pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01737 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Axial w-modes of anisotropic neutron stars

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords axial w-modesanisotropic neutron starscompactnessdamping timesequations of stategravitational wavespressure anisotropyperturbation equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Axial w-mode frequencies of anisotropic neutron stars depend approximately linearly on compactness, with anisotropy modifying the slope and intercept.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the frequencies and damping times of axial w-modes for neutron stars whose radial and tangential pressures differ. Models are built from the BSk21 and SLy4 equations of state together with the Horvat and Bowers-Liang prescriptions for anisotropy. The linearized perturbation equations are solved with a continued-fraction technique, revealing that frequency falls steadily with increasing mass along each stable sequence. The frequency shows a roughly linear rise with stellar compactness, and both the slope and intercept shift when the strength or type of anisotropy changes. Empirical fitting formulas are supplied that express frequency and damping time directly in terms of compactness and anisotropy parameters.

Core claim

The axial w-modes of anisotropic neutron stars exhibit an approximately linear dependence of their frequencies on stellar compactness. For fixed anisotropy strength the frequency decreases monotonically with mass along the stable branch. Configurations with dominant radial pressure have higher frequencies than those with dominant tangential pressure at low mass, but the ordering reverses near the upper end of the stable branch. Damping times increase with mass and become shorter when tangential pressure dominates at fixed mass. The Bowers-Liang ansatz produces a wider spread in both frequencies and damping times than the Horvat ansatz. Empirical expressions are given for frequency and for ln

What carries the argument

The continued-fraction method for solving the linearized axial perturbation equations on static anisotropic neutron-star backgrounds constructed with the Horvat and Bowers-Liang pressure-anisotropy ansatzes.

If this is right

  • For any fixed compactness the axial w-mode frequency can be estimated from the supplied empirical fit once the anisotropy parameter is specified.
  • Damping times shorten when tangential pressure exceeds radial pressure at the same mass, with the effect strongest near the maximum stable mass.
  • The Bowers-Liang ansatz generates a broader range of frequencies and longer damping times than the Horvat ansatz at equal compactness.
  • At low masses, stars with radial pressure larger than tangential pressure oscillate at higher frequencies, while the reverse holds near the maximum mass.
  • The sensitivity of damping time to anisotropy grows markedly for more compact configurations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If axial w-modes are detected in gravitational waves from neutron-star events, the reported relations could be inverted to constrain the level of pressure anisotropy inside the star.
  • The dominance of compactness in the linear fit suggests that anisotropy enters mainly as a correction term that could be calibrated against future observations.
  • The same modeling approach could be applied to polar w-modes or to rotating anisotropic stars to check whether the linear compactness trend persists.
  • Direct comparison of these empirical formulas against full numerical evolutions of oscillating anisotropic stars would test the accuracy of the continued-fraction results.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functional forms for pressure anisotropy together with the BSk21 and SLy4 equations of state produce stable stellar configurations whose axial w-mode spectra are reliably obtained by the continued-fraction technique.

What would settle it

A numerical computation or gravitational-wave observation of an axial w-mode frequency for a known compactness and anisotropy strength that lies significantly off the reported linear frequency-compactness line would falsify the central relation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01737 by Sushovan Mondal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Mass–radius relations for anisotropic neutron-star configurations constructed using the BSk21 and SLy4 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Frequency-compactness and damping time-compactness relations of the fundamental axial view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Frequency-mass relations of axial view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Damping time-mass relations of axial view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Frequency-compactness relations of axial view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Damping time-compactness relations of axial view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the axial $w$-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars. Stellar configurations are constructed using two realistic equations of state, BSk21 and SLy4, with two prescriptions for pressure anisotropy, the Horvat ansatz and the Bowers-Liang ansatz. The axial $w$-mode frequencies are computed by solving the linearized perturbation equations using a continued-fraction method. For each fixed anisotropy strength, the axial $w$-mode frequency decreases monotonically with increasing stellar mass along the stable branch, with its magnitude depending on both the equation of state and the nature of the anisotropy. At low stellar masses, configurations with dominant radial pressure ($p_r>p_t$) exhibit higher frequencies than those with dominant tangential pressure, whereas toward the upper end of the stable branch this ordering is reversed, and configurations with $p_t>p_r$ attain higher frequencies at the same mass. The axial $w$-mode frequency displays an approximately linear dependence on compactness, with anisotropy modifying both the slope and the intercept. The Bowers-Liang ansatz produces a wider spread in the frequency values compared to the Horvat ansatz. We also analyze the damping times associated with the axial $w$-modes and find that they increase with stellar mass, with a rapid rise toward the upper end of the stable branch. At a fixed mass, increasing the tangential pressure relative to the radial pressure leads to shorter damping times, while configurations with dominant radial pressure exhibit longer damping times. The sensitivity of the damping time to anisotropy is more pronounced for more compact stars, and the Bowers-Liang ansatz yields systematically larger damping times than the Horvat ansatz. Finally, we provide empirical expressions for the axial $w$-mode frequency and damping time as functions of stellar compactness and anisotropy strength.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates axial w-modes of anisotropic neutron stars constructed with BSk21 and SLy4 equations of state and Horvat/Bowers-Liang anisotropy prescriptions. It solves the linearized axial perturbation equations via the continued-fraction method, reporting that w-mode frequency decreases monotonically with mass on the stable branch, exhibits approximate linear dependence on compactness (with anisotropy modifying slope and intercept), and provides empirical fitting expressions for frequency and damping time as functions of compactness and anisotropy strength. Damping times increase with mass and show greater sensitivity to anisotropy at higher compactness, with Bowers-Liang yielding larger spreads than Horvat.

Significance. If the numerical trends hold, the work extends asteroseismology to anisotropic neutron-star models, potentially aiding interpretation of gravitational-wave signals from oscillating or merging compact objects. The use of realistic EOS, standard methods, and provision of empirical relations are positive features, though the results remain specific to the chosen ansatzes and may require further validation for broader applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. The empirical fitting expressions for frequency and damping time (described in the abstract and results) are constructed from the computed data points; the manuscript should detail the functional form chosen, the fitting procedure, the exact ranges of compactness and anisotropy strength, and quantitative fit metrics (e.g., residuals or R²) to substantiate their utility beyond interpolation.
  2. Application of the continued-fraction method is load-bearing for all reported frequencies, damping times, and linearity claims, yet the text provides limited information on convergence criteria, truncation errors, or direct validation against the isotropic (zero-anisotropy) limit; explicit error budgets or comparison tables would be required to confirm the monotonic trends and ordering reversals with anisotropy.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract could briefly indicate the range of anisotropy parameters explored to contextualize the reported ordering reversals between radial- and tangential-dominant cases.
  2. Figures displaying frequency versus mass or compactness should label the stable branch explicitly and, if possible, indicate numerical resolution or precision.
  3. Ensure the introduction cites key prior isotropic w-mode studies to clearly frame the extension to anisotropic configurations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The suggestions will help strengthen the presentation of the numerical results and empirical relations. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The empirical fitting expressions for frequency and damping time (described in the abstract and results) are constructed from the computed data points; the manuscript should detail the functional form chosen, the fitting procedure, the exact ranges of compactness and anisotropy strength, and quantitative fit metrics (e.g., residuals or R²) to substantiate their utility beyond interpolation.

    Authors: We agree that additional details on the empirical fits are warranted to allow readers to assess their robustness. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) in the results section that specifies: (i) the exact functional forms adopted (linear in compactness with additive and multiplicative terms linear in the anisotropy parameter), (ii) the least-squares fitting procedure, (iii) the precise ranges of compactness (approximately 0.10–0.32) and anisotropy strengths explored for each EOS and ansatz, and (iv) quantitative goodness-of-fit measures including R² values and maximum relative residuals. These additions will be placed immediately after the presentation of the fitting expressions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Application of the continued-fraction method is load-bearing for all reported frequencies, damping times, and linearity claims, yet the text provides limited information on convergence criteria, truncation errors, or direct validation against the isotropic (zero-anisotropy) limit; explicit error budgets or comparison tables would be required to confirm the monotonic trends and ordering reversals with anisotropy.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current description of the continued-fraction implementation is concise and would benefit from more explicit numerical validation. In the revised version we will expand the methods section to include: (i) the convergence criteria employed (number of continued-fraction terms and tolerance on the frequency), (ii) estimates of truncation error obtained by increasing the truncation order, and (iii) a direct comparison table (or figure) of our zero-anisotropy results against published isotropic w-mode frequencies for BSk21 and SLy4. This will provide an explicit error budget supporting the reported monotonic trends and anisotropy-induced ordering reversals. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper constructs stellar models from two standard EOS (BSk21, SLy4) and two established anisotropy ansatzes (Horvat, Bowers-Liang), then solves the linearized axial perturbation equations via the continued-fraction method to obtain w-mode frequencies and damping times. All reported trends (monotonic decrease with mass, approximate linearity with compactness, ordering reversals, sensitivity to anisotropy) and differences between ansatzes are direct numerical outputs of this procedure. The empirical expressions are explicitly described as fits to the computed data rather than first-principles derivations or predictions, and the central claims do not depend on these fits for their validity. No step reduces by construction to its inputs, no self-citation is load-bearing, and the numerical chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard general-relativistic stellar-structure equations modified by phenomenological anisotropy, plus the assumption that the continued-fraction technique converges for the chosen boundary conditions; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • anisotropy strength parameter
    Fixed value chosen independently for each model run to scan different levels of radial versus tangential pressure difference.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The background metric and hydrostatic equilibrium are described by the anisotropic Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations.
    Invoked to construct the unperturbed stellar models before linearizing the axial perturbations.
  • domain assumption The continued-fraction method accurately solves the linearized axial perturbation equations with appropriate boundary conditions at the center and at infinity.
    Standard technique in the field; its validity is assumed rather than re-derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5611 in / 1491 out tokens · 56181 ms · 2026-05-09T17:18:19.205412+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the non-radial oscillations of realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Axial modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Axial modes of anisotropic neutron stars show mass-scaled frequency and damping time with nearly universal quadratic dependence on compactness, insensitive to EOS and anisotropy model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In the present work, we derive the governing equations for the axialw-modes of anisotropic neutron stars and compute their complex frequencies

    computed the polarw-modes of anisotropic neutron stars. In the present work, we derive the governing equations for the axialw-modes of anisotropic neutron stars and compute their complex frequencies. To solve these equa- tions and obtain the corresponding oscillation frequen- cies and damping times, we consider two realistic nuclear equations of state, na...

  2. [2]

    D. G. Yakovlev, P. Haensel, G. Baym, and C. J. Pethick, Lev Landau and the concept of neutron stars, Phys. Usp. 56, 289 (2013), arXiv:1210.0682 [physics.hist-ph]

  3. [3]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of stars, Phys. Z. Sowjetu- nion1, 285 (1932)

  4. [4]

    Baade and F

    W. Baade and F. Zwicky, Cosmic Rays from Super- Novae, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20, 259 (1934). 15

  5. [5]

    Baade and F

    W. Baade and F. Zwicky, On Super-Novae, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20, 254 (1934)

  6. [6]

    R. C. Tolman, Static solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions for spheres of fluid, Phys. Rev.55, 364 (1939)

  7. [7]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On massive neu- tron cores, Phys. Rev.55, 374 (1939)

  8. [8]

    Hewish, S

    A. Hewish, S. J. Bell, J. D. H. Pilkington, P. F. Scott, and R. A. Collins, Observation of a rapidly pulsating radio source, Nature217, 709 (1968)

  9. [9]

    R. N. Manchesteret al., The Australia Telescope Na- tional Facility Pulsar Catalogue, Astron. J.129, 1993 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0412641 [astro-ph]

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al., Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833

  12. [12]

    P. D. Lasky, Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.32, e034 (2015), arXiv:1508.06643 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    Haskell and D

    B. Haskell and D. I. Jones, Glitching pulsars as gravita- tional wave sources, Astropart. Phys.157, 102921 (2024), arXiv:2311.04586 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    Haskell and K

    B. Haskell and K. Schwenzer, Isolated Neutron Stars (2022) arXiv:2104.03137 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    Kumar, P

    A. Kumar, P. Thakur, and M. Sinha, Non-radial oscilla- tions in newly born compact star considering effects of phase transition, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.530, 501 (2024), arXiv:2404.01252 [astro-ph.HE]

  16. [16]

    Benhar, E

    O. Benhar, E. Berti, and V. Ferrari, The Imprint of the equation of state on the axial w modes of oscillating neu- tron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.310, 797 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9901037

  17. [17]

    Bauswein, N

    A. Bauswein, N. Stergioulas, and H.-T. Janka, Explor- ing properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 56 (2016), arXiv:1508.05493 [astro-ph.HE]

  18. [18]

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Non-Radial Pulsa- tion of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Analysis forL >= 2, Astrophys. J.149, 591 (1967)

  19. [19]

    Gualtieri, E

    L. Gualtieri, E. M. Kantor, M. E. Gusakov, and A. I. Chugunov, Quasinormal modes of superfluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D90, 024010 (2014), arXiv:1404.7512 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Andersson, G

    N. Andersson, G. L. Comer, and D. Langlois, Oscillations of general relativistic superfluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D66, 104002 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0203039

  21. [21]

    Sotani, K

    H. Sotani, K. Tominaga, and K.-i. Maeda, Density dis- continuity of a neutron star and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D65, 024010 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0108060

  22. [22]

    Miniutti, J

    G. Miniutti, J. A. Pons, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, and V. Fer- rari, Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.338, 389 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0206142

  23. [23]

    Kunjipurayil, T

    A. Kunjipurayil, T. Zhao, B. Kumar, B. K. Agrawal, and M. Prakash, Impact of the equation of state on f- and p- mode oscillations of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D106, 063005 (2022), arXiv:2205.02081 [nucl-th]

  24. [24]

    D. Dey, J. A. Pattnaik, M. Bhuyan, R. N. Panda, and S. K. Patra, f-mode oscillations of dark mat- ter admixed quarkyonic neutron star, JCAP08, 003, arXiv:2412.06739 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    Sotani and A

    H. Sotani and A. Kumar, Universal relation involv- ing fundamental modes in two-fluid dark matter ad- mixed neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1438 (2025), arXiv:2512.07105 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, J. Kunz, and V. Preut, Polar Quasinormal Modes of Neutron Stars in Massive Scalar-Tensor Theories, Front. in Phys.9, 741427 (2021), arXiv:2107.06726 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, Normal modes of a model radiating system, Gen. Rel. Grav.18, 913 (1986)

  28. [28]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, W-modes - A new fam- ily of normal modes of pulsating relativistic stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.255, 119 (1992)

  29. [29]

    Chandrasekhar and V

    S. Chandrasekhar and V. Ferrari, On the non-radial os- cillations of a star. III - A reconsideration of the axial modes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Se- ries A434, 449 (1991)

  30. [30]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Axial Modes for Relativistic Stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268, 1015 (1994)

  31. [31]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

  32. [32]

    L. K. Tsui and P. T. Leung, Universality in quasi-normal modes of neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.357, 1029 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412024

  33. [33]

    Chatterjee and D

    D. Chatterjee and D. Bandyopadhyay, Probing dense matter in neutron stars with axialwmodes, Phys. Rev. D80, 023011 (2009), arXiv:0904.1949

  34. [34]

    Sotani and K

    H. Sotani and K. D. Kokkotas, Stellar oscillations in scalar-tensor theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D71, 124038 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0506060

  35. [35]

    Altaha Motahar, J

    Z. Altaha Motahar, J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Axial quasinormal modes of scalarized neu- tron stars with realistic equations of state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044032 (2018), arXiv:1807.02598

  36. [36]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo and K. Eickhoff, Axial quasinor- mal modes of static neutron stars in the nonminimal derivative coupling sector of Horndeski gravity: Spec- trum and universal relations for realistic equations of state, Phys. Rev. D97, 104002 (2018), arXiv:1803.01655

  37. [37]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, J. Kunz, K. V. Staykov, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Axial quasinormal modes of neutron stars inR 2 gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 104047 (2018), arXiv:1804.04060 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Lemaitre, The expanding universe, Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre, The expanding universe, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A53, 51 (1933)

  39. [39]

    R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity, Astrophys. J.188, 657 (1974)

  40. [40]

    Ruderman, Pulsars: structure and dynamics, Ann

    M. Ruderman, Pulsars: structure and dynamics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.10, 427 (1972)

  41. [41]

    Hoffberg, A

    M. Hoffberg, A. E. Glassgold, R. W. Richardson, and M. Ruderman, Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 775 (1970)

  42. [42]

    R. F. Sawyer, Condensed pi- phase in neutron star mat- ter, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 382 (1972)

  43. [43]

    Nelmes and B

    S. Nelmes and B. M. A. G. Piette, Phase transition and anisotropic deformations of neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. D85, 123004 (2012), arXiv:1204.0910 [astro-ph.SR]

  44. [44]

    Barreto and S

    W. Barreto and S. Rojas, An equation of state for radiat- ing dissipative spheres in general relativity, Astrophysics and space science193, 201 (1992)

  45. [45]

    Barreto, Exploding radiating viscous spheres in gen- eral relativity, Astrophysics and space science201, 191 (1993)

    W. Barreto, Exploding radiating viscous spheres in gen- eral relativity, Astrophysics and space science201, 191 (1993). 16

  46. [46]

    Yazadjiev, Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonper- turbative analytical approach, Phys

    S. Yazadjiev, Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonper- turbative analytical approach, Phys. Rev. D85, 044030 (2012), arXiv:1111.3536 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Karlovini and L

    M. Karlovini and L. Samuelsson, Elastic stars in general relativity. 1. Foundations and equilibrium models, Class. Quant. Grav.20, 3613 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0211026

  48. [48]

    A. Alho, J. Nat´ ario, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Compact elastic objects in general relativity, Physical Review D 105, 044025 (2022)

  49. [49]

    Herrera and N

    L. Herrera and N. O. Santos, Local anisotropy in self- gravitating systems, Phys. Rept.286, 53 (1997)

  50. [50]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi, f-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 123011 (2024), arXiv:2309.00439 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi, Quasinormal f-modes of anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D111, 103035 (2025), arXiv:2504.20589 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    S. Y. Lau, S. Ajith, V. Guedes, and K. Yagi, Nonradial instabilities in anisotropic neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083020 (2024), arXiv:2405.04653 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    J. Yu, V. Guedes, S. Y. Lau, S. Ajith, and K. Yagi, Space- time Quasi-normal Mode Oscillations of Anisotropic Neutron Stars, (2026), arXiv:2601.06962 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J. M. Pear- son, and S. Goriely, Analytical representations of unified equations of state for neutron-star matter, Astron. Astro- phys.560, A48 (2013), arXiv:1310.0049 [astro-ph.SR]

  55. [55]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astron. As- trophys.380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092

  56. [56]

    Chabanat, P

    E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabili- ties, Nucl. Phys. A635, 231 (1998)

  57. [57]

    Horvat, S

    D. Horvat, S. Ilijic, and A. Marunovic, Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with quasi-local equa- tion of state, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 025009 (2011), arXiv:1010.0878 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Gravitational wave spectrum of anisotropic neutron stars in Cowl- ing approximation, Phys. Rev. D85, 124023 (2012), arXiv:1203.3963 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Folomeev, Anisotropic neutron stars inR 2 gravity, Phys

    V. Folomeev, Anisotropic neutron stars inR 2 gravity, Phys. Rev. D97, 124009 (2018), arXiv:1802.01801 [gr- qc]

  60. [60]

    H. O. Silva, C. F. B. Macedo, E. Berti, and L. C. B. Crispino, Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in general relativity and scalar–tensor theory, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 145008 (2015), arXiv:1411.6286 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    L. M. Becerra, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, and F. D. Lora- Clavijo, Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars with a parametrized equation of state, Phys. Rev. D110, 103004 (2024), arXiv:2410.06316 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    J. W. McKeeet al., A precise mass measurement of PSR J2045 + 3633, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.499, 4082 (2020), arXiv:2009.12283 [astro-ph.HE]

  63. [63]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952−0607: The Fastest and Heav- iest Known Galactic Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124 [astro-ph.HE]

  64. [64]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

  65. [65]

    Andersson and G

    N. Andersson and G. L. Comer, Relativistic fluid dynam- ics: Physics for many different scales, Living Rev. Rel. 10, 1 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0605010

  66. [66]

    Kojima, Equations governing the nonradial oscilla- tions of a slowly rotating relativistic star, Phys

    Y. Kojima, Equations governing the nonradial oscilla- tions of a slowly rotating relativistic star, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4289 (1992)

  67. [67]

    E. W. Leaver, An Analytic Representation for the Quasi- Normal Modes of Kerr Black Holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

  68. [68]

    Leins, H

    M. Leins, H. P. Nollert, and M. H. Soffel, Nonradial os- cillations of neutron stars: A New branch of strongly damped normal modes, Phys. Rev. D48, 3467 (1993)

  69. [69]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C58, 1804 (1998)