pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17868 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational waveseccentric binariesnumerical relativitysurrogate modelshigher-order modeswaveform modelingbinary black holes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Universal eccentric modulation functions from the quadrupolar mode turn multi-modal quasi-circular waveforms into eccentric ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the gwNRHME framework, which converts any multi-modal quasi-circular gravitational waveform into an eccentric version once the eccentric quadrupolar mode is available. It achieves this by applying universal modulation functions extracted from the quadrupolar mode to adjust the amplitude and phase of all included modes. The authors combine the NRHybSur3dq8 quasi-circular surrogate with the NRSurE_q4NoSpin_22 eccentric quadrupolar surrogate to build a nine-mode non-spinning eccentric model. This model reproduces 156 eccentric numerical relativity waveforms with median frequency-domain mismatches of roughly 9 times 10 to the minus 5. The same framework also pairs the eccentric quadrupolar model with effective-one-body approaches to produce eccentric waveforms at comparable accuracy.

Core claim

The central claim is that eccentricity modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar (2,2) mode are universal and can be applied directly to higher-order modes, so that any multi-modal quasi-circular waveform model can be transformed into its eccentric counterpart without new numerical relativity simulations for each mode.

What carries the argument

The universal eccentric modulation functions, which are computed from the quadrupolar mode and then multiply the amplitude and phase of higher spherical harmonic modes to imprint eccentricity effects.

If this is right

  • Existing quasi-circular multi-mode surrogates can be reused to generate eccentric waveforms once only the quadrupolar eccentric surrogate is known.
  • The approach produces both a surrogate and an analytical model for eccentricity evolution up to 2M before merger.
  • The same modulation method works when the eccentric quadrupolar input comes from effective-one-body models instead of numerical relativity.
  • The resulting models achieve median mismatches below 10 to the minus 3 against numerical relativity across the tested parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This modularity could lower the cost of building waveform catalogs that include eccentricity for current and future gravitational-wave detectors.
  • If the universality extends to spinning binaries, the framework would allow rapid construction of spinning eccentric models from existing quasi-circular spinning surrogates.
  • The provided eccentricity evolution models could be used to map observed signals back to initial eccentricity at large separation.
  • The public release of the framework invites direct tests on new eccentric numerical relativity data sets to check the range of validity.

Load-bearing premise

The modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar mode remain accurate when applied without adjustment to higher-order modes.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that mismatches for the higher modes exceed 10 to the minus 3 when the constructed model is tested against full eccentric numerical relativity waveforms that independently resolve those modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17868 by Abhishek Ravishankar, Adhrit Ravichandran, Andrea Ceja, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Daniel Tellez, Hannes R. Ruter, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Katie Rink, Lawrence E. Kidder, Mark A. Scheel, Marlo Morales, Md Arif Shaikh, Noora Ghadiri, Peter James Nee, Prayush Kumar, Scott E. Field, Tousif Islam, Vijay Varma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We show the eccentric modulation in the amplitudes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We show the distribution of waveform starting times ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Upper panel:) We show the evolution of the ec￾centricity, eξ (t) (defined in Eq.(10)), estimated for the NR sim￾ulations used in this work by applying the framework intro￾duced in Ref. [89] and implemented in the gwModels package (https://github.com/tousifislam/gwModels). (Lower panel:) We scale the eccentricity by its initial value and observe that the eccentricity evolution exhibits a degree of universa… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: We show the correlation between the relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: We show the frequency-domain mismatches between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: We show the median frequency-domain mismatches between surrogate predictions and NR data, computed using the Advanced LIGO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: We show median Advanced LIGO mismatches between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Median Advanced LIGO mismatches between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: We show the eccentric spherical harmonic modes obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: We show the eccentric spherical harmonic modes obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: We show the amplitude of a representative odd- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: We show that the relative peak times of two representative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (Upper panel:) We show the NR eccentricity evolution eξ (t) (solid grey lines; computed using the gwModels package, avail￾able at https://github.com/tousifislam/gwModels) for three representa￾tive simulations, alongside the corresponding validation predictions from the surrogate gwEccEvolve_NoSpinq4_Sur (dashed maroon lines) and analytical gwEccEvv2 (dotted black lines) models. (Lower panel:) Percentage e… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: We show frequency-domain Advanced LIGO mismatches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: We show median Advanced LIGO mismatches between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

\texttt{gwNRHME} is a framework that converts multi-modal (i.e., containing several spherical harmonic modes) quasi-circular waveforms into their eccentric counterparts, provided the quadrupolar eccentric mode is known, by exploiting universal eccentric modulation functions. Leveraging this framework, we combine the quasi-circular NR surrogate model \texttt{NRHybSur3dq8} with the quadrupolar, non-spinning, eccentric surrogate \texttt{NRSurE\_q4NoSpin\_22} to construct a multi-modal, non-spinning, eccentric model, denoted as \model{}, which includes nine modes: $(2,\{1,2\})$, $(3,\{1,2,3\})$, $(4,\{2,3,4\})$, and $(5,5)$. When compared against 156 eccentric SXS NR waveforms, \model{} achieves median frequency-domain mismatches (computed using the Advanced LIGO design sensitivity) of $\sim 9\times 10^{-5}$, with a standard deviation of $\sim 2 \times 10^{-4}$. To demonstrate the modularity of the framework, we further combine \texttt{NRSurE\_q4NoSpin\_22} with effective-one-body (EOB) models \texttt{SEOBNRv5HM} and \texttt{TEOBResumS-Dali} in their non-spinning limits, yielding eccentric waveforms with median mismatches of $\sim 2\times10^{-4}$ and $\sim 10^{-3}$, respectively, with standard deviation of $\sim 2 \times 10^{-3}$ and $\sim 2 \times 10^{-2}$ respectively. Finally, we provide both a surrogate model, \texttt{gwEccEvolve\_q4NoSpin\_Sur}, and an analytical model, \texttt{gwEccEvNSv2}, for the eccentricity evolution up to $2M$ before merger, based on eccentricity definitions derived from the universal modulation functions. The \texttt{gwNRHME} framework is publicly available through the \texttt{gwModels} package, and the resulting waveform models will be released via the \texttt{gwsurrogate} package.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the gwNRHME framework that converts multi-modal quasi-circular gravitational-wave surrogates into eccentric counterparts by applying universal eccentric modulation functions extracted from the quadrupolar mode. It combines NRHybSur3dq8 with NRSurE_q4NoSpin_22 to produce a nine-mode eccentric surrogate (modes (2,1-2), (3,1-3), (4,2-4), (5,5)) that achieves median frequency-domain mismatches of ~9e-5 against 156 eccentric SXS NR waveforms; the same framework is applied to SEOBNRv5HM and TEOBResumS-Dali, and auxiliary models for eccentricity evolution are supplied.

Significance. If the universality assumption holds, the modular construction supplies an efficient route to eccentric waveforms that include higher-order modes without constructing entirely new multi-mode eccentric surrogates. The reported mismatch levels, the explicit demonstration of modularity with both NR and EOB bases, and the public release of the code and models constitute clear strengths for gravitational-wave data-analysis applications.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and validation results: the central claim that the modulation functions derived from the (2,2) quadrupolar surrogate can be applied accurately to the eight higher-order modes rests on aggregate full-waveform frequency-domain mismatches (~9e-5 median) computed with the Advanced LIGO PSD. Because the (2,2) mode dominates the inner product, this metric does not directly test the fidelity of the modulated (3,3), (4,4) or (5,5) amplitudes and phases. Per-mode mismatch tables or direct residual comparisons for the subdominant modes are required to substantiate the universality assumption.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [—] Abstract and validation results: the central claim that the modulation functions derived from the (2,2) quadrupolar surrogate can be applied accurately to the eight higher-order modes rests on aggregate full-waveform frequency-domain mismatches (~9e-5 median) computed with the Advanced LIGO PSD. Because the (2,2) mode dominates the inner product, this metric does not directly test the fidelity of the modulated (3,3), (4,4) or (5,5) amplitudes and phases. Per-mode mismatch tables or direct residual comparisons for the subdominant modes are required to substantiate the universality assumption.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the full-waveform mismatch metric is dominated by the (2,2) mode and therefore provides only indirect evidence for the accuracy of the modulated higher-order modes. To directly substantiate the universality assumption, we will add per-mode mismatch tables (computed in the frequency domain with the Advanced LIGO PSD) for all nine modes against the 156 NR waveforms, together with representative residual plots of amplitude and phase for the subdominant modes ((3,3), (4,4), (5,5), etc.). These additions will be included in the revised manuscript and will allow readers to evaluate the fidelity of the modulation functions mode by mode. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modular combination of independent surrogates with empirical universality assumption

full rationale

The derivation chain extracts eccentric modulation functions from the existing quadrupolar surrogate NRSurE_q4NoSpin_22 and applies them to higher modes taken from the independent quasi-circular surrogate NRHybSur3dq8. The resulting multi-modal model is validated directly against 156 external SXS NR waveforms via frequency-domain mismatch; the headline metric is not a fitted quantity or a self-referential prediction. The additional eccentricity-evolution models are downstream outputs based on the same modulation functions rather than inputs that define the main result. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central claim, no uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no step reduces the final waveform or mismatch to an input by construction. The framework is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that eccentric modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar mode are universal across higher-order modes and that the base surrogate models remain accurate when modulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Eccentric modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar mode are universal and applicable to higher-order modes
    This universality is the core premise of the gwNRHME framework as stated in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • universal eccentric modulation functions no independent evidence
    purpose: To convert quasi-circular multi-modal waveforms into eccentric counterparts
    These functions are exploited by the framework and derived from the quadrupolar eccentric surrogate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1471 out tokens · 57621 ms · 2026-05-10T04:35:49.339403+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors,

    Gregory M. Harry (LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav.27, 084006 (2010)

  2. [2]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), “Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

  4. [4]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), “Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history,” PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

  5. [5]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

  6. [6]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run,

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), “GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observ- ing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Cata- log with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and Gen- eral Tests,” (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    Romero-Shaw, P

    Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky, Eric Thrane, and Juan Calderon Bustillo, “GW190521: orbital eccentricity and signatures of dynamical formation in a binary black hole merger signal,” Astrophys. J. Lett.903, L5 (2020), arXiv:2009.04771 [astro-ph.HE]

  12. [12]

    2020, NatAs, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2009.05461 Gond´an, L., & Kocsis, B

    V . Gayathri, J. Healy, J. Lange, B. O’Brien, M. Szczepanczyk, Imre Bartos, M. Campanelli, S. Klimenko, C. O. Lousto, and R. O’Shaughnessy, “Eccentricity estimate for black hole merg- ers with numerical relativity simulations,” Nature Astron.6, 344–349 (2022), arXiv:2009.05461 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    Gamba, M

    Rossella Gamba, Matteo Breschi, Gregorio Carullo, Simone Albanesi, Piero Rettegno, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Alessan- dro Nagar, “GW190521 as a dynamical capture of two nonspinning black holes,” Nature Astron.7, 11–17 (2023), arXiv:2106.05575 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, and Jonathan Gair, “Bayesian inference of binary black holes with inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms using two eccentric parameters,” Phys. Rev. D108, 124063 (2023), arXiv:2309.15528 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA

    Nihar Gupteet al., “Evidence for eccentricity in the popula- tion of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA,” (2024), arXiv:2404.14286 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    Morras, G

    Gonzalo Morras, Geraint Pratten, and Patricia Schmidt, “Or- bital eccentricity in a neutron star - black hole binary,” (2025), arXiv:2503.15393 [astro-ph.HE]

  17. [17]

    Romero-Shaw, J

    Isobel Romero-Shaw, Jakob Stegmann, Hiromichi Tagawa, Davide Gerosa, Johan Samsing, Nihar Gupte, and Stephen R. Green, “Gw200208_222617 as an eccentric black-hole binary merger: properties and astrophysical implications,” (2025), arXiv:2506.17105 [astro-ph.HE]

  18. [18]

    Reanalysis of binary black hole gravitational wave events for orbital eccentricity signatures,

    Maria de Lluc Planas, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Cecilio García- Quirós, Héctor Estellés, Sascha Husa, and Maria Haney, “Ec- centric or circular? A reanalysis of binary black hole gravita- tional wave events for orbital eccentricity signatures,” (2025), arXiv:2504.15833 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Tiwari, S

    Avinash Tiwari, Sajad A. Bhat, MD Arif Shaikh, and Shashvath J. Kapaida, “Testing the nature of GW200105 by probing the frequency evolution of eccentricity,” (2025), 17 arXiv:2509.26152 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [20]

    Kacanja, K

    Keisi Kacanja, Kanchan Soni, and Alexander Harvey Nitz, “Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s BNS and NSBH binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.00179 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Jan, B.-J

    Aasim Jan, Bing-Jyun Tsao, Richard O’Shaughnessy, Deirdre Shoemaker, and Pablo Laguna, “GW200105: A detailed study of eccentricity in the neutron star-black hole binary,” (2025), arXiv:2508.12460 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search

    Khun Sang Phukon, Patricia Schmidt, Gonzalo Morras, and Geraint Pratten, “Detection of GW200105 with a targeted ec- centric search,” (2025), arXiv:2512.10803 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Parameter Estimation with Targeted Eccentric Numerical-Relativity Simulations for GW200208_22 and GW190620

    Patricia McMillin, Katelyn J. Wagner, Giuseppe Ficarra, Car- los O. Lousto, and Richard O’Shaughnessy, “Parameter Esti- mation for GW200208_22 with Targeted Eccentric Numerical- relativity Simulations,” (2025), arXiv:2507.22862 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Highly-Eccentric, Highly-Spinning, and Repeated Binary Black Hole Mergers

    Carl L. Rodriguez, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Sourav Chatterjee, and Frederic A. Rasio, “Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Highly-Eccentric, Highly-Spinning, and Repeated Binary Black Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 151101 (2018), arXiv:1712.04937 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Formation, Masses, and Merger Rates of Highly-Eccentric Black Hole Binaries

    Carl L. Rodriguez, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Sourav Chatterjee, Kyle Kremer, Frederic A. Rasio, Johan Samsing, Claire S. Ye, and Michael Zevin, “Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Formation, Masses, and Merger Rates of Highly- Eccentric Black Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. D98, 123005 (2018), arXiv:1811.04926 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters

    Johan Samsing, “Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters,” Phys. Rev. D97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

  27. [27]

    Eccentric Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters: The Role of Binary-Binary Encounters

    Michael Zevin, Johan Samsing, Carl Rodriguez, Carl-Johan Haster, and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, “Eccentric Black Hole Merg- ers in Dense Star Clusters: The Role of Binary–Binary Encoun- ters,” Astrophys. J.871, 91 (2019), arXiv:1810.00901 [astro- ph.HE]

  28. [28]

    Zevin, I

    Michael Zevin, Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Kyle Kremer, Eric Thrane, and Paul D. Lasky, “Implications of Eccentric Obser- vations on Binary Black Hole Formation Channels,” Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L43 (2021), arXiv:2106.09042 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [29]

    AGN as potential factories for eccentric black hole mergers,

    J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, N. W. C. Leigh, B. Liu, M. E. Pessah, and H. Tagawa, “AGN as potential factories for eccentric black hole mergers,” Nature 603, 237–240 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro-ph.HE]

  30. [30]

    The SXS collaboration’s third catalog of binary black hole simulations,

    Mark A. Scheelet al., “The SXS Collaboration’s third catalog of binary black hole simulations,” (2025), arXiv:2505.13378 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    Measuring orbital eccentricity and perias- tron advance in quasi-circular black hole simulations,

    Abdul H. Mroue, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Saul A. Teukolsky, “Measuring orbital eccentricity and perias- tron advance in quasi-circular black hole simulations,” Phys. Rev. D82, 124016 (2010), arXiv:1004.4697 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Post-Newtonian Quasicircular Initial Or- bits for Numerical Relativity,

    James Healy, Carlos O. Lousto, Hiroyuki Nakano, and Yosef Zlochower, “Post-Newtonian Quasicircular Initial Or- bits for Numerical Relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, 145011 (2017), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 40, 249502 (2023)], arXiv:1702.00872 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries

    Alessandra Buonanno, Gregory B. Cook, and Frans Pretorius, “Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole bina- ries,” Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122

  34. [34]

    Reducing eccentricity in black-hole binary evolutions with initial parameters from post-Newtonian inspiral,

    Sascha Husa, Mark Hannam, Jose A. Gonzalez, Ulrich Sper- hake, and Bernd Bruegmann, “Reducing eccentricity in black-hole binary evolutions with initial parameters from post-Newtonian inspiral,” Phys. Rev. D77, 044037 (2008), arXiv:0706.0904 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Simple procedures to reduce eccentricity of binary black hole simulations,

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Sascha Husa, and Geraint Prat- ten, “Simple procedures to reduce eccentricity of binary black hole simulations,” Phys. Rev. D99, 023003 (2019), arXiv:1810.00036 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Ramos-Buades, S

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Sascha Husa, Geraint Pratten, Héctor Estellés, Cecilio García-Quirós, Maite Mateu-Lucena, Marta Colleoni, and Rafel Jaume, “First survey of spinning eccen- tric black hole mergers: Numerical relativity simulations, hy- brid waveforms, and parameter estimation,” Phys. Rev. D101, 083015 (2020), arXiv:1909.11011 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    An Ef- ficient iterative method to reduce eccentricity in numerical- relativity simulations of compact binary inspiral,

    Michael Purrer, Sascha Husa, and Mark Hannam, “An Ef- ficient iterative method to reduce eccentricity in numerical- relativity simulations of compact binary inspiral,” Phys. Rev. D85, 124051 (2012), arXiv:1203.4258 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Bonino, P

    Alice Bonino, Patricia Schmidt, and Geraint Pratten, “Map- ping eccentricity evolutions between numerical relativity and effective-one-body gravitational waveforms,” (2024), arXiv:2404.18875 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Ramos-Buades, M

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Maarten van de Meent, Harald P. Pfeif- fer, Hannes R. Rüter, Mark A. Scheel, Michael Boyle, and Lawrence E. Kidder, “Eccentric binary black holes: Comparing numerical relativity and small mass-ratio perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D106, 124040 (2022), arXiv:2209.03390 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Impact of eccentricity and mean anomaly in numerical relativity mergers,

    Peter James Neeet al., “Impact of eccentricity and mean anomaly in numerical relativity mergers,” (2025), arXiv:2503.05422 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Fourth RIT binary black hole simulations catalog: Extension to eccentric orbits,

    James Healy and Carlos O. Lousto, “Fourth RIT binary black hole simulations catalog: Extension to eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D105, 124010 (2022), arXiv:2202.00018 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    Luc Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr- qc]

  43. [43]

    Ready-to-use Fourier domain templates for compact binaries inspiraling along moderately eccentric orbits

    Srishti Tiwari, Gopakumar Achamveedu, Maria Haney, and Phurailatapam Hemantakumar, “Ready-to-use Fourier do- main templates for compact binaries inspiraling along mod- erately eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D99, 124008 (2019), arXiv:1905.07956 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Accurate and efficient waveforms for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,

    E. A. Huerta, Prayush Kumar, Sean T. McWilliams, Richard O’Shaughnessy, and Nicolás Yunes, “Accurate and efficient waveforms for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D90, 084016 (2014), arXiv:1408.3406 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity in- spiralling compact binaries to 3PN order,

    Blake Moore, Marc Favata, K. G. Arun, and Chandra Kant Mishra, “Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity in- spiralling compact binaries to 3PN order,” Phys. Rev. D93, 124061 (2016), arXiv:1605.00304 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Phasing of gravitat ional waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries

    Thibault Damour, Achamveedu Gopakumar, and Bala R. Iyer, “Phasing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric bi- naries,” Phys. Rev. D70, 064028 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404128

  47. [47]

    Phas- ing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian order,

    Christian Konigsdorffer and Achamveedu Gopakumar, “Phas- ing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D73, 124012 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0603056

  48. [48]

    Third post-Newtonian accurate general- ized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in eccentric orbits,

    Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Achamveedu Gopakumar, and Gerhard Schaefer, “Third post-Newtonian accurate general- ized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0407049

  49. [49]

    Generalized quasi-Keplerian solution for eccentric, nonspinning compact binaries at 4PN order and the associated inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform,

    Gihyuk Cho, Sashwat Tanay, Achamveedu Gopakumar, and Hyung Mok Lee, “Generalized quasi-Keplerian solution for eccentric, nonspinning compact binaries at 4PN order and the associated inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 064010 (2022), arXiv:2110.09608 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Foundations of an effective-one-body model for coalescing binaries on eccentric orbits

    Tanja Hinderer and Stanislav Babak, “Foundations of an effective-one-body model for coalescing binaries on eccen- tric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D96, 104048 (2017), arXiv:1707.08426 [gr-qc]. 18

  51. [51]

    A waveform model for eccentric binary black hole based on effective-one-body-numerical-relativity (EOBNR) formalism

    Zhoujian Cao and Wen-Biao Han, “Waveform model for an eccentric binary black hole based on the effective-one-body- numerical-relativity formalism,” Phys. Rev. D96, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1708.00166 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    Chiaramello and A

    Danilo Chiaramello and Alessandro Nagar, “Faithful analytical effective-one-body waveform model for spin-aligned, moder- ately eccentric, coalescing black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 101501 (2020), arXiv:2001.11736 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Faithful effective- one-body waveform of small-mass-ratio coalescing black hole binaries: The eccentric, nonspinning case,

    Simone Albanesi, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Thibault Damour, Alessandro Nagar, and Andrea Placidi, “Faithful effective- one-body waveform of small-mass-ratio coalescing black hole binaries: The eccentric, nonspinning case,” Phys. Rev. D108, 084037 (2023), arXiv:2305.19336 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    New avenue for accurate analytical waveforms and fluxes for eccentric compact binaries,

    Simone Albanesi, Andrea Placidi, Alessandro Nagar, Marta Orselli, and Sebastiano Bernuzzi, “New avenue for accurate analytical waveforms and fluxes for eccentric compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D105, L121503 (2022), arXiv:2203.16286 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    Assessment of consistent next-to- quasicircular corrections and postadiabatic approximation in effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for binary black hole coalescences,

    Gunnar Riemenschneider, Piero Rettegno, Matteo Breschi, Angelica Albertini, Rossella Gamba, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Alessandro Nagar, “Assessment of consistent next-to- quasicircular corrections and postadiabatic approximation in effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D104, 104045 (2021), arXiv:2104.07533 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    Effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for eccentric binary black holes with nonprecessing spins,

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, Mohammed Khalil, and Serguei Ossokine, “Effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for eccentric binary black holes with nonprecessing spins,” Phys. Rev. D105, 044035 (2022), arXiv:2112.06952 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Effective- One-Body Numerical-Relativity waveform model for Eccen- tric spin-precessing binary black hole coalescence,

    Xiaolin Liu, Zhoujian Cao, and Zong-Hong Zhu, “Effective- One-Body Numerical-Relativity waveform model for Eccen- tric spin-precessing binary black hole coalescence,” (2023), arXiv:2310.04552 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    Complete waveform model for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,

    E. A. Huertaet al., “Complete waveform model for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D95, 024038 (2017), arXiv:1609.05933 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Eccentric, nonspinning, inspiral, Gaussian-process merger approximant for the detection and characterization of eccentric binary black hole mergers

    E. A. Huertaet al., “Eccentric, nonspinning, inspiral, Gaussian- process merger approximant for the detection and characteriza- tion of eccentric binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D97, 024031 (2018), arXiv:1711.06276 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Numerical relativity higher order gravitational wave- forms of eccentric, spinning, nonprecessing binary black hole mergers,

    Abhishek V . Joshi, Shawn G. Rosofsky, Roland Haas, and E. A. Huerta, “Numerical relativity higher order gravitational wave- forms of eccentric, spinning, nonprecessing binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D107, 064038 (2023), arXiv:2210.01852 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Phenomenolog- ical relationship between eccentric and quasicircular orbital binary black hole waveform,

    Hao Wang, Yuan-Chuan Zou, and Yu Liu, “Phenomenolog- ical relationship between eccentric and quasicircular orbital binary black hole waveform,” Phys. Rev. D107, 124061 (2023), arXiv:2302.11227 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Unveiling the Merger Structure of Black Hole Binaries in Generic Planar Orbits,

    Gregorio Carullo, Simone Albanesi, Alessandro Nagar, Rossella Gamba, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Tomas Andrade, and Juan Trenado, “Unveiling the Merger Structure of Black Hole Binaries in Generic Planar Orbits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 101401 (2024), arXiv:2309.07228 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    Ef- fective one-body multipolar waveform model for spin-aligned, quasicircular, eccentric, hyperbolic black hole binaries,

    Alessandro Nagar, Alice Bonino, and Piero Rettegno, “Ef- fective one-body multipolar waveform model for spin-aligned, quasicircular, eccentric, hyperbolic black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D103, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2101.08624 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Frequency and time domain inspiral templates for comparable mass compact binaries in eccentric orbits,

    Sashwat Tanay, Maria Haney, and Achamveedu Gopakumar, “Frequency and time domain inspiral templates for comparable mass compact binaries in eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D93, 064031 (2016), arXiv:1602.03081 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    Gamboaet al., Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned- spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model seobnrv5ehm, Phys

    Aldo Gamboaet al., “Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned-spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one- body model SEOBNRv5EHM,” (2024), arXiv:2412.12823 [gr-qc]

  66. [66]

    Morras,Modeling gravitational wave modes from binaries with arbitrary eccentricity(2025), 2507.00169, URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.00169

    Gonzalo Morras, “Modeling Gravitational Wave Modes from Binaries with Arbitrary Eccentricity,” (2025), arXiv:2507.00169 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    Morras, G

    Gonzalo Morras, Geraint Pratten, and Patricia Schmidt, “Improved post-Newtonian waveform model for inspiralling precessing-eccentric compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D111, 084052 (2025), arXiv:2502.03929 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    An eccentric binary black hole inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model from numerical relativity and post-Newtonian theory

    Ian Hinder, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Harald P. Pfeiffer, “Eccen- tric binary black hole inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model from numerical relativity and post-Newtonian theory,” Phys. Rev. D98, 044015 (2018), arXiv:1709.02007 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    de Lluc Planas, A

    Maria de Lluc Planas, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Cecilio García- Quirós, Héctor Estellés, Sascha Husa, and Maria Haney, “Time-domain phenomenological multipolar waveforms for aligned-spin binary black holes in elliptical orbits,” (2025), arXiv:2503.13062 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    Abhishek Chattaraj, Tamal RoyChowdhury, Divyajyoti, Chan- dra Kant Mishra, and Anshu Gupta, “High accuracy post- Newtonian and numerical relativity comparisons involving higher modes for eccentric binary black holes and a domi- nant mode eccentric inspiral-merger-ringdown model,” Phys. Rev. D106, 124008 (2022), arXiv:2204.02377 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Adding eccentricity to quasicircular binary-black-hole waveform models,

    Yoshinta Setyawati and Frank Ohme, “Adding eccentricity to quasicircular binary-black-hole waveform models,” Phys. Rev. D103, 124011 (2021), arXiv:2101.11033 [gr-qc]

  72. [72]

    ESIGMAHM: An Eccentric, Spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model with Higher Modes for the detection and characterization of binary black holes,

    Kaushik Paul, Akash Maurya, Quentin Henry, Kartikey Sharma, Pranav Satheesh, Divyajyoti, Prayush Kumar, and Chan- dra Kant Mishra, “ESIGMAHM: An Eccentric, Spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model with Higher Modes for the detection and characterization of binary black holes,” (2024), arXiv:2409.13866 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    An improved IMR model for BBHs on elliptical or- bits,

    Pratul Manna, Tamal RoyChowdhury, and Chandra Kant Mishra, “An improved IMR model for BBHs on elliptical or- bits,” (2024), arXiv:2409.10672 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    Maurya, P

    Akash Maurya, Prayush Kumar, Scott E. Field, Chandra Kant Mishra, Peter James Nee, Kaushik Paul, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Adhrit Ravichandran, and Vijay Varma, “Chase Orbits, not Time: A Scalable Paradigm for Long-Duration Eccentric Gravitational-Wave Surrogates,” (2025), arXiv:2510.00116 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Nagar, D

    Alessandro Nagar, Danilo Chiaramello, Rossella Gamba, Si- mone Albanesi, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Veronica Fantini, Mat- tia Panzeri, and Piero Rettegno, “Effective-one-body wave- form model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries. II. High accuracy by improving logarithmic terms in resummations,” Phys. Rev. D111, 064050 (2025), arXiv:2407...

  76. [76]

    Ramos-Buades, Q

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Quentin Henry, and Maria Haney, “Fast frequency-domain phenomenological model- ing of eccentric aligned-spin binary black holes,” (2026), arXiv:2601.03340 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    Gonzalo Morras, Geraint Pratten, Patricia Schmidt, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects,” (2026), arXiv:2604.11903 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Revisiting the Coprecess- ing Frame in the Presence of Orbital Eccentricity,

    Lucy M. Thomas, Katerina Chatziioannou, Sam Johar, Tay- lor Knapp, and Michael Boyle, “Revisiting the Coprecess- ing Frame in the Presence of Orbital Eccentricity,” (2026), arXiv:2603.29307 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    Identifying Eccentricity in Binary Black Hole mergers using 19 a Harmonic Decomposition of the Gravitational Waveform,

    Ben G. Patterson, Sharon Mary Tomson, and Stephen Fairhurst, “Identifying Eccentricity in Binary Black Hole mergers using 19 a Harmonic Decomposition of the Gravitational Waveform,” (2024), arXiv:2411.04187 [gr-qc]

  80. [80]

    Data-driven extraction, phenomenology and modeling of eccentric har- monics in binary black hole merger waveforms,

    Tousif Islam, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Ajit Kumar Mehta, Isha Anantpurkar, Digvijay Wadekar, Javier Roulet, Jonathan Mushkin, Barak Zackay, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Data-driven extraction, phenomenology and modeling of eccentric har- monics in binary black hole merger waveforms,” (2025), arXiv:2504.12469 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.