arxiv: 2604.04546 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Inference of recoil kicks from binary black hole mergers up to GWTC--4 and their astrophysical implications

Tousif Islam

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

keywords binary black hole mergersrecoil kicksGWTC-4gravitational wavesretention probabilitieshierarchical mergersastrophysical implications

0 comments

The pith

Gravitational wave data show binary black hole mergers impart recoil kicks that eject most remnants from globular clusters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates recoil velocities for every binary black hole merger reported through the GWTC-4 catalog by applying the standard kick formula to the posterior distributions of mass ratio and spins. Two events receive informative constraints with kicks of several hundred to nearly 1000 km/s. These velocities translate into retention probabilities of only 1-5 percent in globular clusters, 15-30 percent in nuclear star clusters, and 70-100 percent in elliptical galaxies. Even when a remnant stays inside a cluster, the kick often displaces it far from the dense core, sharply lowering the chance it will merge again with another black hole.

Core claim

We infer recoil velocities for all binary black hole mergers in GWTC-4 and selected candidate events by combining measured mass ratios and spin magnitudes. Informative kick posteriors are obtained for GW231028_153006 and GW231123_135430. Present constraints are driven mainly by mass ratio and spin magnitude while spin orientations remain subdominant. Retention fractions of the remnants are estimated at 1-5% for globular clusters, 15-30% for nuclear star clusters, 5-40% for dwarf galaxies and 70-100% for elliptical galaxies, with the probability of subsequent hierarchical mergers falling to 0.1-1% in globular clusters.

What carries the argument

Application of the analytic recoil-velocity formula to posterior samples of mass ratio and spin parameters drawn from gravitational-wave parameter estimation.

If this is right

Most remnants from catalogued events are ejected from globular clusters.
Recoil displacements inside clusters suppress the rate of hierarchical mergers even for the few retained black holes.
Retention and subsequent merger probabilities rise substantially in nuclear star clusters and elliptical galaxies.
The remnant of GW241011_233834 is among the events with the largest inferred kicks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Improved spin-orientation measurements in future catalogs could tighten the kick constraints that are now only weakly informed by those angles.
The reported retention fractions can be folded into population-synthesis models to predict the fraction of detectable hierarchical mergers from different host environments.
Large kick values for specific events offer a possible discriminant between isolated binary evolution and dynamical formation channels.

Load-bearing premise

Kick posteriors are assumed to be dominated by mass ratio and spin magnitude while spin orientation angles contribute only weakly and waveform or population-model systematics do not shift the reported values substantially.

What would settle it

Observation of a retained black hole remnant inside the core of a globular cluster after a GWTC-style merger, or direct detection of a hierarchical merger whose progenitor was retained in such a cluster.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04546 by Tousif Islam.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Inferred recoil kicks for all events. We show the posterior distributions of recoil kick velocities inferred from publicly available samples for events in GWTC–4 (blue), GWTC–3 (orange-red), GWTC–2.1 (green), and LVK candidate IMBH mergers (yellow). For comparison, we show the median and 90% credible interval of the prior as a horizontal dashed line and a gray shaded region, respectively. The events are or… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Example of events with large kick inference. Upper panel: We show recoil kick velocity posteriors (shaded blue histograms) inferred from the publicly available GWTC–4 posterior samples for the eight events whose Jensen–Shannon divergence (JSD) between the inferred posterior and the corresponding prior (shaded gray histograms) exceeds 0.07 bits. For comparison, we also show kick posteriors obtained by propa… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Quantifying the effect of spin angles on kick inference. We show the Jensen–Shannon divergence (JSD) between the kick posterior vkick and the distribution obtained under isotropic spin orientations, v iso kick, as a function of the JSD between the kick posterior vkick and the prior distribution, v prior kick . For reference, we indicate a fiducial JSD threshold value of 0.02 (red dashed line), which marks… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Inference of kick for O4b GW events. We show the inferred recoil kick velocity posteriors for three recently announced GW events from the ongoing O4b observing run: GW241011_233834 (blue), GW241110_124123 (orange) and GW250114_082203 (green). For reference, we also show the corresponding kick prior distributions (gray). More details are in Section IV. recompute the recoil velocities by propagating the infe… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Retention probability of individual GW events. We show the retention probability of all BBH merger remnants for events in GWTC–4 (blue), GWTC–3 (orange-red), GWTC–2.1 (green), and LVK candidate IMBH mergers (yellow) as a function of the escape velocity in the range [0, 2500] km s−1 . For reference, we also indicate representative escape velocity ranges for globular clusters, nuclear star clusters, dwarf ga… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Overall retention probability of all GW events in different host enviorment. Upper panel: We show the retention probability of BBH merger remnants for events in GWTC–4 (blue), GWTC–3 (orange-red), GWTC–2.1 (green), and LVK candidate IMBH mergers (yellow), assuming the mergers occurred in globular clusters (GC) and nuclear star clusters (NSC). Lower panel: Same but for dwarf galaxies (DG) and elliptical gal… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Understanding the effect of recoil kick in remnant displacement. Upper panel: We show the median dynamical-friction return time t DF return (in Myr) and the maximum displacement due to the recoil kick, rmax, for BBH merger remnants corresponding to events in GWTC–4 (blue), GWTC–3 (orange-red), GWTC–2.1 (green), and LVK candidate IMBH mergers (yellow), assuming the mergers occurred in globular clusters s… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Probability of remnant participation in hierarchical mergers. We show the overall probability that BBH merger remnants participate in at least one hierarchical merger for events in GWTC–4 (blue), GWTC–3 (orange-red), GWTC–2.1 (green), and LVK candidate IMBH mergers (yellow), assuming the mergers occur in globular clusters (GC) and nuclear star clusters (NSC). More details are in Section V D. lifetime. We… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We infer recoil (kick) velocities for all binary black hole merger events reported up to the GWTC--4 catalog, together with candidate intermediate-mass black hole events. We obtain informative kick constraints for GW231028\_153006 ($839^{+1018}_{-681}\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$) and GW231123\_135430 ($974^{+944}_{-760}\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$). Additionally, we compute recoil velocities for recently reported events from the ongoing fourth observing run: GW241011\_233834, GW241110\_124123, and GW250114\_082203, obtaining $v_{\rm kick} = 974^{+555}_{-466}\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$, $394^{+582}_{-207}\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$, and $115^{+301}_{-95}\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$, respectively. The remnant of GW241011\_233834 is therefore inferred to have one of the largest recoil velocities among currently known events. We find that present recoil kick constraints are driven primarily by measurements of the mass ratio and spin magnitudes, while the contribution from spin orientation angles remains subdominant in most cases. We estimate typical retention probabilities of the remnant black holes in GWTC catalogs to be $\sim 1$--$5\%$ for globular clusters, $\sim 15$--$30\%$ for nuclear star clusters, $\sim 5$--$40\%$ for dwarf galaxies, and $\sim 70$--$100\%$ for elliptical galaxies. We further show that, even for remnants retained in globular clusters, recoil-induced spatial displacements from the cluster core are often significant, which can substantially suppress the chances of hierarchical mergers. We find that the probability for a GWTC merger remnant to participate in hierarchical mergers is $\sim 0.1$--$1\%$ in globular clusters and $\sim 1$--$15\%$ in nuclear star clusters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper supplies new kick posteriors for GWTC-4 and early O4 events plus retention fractions, but the claim that spin orientations are subdominant rests on an untested assertion.

read the letter

This paper applies standard kick-velocity inference to the full GWTC-4 catalog and three recent O4 candidates, delivering concrete posteriors such as 839^{+1018}_{-681} km/s for GW231028_153006 and 974^{+944}_{-760} km/s for GW231123_135430. It then converts those into retention probabilities across environments and notes that even retained remnants are often displaced from cluster cores, lowering hierarchical merger chances to roughly 0.1-1% in globular clusters and 1-15% in nuclear star clusters. Those numbers are the timely part; they give modelers fresh observational anchors for black-hole dynamics in dense systems. The work is a direct extension of earlier techniques, but the catalog update and the downstream astrophysical translation are what make it useful right now. The methods appear standard and the citation pattern is appropriate for the topic. The main soft spot is the statement that mass ratio and spin magnitudes dominate while orientation angles remain subdominant. No variance decomposition, conditional posteriors, or re-inference under altered tilt priors is shown, even though the kick formula is nonlinear and the high-velocity tail controls retention fractions. A modest shift in orientation priors could broaden those tails and move the 1-5% globular-cluster retention range. Data selection, waveform-model checks, and injection validation are not visible in the abstract, so a referee would need to see them explicitly. This is for people who combine gravitational-wave catalogs with cluster evolution and merger-rate calculations. A reader updating population models or retention estimates will get direct value from the new numbers. It deserves serious peer review; the core results are grounded enough to warrant referee time, provided the authors add the orientation sensitivity tests and clarify the validation steps.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper infers recoil kick velocities for all binary black hole mergers in the GWTC-4 catalog plus selected O4 candidate events by applying standard Bayesian inference to the reported posterior samples on component masses and spins. It reports specific kick posteriors, notably 839^{+1018}_{-681} km s^{-1} for GW231028_153006 and 974^{+944}_{-760} km s^{-1} for GW231123_135430, states that these constraints are driven primarily by mass ratio and spin magnitudes with spin orientations subdominant, and derives retention probabilities of the remnants in globular clusters (~1-5%), nuclear star clusters (~15-30%), dwarf galaxies (~5-40%), and elliptical galaxies (~70-100%), together with estimates of the low probability (~0.1-1% in globular clusters) that retained remnants participate in hierarchical mergers.

Significance. If the kick posteriors and the subdominance assumption hold, the work supplies concrete, catalog-level constraints on remnant velocities that can be directly ingested by cluster dynamics simulations and population-synthesis models. The retention fractions and the quantitative statement that recoil-induced displacements suppress hierarchical mergers provide falsifiable inputs for interpreting the observed BBH merger rate and for assessing the contribution of dense environments to black-hole growth.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'the contribution from spin orientation angles remains subdominant in most cases' is not accompanied by a quantitative test (variance decomposition, conditional posteriors with orientations fixed, or re-inference under uniform tilt priors). Because the kick velocity is a nonlinear function of all seven parameters, even modest orientation uncertainty can broaden the high-velocity tail that determines the reported credible intervals and the downstream 1-5% globular-cluster retention probabilities; without this check the central numerical results rest on an unverified modeling choice.

minor comments (2)

The manuscript would benefit from an explicit table that compiles the median and 90% credible intervals for every reported kick velocity (including the three new O4 events) so that readers can quickly compare them to the literature.
A short paragraph or appendix entry describing the precise data-selection cuts applied to the GWTC-4 posterior samples and any checks against injected signals would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the abstract. We address the point below and agree that an explicit quantitative test will strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The assertion that 'the contribution from spin orientation angles remains subdominant in most cases' is not accompanied by a quantitative test (variance decomposition, conditional posteriors with orientations fixed, or re-inference under uniform tilt priors). Because the kick velocity is a nonlinear function of all seven parameters, even modest orientation uncertainty can broaden the high-velocity tail that determines the reported credible intervals and the downstream 1-5% globular-cluster retention probabilities; without this check the central numerical results rest on an unverified modeling choice.

Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not include an explicit quantitative test of the relative contribution of spin orientations. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection that performs two checks on the posterior samples: (i) a variance decomposition that isolates the contribution to the kick-velocity variance from mass ratio, spin magnitudes, and spin tilts separately, and (ii) a comparison of the full kick posteriors against conditional posteriors in which the tilt angles are fixed to their median values (or drawn from uniform priors). The resulting changes to the 90% credible intervals and to the globular-cluster retention probabilities will be reported for the events that drive the headline results. This will directly test whether orientation uncertainty materially affects the high-velocity tails. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard Bayesian inference of kicks from external posteriors

full rationale

The paper infers recoil velocities by applying established kick-velocity fitting formulas to posterior samples of component masses and spins drawn from GWTC-4 analyses. No equation reduces the reported kick values or retention probabilities to a quantity fitted inside the present work; the mass-ratio and spin-magnitude dominance statement is presented as an empirical observation from the sampled posteriors rather than a self-defining relation. Self-citations, if present, are limited to prior kick formulas or catalog releases and are not load-bearing for the central numerical results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard general-relativity waveform models and Bayesian priors for spins and masses; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)

Spin orientation priors
Standard priors on spin angles are used to marginalize the kick posterior; specific functional form affects the reported uncertainties.

axioms (2)

standard math General relativity accurately describes the merger waveform
Invoked implicitly when converting observed signals to mass and spin parameters.
domain assumption GWTC-4 events are genuine binary black hole mergers
Classification from the catalog is taken as given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5665 in / 1298 out tokens · 66411 ms · 2026-05-10T20:02:01.827290+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We construct the mapping using a combination of NRSur7dq4Remnant and HLZ... vkick = f(q, |χ1|, |χ2|, θ1, θ2, ϕ1, ϕ2)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We estimate typical retention probabilities... ∼1–5% for globular clusters

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

Michele Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. V ol. 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2007)

2007
[2]

Getting a kick out of numerical relativity,

John G. Baker, Joan Centrella, Dae-Il Choi, Michael Koppitz, James R. van Meter, and M. Coleman Miller, “Getting a kick out of numerical relativity,” Astrophys. J. Lett.653, L93–L96 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603204

work page arXiv 2006
[3]

Modeling kicks from the merger of non-precessing black-hole binaries,

John G. Baker, William D. Boggs, Joan Centrella, Bernard J. Kelly, Sean T. McWilliams, M. Coleman Miller, and James R. van Meter, “Modeling kicks from the merger of non-precessing black-hole binaries,” Astrophys. J.668, 1140–1144 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0702390

work page arXiv 2007
[4]

Modeling kicks from the merger of generic black-hole binaries,

John G. Baker, William D. Boggs, Joan Centrella, Bernard J. Kelly, Sean T. McWilliams, M. Coleman Miller, and James R. van Meter, “Modeling kicks from the merger of generic black-hole binaries,” Astrophys. J. Lett.682, L29–L32 (2008), arXiv:0802.0416 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[5]

Binary black holes and recoil velocities,

F. Herrmann, I. Hinder, D. Shoemaker, and P. Laguna, “Binary black holes and recoil velocities,” AIP Conf. Proc.873, 89–93 (2006)

2006
[6]

Further insight into gravitational recoil,

Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Further insight into gravitational recoil,” Phys. Rev. D77, 044028 (2008), arXiv:0708.4048 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[7]

Gravitational recoil from spinning binary black hole mergers,

Frank Herrmann, Ian Hinder, Deirdre Shoemaker, Pablo Laguna, and Richard A. Matzner, “Gravitational recoil from spinning binary black hole mergers,” Astrophys. J.661, 430–436 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0701143

work page arXiv 2007
[8]

Binary Black Holes: Spin Dynamics and Gravitational Recoil,

Frank Herrmann, Ian Hinder, Deirdre M. Shoemaker, Pablo Laguna, and Richard A. Matzner, “Binary Black Holes: Spin Dynamics and Gravitational Recoil,” Phys. Rev. D76, 084032 (2007), arXiv:0706.2541 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2007
[9]

Unequal mass binary black hole plunges and gravitational recoil,

Frank Herrmann, Ian Hinder, Deirdre Shoemaker, and Pablo La- guna, “Unequal mass binary black hole plunges and gravitational recoil,” Class. Quant. Grav.24, S33–S42 (2007)

2007
[10]

Gravitational Wave Recoil and the Retention of Intermediate Mass Black Holes,

Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Kayhan Gultekin, Deirdre Shoe- maker, and Nico Yunes, “Gravitational Wave Recoil and the Retention of Intermediate Mass Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.686, 829 (2008), arXiv:0707.1334 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[11]

Black-hole horizons as probes of black- hole dynamics I: post-merger recoil in head-on collisions,

Jose Luis Jaramillo, Rodrigo Panosso Macedo, Philipp Moesta, and Luciano Rezzolla, “Black-hole horizons as probes of black- hole dynamics I: post-merger recoil in head-on collisions,” Phys. Rev. D85, 084030 (2012), arXiv:1108.0060 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[12]

Recoil Velocities from Equal-Mass Binary-Black-Hole Mergers,

Michael Koppitz, Denis Pollney, Christian Reisswig, Luciano Rezzolla, Jonathan Thornburg, Peter Diener, and Erik Schnetter, “Recoil Velocities from Equal-Mass Binary-Black-Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 041102 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0701163

work page arXiv 2007
[13]

Modeling grav- itational recoil from precessing highly-spinning unequal- mass black-hole binaries,

Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Modeling gravitational recoil from precessing highly-spinning unequal-mass black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D79, 064018 (2009), arXiv:0805.0159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[14]

Modeling maximum astrophysical gravitational recoil velocities,

Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Modeling maximum astrophysical gravitational recoil velocities,” Phys. Rev. D83, 024003 (2011), arXiv:1011.0593 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[15]

Anatomy of the binary black hole recoil: A multipolar analysis,

Jeremy D. Schnittman, Alessandra Buonanno, James R. van Me- ter, John G. Baker, William D. Boggs, Joan Centrella, Bernard J. 11 Kelly, and Sean T. McWilliams, “Anatomy of the binary black hole recoil: A multipolar analysis,” Phys. Rev. D77, 044031 (2008), arXiv:0707.0301 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[16]

Gravita- tional recoil velocities from eccentric binary black hole mergers,

Carlos F. Sopuerta, Nicolas Yunes, and Pablo Laguna, “Gravita- tional recoil velocities from eccentric binary black hole mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett.656, L9–L12 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0611110

work page arXiv 2007
[17]

Recoil velocities from equal-mass bi- nary black-hole mergers: A Systematic investigation of spin- orbit aligned configurations,

Denis Pollneyet al., “Recoil velocities from equal-mass bi- nary black-hole mergers: A Systematic investigation of spin- orbit aligned configurations,” Phys. Rev. D76, 124002 (2007), arXiv:0707.2559 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2007
[18]

Rezzolla, R

Luciano Rezzolla, Rodrigo P. Macedo, and Jose Luis Jaramillo, “Understanding the ’anti-kick’ in the merger of binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 221101 (2010), arXiv:1003.0873 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[19]

Hangup Kicks: Still Larger Recoils by Partial Spin/Orbit Alignment of Black-Hole Binaries,

Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Hangup Kicks: Still Larger Recoils by Partial Spin/Orbit Alignment of Black-Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 231102 (2011), arXiv:1108.2009 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[20]

Nonlinear Gravita- tional Recoil from the Mergers of Precessing Black-Hole Bi- naries,

Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Nonlinear Gravitational Recoil from the Mergers of Precessing Black-Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. D87, 084027 (2013), arXiv:1211.7099 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[21]

Gravitational Recoil From Accretion-Aligned Black-Hole Binaries,

Carlos O. Lousto, Yosef Zlochower, Massimo Dotti, and Marta V olonteri, “Gravitational Recoil From Accretion-Aligned Black-Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. D85, 084015 (2012), arXiv:1201.1923 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[22]

Multipole Analysis of Kicks in Collision of Binary Black Holes,

Sarah H. Miller and R. A. Matzner, “Multipole Analysis of Kicks in Collision of Binary Black Holes,” Gen. Rel. Grav.41, 525–539 (2009), arXiv:0807.3028 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[23]

Binary black hole merg- ers: Large kicks for generic spin orientations,

Wolfgang Tichy and Pedro Marronetti, “Binary black hole merg- ers: Large kicks for generic spin orientations,” Phys. Rev. D76, 061502 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703075

work page arXiv 2007
[24]

Modeling Gravitational Recoil Using Numerical Relativity,

Yosef Zlochower, Manuela Campanelli, and Carlos O. Lousto, “Modeling Gravitational Recoil Using Numerical Relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.28, 114015 (2011), arXiv:1011.2210 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[25]

Healy, C

James Healy, Carlos O. Lousto, and Yosef Zlochower, “Remnant mass, spin, and recoil from spin aligned black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D90, 104004 (2014), arXiv:1406.7295 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[26]

Remnant Masses, Spins and Recoils from the Merger of Generic Black-Hole Binaries,

Carlos O. Lousto, Manuela Campanelli, Yosef Zlochower, and Hiroyuki Nakano, “Remnant Masses, Spins and Recoils from the Merger of Generic Black-Hole Binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 114006 (2010), arXiv:0904.3541 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[27]

Perturbative effects of spinning black holes with applications to recoil velocities,

Hiroyuki Nakano, Manuela Campanelli, Carlos O. Lousto, and Yosef Zlochower, “Perturbative effects of spinning black holes with applications to recoil velocities,” Class. Quant. Grav.28, 134005 (2011), arXiv:1011.2767 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[28]

Binary black hole merger gravitational waves and recoil in the large mass ratio limit,

Pranesh A. Sundararajan, Gaurav Khanna, and Scott A. Hughes, “Binary black hole merger gravitational waves and recoil in the large mass ratio limit,” Phys. Rev. D81, 104009 (2010), arXiv:1003.0485 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[29]

Remnant black hole properties from numerical-relativity- informed perturbation theory and implications for wave- form modeling,

Tousif Islam, Scott E. Field, and Gaurav Khanna, “Remnant black hole properties from numerical-relativity-informed pertur- bation theory and implications for waveform modeling,” Phys. Rev. D108, 064048 (2023), arXiv:2301.07215 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

How black holes get their kicks: Radiation recoil in binary black hole mergers,

Scott A. Hughes, Marc Favata, and Daniel E. Holz, “How black holes get their kicks: Radiation recoil in binary black hole mergers,” inConference on Growing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological Context(2004) arXiv:astro-ph/0408492

work page arXiv 2004
[31]

Black hole binary inspiral and trajectory dominance,

Richard H. Price, Gaurav Khanna, and Scott A. Hughes, “Black hole binary inspiral and trajectory dominance,” Phys. Rev. D88, 104004 (2013), arXiv:1306.1159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[32]

Sys- tematics of black hole binary inspiral kicks and the slowness ap- proximation,

Richard H. Price, Gaurav Khanna, and Scott A. Hughes, “Sys- tematics of black hole binary inspiral kicks and the slowness ap- proximation,” Phys. Rev. D83, 124002 (2011), arXiv:1104.0387 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[33]

and Qusailah, M

Luc Blanchet, Moh’d S. S. Qusailah, and Clifford M. Will, “Gravitational recoil of inspiralling black-hole binaries to sec- ond post-Newtonian order,” Astrophys. J.635, 508 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507692

work page arXiv 2005
[34]

Grav- itational Recoil from Binary Black Hole Mergers: The Close- Limit Approximation,

Carlos F. Sopuerta, Nicolas Yunes, and Pablo Laguna, “Grav- itational Recoil from Binary Black Hole Mergers: The Close- Limit Approximation,” Phys. Rev. D74, 124010 (2006), [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 069903 (2007), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 049901 (2008)], arXiv:astro-ph/0608600

work page arXiv 2006
[35]

How black holes get their kicks: Gravitational radiation recoil revisited,

Marc Favata, Scott A. Hughes, and Daniel E. Holz, “How black holes get their kicks: Gravitational radiation recoil revisited,” Astrophys. J. Lett.607, L5–L8 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402056

work page arXiv 2004
[36]

The influence of gravitational wave momentum losses on the centre of mass motion of a Newtonian binary system,

M. J. Fitchett, “The influence of gravitational wave momentum losses on the centre of mass motion of a Newtonian binary system,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.203, 1049–1062 (1983)

1983
[37]

Linear momentum and gravitational-waves - circular orbits around a schwarzschild black-hole,

M. J. Fitchett and Steven L. Detweiler, “Linear momentum and gravitational-waves - circular orbits around a schwarzschild black-hole,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.211, 933–942 (1984)

1984
[38]

Coalescing binary systems of compact ob- jects to (post)5/2 Newtonian order. 2. Higher order wave forms and radiation recoil,

Alan G. Wiseman, “Coalescing binary systems of compact ob- jects to (post)5/2 Newtonian order. 2. Higher order wave forms and radiation recoil,” Phys. Rev. D46, 1517–1539 (1992)

1992
[39]

Coalescing binary systems of compact objects to (post)$^{5/2}-Newtonian order. V. Spin Effects

Lawrence E. Kidder, “Coalescing binary systems of compact objects to postNewtonian 5/2 order. 5. Spin effects,” Phys. Rev. D52, 821–847 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9506022

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[40]

Maximum gravitational recoil,

Manuela Campanelli, Carlos O. Lousto, Yosef Zlochower, and David Merritt, “Maximum gravitational recoil,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 231102 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702133

work page arXiv 2007
[41]

Exploring black hole superkicks

Bernd Bruegmann, Jose A. Gonzalez, Mark Hannam, Sascha Husa, and Ulrich Sperhake, “Exploring black hole superkicks,” Phys. Rev. D77, 124047 (2008), arXiv:0707.0135 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[42]

Large merger recoils and spin flips from generic black-hole binaries,

Manuela Campanelli, Carlos O. Lousto, Yosef Zlochower, and David Merritt, “Large merger recoils and spin flips from generic black-hole binaries,” Astrophys. J. Lett.659, L5–L8 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0701164

work page arXiv 2007
[43]

Recoiling from a kick in the head-on collision of spinning black holes,

Dae-Il Choi, Bernard J. Kelly, William D. Boggs, John G. Baker, Joan Centrella, and James van Meter, “Recoiling from a kick in the head-on collision of spinning black holes,” Phys. Rev. D76, 104026 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702016

work page arXiv 2007
[44]

Extra- Large Remnant Recoil Velocities and Spins from Near-Extremal- Bowen-York-Spin Black-Hole Binaries,

Sergio Dain, Carlos O. Lousto, and Yosef Zlochower, “Extra- Large Remnant Recoil Velocities and Spins from Near-Extremal- Bowen-York-Spin Black-Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. D78, 024039 (2008), arXiv:0803.0351 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[45]

Total recoil: The Maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary inspiral,

Jose A. Gonzalez, Ulrich Sperhake, Bernd Bruegmann, Mark Hannam, and Sascha Husa, “Total recoil: The Maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 091101 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610154

work page arXiv 2007
[46]

Supermassive recoil velocities for binary black- hole mergers with antialigned spins,

J. A. Gonzalez, M. D. Hannam, U. Sperhake, Bernd Bruegmann, and S. Husa, “Supermassive recoil velocities for binary black- hole mergers with antialigned spins,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 231101 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702052

work page arXiv 2007
[47]

Superkicks in Hyperbolic Encounters of Binary Black Holes,

James Healy, Frank Herrmann, Ian Hinder, Deirdre M. Shoe- maker, Pablo Laguna, and Richard A. Matzner, “Superkicks in Hyperbolic Encounters of Binary Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 041101 (2009), arXiv:0807.3292 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[48]

Healy and C

James Healy and Carlos O. Lousto, “Ultimate Black Hole Recoil: What is the Maximum High-Energy Collision Kick?” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 071401 (2023), arXiv:2301.00018 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[49]

Zlochower and C

Yosef Zlochower and Carlos O. Lousto, “Modeling the remnant mass, spin, and recoil from unequal-mass, precessing black-hole binaries: The Intermediate Mass Ratio Regime,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 024022 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 029901 (2016)], arXiv:1503.07536 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[50]

A General Formula for Black Hole Gravitational Wave Kicks,

James R. van Meter, M. Coleman Miller, John G. Baker, 12 William D. Boggs, and Bernard J. Kelly, “A General Formula for Black Hole Gravitational Wave Kicks,” Astrophys. J.719, 1427 (2010), arXiv:1003.3865 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2010
[51]

Varma, S

Vijay Varma, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, Jonathan Black- man, Davide Gerosa, Leo C. Stein, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Harald P. Pfeiffer, “Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses,” Phys. Rev. Research.1, 033015 (2019), arXiv:1905.09300 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[52]

High-accuracy mass, spin, and recoil predictions of generic black-hole merger remnants

Vijay Varma, Davide Gerosa, Leo C. Stein, François Hébert, and Hao Zhang, “High-accuracy mass, spin, and recoil predictions of generic black-hole merger remnants,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 011101 (2019), arXiv:1809.09125 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[53]

Consequences of gravitational radiation recoil,

David Merritt, Milos Milosavljevic, Marc Favata, Scott A. Hughes, and Daniel E. Holz, “Consequences of gravitational radiation recoil,” Astrophys. J. Lett.607, L9–L12 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402057

work page arXiv 2004
[54]

Amplification of superkicks in black-hole binaries through orbital eccentricity,

U. Sperhake, R. Rosca-Mead, D. Gerosa, and E. Berti, “Ampli- fication of superkicks in black-hole binaries through orbital ec- centricity,” Phys. Rev. D101, 024044 (2020), arXiv:1910.01598 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[55]

Accurate models for recoil velocity distribution in black hole mergers with comparable to extreme mass-ratios and their astrophysical implications

Tousif Islam and Digvijay Wadekar, “Accurate models for recoil velocity distribution in black hole mergers with comparable to ex- treme mass-ratios and their astrophysical implications,” (2025), arXiv:2511.11536 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

H., et al

Tousif Islam, Avi Vajpeyi, Feroz H. Shaik, Carl-Johan Haster, Vi- jay Varma, Scott E. Field, Jacob Lange, Richard O’Shaughnessy, and Rory Smith, “Analysis of GWTC-3 with fully precessing nu- merical relativity surrogate models,” Phys. Rev. D112, 044001 (2025), arXiv:2309.14473 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Mahapatra, A

Parthapratim Mahapatra, Anuradha Gupta, Marc Favata, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Remnant Black Hole Kicks and Implications for Hierarchical Mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L31 (2021), arXiv:2106.07179 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

Gerosa and C

Davide Gerosa and Christopher J. Moore, “Black hole kicks as new gravitational wave observables,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 011101 (2016), arXiv:1606.04226 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[59]

A., & Oey, M

Angela Borchers, Claire S. Ye, and Maya Fishbach, “Gravitational-wave Kicks Impact the Spins of Black Holes from Hierarchical Mergers,” Astrophys. J.987(2025), 10.3847/1538- 4357/addec6, arXiv:2503.21278 [astro-ph.HE]

work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2025
[60]

Ef- fects of post-Newtonian Spin Alignment on the Distribution of Black-Hole Recoils,

Emanuele Berti, Michael Kesden, and Ulrich Sperhake, “Ef- fects of post-Newtonian Spin Alignment on the Distribution of Black-Hole Recoils,” Phys. Rev. D85, 124049 (2012), arXiv:1203.2920 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2012
[61]

and Miller, M

Kayhan Gultekin, M. Coleman Miller, and Douglas P. Hamilton, “Growth of intermediate - mass black holes in globular clusters,” Astrophys. J.616, 221–230 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402532

work page arXiv 2004
[62]

High mass but low spin: an exclusion region to rule out hierarchical black-hole mergers as a mechanism to populate the pair-instability mass gap,

Davide Gerosa, Nicola Giacobbo, and Alberto Vecchio, “High mass but low spin: an exclusion region to rule out hierarchical black-hole mergers as a mechanism to populate the pair-instability mass gap,” Astrophys. J.915, 56 (2021), arXiv:2104.11247 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[63]

Gerosa and E

Davide Gerosa and Emanuele Berti, “Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?” Phys. Rev. D 95, 124046 (2017), arXiv:1703.06223 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[64]

Extract- ing the Gravitational Recoil from Black Hole Merger Signals,

Vijay Varma, Maximiliano Isi, and Sylvia Biscoveanu, “Extract- ing the Gravitational Recoil from Black Hole Merger Signals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 101104 (2020), arXiv:2002.00296 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[65]

Varma, S

Vijay Varma, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Tousif Islam, Feroz H. Shaik, Carl-Johan Haster, Maximiliano Isi, Will M. Farr, Scott E. Field, and Salvatore Vitale, “Evidence of Large Recoil Velocity from a Black Hole Merger Signal,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 191102 (2022), arXiv:2201.01302 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[66]

GW190412: measuring a black-hole recoil direc- tion through higher-order gravitational-wave modes,

Juan Calderón Bustillo, Samson H. W. Leong, and Koustav Chandra, “GW190412: measuring a black-hole recoil direc- tion through higher-order gravitational-wave modes,” (2022), arXiv:2211.03465 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[67]

GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo- KAGRA Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[68]

GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[69]

GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
[70]

GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run,

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), “GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[71]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), “GWTC- 3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[72]

Search for intermediate-mass black hole binaries in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,

Rich Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “Search for intermediate-mass black hole binaries in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,” Astron. Astrophys. 659, A84 (2022), arXiv:2105.15120 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[73]

Properties of “Lite

Krystal Ruiz-Rocha, Anjali B. Yelikar, Jacob Lange, William Gabella, Robert A. Weller, Richard O’Shaughnessy, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, and Karan Jani, “Properties of “Lite” Intermediate-mass Black Hole Candidates in LIGO-Virgo’s Third Observing Run,” Astrophys. J. Lett.985, L37 (2025), arXiv:2502.17681 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[74]

GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-spin Black Hole Coalescences,

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), “GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-spin Black Hole Coalescences,” Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L21 (2025), arXiv:2510.26931 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[75]

GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), “GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Na- ture of Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[76]

Michele Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. V ol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology(Oxford University Press, 2018)

2018
[77]

Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

Geraint Prattenet al., “Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precess- ing binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
[78]

Colleoni, F

Marta Colleoni, Felip A. Ramis Vidal, Cecilio García-Quirós, Sarp Akçay, and Sayantani Bera, “Fast frequency-domain grav- itational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist,” Phys. Rev. D111, 104019 (2025), arXiv:2412.16721 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[79]

Ossokineet al., Phys

Serguei Ossokineet al., “Multipolar Effective-One-Body Wave- forms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Construction and Val- idation,” Phys. Rev. D102, 044055 (2020), arXiv:2004.09442 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[80]

Ramos-Buades, A

Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, Héctor Estel- lés, Mohammed Khalil, Deyan P. Mihaylov, Serguei Ossokine, Lorenzo Pompili, and Mahlet Shiferaw, “SEOBNRv5PHM: Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing- spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes,” (2023), arXiv:2303.18046 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.