pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2108.01045 · v2 · submitted 2021-08-02 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration , the Virgo Collaboration: R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , F. Acernese , K. Ackley , C. Adams , N. Adhikari , R. X. Adhikari
show 1423 more authors
V. B. Adya C. Affeldt D. Agarwal M. Agathos K. Agatsuma N. Aggarwal O. D. Aguiar L. Aiello A. Ain P. Ajith S. Albanesi A. Allocca P. A. Altin A. Amato C. Anand S. Anand A. Ananyeva S. B. Anderson W. G. Anderson T. Andrade N. Andres T. Andri\'c S. V. Angelova S. Ansoldi J. M. Antelis S. Antier S. Appert K. Arai M. C. Araya J. S. Areeda M. Ar\`ene N. Arnaud S. M. Aronson K. G. Arun Y. Asali G. Ashton M. Assiduo S. M. Aston P. Astone F. Aubin C. Austin S. Babak F. Badaracco M. K. M. Bader C. Badger S. Bae A. M. Baer S. Bagnasco Y. Bai J. Baird M. Ball G. Ballardin S. W. Ballmer A. Balsamo G. Baltus S. Banagiri D. Bankar J. C. Barayoga C. Barbieri B. C. Barish D. Barker P. Barneo F. Barone B. Barr L. Barsotti M. Barsuglia D. Barta J. Bartlett M. A. Barton I. Bartos R. Bassiri A. Basti M. Bawaj J. C. Bayley A. C. Baylor M. Bazzan B. B\'ecsy V. M. Bedakihale M. Bejger I. Belahcene V. Benedetto D. Beniwal T. F. Bennett J. D. Bentley M. BenYaala F. Bergamin B. K. Berger S. Bernuzzi C. P. L. Berry D. Bersanetti A. Bertolini J. Betzwieser D. Beveridge R. Bhandare U. Bhardwaj D. Bhattacharjee S. Bhaumik I. A. Bilenko G. Billingsley S. Bini R. Birney O. Birnholtz S. Biscans M. Bischi S. Biscoveanu A. Bisht B. Biswas M. Bitossi M.-A. Bizouard J. K. Blackburn C. D. Blair D. G. Blair R. M. Blair F. Bobba N. Bode M. Boer G. Bogaert M. Boldrini L. D. Bonavena F. Bondu E. Bonilla R. Bonnand P. Booker B. A. Boom R. Bork V. Boschi N. Bose S. Bose V. Bossilkov V. Boudart Y. Bouffanais A. Bozzi C. Bradaschia P. R. Brady A. Bramley A. Branch M. Branchesi J. E. Brau M. Breschi T. Briant J. H. Briggs A. Brillet M. Brinkmann P. Brockill A. F. Brooks J. Brooks D. D. Brown S. Brunett G. Bruno R. Bruntz J. Bryant T. Bulik H. J. Bulten A. Buonanno R. Buscicchio D. Buskulic C. Buy R. L. Byer L. Cadonati G. Cagnoli C. Cahillane J. Calder\'on Bustillo J. D. Callaghan T. A. Callister E. Calloni J. Cameron J. B. Camp M. Canepa S. Canevarolo M. Cannavacciuolo K. C. Cannon H. Cao E. Capote G. Carapella F. Carbognani J. B. Carlin M. F. Carney M. Carpinelli G. Carrillo G. Carullo T. L. Carver J. Casanueva Diaz C. Casentini G. Castaldi S. Caudill M. Cavagli\`a F. Cavalier R. Cavalieri M. Ceasar G. Cella P. Cerd\'a-Dur\'an E. Cesarini W. Chaibi K. Chakravarti S. Chalathadka Subrahmanya E. Champion C.-H. Chan C. Chan C. L. Chan K. Chan K. Chandra P. Chanial S. Chao P. Charlton E. A. Chase E. Chassande-Mottin C. Chatterjee Debarati Chatterjee Deep Chatterjee D. Chattopadhyay M. Chaturvedi S. Chaty K. Chatziioannou H. Y. Chen J. Chen X. Chen Y. Chen Z. Chen H. Cheng C. K. Cheong H. Y. Cheung H. Y. Chia F. Chiadini G. Chiarini R. Chierici A. Chincarini M. L. Chiofalo A. Chiummo G. Cho H. S. Cho R. K. Choudhary S. Choudhary N. Christensen Q. Chu S. Chua K. W. Chung G. Ciani P. Ciecielag M. Cie\'slar M. Cifaldi A. A. Ciobanu R. Ciolfi F. Cipriano A. Cirone F. Clara E. N. Clark J. A. Clark L. Clarke P. Clearwater S. Clesse F. Cleva E. Coccia E. Codazzo P.-F. Cohadon D. E. Cohen L. Cohen M. Colleoni C. G. Collette A. Colombo M. Colpi C. M. Compton M. Constancio Jr. L. Conti S. J. Cooper P. Corban T. R. Corbitt I. Cordero-Carri\'on S. Corezzi K. R. Corley N. Cornish D. Corre A. Corsi S. Cortese C. A. Costa R. Cotesta M. W. Coughlin J.-P. Coulon S. T. Countryman B. Cousins P. Couvares D. M. Coward M. J. Cowart D. C. Coyne R. Coyne J. D. E. Creighton T. D. Creighton A. W. Criswell M. Croquette S. G. Crowder J. R. Cudell T. J. Cullen A. Cumming R. Cummings L. Cunningham E. Cuoco M. Cury{\l}o P. Dabadie T. Dal Canton S. Dall'Osso G. D\'alya A. Dana L. M. DaneshgaranBajastani B. D'Angelo B. Danila S. Danilishin S. D'Antonio K. Danzmann C. Darsow-Fromm A. Dasgupta L. E. H. Datrier S. Datta V. Dattilo I. Dave M. Davier G. S. Davies D. Davis M. C. Davis E. J. Daw R. Dean D. DeBra M. Deenadayalan J. Degallaix M. De Laurentis S. Del\'eglise V. Del Favero F. De Lillo N. De Lillo W. Del Pozzo L. M. DeMarchi F. De Matteis V. D'Emilio N. Demos T. Dent A. Depasse R. De Pietri R. De Rosa C. De Rossi R. DeSalvo R. De Simone S. Dhurandhar M. C. D\'iaz M. Diaz-Ortiz Jr. N. A. Didio T. Dietrich L. Di Fiore C. Di Fronzo C. Di Giorgio F. Di Giovanni M. Di Giovanni T. Di Girolamo A. Di Lieto B. Ding S. Di Pace I. Di Palma F. Di Renzo A. K. Divakarla Divyajyoti A. Dmitriev Z. Doctor L. D'Onofrio F. Donovan K. L. Dooley S. Doravari I. Dorrington M. Drago J. C. Driggers Y. Drori J.-G. Ducoin P. Dupej O. Durante D. D'Urso P.-A. Duverne S. E. Dwyer C. Eassa P. J. Easter M. Ebersold T. Eckhardt G. Eddolls B. Edelman T. B. Edo O. Edy A. Effler J. Eichholz S. S. Eikenberry M. Eisenmann R. A. Eisenstein A. Ejlli E. Engelby L. Errico R. C. Essick H. Estell\'es D. Estevez Z. Etienne T. Etzel M. Evans T. M. Evans B. E. Ewing V. Fafone H. Fair S. Fairhurst S. P. Fanning A. M. Farah S. Farinon B. Farr W. M. Farr N. W. Farrow E. J. Fauchon-Jones G. Favaro M. Favata M. Fays M. Fazio J. Feicht M. M. Fejer E. Fenyvesi D. L. Ferguson A. Fernandez-Galiana I. Ferrante T. A. Ferreira F. Fidecaro P. Figura I. Fiori M. Fishbach R. P. Fisher R. Fittipaldi V. Fiumara R. Flaminio E. Floden H. Fong J. A. Font B. Fornal P. W. F. Forsyth A. Franke S. Frasca F. Frasconi C. Frederick J. P. Freed Z. Frei A. Freise R. Frey P. Fritschel V. V. Frolov G. G. Fronz\'e P. Fulda M. Fyffe H. A. Gabbard W. Gabella B. U. Gadre J. R. Gair J. Gais S. Galaudage R. Gamba D. Ganapathy A. Ganguly S. G. Gaonkar B. Garaventa F. Garc\'ia C. Garc\'ia-N\'u\~nez C. Garc\'ia-Quir\'os F. Garufi B. Gateley S. Gaudio V. Gayathri G. Gemme A. Gennai J. George R. N. George O. Gerberding L. Gergely P. Gewecke S. Ghonge Abhirup Ghosh Archisman Ghosh Shaon Ghosh Shrobana Ghosh B. Giacomazzo L. Giacoppo J. A. Giaime K. D. Giardina D. R. Gibson C. Gier M. Giesler P. Giri F. Gissi J. Glanzer A. E. Gleckl P. Godwin E. Goetz R. Goetz N. Gohlke B. Goncharov G. Gonz\'alez A. Gopakumar M. Gosselin R. Gouaty D. W. Gould B. Grace A. Grado M. Granata V. Granata A. Grant S. Gras P. Grassia C. Gray R. Gray G. Greco A. C. Green R. Green A. M. Gretarsson E. M. Gretarsson D. Griffith W. Griffiths H. L. Griggs G. Grignani A. Grimaldi S. J. Grimm H. Grote S. Grunewald P. Gruning D. Guerra G. M. Guidi A. R. Guimaraes G. Guix\'e H. K. Gulati H.-K. Guo Y. Guo Anchal Gupta Anuradha Gupta P. Gupta E. K. Gustafson R. Gustafson F. Guzman L. Haegel O. Halim E. D. Hall E. Z. Hamilton G. Hammond M. Haney J. Hanks C. Hanna M. D. Hannam O. Hannuksela H. Hansen T. J. Hansen J. Hanson T. Harder T. Hardwick K. Haris J. Harms G. M. Harry I. W. Harry D. Hartwig B. Haskell R. K. Hasskew C.-J. Haster K. Haughian F. J. Hayes J. Healy A. Heidmann A. Heidt M. C. Heintze J. Heinze J. Heinzel H. Heitmann F. Hellman P. Hello A. F. Helmling-Cornell G. Hemming M. Hendry I. S. Heng E. Hennes J. Hennig M. H. Hennig A. G. Hernandez F. Hernandez Vivanco M. Heurs S. Hild P. Hill A. S. Hines S. Hochheim D. Hofman J. N. Hohmann D. G. Holcomb N. A. Holland K. Holley-Bockelmann I. J. Hollows Z. J. Holmes K. Holt D. E. Holz P. Hopkins J. Hough S. Hourihane E. J. Howell C. G. Hoy D. Hoyland A. Hreibi Y. Hsu Y. Huang M. T. H\"ubner A. D. Huddart B. Hughey V. Hui S. Husa S. H. Huttner R. Huxford T. Huynh-Dinh B. Idzkowski A. Iess C. Ingram M. Isi K. Isleif B. R. Iyer V. JaberianHamedan T. Jacqmin S. J. Jadhav S. P. Jadhav A. L. James A. Z. Jan K. Jani J. Janquart K. Janssens N. N. Janthalur P. Jaranowski D. Jariwala R. Jaume A. C. Jenkins K. Jenner M. Jeunon W. Jia G. R. Johns N. K. Johnson-McDaniel A. W. Jones D. I. Jones J. D. Jones P. Jones R. Jones R. J. G. Jonker L. Ju J. Junker V. Juste C. V. Kalaghatgi V. Kalogera B. Kamai S. Kandhasamy G. Kang J. B. Kanner Y. Kao S. J. Kapadia D. P. Kapasi S. Karat C. Karathanasis S. Karki R. Kashyap M. Kasprzack W. Kastaun S. Katsanevas E. Katsavounidis W. Katzman T. Kaur K. Kawabe F. K\'ef\'elian D. Keitel J. S. Key S. Khadka F. Y. Khalili S. Khan E. A. Khazanov N. Khetan M. Khursheed N. Kijbunchoo C. Kim J. C. Kim K. Kim W. S. Kim Y.-M. Kim C. Kimball M. Kinley-Hanlon R. Kirchhoff J. S. Kissel L. Kleybolte S. Klimenko A. M. Knee T. D. Knowles E. Knyazev P. Koch G. Koekoek S. Koley P. Kolitsidou M. Kolstein K. Komori V. Kondrashov A. Kontos N. Koper M. Korobko M. Kovalam D. B. Kozak V. Kringel N. V. Krishnendu A. Kr\'olak G. Kuehn F. Kuei P. Kuijer A. Kumar P. Kumar Rahul Kumar Rakesh Kumar K. Kuns S. Kuwahara P. Lagabbe D. Laghi E. Lalande T. L. Lam A. Lamberts M. Landry B. B. Lane R. N. Lang J. Lange B. Lantz I. La Rosa A. Lartaux-Vollard P. D. Lasky M. Laxen A. Lazzarini C. Lazzaro P. Leaci S. Leavey Y. K. Lecoeuche H. M. Lee H. W. Lee J. Lee K. Lee J. Lehmann A. Lema\^itre N. Leroy N. Letendre C. Levesque Y. Levin J. N. Leviton K. Leyde A. K. Y. Li B. Li J. Li T. G. F. Li X. Li F. Linde S. D. Linker J. N. Linley T. B. Littenberg J. Liu K. Liu X. Liu F. Llamas M. Llorens-Monteagudo R. K. L. Lo A. Lockwood L. T. London A. Longo D. Lopez M. Lopez Portilla M. Lorenzini V. Loriette M. Lormand G. Losurdo T. P. Lott J. D. Lough C. O. Lousto G. Lovelace J. F. Lucaccioni H. L\"uck D. Lumaca A. P. Lundgren J. E. Lynam R. Macas M. MacInnis D. M. Macleod I. A. O. MacMillan A. Macquet I. Maga\~na Hernandez C. Magazz\`u R. M. Magee R. Maggiore M. Magnozzi S. Mahesh E. Majorana C. Makarem I. Maksimovic S. Maliakal A. Malik N. Man V. Mandic V. Mangano J. L. Mango G. L. Mansell M. Manske M. Mantovani M. Mapelli F. Marchesoni F. Marion Z. Mark S. M\'arka Z. M\'arka C. Markakis A. S. Markosyan A. Markowitz E. Maros A. Marquina S. Marsat F. Martelli I. W. Martin R. M. Martin M. Martinez V. A. Martinez V. Martinez K. Martinovic D. V. Martynov E. J. Marx H. Masalehdan K. Mason E. Massera A. Masserot T. J. Massinger M. Masso-Reid S. Mastrogiovanni A. Matas M. Mateu-Lucena F. Matichard M. Matiushechkina N. Mavalvala J. J. McCann R. McCarthy D. E. McClelland P. K. McClincy S. McCormick L. McCuller G. I. McGhee S. C. McGuire C. McIsaac J. McIver T. McRae S. T. McWilliams D. Meacher M. Mehmet A. K. Mehta Q. Meijer A. Melatos D. A. Melchor G. Mendell A. Menendez-Vazquez C. S. Menoni R. A. Mercer L. Mereni K. Merfeld E. L. Merilh J. D. Merritt M. Merzougui S. Meshkov C. Messenger C. Messick P. M. Meyers F. Meylahn A. Mhaske A. Miani H. Miao I. Michaloliakos C. Michel H. Middleton L. Milano A. Miller A. L. Miller B. Miller M. Millhouse J. C. Mills E. Milotti O. Minazzoli Y. Minenkov Ll. M. Mir M. Miravet-Ten\'es C. Mishra T. Mishra T. Mistry S. Mitra V. P. Mitrofanov G. Mitselmakher R. Mittleman Geoffrey Mo E. Moguel K. Mogushi S. R. P. Mohapatra S. R. Mohite I. Molina M. Molina-Ruiz M. Mondin M. Montani C. J. Moore D. Moraru F. Morawski A. More C. Moreno G. Moreno S. Morisaki B. Mours C. M. Mow-Lowry S. Mozzon F. Muciaccia Arunava Mukherjee D. Mukherjee Soma Mukherjee Subroto Mukherjee Suvodip Mukherjee N. Mukund A. Mullavey J. Munch E. A. Mu\~niz P. G. Murray R. Musenich S. Muusse S. L. Nadji A. Nagar V. Napolano I. Nardecchia L. Naticchioni B. Nayak R. K. Nayak B. F. Neil J. Neilson G. Nelemans T. J. N. Nelson M. Nery P. Neubauer A. Neunzert K. Y. Ng S. W. S. Ng C. Nguyen P. Nguyen T. Nguyen S. A. Nichols S. Nissanke E. Nitoglia F. Nocera M. Norman C. North L. K. Nuttall J. Oberling B. D. O'Brien J. O'Dell E. Oelker G. Oganesyan J. J. Oh S. H. Oh F. Ohme H. Ohta M. A. Okada C. Olivetto R. Oram B. O'Reilly R. G. Ormiston N. D. Ormsby L. F. Ortega R. O'Shaughnessy E. O'Shea S. Ossokine C. Osthelder D. J. Ottaway H. Overmier A. E. Pace G. Pagano M. A. Page G. Pagliaroli A. Pai S. A. Pai J. R. Palamos O. Palashov C. Palomba H. Pan P. K. Panda P. T. H. Pang C. Pankow F. Pannarale B. C. Pant F. H. Panther F. Paoletti A. Paoli A. Paolone H. Park W. Parker D. Pascucci A. Pasqualetti R. Passaquieti D. Passuello M. Patel M. Pathak B. Patricelli A. S. Patron S. Patrone S. Paul E. Payne M. Pedraza M. Pegoraro A. Pele S. Penn A. Perego A. Pereira T. Pereira C. J. Perez C. P\'erigois C. C. Perkins A. Perreca S. Perri\`es J. Petermann D. Petterson H. P. Pfeiffer K. A. Pham K. S. Phukon O. J. Piccinni M. Pichot M. Piendibene F. Piergiovanni L. Pierini V. Pierro G. Pillant M. Pillas F. Pilo L. Pinard I. M. Pinto M. Pinto K. Piotrzkowski M. Pirello M. D. Pitkin E. Placidi L. Planas W. Plastino C. Pluchar R. Poggiani E. Polini D. Y. T. Pong S. Ponrathnam P. Popolizio E. K. Porter R. Poulton J. Powell M. Pracchia T. Pradier A. K. Prajapati K. Prasai R. Prasanna G. Pratten M. Principe G. A. Prodi L. Prokhorov P. Prosposito L. Prudenzi A. Puecher M. Punturo F. Puosi P. Puppo M. P\"urrer H. Qi V. Quetschke R. Quitzow-James F. J. Raab G. Raaijmakers H. Radkins N. Radulesco P. Raffai S. X. Rail S. Raja C. Rajan K. E. Ramirez T. D. Ramirez A. Ramos-Buades J. Rana P. Rapagnani U. D. Rapol A. Ray V. Raymond N. Raza M. Razzano J. Read L. A. Rees T. Regimbau L. Rei S. Reid S. W. Reid D. H. Reitze P. Relton A. Renzini P. Rettegno A. Reza M. Rezac F. Ricci D. Richards J. W. Richardson L. Richardson G. Riemenschneider K. Riles S. Rinaldi K. Rink M. Rizzo N. A. Robertson R. Robie F. Robinet A. Rocchi S. Rodriguez L. Rolland J. G. Rollins M. Romanelli R. Romano C. L. Romel A. Romero-Rodr\'iguez I. M. Romero-Shaw J. H. Romie S. Ronchini L. Rosa C. A. Rose M. J. B. Rosell D. Rosi\'nska M. P. Ross S. Rowan S. J. Rowlinson S. Roy Santosh Roy Soumen Roy D. Rozza P. Ruggi K. Ruiz-Rocha K. Ryan S. Sachdev T. Sadecki J. Sadiq M. Sakellariadou O. S. Salafia L. Salconi M. Saleem F. Salemi A. Samajdar E. J. Sanchez J. H. Sanchez L. E. Sanchez N. Sanchis-Gual J. R. Sanders A. Sanuy T. R. Saravanan N. Sarin B. Sassolas H. Satari O. Sauter R. L. Savage D. Sawant H. L. Sawant S. Sayah D. Schaetzl M. Scheel J. Scheuer M. Schiworski P. Schmidt S. Schmidt R. Schnabel M. Schneewind R. M. S. Schofield A. Sch\"onbeck B. W. Schulte B. F. Schutz E. Schwartz J. Scott S. M. Scott M. Seglar-Arroyo D. Sellers A. S. Sengupta D. Sentenac E. G. Seo V. Sequino A. Sergeev Y. Setyawati T. Shaffer M. S. Shahriar B. Shams A. Sharma P. Sharma P. Shawhan N. S. Shcheblanov M. Shikauchi D. H. Shoemaker D. M. Shoemaker S. ShyamSundar M. Sieniawska D. Sigg L. P. Singer D. Singh N. Singh A. Singha A. M. Sintes V. Sipala V. Skliris B. J. J. Slagmolen T. J. Slaven-Blair J. Smetana J. R. Smith R. J. E. Smith J. Soldateschi S. N. Somala E. J. Son K. Soni S. Soni V. Sordini F. Sorrentino N. Sorrentino R. Soulard T. Souradeep E. Sowell V. Spagnuolo A. P. Spencer M. Spera R. Srinivasan A. K. Srivastava V. Srivastava K. Staats C. Stachie D. A. Steer J. Steinhoff J. Steinlechner S. Steinlechner S. Stevenson D. J. Stops M. Stover K. A. Strain L. C. Strang G. Stratta A. Strunk R. Sturani A. L. Stuver S. Sudhagar V. Sudhir H. G. Suh T. Z. Summerscales H. Sun L. Sun S. Sunil A. Sur J. Suresh P. J. Sutton B. L. Swinkels M. J. Szczepa\'nczyk P. Szewczyk M. Tacca S. C. Tait C. J. Talbot C. Talbot A. J. Tanasijczuk D. B. Tanner D. Tao L. Tao E. N. Tapia San Mart\'in C. Taranto J. D. Tasson R. Tenorio J. E. Terhune L. Terkowski M. P. Thirugnanasambandam L. Thomas M. Thomas P. Thomas J. E. Thompson S. R. Thondapu K. A. Thorne E. Thrane Shubhanshu Tiwari Srishti Tiwari V. Tiwari A. M. Toivonen K. Toland A. E. Tolley M. Tonelli A. Torres-Forn\'e C. I. Torrie I. Tosta e Melo D. T\"oyr\"a A. Trapananti F. Travasso G. Traylor M. Trevor M. C. Tringali A. Tripathee L. Troiano A. Trovato L. Trozzo R. J. Trudeau D. S. Tsai D. Tsai K. W. Tsang M. Tse R. Tso L. Tsukada D. Tsuna T. Tsutsui K. Turbang M. Turconi A. S. Ubhi R. P. Udall K. Ueno C. S. Unnikrishnan A. L. Urban A. Utina H. Vahlbruch G. Vajente A. Vajpeyi G. Valdes M. Valentini V. Valsan N. van Bakel M. van Beuzekom J. F. J. van den Brand C. Van Den Broeck D. C. Vander-Hyde L. van der Schaaf J. V. van Heijningen J. Vanosky N. van Remortel M. Vardaro A. F. Vargas V. Varma M. Vas\'uth A. Vecchio G. Vedovato J. Veitch P. J. Veitch J. Venneberg G. Venugopalan D. Verkindt P. Verma Y. Verma D. Veske F. Vetrano A. Vicer\'e S. Vidyant A. D. Viets A. Vijaykumar V. Villa-Ortega J.-Y. Vinet A. Virtuoso S. Vitale T. Vo H. Vocca E. R. G. von Reis J. S. A. von Wrangel C. Vorvick S. P. Vyatchanin L. E. Wade M. Wade K. J. Wagner R. C. Walet M. Walker G. S. Wallace L. Wallace S. Walsh J. Z. Wang W. H. Wang R. L. Ward J. Warner M. Was N. Y. Washington J. Watchi B. Weaver S. A. Webster M. Weinert A. J. Weinstein R. Weiss C. M. Weller R. Weller F. Wellmann L. Wen P. We{\ss}els K. Wette J. T. Whelan D. D. White B. F. Whiting C. Whittle D. Wilken D. Williams M. J. Williams A. R. Williamson J. L. Willis B. Willke D. J. Wilson W. Winkler C. C. Wipf T. Wlodarczyk G. Woan J. Woehler J. K. Wofford I. C. F. Wong D. S. Wu D. M. Wysocki L. Xiao H. Yamamoto F. W. Yang L. Yang Yang Yang Z. Yang M. J. Yap D. W. Yeeles A. B. Yelikar M. Ying J. Yoo Hang Yu Haocun Yu A. Zadro\.zny M. Zanolin T. Zelenova J.-P. Zendri M. Zevin J. Zhang L. Zhang T. Zhang Y. Zhang C. Zhao G. Zhao Yue Zhao R. Zhou Z. Zhou X. J. Zhu A. B. Zimmerman Y. Zlochower M. E. Zucker J. Zweizig
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesLIGOVirgobinary black holescompact binary coalescencesmass gapGWTC-2.1
0
0 comments X

The pith

GWTC-2.1 adds eight new high-significance compact binary coalescence candidates from the same 2019 data period.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reprocesses the final LIGO-Virgo strain data from April to October 2019 using improved calibration and noise subtraction. Three matched-filter pipelines identify 1201 candidates above a false-alarm rate of two per day, and the authors retain 44 with astrophysical probability exceeding 0.5. Eight of these are new; if real, they extend the total mass range of confirmed binary black holes to 14–182 solar masses, place two primary components inside the pair-instability mass gap, and increase the count of strongly asymmetric-mass-ratio systems. Two new events also show positive effective inspiral spin at 90 percent credibility.

Core claim

The authors present a deeper catalog of 44 high-significance compact binary coalescences, including eight not reported in GWTC-2. If astrophysical, these new events increase the total mass range of binary black holes from approximately 14 to 182 solar masses, with GW190426_190642 at the high end and two candidates having primary components in the mass gap predicted by pair-instability supernova theory. They also add two events with mass ratios below 0.65 and 0.44 at 90 percent probability, and find two with positive effective inspiral spins.

What carries the argument

Matched-filter search pipelines applied to the final calibrated strain data, combined with astrophysical probability P_astro > 0.5 to classify candidates.

If this is right

  • The observed total mass range for binary black holes extends up to about 182 solar masses.
  • Two new candidate events have primary masses falling in the pair-instability supernova mass gap.
  • Two additional events with significantly asymmetric mass ratios are identified.
  • Two of the new events exhibit positive effective inspiral spins at 90 percent credibility.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of mass-gap events would tighten constraints on pair-instability supernova models.
  • The absence of clearly negative effective spins may favor formation channels that produce aligned spins.
  • Deeper catalogs of this kind improve statistical measurements of the compact-object mass and spin distributions.
  • The demonstrated noise-subtraction methods could raise detection rates in current and future observing runs.

Load-bearing premise

The astrophysical probability P_astro greater than 0.5 correctly identifies the eight new candidates as real events rather than noise.

What would settle it

An independent reanalysis or follow-up observation that rules out one of the new candidates, such as GW190426_190642, as a noise artifact.

read the original abstract

The second Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog reported on 39 compact binary coalescences observed by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors between 1 April 2019 15:00 UTC and 1 October 2019 15:00 UTC. We present GWTC-2.1, which reports on a deeper list of candidate events observed over the same period. We analyze the final version of the strain data over this period with improved calibration and better subtraction of excess noise, which has been publicly released. We employ three matched-filter search pipelines for candidate identification, and estimate the astrophysical probability for each candidate event. While GWTC-2 used a false alarm rate threshold of 2 per year, we include in GWTC-2.1, 1201 candidates that pass a false alarm rate threshold of 2 per day. We calculate the source properties of a subset of 44 high-significance candidates that have an astrophysical probability greater than 0.5. Of these candidates, 36 have been reported in GWTC-2. If the 8 additional high-significance candidates presented here are astrophysical, the mass range of events that are unambiguously identified as binary black holes (both objects $\geq 3M_\odot$) is increased compared to GWTC-2, with total masses from $\sim 14 M_\odot$ for GW190924_021846 to $\sim 182 M_\odot$ for GW190426_190642. The primary components of two new candidate events (GW190403_051519 and GW190426_190642) fall in the mass gap predicted by pair instability supernova theory. We also expand the population of binaries with significantly asymmetric mass ratios reported in GWTC-2 by an additional two events (the mass ratio is less than $0.65$ and $0.44$ at $90\%$ probability for GW190403_051519 and GW190917_114630 respectively), and find that 2 of the 8 new events have effective inspiral spins $\chi_\mathrm{eff} > 0$ (at $90\%$ credibility), while no binary is consistent with $\chi_\mathrm{eff} < 0$ at the same significance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents GWTC-2.1, an extended catalog of compact binary coalescences from LIGO-Virgo O3a (1 April to 1 October 2019). Using the final public strain data with improved calibration and noise subtraction, three matched-filter pipelines identify 1201 candidates passing a false-alarm-rate threshold of 2 per day. Source properties are reported for the 44 events with astrophysical probability P_astro > 0.5, of which 8 are new relative to GWTC-2. The paper conditionally discusses an expanded binary-black-hole mass range (total masses ~14 to ~182 M_⊙) and additional asymmetric-mass-ratio and positive effective-spin events if the new candidates are astrophysical.

Significance. If the results hold, this catalog update meaningfully enlarges the observed sample of compact binaries, extending the unambiguously identified BBH mass range and adding events near the pair-instability gap and with asymmetric mass ratios. Strengths include reliance on publicly released data, cross-validation across three independent search pipelines, and explicit conditioning of claims on P_astro. The work supplies reproducible posterior samples and population-level implications that directly inform stellar-evolution and supernova models.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1] §3.1: The description of the improved calibration and excess-noise subtraction would benefit from a short quantitative statement of the reduction in noise power spectral density relative to the version used in GWTC-2.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2: The 90% credible intervals for the two new mass-gap candidates (GW190403_051519 and GW190426_190642) should be presented with the same number of significant figures as the other events for consistency.
  3. [§5] §5: The discussion of effective inspiral spin could note whether the two events with χ_eff > 0 at 90% credibility remain significant when the analysis is restricted to the three-pipeline intersection.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. We appreciate the recognition that the updated catalog meaningfully enlarges the sample of compact binaries, extends the observed black-hole mass range, and supplies reproducible results that inform stellar-evolution models.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in observational catalog

full rationale

The paper presents an observational catalog of compact binary coalescence candidates derived from publicly released LIGO/Virgo strain data using three independent matched-filter search pipelines, a lowered false-alarm-rate threshold, and standard astrophysical probability estimation (P_astro). No central claim reduces by the paper's own equations to a quantity defined by a fitted parameter chosen to produce that claim, nor does any load-bearing step rely on self-citation chains or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The mass-range extension is explicitly conditional on the new candidates being astrophysical and follows directly from the reported posterior samples once that external classification is granted. This is the expected non-finding for a data-release catalog paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The catalog rests on standard assumptions of gravitational-wave data analysis rather than new postulates; free parameters are mainly analysis thresholds.

free parameters (2)
  • FAR threshold of 2 per day
    Chosen to select a deeper list of candidates than the previous 2-per-year threshold used in GWTC-2.
  • P_astro > 0.5 cutoff
    Arbitrary threshold used to define the high-significance subset of 44 events.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Residual noise after subtraction is stationary and Gaussian
    Standard assumption required for matched-filter statistics to hold.
  • domain assumption Waveform models used for parameter estimation accurately represent the signals
    Invoked when reporting masses, spins, and distances for the 44 events.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 13886 in / 1443 out tokens · 35969 ms · 2026-05-16T07:41:53.858105+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. Constraints on the Primordial Black Hole Abundance using Pulsar Parameter Drifts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first search for scalar-induced gravitational waves via pulsar parameter drifts yields f_PBH < 10^{-10} (95% CL) for PBH masses 0.3 to 4e4 solar masses, strongly disfavoring a primordial black hole origin for LVK ...

  3. Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.

  4. Population Properties of Binary Black Holes with Eccentricity

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 8.0

    First joint population inference on binary black hole eccentricity from GWTC-4 bounds the eccentric branching ratio below 5% at 90% confidence, with results consistent with quasi-circular models but highly model-dependent.

  5. Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    The gwNRHME framework constructs a multi-modal non-spinning eccentric gravitational waveform surrogate by modulating quasi-circular models with universal eccentric functions, achieving median mismatches of ~9e-5 again...

  6. Accelerated Time-domain Analysis for Gravitational Wave Astronomy

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Presents a practical fully time-domain end-to-end likelihood for gravitational-wave inference with structured linear algebra and GPU acceleration.

  7. Mechanical Long Baseline Differential Gradiometers as Low Frequency Gravitational Wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A vertical long-wire suspended gradiometer configuration amplifies gravitational wave signals from order h to order h L/D by separating gravitational force from moment of inertia.

  8. Second-Generation Mass Peak in the Gravitational-Wave Population as a Probe of Globular Clusters

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamical formation in globular clusters produces a robust second black-hole mass peak at ~70 solar masses from second-generation mergers when the first-generation spectrum is truncated by pair-instability supernovae.

  9. Posterior Predictive Checks for Gravitational-wave Populations: Limitations and Improvements

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Maximum-likelihood-based posterior predictive checks detect model misspecification better than event-level versions for uncertain spin tilts, but current detector sensitivity limits their power; the Gaussian Component...

  10. Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Simulations show a 40-50 solar-mass black-hole cutoff is not guaranteed to be confidently recovered from GWTC-4-like catalogs, spurious detections are unlikely, and O4 data would reduce cutoff-mass uncertainty by at l...

  11. Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant is consistent with a Kerr black hole and bound the dominant quadrupolar mode frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction, with constraints tighter than prior multi-event catalogs.

  12. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  13. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  14. Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.

  15. Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA EMRIs can constrain deviations from Kerr equatorial symmetry to 10^{-2} and axial symmetry to 10^{-3} using Analytic Kludge waveforms and Fisher analysis.

  16. Inference of recoil kicks from binary black hole mergers up to GWTC--4 and their astrophysical implications

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Recoil kicks are inferred for GWTC-4 binary black hole events with values up to nearly 1000 km/s for some, yielding retention probabilities of 1-5% in globular clusters and 70-100% in elliptical galaxies.

  17. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Population-informed hierarchical parameter estimation is required for unbiased astrophysical interpretation of gravitational-wave events rather than using standard individual posteriors with reference priors.

  18. GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Two asymmetric BBH mergers are characterized with mass ratios 0.35 and ≤0.20; one shows high spins, negative χ_eff, and strong precession, suggesting an emerging population of massive rapidly spinning systems.

  19. Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    gr-qc 2021-12 accept novelty 3.0

    No evidence for physics beyond general relativity is found in the analysis of 15 GW events from GWTC-3, with consistency in residuals, PN parameters, and remnant properties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 298 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 133 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), “Ad- vanced LIGO,” Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

  2. [2]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), “Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  4. [4]

    Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), “Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. X 8, 039903 (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

  5. [5]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration), “GW170817: Observa- tion of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, Ice- Cube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3,...

  7. [7]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), “GWTC-1: A Gravitational- Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Sec- ond Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC- 2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Ob- serving Run,” Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    1-OGC: The first open gravitational-wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO data

    Alexander H. Nitz, Collin Capano, Alex B. Nielsen, Steven Reyes, Rebecca White, Duncan A. Brown, and Badri Krishnan, “1-OGC: The first open gravitational- wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO data,” Astrophys. J. 872, 195 (2019), arXiv:1811.01921 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    Sub-threshold binary neutron star search in Advanced LIGO's first observing run

    Ryan Magee et al., “Sub-threshold Binary Neutron Star Search in Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run,” As- trophys. J. 878, L17 (2019), arXiv:1901.09884 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    New search pipeline for compact binary mergers: Results for bi- nary black holes in the first observing run of Ad- vanced LIGO,

    Tejaswi Venumadhav, Barak Zackay, Javier Roulet, Liang Dai, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “New search pipeline for compact binary mergers: Results for bi- nary black holes in the first observing run of Ad- vanced LIGO,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 023011 (2019), arXiv:1902.10341 [astro-ph.IM]

  12. [12]

    A Highly Spinning and Aligned Binary Black Hole Merger in the Advanced LIGO First Observing Run

    Barak Zackay, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Liang Dai, Javier Roulet, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Highly spinning and aligned binary black hole merger in the Advanced LIGO first observing run,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 023007 (2019), arXiv:1902.10331 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    New binary black hole mergers in the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,

    Tejaswi Venumadhav, Barak Zackay, Javier Roulet, Liang Dai, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “New binary black hole mergers in the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), 10.1103/physrevd.101.083030

  14. [14]

    2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Cat- alog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data,

    Alexander H. Nitz, Thomas Dent, Gareth S. Davies, Sumit Kumar, Collin D. Capano, Ian Harry, Si- mone Mozzon, Laura Nuttall, Andrew Lundgren, and M´ arton T´ apai, “2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Cat- alog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data,” Astrophys. J. 891, 123 (2019), arXiv:1910.05331 [astro-ph.HE]

  15. [15]

    Detecting gravita- tional waves with disparate detector responses: Two new binary black hole mergers,

    Barak Zackay, Liang Dai, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Javier Roulet, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Detecting gravita- tional waves with disparate detector responses: Two new binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 063030 (2021)

  16. [16]

    Search for Gravitational Waves from High-Mass-Ratio Compact- Binary Mergers of Stellar Mass and Subsolar Mass Black Holes,

    Alexander Harvey Nitz and Yi-Fan Wang, “Search for Gravitational Waves from High-Mass-Ratio Compact- Binary Mergers of Stellar Mass and Subsolar Mass Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 021103 (2021), arXiv:2007.03583 [astro-ph.HE]

  17. [17]

    3-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact-binary Mergers,

    Alexander H. Nitz, Collin D. Capano, Sumit Kumar, Yi-Fan Wang, Shilpa Kastha, Marlin Sch¨ afer, Rahul Dhurkunde, and Miriam Cabero, “3-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact-binary Mergers,” Astrophys. J. 922, 76 (2021)

  18. [18]

    Search for Grav- itational Waves from the Coalescence of Subsolar-Mass Binaries in the First Half of Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s Third Observing Run,

    Alexander H. Nitz and Yi-Fan Wang, “Search for Grav- itational Waves from the Coalescence of Subsolar-Mass Binaries in the First Half of Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151101 (2021), arXiv:2106.08979 [astro-ph.HE]

  19. [19]

    4-OGC: Catalog of gravita- tional waves from compact-binary mergers,

    Alexander H. Nitz, Sumit Kumar, Yi-Fan Wang, Shilpa Kastha, Shichao Wu, Marlin Sch¨ afer, Rahul Dhurkunde, and Collin D. Capano, “4-OGC: Catalog of gravita- tional waves from compact-binary mergers,” (2021), arXiv:2112.06878 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [20]

    New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO–Virgo O3a data,

    Seth Olsen, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Jonathan Mushkin, Javier Roulet, Barak Zackay, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO–Virgo O3a data,” (2022), arXiv:2201.02252 [astro-ph.HE]

  21. [21]

    Broad search for gravitational waves from subsolar-mass binaries through LIGO and Virgo’s third observing run,

    Alexander H. Nitz and Yi-Fan Wang, “Broad search for gravitational waves from subsolar-mass binaries through LIGO and Virgo’s third observing run,” (2022), arXiv:2202.11024 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [22]

    The astrophysi- cal multimessenger observatory network (amon),

    M.W.E. Smith, D.B. Fox, D.F. Cowen, P. M´ esz´ aros, G. Teˇ si´ c, J. Fixelle, I. Bartos, P. Sommers, Abhay Ashtekar, G. Jogesh Babu, et al. , “The astrophysi- cal multimessenger observatory network (amon),” As- 36 troparticle Physics 45, 56–70 (2013)

  23. [23]

    A Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Search for Electromagnetic Signals Coinci- dent with Gravitational-Wave Candidates in Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run,

    E. Burns et al. (Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Team, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “A Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Search for Electromagnetic Signals Coinci- dent with Gravitational-Wave Candidates in Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run,” Astrophys. J. 871, 90 (2019), arXiv:1810.02764 [astro-ph.HE]

  24. [24]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabo- ration, Trigger Data to Accompany ”GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Bi- nary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs” , Tech. Rep. P1900392 (LIGO DCC, 2020)

  25. [25]

    Potential Gravitational-wave and Gamma-ray Multi-messenger Candidate from Oct. 30, 2015

    Alexander H. Nitz, Alex B. Nielsen, and Collin D. Capano, “Potential Gravitational-wave and Gamma- ray Multi-messenger Candidate from 2015 October 30,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 876, L4 (2019), arXiv:1902.09496 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    Counting And Confusion: Bayesian Rate Estimation With Multiple Populations

    Will M. Farr, Jonathan R. Gair, Ilya Mandel, and Curt Cutler, “Counting And Confusion: Bayesian Rate Esti- mation With Multiple Populations,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 023005 (2015), arXiv:1302.5341 [astro-ph.IM]

  27. [27]

    The Rate of Binary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO Observations Surrounding GW150914

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), “The Rate of Binary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO Observations Surrounding GW150914,” Astrophys. J.833, L1 (2016), arXiv:1602.03842 [astro-ph.HE]

  28. [28]

    Supplement: The Rate of Binary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO Observations Surrounding GW150914

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), “Supplement: The Rate of Bi- nary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO Observations Surrounding GW150914,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. 227, 14 (2016), arXiv:1606.03939 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [29]

    Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observations from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observing Run,

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), “Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observations from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observing Run,” Astrophys. J. 923, 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.06384 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Finding diamonds in the rough: Targeted Sub- threshold Search for Strongly-lensed Gravitational-wave Events,

    Alvin K. Y. Li, Rico K. L. Lo, Surabhi Sachdev, C. L. Chan, E. T. Lin, Tjonnie G. F. Li, and Alan J. Wein- stein, “Finding diamonds in the rough: Targeted Sub- threshold Search for Strongly-lensed Gravitational-wave Events,” arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1904.06020 [gr- qc]

  31. [31]

    Search for strongly lensed counterpart images of binary black hole mergers in the first two LIGO observing runs,

    Connor McIsaac, David Keitel, Thomas Collett, Ian Harry, Simone Mozzon, Oliver Edy, and David Ba- con, “Search for strongly lensed counterpart images of binary black hole mergers in the first two LIGO observing runs,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 084031 (2020), arXiv:1912.05389 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Pulsational Pair-Instability Supernovae

    S. E. Woosley, “Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae,” Astrophys. J. 836, 244 (2017), arXiv:1608.08939 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [33]

    The Evolution of Massive Helium Stars Including Mass Loss

    S. E. Woosley, “The Evolution of Massive Helium Stars, Including Mass Loss,” Astrophys. J. 878, 49 (2019), arXiv:1901.00215 [astro-ph.SR]

  34. [34]

    The Impact of Pair-instability Mass Loss on the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,

    Simon Stevenson, Matthew Sampson, Jade Powell, Ale- jandro Vigna-G´ omez, Coenraad J. Neijssel, Dorottya Sz´ ecsi, and Ilya Mandel, “The Impact of Pair-instability Mass Loss on the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,” Astrophys. J. 882, 121 (2019), arXiv:1904.02821 [astro- ph.HE]

  35. [35]

    Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap,

    R. Farmer, M. Renzo, S. E. de Mink, P. Marchant, and S. Justham, “Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap,” Astrophys. J. 887, 53 (2019), arXiv:1910.12874 [astro-ph.SR]

  36. [36]

    Constraints from Gravitational- wave Detections of Binary Black Hole Mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O Rate,

    R. Farmer, M. Renzo, S. E. de Mink, M. Fish- bach, and S. Justham, “Constraints from Gravitational- wave Detections of Binary Black Hole Mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O Rate,” Astrophys. J. 902, L36 (2020), arXiv:2006.06678 [astro-ph.HE]

  37. [37]

    Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Progenitors on the Mass of Black Holes,

    Michela Mapelli, Mario Spera, Enrico Montanari, Marco Limongi, Alessandro Chieffi, Nicola Giacobbo, Alessandro Bressan, and Yann Bouffanais, “Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Progenitors on the Mass of Black Holes,” Astrophys. J. 888, 76 (2020), arXiv:1909.01371 [astro-ph.HE]

  38. [38]

    The impact of stellar rotation on the black hole mass-gap from pair- instability supernovae,

    Pablo Marchant and Takashi Moriya, “The impact of stellar rotation on the black hole mass-gap from pair- instability supernovae,” Astron. Astrophys. 640, L18 (2020), arXiv:2007.06220 [astro-ph.HE]

  39. [39]

    For- mation of GW190521 from stellar evolution: the impact of the hydrogen-rich envelope, dredge-up, and 12C(α, γ)16O rate on the pair-instability black hole mass gap,

    Guglielmo Costa, Alessandro Bressan, Michela Mapelli, Paola Marigo, Giuliano Iorio, and Mario Spera, “For- mation of GW190521 from stellar evolution: the impact of the hydrogen-rich envelope, dredge-up, and 12C(α, γ)16O rate on the pair-instability black hole mass gap,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501, 4514–4533 (2021), arXiv:2010.02242 [astro-ph.SR]

  40. [40]

    Is GW190521 the merger of black holes from the first stellar generations?

    Eoin Farrell, Jose H. Groh, Raphael Hirschi, Laura Mur- phy, Etienne Kaiser, Sylvia Ekstr¨ om, Cyril Georgy, and Georges Meynet, “Is GW190521 the merger of black holes from the first stellar generations?” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502, L40–L44 (2021), arXiv:2009.06585 [astro-ph.SR]

  41. [41]

    GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object,

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Ob- ject,” Astrophys. J. 896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

  42. [42]

    Machine-learning non- stationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors,

    Gabriele Vajente, Yiwen Huang, Maximiliano Isi, Jenne C. Driggers, Jeffrey S. Kissel, Marek J. Szczep- anczyk, and Salvatore Vitale, “Machine-learning non- stationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 042003 (2020), arXiv:1911.09083 [gr- qc]

  43. [43]

    Regression of Environmental Noise in LIGO Data

    Vaibhav Tiwari et al. , “Regression of Environmental Noise in LIGO Data,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 165014 (2015), arXiv:1503.07476 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    The o3a data release,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, “The o3a data release,” Gravitational Wave Open Sci- ence Center (2021), 10.7935/nfnt-hm34

  45. [45]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, “GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Bi- nary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo Dur- ing the First Half of the Third Observing Run - Data Quality Products for GW Searches,” Zenodo (2022), 10.5281/zenodo.6477645

  46. [46]

    GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Com- pact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run - Glitch modelling for events,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabora- tion, “GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Com- pact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run - Glitch modelling for events,” Zenodo (2022), doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6477075

  47. [47]

    The GstLAL Search Analysis Methods for Compact Binary Mergers in Advanced LIGO's Second and Advanced Virgo's First Observing Runs

    Surabhi Sachdev et al. , “The GstLAL Search Analy- sis Methods for Compact Binary Mergers in Advanced LIGO’s Second and Advanced Virgo’s First Observing Runs,” (2019), arXiv:1901.08580 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Fast evaluation of multi-detector 37 consistency for real-time gravitational wave searches,

    Chad Hanna et al. , “Fast evaluation of multi-detector 37 consistency for real-time gravitational wave searches,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 022003 (2020), arXiv:1901.02227 [gr- qc]

  49. [49]

    Analysis Framework for the Prompt Discovery of Compact Binary Mergers in Gravitational-wave Data

    Cody Messick et al. , “Analysis Framework for the Prompt Discovery of Compact Binary Mergers in Gravitational-wave Data,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 042001 (2017), arXiv:1604.04324 [astro-ph.IM]

  50. [50]

    FINDCHIRP: an algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries

    Bruce Allen, Warren G. Anderson, Patrick R. Brady, Duncan A. Brown, and Jolien D. E. Creighton, “FIND- CHIRP: An Algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012), arXiv:gr-qc/0509116 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    A chi-squared time-frequency discriminator for gravitational wave detection

    Bruce Allen, “χ2 time-frequency discriminator for grav- itational wave detection,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 062001 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0405045 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star -- black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors

    Tito Dal Canton et al. , “Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star-black hole systems with ad- vanced ground based gravitational wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 082004 (2014), arXiv:1405.6731 [gr- qc]

  53. [53]

    The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence

    Samantha A. Usman et al. , “The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coales- cence,” Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 215004 (2016), arXiv:1508.02357 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    Detecting binary compact-object mergers with gravitational waves: Understanding and Improving the sensitivity of the PyCBC search

    Alexander H. Nitz, Thomas Dent, Tito Dal Canton, Stephen Fairhurst, and Duncan A. Brown, “Detect- ing binary compact-object mergers with gravitational waves: Understanding and Improving the sensitivity of the PyCBC search,” Astrophys. J. 849, 118 (2017), arXiv:1705.01513 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    The MBTA pipeline for detecting com- pact binary coalescences in the third LIGO–Virgo ob- serving run,

    F. Aubin et al., “The MBTA pipeline for detecting com- pact binary coalescences in the third LIGO–Virgo ob- serving run,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 095004 (2021), arXiv:2012.11512 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    Geraint Pratten et al., “Computationally efficient mod- els for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact bina- ries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasi- circular black holes,

    Geraint Pratten, Sascha Husa, Cecilio Garcia-Quiros, Marta Colleoni, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Hector Estelles, and Rafel Jaume, “Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact bina- ries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasi- circular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 064001 (2020), arXiv:2001.11412 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    Mul- timode frequency-domain model for the gravitational wave signal from nonprecessing black-hole binaries,

    Cecilio Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, Marta Colleoni, Sascha Husa, H´ ector Estell´ es, Geraint Pratten, Antoni Ramos- Buades, Maite Mateu-Lucena, and Rafel Jaume, “Mul- timode frequency-domain model for the gravitational wave signal from nonprecessing black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 064002 (2020), arXiv:2001.10914 [gr- qc]

  59. [59]

    Accelerating the eval- uation of inspiral–merger–ringdown waveforms with adapted grids,

    Cecilio Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, Sascha Husa, Maite Mateu- Lucena, and Angela Borchers, “Accelerating the eval- uation of inspiral–merger–ringdown waveforms with adapted grids,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 015006 (2021), arXiv:2001.10897 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Multipolar Effective-One-Body Waveforms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Con- struction and Validation,

    Serguei Ossokine et al., “Multipolar Effective-One-Body Waveforms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Con- struction and Validation,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 044055 (2020), arXiv:2004.09442 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against numerical relativity

    Stanislav Babak, Andrea Taracchini, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against nu- merical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 024010 (2017), arXiv:1607.05661 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism

    Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, Andrea Taracchini, Lawrence E. Kidder, Abdul H. Mrou´ e, Harald P. Pfeif- fer, Mark A. Scheel, and B´ ela Szil´ agyi, “Inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 084006 (2014), arXiv:1307.6232 [gr- qc]

  63. [63]

    Enriching the Symphony of Gravi- tational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics,

    Roberto Cotesta, Alessandra Buonanno, Alejandro Boh´ e, Andrea Taracchini, Ian Hinder, and Ser- guei Ossokine, “Enriching the Symphony of Gravi- tational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 084028 (2018), arXiv:1803.10701 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitational waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations

    Tim Dietrich, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Wolfgang Tichy, “Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neu- tron star gravitational waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 121501 (2017), arXiv:1706.02969 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: tidal and self-spin effects

    Tim Dietrich et al., “Matter imprints in waveform mod- els for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 024029 (2019), arXiv:1804.02235 [gr- qc]

  66. [66]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA

    B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational- wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,” Living Rev. Rel. 21, 3 (2018), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    Sensitivity and Perfor- mance of the Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Third Observing Run,

    Aaron Buikema et al. (aLIGO), “Sensitivity and Perfor- mance of the Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020), arXiv:2008.01301 [astro-ph.IM]

  69. [69]

    Suppress- ing parametric instabilities in LIGO using low-noise acoustic mode dampers,

    S. Biscans, S. Gras, C. D. Blair, J. Driggers, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, T. Hardwick, and G. Mansell, “Suppress- ing parametric instabilities in LIGO using low-noise acoustic mode dampers,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 122003 (2019), arXiv:1909.07805 [physics.app-ph]

  70. [70]

    Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astron- omy,

    M. Tse et al. , “Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astron- omy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019)

  71. [71]

    Reducing scattered light in LIGO’s third observing run,

    S. Soni et al. (LIGO), “Reducing scattered light in LIGO’s third observing run,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 025016 (2020), arXiv:2007.14876 [astro-ph.IM]

  72. [72]

    Dis- tance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology,

    Hsin-Yu Chen, Daniel E. Holz, John Miller, Matthew Evans, Salvatore Vitale, and Jolien Creighton, “Dis- tance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 055010 (2021), arXiv:1709.08079 [astro-ph.CO]

  73. [73]

    The Advanced Virgo monolithic fused silica suspension,

    D. Aisa et al. , “The Advanced Virgo monolithic fused silica suspension,” Proceedings, 13th Pisa Meet- ing on Advanced Detectors : Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics (FDFP 2015): La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy, 2015, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A824 (2016), 10.1016/j.nima.2015.09.037

  74. [74]

    Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light,

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), “Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019)

  75. [75]

    Vertical and Horizontal Seismic Iso- 38 lation Performance of the Advanced Virgo External Injection Bench Seismic Attenuation System,

    M. Blom et al. , “Vertical and Horizontal Seismic Iso- 38 lation Performance of the Advanced Virgo External Injection Bench Seismic Attenuation System,” Pro- ceedings, 13th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2013): Asilomar, CA, USA, 2013 , Phys. Procedia 61 (2015), 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.12.064

  76. [76]

    Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration,

    Ling Sun et al., “Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration,” Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 225008 (2020), arXiv:2005.02531 [astro-ph.IM]

  77. [77]

    Calibration of Advanced Virgo and reconstruction of detector strain h(t) during the Observing Run O3,

    F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO), “Calibration of Advanced Virgo and reconstruction of detector strain h(t) during the Observing Run O3,” Class. Quant. Grav.39, 045006 (2022), arXiv:2107.03294 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    The Advanced Virgo Photon Calibrators,

    D. Estevez, P. Lagabbe, A. Masserot, L. Rolland, M. Seglar-Arroyo, and D. Verkindt, “The Advanced Virgo Photon Calibrators,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 075007 (2021), arXiv:2009.08103 [astro-ph.IM]

  79. [79]

    Improving the Sensitivity of Advanced LIGO Using Noise Subtraction

    D. Davis, T. J. Massinger, A. P. Lundgren, J. C. Drig- gers, A. L. Urban, and L. K. Nuttall, “Improving the Sensitivity of Advanced LIGO Using Noise Sub- traction,” Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 055011 (2019), arXiv:1809.05348 [astro-ph.IM]

  80. [80]

    Subtracting Narrow-band Noise from LIGO Strain Data in the Third Observing Run,

    A. Viets and M. Wade, “Subtracting Narrow-band Noise from LIGO Strain Data in the Third Observing Run,” (2021), https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2100058/public

Showing first 80 references.