arxiv: 2605.10102 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

From Large Telescopes to the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST)

Zheng Cai , Song Huang , Yu Liu , Cheng Zhao , Lei Huang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA

keywords MUSTspectroscopic surveyfiber positioning robotswide-field spectroscopyredshift surveycosmologygalaxy redshiftsStage-V facility

0 comments

The pith

A 6.5-meter telescope called MUST will capture spectra from over 20,000 targets at once to map redshifts for more than 100 million galaxies and quasars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the historical progress of large telescopes and spectroscopic surveys, notes the persistent shortfall in wide-field multiplexed spectroscopy even as imaging advances rapidly, and presents MUST as the first Stage-V facility designed to close that gap. MUST employs a modular focal plane with dense fiber-positioning robots to observe thousands of objects simultaneously across a five-square-degree field. An eight-year survey in the 2030s is projected to deliver the largest 3D spectroscopic dataset yet, supplying redshifts and spectra that would enable statistical studies of cosmology, galaxy evolution, Galactic structure, and transient events. A sympathetic reader would see this as the missing link that turns existing and upcoming imaging catalogs into fully characterized three-dimensional maps.

Core claim

MUST is a 6.5-meter telescope that obtains optical spectra for over 20,000 targets simultaneously within a ~5 deg² field by means of a modular focal plane populated with 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots; an eight-year survey in the 2030s is intended to measure redshifts for over 100 million galaxies and quasars, thereby producing the most comprehensive 3D spectroscopic map of the Universe to date.

What carries the argument

The modular focal plane populated with 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots, which places and aligns thousands of optical fibers to distinct targets at high density to achieve the required multiplexing.

If this is right

The survey will supply the largest existing sample of galaxy redshifts for mapping large-scale structure and constraining dark energy.
Stellar spectra from the same observations will allow detailed reconstruction of Milky Way dynamics and chemical evolution.
Rapid follow-up spectra will characterize transients and variable sources discovered by wide-field imaging surveys.
The resulting catalog will serve as a reference dataset for cross-correlating with multi-wavelength and multi-messenger observations.
MUST data will test and refine models of galaxy formation and quasar evolution over a wide range of cosmic epochs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the fiber-robot technology proves reliable, it could be scaled to larger apertures or wider fields in subsequent facilities.
The same modular design might allow rapid reconfiguration for specialized programs such as time-domain monitoring or targeted deep fields.
Early science results from partial operations could reveal whether the achieved redshift completeness matches the design targets for faint objects.
Integration with contemporaneous imaging surveys will be essential; any mismatch in sky coverage or depth would reduce the scientific yield of the combined datasets.

Load-bearing premise

The modular focal plane with 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots can be built, aligned, and operated at the required speed and accuracy to deliver the stated multiplexing and survey volume without major technical or scheduling setbacks.

What would settle it

A full-scale prototype focal-plane test that fails to position and acquire usable spectra from at least 15,000 targets simultaneously within the design field of view and cycle time.

read the original abstract

Recent advances in astronomical observations have ushered in an era of remarkable discoveries. We now probe the Universe through multi-messenger signals, image the sky with unprecedented depth and resolution, and investigate individual sources using powerful large-aperture telescopes. Yet, a critical gap persists: the lack of wide-field, highly multiplexed spectroscopic capabilities needed to fully exploit the wealth of imaging data from current and upcoming surveys. In this review, we trace the historical development of large optical telescopes and spectroscopic surveys, assess the capabilities of ongoing and near-future facilities, and motivate the need for next-generation Stage-V spectroscopic experiments. As a representative example, we present the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST), the first Stage-V spectroscopic facility currently under construction. MUST is a 6.5-meter telescope designed to obtain optical spectra for over 20,000 targets simultaneously within a $\sim$5 deg$^2$ field, using a modular focal plane populated with 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots. Over an 8-year survey in the 2030s, MUST aims to build the most comprehensive 3D spectroscopic map of the Universe to date, measuring redshifts for over 100 million galaxies and quasars and opening new windows into cosmology, Galactic structure, and time-domain astrophysics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a review tracing telescope history and laying out the MUST project specs, with no new results or analysis.

read the letter

This paper walks through the history of large telescopes and spectroscopic surveys to make the case for a next-generation facility, then describes MUST as the first Stage-V example already under construction. The core pitch is a 6.5 m telescope delivering 20,000 simultaneous spectra over roughly 5 square degrees with 6.2 mm pitch fiber robots, aiming for over 100 million redshifts in an 8-year survey during the 2030s. That sets up the motivation for cosmology, Galactic archaeology, and time-domain work at a scale beyond current instruments. It does a clean job summarizing why imaging surveys are outpacing spectroscopy and why the gap matters, with straightforward numbers on field of view and multiplexing that make the scale easy to grasp. The historical section is concise and hits the main milestones without padding. The soft spot is that none of the performance claims are backed by new modeling, error budgets, or feasibility checks in the text. The 20k target count, robot speed, and survey yield are all forward-looking engineering targets rather than demonstrated quantities, so the paper reads as a project overview rather than a technical validation. Readers get a clear picture of the intended capabilities but have to take the feasibility on trust from the construction status. This is useful for anyone tracking Stage-V survey plans or thinking about how to use the data once it arrives, but it won't supply new measurements or derivations for immediate citation. I'd send it to peer review so the community can comment on the design choices and survey strategy before the instrument is further along.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the historical development of large optical telescopes and spectroscopic surveys, identifies a gap in wide-field highly multiplexed spectroscopy needed to exploit current imaging data, and presents the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST) as the first Stage-V facility under construction. MUST is described as a 6.5 m telescope with a modular focal plane using 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots to obtain spectra for over 20,000 targets simultaneously across a ~5 deg² field, with an 8-year survey in the 2030s targeting redshifts for over 100 million galaxies and quasars to create the most comprehensive 3D spectroscopic map of the Universe.

Significance. If the described design parameters are achieved, MUST would enable transformative advances in cosmology, Galactic structure, and time-domain astrophysics by delivering an unprecedented volume of spectroscopic data. The paper's clear historical context and explicit science motivation are strengths, providing a concrete vision for next-generation facilities; however, the significance remains prospective as the headline numbers are engineering targets rather than validated results.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of measuring redshifts for over 100 million galaxies and quasars over an 8-year survey is load-bearing for the paper's motivation of MUST as the leading Stage-V facility, yet no supporting survey strategy, exposure-time calculations, or efficiency estimates are provided to substantiate this yield.
[MUST design description] MUST design description: The multiplexing of over 20,000 simultaneous targets using 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots across the ~5 deg² field is presented as a key innovation, but the text contains no quantitative feasibility analysis, prototype references, alignment tolerances, or operational speed/error budget, which directly underpins the claimed performance.

minor comments (2)

[historical review] The historical review section would benefit from explicit citations to key prior surveys (e.g., SDSS, DESI) when contrasting capabilities, to strengthen the gap analysis.
Figure captions for any focal-plane or telescope layout diagrams should include scale bars and labeling of the modular robot units for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the manuscript's historical context and science motivation. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the substantiation of the key claims while preserving the review-oriented scope of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of measuring redshifts for over 100 million galaxies and quasars over an 8-year survey is load-bearing for the paper's motivation of MUST as the leading Stage-V facility, yet no supporting survey strategy, exposure-time calculations, or efficiency estimates are provided to substantiate this yield.

Authors: We agree that the abstract states the target yield without explicit supporting calculations in the main text. This figure is a design goal derived from preliminary survey simulations incorporating the telescope's collecting area, field of view, fiber throughput, and typical exposure times for the targeted galaxy populations. As the manuscript is a high-level review, detailed calculations reside in supporting technical documents. In the revised version, we will add a concise paragraph in the MUST section summarizing the high-level survey strategy, including assumed exposure times, field revisit rates, and overall efficiency, with a reference to the underlying estimates. This will directly address the concern without expanding into a full technical appendix. revision: yes
Referee: [MUST design description] MUST design description: The multiplexing of over 20,000 simultaneous targets using 6.2-mm pitch fiber-positioning robots across the ~5 deg² field is presented as a key innovation, but the text contains no quantitative feasibility analysis, prototype references, alignment tolerances, or operational speed/error budget, which directly underpins the claimed performance.

Authors: The description is intentionally concise to emphasize the overall concept and science drivers rather than engineering specifics. The 6.2-mm pitch robots draw on demonstrated technology from prior fiber-positioning systems, with prototypes already tested for positioning precision and speed. To strengthen the presentation, the revised manuscript will include citations to the relevant prototype development papers and technical reports, along with a brief summary of key feasibility metrics such as alignment tolerances and operational error budgets. This addition will provide the requested quantitative context while remaining appropriate for the review format. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a review tracing telescope history and motivating a conceptual Stage-V facility. It states design parameters but contains no new derivations, data reductions, quantitative performance models, or equations. All headline numbers are forward-looking engineering targets. No self-citation load-bearing arguments, fitted inputs called predictions, or self-definitional steps exist. The derivation chain is empty, making the paper self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and project description with no scientific derivations, data fits, or new physical postulates. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond naming the MUST instrument and its nominal specifications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5541 in / 1281 out tokens · 43103 ms · 2026-05-12T03:37:50.717555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

258 extracted references · 258 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

[1]

Kaushik , A

M. Kaushik , A. Mattoo , and R. Rastogi , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.09143 (2024), arXiv: 2404.09143

work page arXiv 2024
[2]

B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott et al., 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv: 1602.03837

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[3]

B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott et al., 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv: 1710.05832

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[4]

B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott et al., 848, L12 (2017), arXiv: 1710.05833

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[5]

B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott et al., 848, L13 (2017), arXiv: 1710.05834

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[6]

Soares-Santos , D

M. Soares-Santos , D. E. Holz , J. Annis et al., 848, L16 (2017), arXiv: 1710.05459

work page arXiv 2017
[7]

IceCube Collaboration , M. G. Aartsen , M. Ackermann et al., Science 361, eaat1378 (2018), arXiv: 1807.08816

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

J. P. Gardner , J. C. Mather , M. Clampin et al., 123, 485 (2006), arXiv: astro-ph/0606175

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[9]

Padovani and M

P. Padovani and M. Cirasuolo , Contemporary Physics 64, 47 (2023), arXiv: 2312.04299

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

G. H. Sanders , Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 34, 81 (2013)

work page 2013
[11]

Thirty Meter Telescope Detailed Science Case: 2015,

W. Skidmore , TMT International Science Development Teams , and T. Science Advisory Committee , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 15, 1945 (2015), arXiv: 1505.01195

work page arXiv 1945
[12]

Johns , P

M. Johns , P. McCarthy , K. Raybould et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV, (edited by L. M. Stepp , R. Gilmozzi , and H. J. Hall ), volume 8444 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 84441H (2012)

work page 2012
[13]

Zhao , Y.-H

G. Zhao , Y.-H. Zhao , Y.-Q. Chu , Y.-P. Jing , and L.-C. Deng , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 12, 723 (2012)

work page 2012
[14]

S. Jin , S. C. Trager , G. B. Dalton et al., 530, 2688 (2024), arXiv: 2212.03981

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Tegmark , M

M. Tegmark , M. R. Blanton , M. A. Strauss et al., 606, 702 (2004), arXiv: astro-ph/0310725

work page arXiv 2004
[16]

Cole , W

S. Cole , W. J. Percival , J. A. Peacock et al., 362, 505 (2005), arXiv: astro-ph/0501174

work page arXiv 2005
[17]

1999, apj, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

S. Perlmutter , G. Aldering , G. Goldhaber et al., 517, 565 (1999), arXiv: astro-ph/9812133

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[18]

A. G. Riess , A. V. Filippenko , P. Challis et al., 116, 1009 (1998), arXiv: astro-ph/9805201

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[19]

N. A. Bahcall , J. P. Ostriker , S. Perlmutter , and P. J. Steinhardt , Science 284, 1481 (1999), arXiv: astro-ph/9906463

work page arXiv 1999
[20]

D. G. York , J. Adelman , J. E. Anderson , Jr. et al., 120, 1579 (2000), arXiv: astro-ph/0006396

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[21]

J. E. Gunn , W. A. Siegmund , E. J. Mannery et al., 131, 2332 (2006), arXiv: astro-ph/0602326

work page arXiv 2006
[22]

K. S. Dawson , J.-P. Kneib , W. J. Percival et al., 151, 44 (2016), arXiv: 1508.04473

work page arXiv 2016
[23]

The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

Dark Energy Survey Collaboration , T. Abbott , F. B. Abdalla et al., 460, 1270 (2016), arXiv: 1601.00329

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[24]

and Arimoto, N

H. Aihara , N. Arimoto , R. Armstrong et al., 70, S4 (2018), arXiv: 1704.05858

work page arXiv 2018
[25]

J. T. A. de Jong , G. A. Verdoes Kleijn , K. H. Kuijken , and E. A. Valentijn , Experimental Astronomy 35, 25 (2013), arXiv: 1206.1254

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[26]

J. T. A. de Jong , K. Kuijken , D. Applegate et al., The Messenger 154, 44 (2013)

work page 2013
[27]

Report of the Dark Energy Task Force

A. Albrecht , G. Bernstein , R. Cahn et al., arXiv e-prints astro-ph/0609591 (2006), arXiv: astro-ph/0609591

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[28]

Euclid Definition Study Report

R. Laureijs , J. Amiaux , S. Arduini et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1110.3193 (2011), arXiv: 1110.3193

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[30]

2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1809.01669

The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration , R. Mandelbaum , T. Eifler et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1809.01669 (2018), arXiv: 1809.01669

work page arXiv 2018
[31]

Ivezicet al.(LSST), LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products, As- trophys

Z . Ivezi \'c , S. M. Kahn , J. A. Tyson et al., 873, 111 (2019), arXiv: 0805.2366

work page arXiv 2019
[32]

F. B. Bianco , Z . Ivezi \'c , R. L. Jones et al., 258, 1 (2022), arXiv: 2108.01683

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Zhan , Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica 41, 1441 (2011)

H. Zhan , Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica 41, 1441 (2011)

work page 2011
[34]

Gong , X

Y. Gong , X. Liu , Y. Cao et al., 883, 203 (2019), arXiv: 1901.04634

work page arXiv 2019
[35]

Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

D. Spergel , N. Gehrels , C. Baltay et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1503.03757 (2015), arXiv: 1503.03757

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[36]

The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

DESI Collaboration , A. Aghamousa , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1611.00036 (2016), arXiv: 1611.00036

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[37]

Gebhardt , E

K. Gebhardt , E. Mentuch Cooper , R. Ciardullo et al., 923, 217 (2021), arXiv: 2110.04298

work page arXiv 2021
[38]

Extragalactic Science, Cosmology and Galactic Archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS)

M. Takada , R. S. Ellis , M. Chiba et al., 66, R1 (2014), arXiv: 1206.0737

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[39]

R. S. de Jong , O. Agertz , A. A. Berbel et al., The Messenger 175, 3 (2019), arXiv: 1903.02464

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey

O. Dor \'e , J. Bock , M. Ashby et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1412.4872 (2014), arXiv: 1412.4872

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[41]

The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design

DESI Collaboration , A. Aghamousa , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1611.00037 (2016), arXiv: 1611.00037

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[42]

A. Dey , D. J. Schlegel , D. Lang et al., 157, 168 (2019), arXiv: 1804.08657

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[43]

Abareshi, J

DESI Collaboration , B. Abareshi , J. Aguilar et al., 164, 207 (2022), arXiv: 2205.10939

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

R. S. de Jong , O. Bellido-Tirado , C. Chiappini et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, (edited by I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , and H. Takami ), volume 8446 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 84460T (2012), arXiv: 1206.6885

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[45]

Zhang, H

Y. Zhang, H. Jiang, S. A. Shectman et al., PhotoniX 4, 1 (2023), ://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258766165

work page 2023
[46]

MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST) Science White Paper I: Overview of Large-Scale Structure Cosmology in the Era of Stage-V Spectroscopic Surveys

C. Zhao , S. Huang , M. He et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.07970 (2024), arXiv: 2411.07970

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[47]

Zhang , Q

Y. Zhang , Q. Bian , Z. Tian et al., 137, 025001 (2025)

work page 2025
[48]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.07923, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.07923

R. Besuner , A. Dey , A. Drlica-Wagner et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.07923 (2025), arXiv: 2503.07923

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Ellis and K

R. Ellis and K. Dawson , in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, volume 51, 45 (2019), arXiv: 1907.06797

work page arXiv 2019
[50]

Mainieri , R

V. Mainieri , R. I. Anderson , J. Brinchmann et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2403.05398 (2024), arXiv: 2403.05398

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

D.-q. Su , H. Bai , X. Yuan , and X. Cui , Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 67, 279511 (2024), arXiv: 2310.04697

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

I. S. McLean , Electronic Imaging in Astronomy: Detectors and Instrumentation (Second Edition) (2008)

work page 2008
[53]

J. E. Nelson, T. S. Mast, and S. M. Faber (1985), ://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:107280967

work page 1985
[55]

Angel , B

R. Angel , B. Martin , D. G. Sandler et al., in Space Telescopes and Instruments IV, (edited by P. Y. Bely and J. B. Breckinridge ), volume 2807 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 354--356 (1996)

work page 1996
[56]

Cheng, in Principles and Design of Astronomical Telescopes: Radio, Infrared, Optical, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Telescopes, chapter 1, (China Science and Technology Press2003)

J. Cheng, in Principles and Design of Astronomical Telescopes: Radio, Infrared, Optical, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Telescopes, chapter 1, (China Science and Technology Press2003)

work page
[57]

Trimble and J

V. Trimble and J. A. Ceja , Astronomische Nachrichten 331, 338 (2010)

work page 2010
[58]

Flaugher , H

B. Flaugher , H. T. Diehl , K. Honscheid et al., 150, 150 (2015), arXiv: 1504.02900

work page arXiv 2015
[59]

M. Iye , H. Karoji , H. Ando et al., 56, 381 (2004), arXiv: astro-ph/0405012

work page arXiv 2004
[60]

Miyazaki , Y

S. Miyazaki , Y. Komiyama , S. Kawanomoto et al., 70, S1 (2018)

work page 2018
[61]

K. S. Dawson , D. J. Schlegel , C. P. Ahn et al., 145, 10 (2013), arXiv: 1208.0022

work page arXiv 2013
[62]

Alam and others (eBOSS), Phys

S. Alam , M. Aubert , S. Avila et al., 103, 083533 (2021), arXiv: 2007.08991

work page arXiv 2021
[63]

Overview of the SDSS-IV MaNGA Survey: Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory

K. Bundy , M. A. Bershady , D. R. Law et al., 798, 7 (2015), arXiv: 1412.1482

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[64]

Cirasuolo , J

M. Cirasuolo , J. Afonso , M. Carollo et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, (edited by S. K. Ramsay , I. S. McLean , and H. Takami ), volume 9147 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 91470N (2014)

work page 2014
[65]

Cirasuolo , A

M. Cirasuolo , A. Fairley , P. Rees et al., The Messenger 180, 10 (2020), arXiv: 2009.00628

work page arXiv 2020
[66]

Dalton , S

G. Dalton , S. C. Trager , D. C. Abrams et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, (edited by I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , and H. Takami ), volume 8446 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 84460P (2012)

work page 2012
[67]

The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013

M. Levi , C. Bebek , T. Beers et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1308.0847 (2013), arXiv: 1308.0847

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[68]

DESI Collaboration , A. G. Adame , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.03000 (2024), arXiv: 2404.03000

work page arXiv 2024
[70]

A. G. Adame , J. Aguilar , S. Ahlen et al., 2025, 124 (2025), arXiv: 2404.03001

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Tamura , K

N. Tamura , K. Yabe , S. Koshida et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, (edited by J. J. Bryant , K. Motohara , and J. R. D. Vernet ), volume 13096 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1309605 (2024)

work page 2024
[72]

Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives

N. Tamura , N. Takato , A. Shimono et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, (edited by C. J. Evans , L. Simard , and H. Takami ), volume 9908 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 99081M (2016), arXiv: 1608.01075

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[73]

D. J. Schlegel , S. Ferraro , G. Aldering et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2209.03585 (2022), arXiv: 2209.03585

work page arXiv 2022
[74]

A. S. Chou , M. Soares-Santos , T. M. P. Tait et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2211.09978 (2022), arXiv: 2211.09978

work page arXiv 2022
[75]

Najita , B

J. Najita , B. Willman , D. P. Finkbeiner et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1610.01661 (2016), arXiv: 1610.01661

work page arXiv 2016
[76]

G. J. Hill , Advanced Optical Technologies 3, 265 (2014), arXiv: 1408.4625

work page arXiv 2014
[77]

J. E. Gunn , M. Carr , C. Rockosi et al., 116, 3040 (1998), arXiv: astro-ph/9809085

work page arXiv 1998
[78]

The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III

S. Alam , F. D. Albareti , C. Allende Prieto et al., 219, 12 (2015), arXiv: 1501.00963

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[79]

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample

S. Alam , M. Ata , S. Bailey et al., 470, 2617 (2017), arXiv: 1607.03155

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[80]

J. E. Bautista , R. Paviot , M. Vargas Maga \ n a et al., 500, 736 (2021), arXiv: 2007.08993

work page arXiv 2021
[81]

Mellieret al.(Euclid), Euclid

Euclid Collaboration , Y. Mellier , Abdurro'uf et al., 697, A1 (2025), arXiv: 2405.13491

work page arXiv 2025
[82]

DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

DESI Collaboration , M. Abdul-Karim , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.14738 (2025), arXiv: 2503.14738

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[83]

B. F. Schutz , 323, 310 (1986)

work page 1986

Showing first 80 references.