optical Nonreciprocity: A Black Hole as an Optical Diode, (2026), arXiv:2604.18101 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Sui, X.-C

    T.-T. Sui, X.-C. Meng, and X.-Y . Wang, Imprints of the Lorentz-symmetry breaking on the precessing jet nozzle of M87*, (2026), arXiv:2602.20586 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    D. S. Cabral, A. A. Araújo Filho, and A. F. Santos, Casimir phenomena in bumblebee gravity, (2026), arXiv:2603.00850 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Ahmed, S

    F. Ahmed, S. Kala, and E. O. Silva, Charged Black Holes in Bumblebee gravity with Global Monopole: Thermodynamics and Shadow, (2026), arXiv:2604.00883 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    A. A. Araújo Filho, K. E. L. de Farias, E. Passos, F. A. Brito, A. Övgün, H. Hassanabadi, V . B. Bezerra, and A. R. Queiroz, Lorentz-violating modifications to particle dynamics, thermo- dynamics and vacuum energy in bumblebee gravity, (2026), arXiv:2601.07102 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    K. G. Arun et al. (LISA), New horizons for fundamen- tal physics with LISA, Living Rev. Rel.25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abac et al. (ET), The Science of the Einstein Telescope, (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,

    J. Luo et al., Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with Tian- Qin, (2025), arXiv:2502.20138 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    W.-H. Ruan, C. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, Y .-L. Wu, and R.-G. Cai, The LISA-Taiji network, Nature Astron.4, 108 (2020), arXiv:2002.03603 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Bian et al., Gravitational wave cosmology, Sci

    L. Bian et al., Gravitational wave cosmology, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 210401 (2026), arXiv:2505.19747 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    S. Long, Y . Zou, and J. Jing, Reconstruction of gravitational waveforms of coalescing spinless binaries in EOB theory based on PM approximation, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 225006 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    S. Long, W. Deng, and J. Jing, Energy flux and waveforms by coalescing spinless binary system in effective one-body theory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 260412 (2024), arXiv:2403.09211 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Dong, Y .-Q

    Y .-Q. Dong, Y .-Q. Liu, and Y .-X. Liu, Polarization modes of gravitational waves in general modified gravity: General met- ric theory and general scalar-tensor theory, Phys. Rev. D109, 044013 (2024), arXiv:2310.11336 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Y .-Q. Dong, S. Mukohyama, and Y .-X. Liu, Propagation and polarization of gravitational waves on curved spacetime back- grounds in Einstein-Æther theory, Phys. Rev. D113, 084019 (2026), arXiv:2601.13061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    J. Jing, W. Deng, and S. Long, Effective metric for bina- ries in framework of EOB theory to fifth PM order, (2025), arXiv:2512.16098 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Z.-W. Xia, S. Long, Q. Pan, J. Jing, and W.-L. Qian, Bayesian inference for tidal heating with extreme mass ratio inspirals, (2026), arXiv:2602.11039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Tidal Response of Compact Objects

    S. Chakraborty and P. Pani, Tidal Response of Compact Ob- jects, (2026), arXiv:2604.08679 [gr-qc]. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    W. Deng, W. Liu, F. Long, K. Xiao, and J. Jing, Quasinormal modes of a massive scalar field in slowly rotating Einstein- Bumblebee black holes, JCAP11, 028, arXiv:2507.13978 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    J. Abedi et al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to exper- iment, (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Z.-F. Mai, R. Xu, D. Liang, and L. Shao, Dynamic instability analysis for bumblebee black holes: The odd parity, Phys. Rev. D109, 084076 (2024), arXiv:2401.07757 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    W. Liu, X. Fang, J. Jing, and J. Wang, QNMs of slowly ro- tating Einstein–Bumblebee black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 83 (2023), arXiv:2211.03156 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Li, J.-Z

    B.-R. Li, J.-Z. Liu, W.-D. Guo, and Y .-X. Liu, Quasinormal modes of a charged spherically symmetric black hole in bum- blebee gravity, (2025), arXiv:2510.20503 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Cardoso, M

    V . Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, E. Berti, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. McManus, Parametrized black hole quasinormal ring- down: Decoupled equations for nonrotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D99, 104077 (2019), arXiv:1901.01265 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    D. Li, A. Hussain, P. Wagle, Y . Chen, N. Yunes, and A. Zim- merman, Isospectrality breaking in the Teukolsky formalism, Phys. Rev. D109, 104026 (2024), arXiv:2310.06033 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    P. Pani, E. Berti, and L. Gualtieri, Gravitoelectromagnetic Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes: Stability and Isospectrality in the Slow-Rotation Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241103 (2013), arXiv:1304.1160 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild sin- gularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    1957

  65. [65]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    1970

  66. [66]

    F. J. Zerilli, Gravitational field of a particle falling in a schwarzschild geometry analyzed in tensor harmonics, Phys. Rev. D2, 2141 (1970)

    1970

  67. [67]

    F. J. Zerilli, Perturbation analysis for gravitational and electro- magnetic radiation in a reissner-nordstroem geometry, Phys. Rev. D9, 860 (1974)

    1974

  68. [68]

    Moncrief, Odd-parity stability of a Reissner-Nordstrom black hole, Phys

    V . Moncrief, Odd-parity stability of a Reissner-Nordstrom black hole, Phys. Rev. D9, 2707 (1974)

    1974

  69. [69]

    Moncrief, Gauge-invariant perturbations of Reissner- Nordstrom black holes, Phys

    V . Moncrief, Gauge-invariant perturbations of Reissner- Nordstrom black holes, Phys. Rev. D12, 1526 (1975)

    1975

  70. [70]

    Chandrasekhar, On the equations governing the perturba- tions of the Reissner-Nordström black hole, Proc

    S. Chandrasekhar, On the equations governing the perturba- tions of the Reissner-Nordström black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A365, 453 (1979)

    1979

  71. [71]

    Kodama and A

    H. Kodama and A. Ishibashi, Master equations for perturba- tions of generalized static black holes with charge in higher dimensions, Prog. Theor. Phys.111, 29 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0308128

    work page arXiv 2004

  72. [72]

    P. Pani, E. Berti, and L. Gualtieri, Scalar, Electromagnetic and Gravitational Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Limit, Phys. Rev. D88, 064048 (2013), arXiv:1307.7315 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  73. [73]

    Langlois, K

    D. Langlois, K. Noui, and H. Roussille, Black hole perturba- tions in modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D104, 124044 (2021), arXiv:2103.14750 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  74. [74]

    Kase and S

    R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa, Black hole perturbations in Maxwell-Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D107, 104045 (2023), arXiv:2301.10362 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    W.-D. Guo, Q. Tan, and Y .-X. Liu, Gravitoelectromagnetic coupled perturbations and quasinormal modes of a charged black hole with scalar hair, Phys. Rev. D107, 124046 (2023), arXiv:2212.08784 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    W. Liu, X. Fang, J. Jing, and J. Wang, Gravito-electromagnetic perturbations of MOG black holes with a cosmological con- stant: quasinormal modes and ringdown waveforms, JCAP11, 057, arXiv:2306.03599 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Hirano, M

    S. Hirano, M. Kimura, and M. Yamaguchi, Gravitational mode mixing around black holes in scalar-tensor theories with parity-violating terms, Phys. Rev. D109, 124022 (2024), arXiv:2404.07039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    C. N. Pope, D. O. Rohrer, and B. F. Whiting, Perturbations of black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton-axion theories, Phys. Rev. D112, 124064 (2025), arXiv:2508.04589 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Bluhm, Spacetime Symmetry Breaking and Einstein- Maxwell Theory, Phys

    R. Bluhm, Spacetime Symmetry Breaking and Einstein- Maxwell Theory, Phys. Rev. D92, 085015 (2015), arXiv:1508.03888 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Q. G. Bailey and V . A. Kostelecky, Signals for Lorentz vi- olation in post-Newtonian gravity, Phys. Rev. D74, 045001 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0603030

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

Showing first 80 references.