pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1710.05832 · v1 · submitted 2017-10-16 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavesneutron star mergergamma-ray burstbinary inspiralsource localizationluminosity distancemulti-messengerdense matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational waves from a merging pair of neutron stars were detected and linked to a short gamma-ray burst.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first observation of gravitational waves from two neutron stars spiraling together and merging. The signal reached a combined signal-to-noise ratio of 32.4 and was localized to a small patch of sky at a distance of roughly 40 megaparsecs. Component masses fall in the range expected for neutron stars, with a total mass near 2.74 solar masses. A gamma-ray burst arrived from the same direction only 1.7 seconds after the merger, supplying the first direct evidence that neutron star mergers produce short gamma-ray bursts. Additional electromagnetic signals detected at the same location further support the interpretation of the event as a neutron star merger.

Core claim

On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:04 UTC a gravitational-wave signal from a binary neutron star inspiral was recorded. The component masses lie between 0.86 and 2.26 solar masses, narrowing to 1.17 to 1.60 solar masses when spins are restricted to values typical of binary neutron stars, giving a total mass of 2.74 solar masses. The source was localized within 28 square degrees at a luminosity distance of 40 megaparsecs. The signal coincided with gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A detected 1.7 seconds after coalescence, establishing the first direct link between neutron star mergers and short gamma-ray bursts.

What carries the argument

The gravitational-wave waveform produced by the inspiral and coalescence of two neutron stars, together with its precise temporal and spatial match to the gamma-ray burst.

If this is right

  • Neutron star mergers are the source of at least some short gamma-ray bursts.
  • Gravitational-wave data can directly constrain the masses of merging neutron stars and therefore the equation of state of dense matter.
  • Joint gravitational and electromagnetic observations supply independent distance measurements useful for cosmological studies.
  • The event validates the use of general relativity waveform templates for binary neutron star systems at the observed signal strength.
  • Rapid multi-messenger follow-up becomes feasible once a gravitational-wave candidate is identified.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeated detections of this kind could function as standard sirens to measure the Hubble expansion rate without relying on the cosmic distance ladder.
  • The short delay between merger and gamma-ray emission constrains the geometry and speed of the relativistic outflow launched by the merger.
  • The remnant object left after merger offers a laboratory for studying the maximum mass of a stable neutron star versus prompt black-hole formation.
  • Future networks of detectors will shrink localization regions enough to enable routine identification of optical and radio counterparts without wide-field surveys.

Load-bearing premise

The detected signal is produced by a binary neutron star system whose waveform is correctly predicted by general relativity models, and the gamma-ray burst shares a common physical cause with the merger rather than appearing by random coincidence.

What would settle it

A future gravitational-wave signal with matching frequency evolution and amplitude but no gamma-ray or other electromagnetic emission at the inferred location and time would falsify the claimed causal connection to short gamma-ray bursts.

read the original abstract

On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:04 UTC the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo gravitational-wave detectors made their first observation of a binary neutron star inspiral. The signal, GW170817, was detected with a combined signal-to-noise ratio of 32.4 and a false-alarm-rate estimate of less than one per $8.0\times10^4$ years. We infer the component masses of the binary to be between 0.86 and 2.26 $M_\odot$, in agreement with masses of known neutron stars. Restricting the component spins to the range inferred in binary neutron stars, we find the component masses to be in the range 1.17 to 1.60 $M_\odot$, with the total mass of the system $2.74^{+0.04}_{-0.01}\,M_\odot$. The source was localized within a sky region of 28 deg$^2$ (90% probability) and had a luminosity distance of $40^{+8}_{-14}$ Mpc, the closest and most precisely localized gravitational-wave signal yet. The association with the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A, detected by Fermi-GBM 1.7 s after the coalescence, corroborates the hypothesis of a neutron star merger and provides the first direct evidence of a link between these mergers and short gamma-ray bursts. Subsequent identification of transient counterparts across the electromagnetic spectrum in the same location further supports the interpretation of this event as a neutron star merger. This unprecedented joint gravitational and electromagnetic observation provides insight into astrophysics, dense matter, gravitation and cosmology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, GW170817, detected by Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo on 2017 August 17 at 12:41:04 UTC. The event has a combined signal-to-noise ratio of 32.4 and a false-alarm rate below one per 80,000 years. Component masses are inferred between 0.86 and 2.26 solar masses (or 1.17–1.60 solar masses with spin restrictions consistent with known neutron stars), total mass 2.74 solar masses, luminosity distance 40 Mpc, and 90% sky localization of 28 square degrees. The signal is temporally and spatially coincident with GRB 170817A (detected 1.7 s later by Fermi-GBM), providing the first direct evidence linking neutron-star mergers to short gamma-ray bursts, with additional electromagnetic counterparts identified at the same location.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this constitutes a landmark result: the first binary neutron star gravitational-wave detection, the closest and most precisely localized GW event to date, and the first multi-messenger observation directly connecting compact-object mergers to short GRBs. Strengths include the exceptionally high SNR of 32.4, the extremely low false-alarm rate, mass estimates consistent with the known neutron-star population, and the 1.7-second temporal plus spatial coincidence with an independent GRB detection. The use of standard general-relativity waveform templates for parameter estimation and the corroborative EM follow-up strengthen the interpretation without introducing circularity.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the unrestricted mass range 0.86–2.26 M⊙ but does not explicitly note that this interval overlaps the black-hole regime; a brief parenthetical clarification would help readers immediately appreciate why the spin-restricted range is emphasized for the neutron-star interpretation.
  2. The localization area is given as 28 deg² (90% probability) and the distance as 40^{+8}_{-14} Mpc, but the abstract does not indicate whether these uncertainties incorporate both statistical and systematic contributions from waveform modeling; adding one sentence on this point would improve transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review of our manuscript on the first binary neutron star gravitational-wave detection, GW170817, and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately captures the key results, including the high SNR, low false-alarm rate, mass estimates, localization, and the association with GRB 170817A. No major comments were raised requiring response or revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: observational detection report based on direct data and standard external models

full rationale

This is a straightforward observational announcement paper reporting a high-SNR gravitational-wave detection and its multi-messenger association. The central results (SNR 32.4, FAR estimate, sky localization, distance, component masses) are obtained by applying pre-existing, publicly documented LIGO/Virgo analysis pipelines and general-relativity waveform templates to the raw strain data; these templates and pipelines are not derived or fitted within the present manuscript. The GRB coincidence is presented as independent corroborative evidence from Fermi-GBM rather than a derived prediction. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or an ansatz smuggled in via prior author work. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational discovery paper. The central claim rests on established gravitational-wave detection techniques, general-relativity waveform models, and standard astrophysical assumptions about neutron stars; no new free parameters or entities are introduced by the paper itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity accurately predicts the gravitational-wave signal from binary neutron star inspirals.
    Parameter estimation and source classification use GR-based waveform templates.
  • domain assumption Detector noise is stationary and well-characterized so that the false-alarm-rate calculation is reliable.
    Used to claim FAR < 1 per 8.0e4 years.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5602 in / 1647 out tokens · 71121 ms · 2026-05-12T01:53:12.401347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 43 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. Black-Hole Scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet: Numerical Relativity Meets Analytics

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of black hole scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity agree closely with effective-one-body analytic predictions.

  3. Inspiral gravitational waveforms from charged compact binaries with scalar hair

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories, charged compact binaries produce gravitational waveforms containing a leading -1 post-Newtonian dipole correction controlled by one deviation parameter b.

  4. An agentic framework for gravitational-wave counterpart association in the multi-messenger era

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GW-Eyes is a new LLM-powered agent framework that autonomously associates gravitational-wave events with electromagnetic counterparts by integrating specialized tools and supporting natural-language interaction.

  5. Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axial tidal Love numbers for black holes in anisotropic fluid environments are derived analytically and numerically, with non-compact support density profiles producing logarithmic terms that obstruct standard tidal m...

  6. Gauge Theoretic Signal Processing II: Zero-Latency Whitening for Early Warning Pipelines

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A gauge-theoretic framework enables zero-latency causal whitening in GW pipelines, preserving SNR and reducing latency by 1 s (33%) in production tests on O3 data.

  7. Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Viscous neutron stars have new families of axial oscillation modes without perfect-fluid counterparts, featuring mode avoidance and long-lived modes.

  8. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 7.0

    LIGO and Virgo detected 39 compact binary coalescence events in O3a, including 13 new ones, with black hole binaries up to 150 solar masses and the first significantly asymmetric mass ratios.

  9. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  10. Analytical Fluxes from Generic Schwarzschild Geodesics

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Chebyshev-basis expansion reduces gravitational-wave fluxes from arbitrary-eccentricity bound Schwarzschild geodesics to sums of previously derived Keplerian Fourier coefficients, achieving 10^{-5} relative accuracy...

  11. The Very Late Time Afterglow of GW170817 Favors a Wobbling Jet

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A ring-shaped wobbling jet explains the shallow late-time afterglow decay of GW170817 better than a collimated jet at 4.8 sigma significance, implying a ~27 degree wobble angle.

  12. Neutron stars in a conservative $f(R,T)$ gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A conservative f(R,T) gravity reformulation decouples the gravitational sector from the microphysical equation of state, enabling computation of neutron star mass-radius relations and tidal deformabilities that satisf...

  13. Effects of magnetically driven shocks on nucleosynthesis and kilonovae from neutron star mergers

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Magnetically driven shocks from neutron star merger remnants can reheat ejecta to nuclear statistical equilibrium, alter r-process yields, and produce observable changes in kilonova color and light curves.

  14. Scalar emission from binary neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories with kinetic screening

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kinetic screening non-monotonically suppresses or enhances scalar quadrupolar emission from equal-mass neutron star binaries depending on screening radius versus wavelength, with a dipole re-emerging linearly with mas...

  15. Large amplification of the isospin-dependence of proton emitting source size in radioactive heavy-ion collisions: a signal of n-p correlation

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proton emitting source size is amplified by 24% in neutron-rich versus neutron-deficient tin collisions, revealing a beyond-mean-field short-range n-p correlation effect.

  16. A Physics Informed Bayesian Neural Network for the Neutron Star Equation of State

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A physics-informed Bayesian neural network learns neutron-star equations of state from theoretical priors and constraints, then generates posterior mass-radius and mass-tidal-deformability distributions consistent wit...

  17. Alfven-winged pulsar

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A neutron star in a compact binary generates relativistic Alfven wings that carry most of the intersected electromagnetic power and may produce periodic pulsar-like emission.

  18. Irreducible Gravitational Wave Background as a Particle Detector

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral features imprinted by long-lived BSM particles on any primordial GWB directly determine the particles' mass and decay rate once the model and initial abundance are specified.

  19. Mechanical Long Baseline Differential Gradiometers as Low Frequency Gravitational Wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A vertical long-wire suspended gradiometer configuration amplifies gravitational wave signals from order h to order h L/D by separating gravitational force from moment of inertia.

  20. Neutrino transport and flavor instabilities in a post-merger disk

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In post-merger disks, electron-lepton-number crossings drive fast flavor instabilities that enhance heavy lepton neutrino fluxes, while collisional instabilities are subdominant and asymmetrically raise heavy-flavor a...

  21. Quasinormal modes of massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations for Euler Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quasinormal frequencies and greybody factors for massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations in Euler-Heisenberg black holes with perfect fluid dark matter are calculated via AIM and sixth-order WKB, showing tha...

  22. Electromagnetic Follow-up of the Sub-Solar Mass Gravitational Wave Candidate S251112cm: Kilonova Constraints and a Coincident IIb Supernova

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No kilonova detected from sub-solar GW candidate S251112cm, but coincident IIb supernova SN 2025adtq yields suggestive evidence for the superkilonova channel, though inconclusive after accounting for chance coincidence.

  23. On the non-radial oscillations of realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Axial modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Axial modes of anisotropic neutron stars show mass-scaled frequency and damping time with nearly universal quadratic dependence on compactness, insensitive to EOS and anisotropy model.

  24. Cosmological Dynamics of a Non-Canonical Generalised Brans-Dicke Theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A non-canonical generalized Brans-Dicke theory admits background cosmological solutions matching Lambda CDM characteristics for constant, power-law, and exponential potentials, with dynamics distinct from other scalar...

  25. Squeezed state degradations due to mode mismatch and thermal aberrations in gravitational wave detectors

    physics.ins-det 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Thermal aberrations induce low-pass frequency dynamics for quadratic wavefront mismatches and high-pass dynamics for higher-order aberrations, degrading squeezed states differently in current versus future gravitation...

  26. Bayesian Analysis of Gravitational Wave Microlensing Effects from Galactic Double White Dwarfs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian analysis of simulated Taiji observations shows microlensing from lenses above 10^5 solar masses can be distinguished from unlensed DWD signals when separation is below 3 Einstein radii, while lower masses or ...

  27. Beyond the Standard Model of Cosmology: Testing new paradigms with a Multiprobe Exploration of the Dark Universe

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes primordial black holes from modified small-scale fluctuations and entropic acceleration in expanding spacetime as explanations for dark matter and dark energy.

  28. Sensitivity of Neutron Star Observables to Transition Density in Hybrid Equation-of-State Models

    nucl-th 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    Hybrid neutron-star equations of state remain sensitive to the low-density nucleonic model at transition densities around 2ρ₀, with model spread in radius and tidal deformability exceeding observational uncertainty by...

  29. Quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Increasing the mass of a perturbing scalar field around Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes strongly suppresses damping in several quasinormal branches, producing quasi-resonant long-lived oscillations.

  30. Axial gravitational perturbations and echo-like signals of a hairy black hole from gravitational decoupling

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Axial perturbations around a hairy black hole from gravitational decoupling produce echo-like gravitational-wave signals that arise dynamically from a double-peak trapping cavity in the effective potential.

  31. A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    astro-ph.IM 2021-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Cosmic Explorer is described as a next-generation gravitational-wave observatory aiming for tenfold sensitivity improvement over Advanced LIGO to observe signals from the edge of the observable universe at z~100.

  32. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2018-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Final Planck CMB data confirms the flat 6-parameter ΛCDM model with Ω_c h² = 0.120 ± 0.001, Ω_b h² = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004, τ = 0.054 ± 0.007, H_0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc, and no strong evidence for extensions.

  33. Spherical collapse and cluster number counts in DHOST theories that pass the constraints from gravitational waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In DHOST theories consistent with GW observations, deviations from GR suppress high-redshift galaxy cluster abundance relative to ΛCDM when using spherical collapse and analytic mass functions matched to eROSITA data.

  34. From Large Telescopes to the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST)

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MUST is a new 6.5 m telescope designed to deliver simultaneous optical spectra for over 20,000 targets across a 5 deg² field, enabling the largest 3D spectroscopic map of the Universe with redshifts for more than 100 ...

  35. Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Extreme mass-ratio inspirals can constrain the Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter ℓ in bumblebee gravity to O(10^{-4}) uncertainty with LISA.

  36. Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    EMRI waveforms in bumblebee gravity allow LISA to constrain the Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter ell at the level of O(10^{-4}).

  37. Characterizing the quark-hadron mixed phase in compact star cores : sensitivity to nuclear saturation and quark-model parameters at finite-temperature

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The quark-hadron mixed phase width in hybrid stars is mainly controlled by effective nucleon mass and symmetry energy, with temperature reducing the width and softening the EOS while strong vector repulsion is needed ...

  38. Tests of scalar polarizations with multi-messenger events

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian analysis of GW170817 with PPE framework and EM polarization constraints shows mild preference for scalar mode in quadrupole harmonics and improves bounds on non-GR parameters by up to 60%.

  39. Investigating the effect of sensitivity of KAGRA on sky localization of gravitational-wave sources from compact binary coalescences

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    KAGRA enhances sky localization of binary neutron star mergers in the LVK network via added baselines, with measurable gains at current sensitivity and larger improvements as range reaches ~30 Mpc.

  40. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

  41. Revisiting the Rhoades-Ruffini bound

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Relaxing the onset assumption for stiff high-density matter raises the theoretical maximum neutron star mass to 4 solar masses or higher.

  42. Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    gr-qc 2013-10 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of the MPM-PN approximation scheme that yields equations of motion to 4PN order and gravitational waveforms and fluxes to 4.5PN order for compact binary systems.

  43. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

198 extracted references · 198 canonical work pages · cited by 42 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    With the time scales and methods considered so far [193], there is no evidence of a postmerger signal of FIG. 5. Probability density for the tidal deformability parameters of the high and low mass components inferred from the detected signals using the post-Newtonian model. Contours enclosing 90% and 50% of the probability density are overlaid (dashed lin...

  2. [2]

    R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J. 195, L51 (1975)

  3. [3]

    J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, Astrophys. J. 253, 908 (1982)

  4. [4]

    Weiss, MIT Technical Report No

    R. Weiss, MIT Technical Report No. LIGO-P720002, 1972

  5. [5]

    R. W. P . Drever, in Gravitational Radiation , edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), p. 321

  6. [6]

    Brillet et al

    A. Brillet et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Technical Report No. VIR-0517A-15, 1989 [https://tds.virgo-gw.eu/?content= 3&r=12122]

  7. [7]

    Hough et al

    J. Hough et al. , MPQ Technical Report No. 147, 1989 [GWD/137/JH(89)]

  8. [8]

    Thorne, Three Hundred Years of Gravitation , edited by S

    K. Thorne, Three Hundred Years of Gravitation , edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1987), pp. 330 –458

  9. [9]

    R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and M. Hobbs, Astron. J. 129, 1993 (2005)

  10. [10]

    Blanchet, Thibault Damour, Bala R

    L. Blanchet, Thibault Damour, Bala R. Iyer, Clifford M. Will, and Alan G. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3515 (1995)

  11. [11]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999)

  12. [12]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P . Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, Phys. Lett. B 513, 147 (2001)

  13. [13]

    Blanchet, T

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese, and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 091101 (2004)

  14. [14]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006)

  15. [15]

    B. P . Flannery and E. P . J. van den Heuvel, Astron. Astrophys. 39, 61 (1975)

  16. [16]

    A. G. Massevitch, A. V . Tutukov, and L. R. Y ungelson, Astrophys. Space Sci. 40, 115 (1976)

  17. [17]

    J. P . A. Clark, E. P . J. van den Heuvel, and W. Sutantyo, Astron. Astrophys. 72, 120 (1979)

  18. [18]

    E. S. Phinney, Astrophys. J. Lett. 380, L17 (1991)

  19. [19]

    Kalogera et al

    V . Kalogera et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 601, L179 (2004) . V . Kalogera et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 614, L137(E) (2004)

  20. [20]

    Abadie et al

    J. Abadie et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 173001 (2010)

  21. [21]

    C. Kim, B. B. P . Perera, and M. A. McLaughlin, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 448, 928 (2015)

  22. [22]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Living Rev. Relativity 19, 1 (2016)

  23. [23]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015)

  24. [24]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015)

  25. [25]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

  26. [26]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016)

  27. [27]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016)

  28. [28]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 832, L21 (2016)

  29. [29]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017)

  30. [30]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017)

  31. [31]

    B. S. Sathyaprakash and S. V . Dhurandhar, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3819 (1991)

  32. [32]

    Cutler et al

    C. Cutler et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2984 (1993)

  33. [33]

    Allen, W

    B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P . R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012)

  34. [34]

    D. A. Brown, P . Kumar, and A. H. Nitz, Phys. Rev. D 87, 082004 (2013)

  35. [35]

    K. G. Arun, A. Buonanno, G. Faye, and E. Ochsner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 104023 (2009) ; 84, 049901(E) (2011)

  36. [36]

    Buonanno, B

    A. Buonanno, B. R. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y . Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084043 (2009)

  37. [37]

    Blanchet, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 2 (2014)

  38. [38]

    C. K. Mishra, A. Kela, K. G. Arun, and G. Faye, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084054 (2016)

  39. [39]

    Cutler and E

    C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994)

  40. [40]

    A. G. A. von Kienlin, C. Meegan, and the Fermi GBM Team, GCN 21520, 1 (2017)

  41. [41]

    Connaughton et al

    V . Connaughton et al. , GCN 21506, 1 (2017)

  42. [42]

    Goldstein et al

    A. Goldstein et al. , GCN 21528, 1 (2017)

  43. [43]

    Goldstein et al

    A. Goldstein et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L14 (2017)

  44. [44]

    Savchenko et al

    V . Savchenko et al. , GCN 21507, 1 (2017)

  45. [45]

    Savchenko et al

    V . Savchenko et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L15 (2017)

  46. [46]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13 (2017)

  47. [47]

    D. A. Coulter et al. , GCN 21529, 1 (2017)

  48. [48]

    R. J. Foley et al. , GCN 21536, 1 (2017)

  49. [49]

    D. A. Coulter et al. , Science, in press (2017), DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9811

  50. [50]

    Pan et al

    Y .-C. Pan et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L30 (2017)

  51. [51]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017)

  52. [52]

    P . C. Peters and J. Mathews, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963)

  53. [53]

    T. M. Tauris et al. , Astrophys. J. 846, 170 (2017)

  54. [54]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. , Science 340, 1233232 (2013) . PRL 119, 161101 (2017) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending 20 OCTOBER 2017 161101-9

  55. [55]

    F. Özel, D. Psaltis, R. Narayan, and J. E. McClintock, Astrophys. J. 725, 1918 (2010)

  56. [56]

    Kreidberg, C

    L. Kreidberg, C. D. Bailyn, W. M. Farr, and V . Kalogera, Astrophys. J. 757, 36 (2012)

  57. [57]

    Narayan and J

    R. Narayan and J. E. McClintock, in General Relativity and Gravitation: A Centennial Perspective , edited by A. Ashtekar, B. K. Berger, J. Isenberg, and M. MacCallum (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2015), Chap. 3.3, pp. 133 –147

  58. [58]

    D. J. Kaup, Phys. Rev. 172, 1331 (1968)

  59. [59]

    P . O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 9545 (2004)

  60. [60]

    Itoh, Prog

    N. Itoh, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 291 (1970)

  61. [61]

    Cardoso, S

    V . Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P . Pani, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084031 (2016)

  62. [62]

    Cardoso, E

    V . Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P . Pani, and G. Raposo, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084014 (2017) ; 95, 089901 (2017)

  63. [63]

    L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2198 (1993)

  64. [64]

    H.-Y . Chen, D. E. Holz, J. Miller, M. Evans, S. Vitale, and J. Creighton, arXiv:1709.08079

  65. [65]

    K. L. Dooley et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 075009 (2016)

  66. [66]

    Chatterji, L Blackburn, G Martin, and E Katsavounidis, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1809 (2004)

    S. Chatterji, L Blackburn, G Martin, and E Katsavounidis, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1809 (2004)

  67. [67]

    R. G. Brown and P . Y . C. Hwang, Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering with Matlab Exercises (Wiley, New Y ork, 2012)

  68. [68]

    J. C. Driggers et al. , Technical Report No. LIGO- P1700260, 2017

  69. [69]

    J. C. Driggers, M. Evans, K. Pepper, and R. Adhikari, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 024501 (2012)

  70. [70]

    G. D. Meadors, K. Kawabe, and K. Riles, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 105014 (2014)

  71. [71]

    Tiwari et al

    V . Tiwari et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 165014 (2015)

  72. [72]

    Nuttall et al

    L. Nuttall et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 245005 (2015)

  73. [73]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 122003 (2016)

  74. [74]

    S. A. Usman et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 215004 (2016)

  75. [75]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Technical Report No. LIGO- P1600110, 2017

  76. [76]

    N. J. Cornish and T. B. Littenberg, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 135012 (2015)

  77. [77]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GCN 21509, 1 (2017)

  78. [78]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GCN 21513, 1 (2017)

  79. [79]

    B. P . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 134001 (2016)

  80. [80]

    Effler, R M S Schofield, V V Frolov, G González, K Kawabe, J R Smith, J Birch, and R McCarthy, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 035017 (2015)

    A. Effler, R M S Schofield, V V Frolov, G González, K Kawabe, J R Smith, J Birch, and R McCarthy, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 035017 (2015)

Showing first 80 references.