Recognition: unknown
Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:35 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Universal eccentric modulation functions from the quadrupolar mode turn multi-modal quasi-circular waveforms into eccentric ones.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The central claim is that eccentricity modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar (2,2) mode are universal and can be applied directly to higher-order modes, so that any multi-modal quasi-circular waveform model can be transformed into its eccentric counterpart without new numerical relativity simulations for each mode.
What carries the argument
The universal eccentric modulation functions, which are computed from the quadrupolar mode and then multiply the amplitude and phase of higher spherical harmonic modes to imprint eccentricity effects.
If this is right
- Existing quasi-circular multi-mode surrogates can be reused to generate eccentric waveforms once only the quadrupolar eccentric surrogate is known.
- The approach produces both a surrogate and an analytical model for eccentricity evolution up to 2M before merger.
- The same modulation method works when the eccentric quadrupolar input comes from effective-one-body models instead of numerical relativity.
- The resulting models achieve median mismatches below 10 to the minus 3 against numerical relativity across the tested parameter space.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- This modularity could lower the cost of building waveform catalogs that include eccentricity for current and future gravitational-wave detectors.
- If the universality extends to spinning binaries, the framework would allow rapid construction of spinning eccentric models from existing quasi-circular spinning surrogates.
- The provided eccentricity evolution models could be used to map observed signals back to initial eccentricity at large separation.
- The public release of the framework invites direct tests on new eccentric numerical relativity data sets to check the range of validity.
Load-bearing premise
The modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar mode remain accurate when applied without adjustment to higher-order modes.
What would settle it
A direct comparison showing that mismatches for the higher modes exceed 10 to the minus 3 when the constructed model is tested against full eccentric numerical relativity waveforms that independently resolve those modes.
Figures
read the original abstract
\texttt{gwNRHME} is a framework that converts multi-modal (i.e., containing several spherical harmonic modes) quasi-circular waveforms into their eccentric counterparts, provided the quadrupolar eccentric mode is known, by exploiting universal eccentric modulation functions. Leveraging this framework, we combine the quasi-circular NR surrogate model \texttt{NRHybSur3dq8} with the quadrupolar, non-spinning, eccentric surrogate \texttt{NRSurE\_q4NoSpin\_22} to construct a multi-modal, non-spinning, eccentric model, denoted as \model{}, which includes nine modes: $(2,\{1,2\})$, $(3,\{1,2,3\})$, $(4,\{2,3,4\})$, and $(5,5)$. When compared against 156 eccentric SXS NR waveforms, \model{} achieves median frequency-domain mismatches (computed using the Advanced LIGO design sensitivity) of $\sim 9\times 10^{-5}$, with a standard deviation of $\sim 2 \times 10^{-4}$. To demonstrate the modularity of the framework, we further combine \texttt{NRSurE\_q4NoSpin\_22} with effective-one-body (EOB) models \texttt{SEOBNRv5HM} and \texttt{TEOBResumS-Dali} in their non-spinning limits, yielding eccentric waveforms with median mismatches of $\sim 2\times10^{-4}$ and $\sim 10^{-3}$, respectively, with standard deviation of $\sim 2 \times 10^{-3}$ and $\sim 2 \times 10^{-2}$ respectively. Finally, we provide both a surrogate model, \texttt{gwEccEvolve\_q4NoSpin\_Sur}, and an analytical model, \texttt{gwEccEvNSv2}, for the eccentricity evolution up to $2M$ before merger, based on eccentricity definitions derived from the universal modulation functions. The \texttt{gwNRHME} framework is publicly available through the \texttt{gwModels} package, and the resulting waveform models will be released via the \texttt{gwsurrogate} package.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript introduces the gwNRHME framework that converts multi-modal quasi-circular gravitational-wave surrogates into eccentric counterparts by applying universal eccentric modulation functions extracted from the quadrupolar mode. It combines NRHybSur3dq8 with NRSurE_q4NoSpin_22 to produce a nine-mode eccentric surrogate (modes (2,1-2), (3,1-3), (4,2-4), (5,5)) that achieves median frequency-domain mismatches of ~9e-5 against 156 eccentric SXS NR waveforms; the same framework is applied to SEOBNRv5HM and TEOBResumS-Dali, and auxiliary models for eccentricity evolution are supplied.
Significance. If the universality assumption holds, the modular construction supplies an efficient route to eccentric waveforms that include higher-order modes without constructing entirely new multi-mode eccentric surrogates. The reported mismatch levels, the explicit demonstration of modularity with both NR and EOB bases, and the public release of the code and models constitute clear strengths for gravitational-wave data-analysis applications.
major comments (1)
- Abstract and validation results: the central claim that the modulation functions derived from the (2,2) quadrupolar surrogate can be applied accurately to the eight higher-order modes rests on aggregate full-waveform frequency-domain mismatches (~9e-5 median) computed with the Advanced LIGO PSD. Because the (2,2) mode dominates the inner product, this metric does not directly test the fidelity of the modulated (3,3), (4,4) or (5,5) amplitudes and phases. Per-mode mismatch tables or direct residual comparisons for the subdominant modes are required to substantiate the universality assumption.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [—] Abstract and validation results: the central claim that the modulation functions derived from the (2,2) quadrupolar surrogate can be applied accurately to the eight higher-order modes rests on aggregate full-waveform frequency-domain mismatches (~9e-5 median) computed with the Advanced LIGO PSD. Because the (2,2) mode dominates the inner product, this metric does not directly test the fidelity of the modulated (3,3), (4,4) or (5,5) amplitudes and phases. Per-mode mismatch tables or direct residual comparisons for the subdominant modes are required to substantiate the universality assumption.
Authors: We agree with the referee that the full-waveform mismatch metric is dominated by the (2,2) mode and therefore provides only indirect evidence for the accuracy of the modulated higher-order modes. To directly substantiate the universality assumption, we will add per-mode mismatch tables (computed in the frequency domain with the Advanced LIGO PSD) for all nine modes against the 156 NR waveforms, together with representative residual plots of amplitude and phase for the subdominant modes ((3,3), (4,4), (5,5), etc.). These additions will be included in the revised manuscript and will allow readers to evaluate the fidelity of the modulation functions mode by mode. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; modular combination of independent surrogates with empirical universality assumption
full rationale
The derivation chain extracts eccentric modulation functions from the existing quadrupolar surrogate NRSurE_q4NoSpin_22 and applies them to higher modes taken from the independent quasi-circular surrogate NRHybSur3dq8. The resulting multi-modal model is validated directly against 156 external SXS NR waveforms via frequency-domain mismatch; the headline metric is not a fitted quantity or a self-referential prediction. The additional eccentricity-evolution models are downstream outputs based on the same modulation functions rather than inputs that define the main result. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central claim, no uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no step reduces the final waveform or mismatch to an input by construction. The framework is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Eccentric modulation functions derived from the quadrupolar mode are universal and applicable to higher-order modes
invented entities (1)
-
universal eccentric modulation functions
no independent evidence
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors,
Gregory M. Harry (LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav.27, 084006 (2010)
2010
-
[2]
J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
-
[3]
Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector
F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), “Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
-
[4]
T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), “Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history,” PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]
-
[5]
B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
-
[6]
R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
-
[7]
R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), “GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observ- ing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]
-
[8]
R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
-
[9]
A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Cata- log with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
-
[10]
GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests,
A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and Gen- eral Tests,” (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]
-
[11]
Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky, Eric Thrane, and Juan Calderon Bustillo, “GW190521: orbital eccentricity and signatures of dynamical formation in a binary black hole merger signal,” Astrophys. J. Lett.903, L5 (2020), arXiv:2009.04771 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[12]
2020, NatAs, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2009.05461 Gond´an, L., & Kocsis, B
V . Gayathri, J. Healy, J. Lange, B. O’Brien, M. Szczepanczyk, Imre Bartos, M. Campanelli, S. Klimenko, C. O. Lousto, and R. O’Shaughnessy, “Eccentricity estimate for black hole merg- ers with numerical relativity simulations,” Nature Astron.6, 344–349 (2022), arXiv:2009.05461 [astro-ph.HE]
- [13]
-
[14]
Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, and Jonathan Gair, “Bayesian inference of binary black holes with inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms using two eccentric parameters,” Phys. Rev. D108, 124063 (2023), arXiv:2309.15528 [gr-qc]
-
[15]
Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA
Nihar Gupteet al., “Evidence for eccentricity in the popula- tion of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA,” (2024), arXiv:2404.14286 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
- [16]
-
[17]
Isobel Romero-Shaw, Jakob Stegmann, Hiromichi Tagawa, Davide Gerosa, Johan Samsing, Nihar Gupte, and Stephen R. Green, “Gw200208_222617 as an eccentric black-hole binary merger: properties and astrophysical implications,” (2025), arXiv:2506.17105 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[18]
Reanalysis of binary black hole gravitational wave events for orbital eccentricity signatures,
Maria de Lluc Planas, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Cecilio García- Quirós, Héctor Estellés, Sascha Husa, and Maria Haney, “Ec- centric or circular? A reanalysis of binary black hole gravita- tional wave events for orbital eccentricity signatures,” (2025), arXiv:2504.15833 [gr-qc]
- [19]
-
[20]
Keisi Kacanja, Kanchan Soni, and Alexander Harvey Nitz, “Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s BNS and NSBH binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.00179 [gr-qc]
- [21]
-
[22]
Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search
Khun Sang Phukon, Patricia Schmidt, Gonzalo Morras, and Geraint Pratten, “Detection of GW200105 with a targeted ec- centric search,” (2025), arXiv:2512.10803 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[23]
Patricia McMillin, Katelyn J. Wagner, Giuseppe Ficarra, Car- los O. Lousto, and Richard O’Shaughnessy, “Parameter Esti- mation for GW200208_22 with Targeted Eccentric Numerical- relativity Simulations,” (2025), arXiv:2507.22862 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[24]
Carl L. Rodriguez, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Sourav Chatterjee, and Frederic A. Rasio, “Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Highly-Eccentric, Highly-Spinning, and Repeated Binary Black Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 151101 (2018), arXiv:1712.04937 [astro-ph.HE]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[25]
Carl L. Rodriguez, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Sourav Chatterjee, Kyle Kremer, Frederic A. Rasio, Johan Samsing, Claire S. Ye, and Michael Zevin, “Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Formation, Masses, and Merger Rates of Highly- Eccentric Black Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. D98, 123005 (2018), arXiv:1811.04926 [astro-ph.HE]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[26]
Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters
Johan Samsing, “Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters,” Phys. Rev. D97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[27]
Eccentric Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters: The Role of Binary-Binary Encounters
Michael Zevin, Johan Samsing, Carl Rodriguez, Carl-Johan Haster, and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, “Eccentric Black Hole Merg- ers in Dense Star Clusters: The Role of Binary–Binary Encoun- ters,” Astrophys. J.871, 91 (2019), arXiv:1810.00901 [astro- ph.HE]
work page Pith review arXiv 2019
- [28]
-
[29]
AGN as potential factories for eccentric black hole mergers,
J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, N. W. C. Leigh, B. Liu, M. E. Pessah, and H. Tagawa, “AGN as potential factories for eccentric black hole mergers,” Nature 603, 237–240 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[30]
The SXS collaboration’s third catalog of binary black hole simulations,
Mark A. Scheelet al., “The SXS Collaboration’s third catalog of binary black hole simulations,” (2025), arXiv:2505.13378 [gr-qc]
-
[31]
Measuring orbital eccentricity and perias- tron advance in quasi-circular black hole simulations,
Abdul H. Mroue, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Saul A. Teukolsky, “Measuring orbital eccentricity and perias- tron advance in quasi-circular black hole simulations,” Phys. Rev. D82, 124016 (2010), arXiv:1004.4697 [gr-qc]
-
[32]
Post-Newtonian Quasicircular Initial Or- bits for Numerical Relativity,
James Healy, Carlos O. Lousto, Hiroyuki Nakano, and Yosef Zlochower, “Post-Newtonian Quasicircular Initial Or- bits for Numerical Relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, 145011 (2017), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 40, 249502 (2023)], arXiv:1702.00872 [gr-qc]
-
[33]
Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries
Alessandra Buonanno, Gregory B. Cook, and Frans Pretorius, “Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole bina- ries,” Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122
work page Pith review arXiv 2007
-
[34]
Sascha Husa, Mark Hannam, Jose A. Gonzalez, Ulrich Sper- hake, and Bernd Bruegmann, “Reducing eccentricity in black-hole binary evolutions with initial parameters from post-Newtonian inspiral,” Phys. Rev. D77, 044037 (2008), arXiv:0706.0904 [gr-qc]
-
[35]
Simple procedures to reduce eccentricity of binary black hole simulations,
Antoni Ramos-Buades, Sascha Husa, and Geraint Prat- ten, “Simple procedures to reduce eccentricity of binary black hole simulations,” Phys. Rev. D99, 023003 (2019), arXiv:1810.00036 [gr-qc]
-
[36]
Antoni Ramos-Buades, Sascha Husa, Geraint Pratten, Héctor Estellés, Cecilio García-Quirós, Maite Mateu-Lucena, Marta Colleoni, and Rafel Jaume, “First survey of spinning eccen- tric black hole mergers: Numerical relativity simulations, hy- brid waveforms, and parameter estimation,” Phys. Rev. D101, 083015 (2020), arXiv:1909.11011 [gr-qc]
-
[37]
Michael Purrer, Sascha Husa, and Mark Hannam, “An Ef- ficient iterative method to reduce eccentricity in numerical- relativity simulations of compact binary inspiral,” Phys. Rev. D85, 124051 (2012), arXiv:1203.4258 [gr-qc]
- [38]
-
[39]
Antoni Ramos-Buades, Maarten van de Meent, Harald P. Pfeif- fer, Hannes R. Rüter, Mark A. Scheel, Michael Boyle, and Lawrence E. Kidder, “Eccentric binary black holes: Comparing numerical relativity and small mass-ratio perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D106, 124040 (2022), arXiv:2209.03390 [gr-qc]
-
[40]
Impact of eccentricity and mean anomaly in numerical relativity mergers,
Peter James Neeet al., “Impact of eccentricity and mean anomaly in numerical relativity mergers,” (2025), arXiv:2503.05422 [gr-qc]
-
[41]
Fourth RIT binary black hole simulations catalog: Extension to eccentric orbits,
James Healy and Carlos O. Lousto, “Fourth RIT binary black hole simulations catalog: Extension to eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D105, 124010 (2022), arXiv:2202.00018 [gr-qc]
-
[42]
Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves
Luc Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr- qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
-
[43]
Srishti Tiwari, Gopakumar Achamveedu, Maria Haney, and Phurailatapam Hemantakumar, “Ready-to-use Fourier do- main templates for compact binaries inspiraling along mod- erately eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D99, 124008 (2019), arXiv:1905.07956 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2019
-
[44]
Accurate and efficient waveforms for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,
E. A. Huerta, Prayush Kumar, Sean T. McWilliams, Richard O’Shaughnessy, and Nicolás Yunes, “Accurate and efficient waveforms for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D90, 084016 (2014), arXiv:1408.3406 [gr-qc]
-
[45]
Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity in- spiralling compact binaries to 3PN order,
Blake Moore, Marc Favata, K. G. Arun, and Chandra Kant Mishra, “Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity in- spiralling compact binaries to 3PN order,” Phys. Rev. D93, 124061 (2016), arXiv:1605.00304 [gr-qc]
-
[46]
Phasing of gravitat ional waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries
Thibault Damour, Achamveedu Gopakumar, and Bala R. Iyer, “Phasing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric bi- naries,” Phys. Rev. D70, 064028 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404128
-
[47]
Christian Konigsdorffer and Achamveedu Gopakumar, “Phas- ing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D73, 124012 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0603056
-
[48]
Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Achamveedu Gopakumar, and Gerhard Schaefer, “Third post-Newtonian accurate general- ized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0407049
-
[49]
Gihyuk Cho, Sashwat Tanay, Achamveedu Gopakumar, and Hyung Mok Lee, “Generalized quasi-Keplerian solution for eccentric, nonspinning compact binaries at 4PN order and the associated inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 064010 (2022), arXiv:2110.09608 [gr-qc]
-
[50]
Foundations of an effective-one-body model for coalescing binaries on eccentric orbits
Tanja Hinderer and Stanislav Babak, “Foundations of an effective-one-body model for coalescing binaries on eccen- tric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D96, 104048 (2017), arXiv:1707.08426 [gr-qc]. 18
work page Pith review arXiv 2017
-
[51]
Zhoujian Cao and Wen-Biao Han, “Waveform model for an eccentric binary black hole based on the effective-one-body- numerical-relativity formalism,” Phys. Rev. D96, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1708.00166 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2017
-
[52]
Danilo Chiaramello and Alessandro Nagar, “Faithful analytical effective-one-body waveform model for spin-aligned, moder- ately eccentric, coalescing black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 101501 (2020), arXiv:2001.11736 [gr-qc]
-
[53]
Simone Albanesi, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Thibault Damour, Alessandro Nagar, and Andrea Placidi, “Faithful effective- one-body waveform of small-mass-ratio coalescing black hole binaries: The eccentric, nonspinning case,” Phys. Rev. D108, 084037 (2023), arXiv:2305.19336 [gr-qc]
-
[54]
New avenue for accurate analytical waveforms and fluxes for eccentric compact binaries,
Simone Albanesi, Andrea Placidi, Alessandro Nagar, Marta Orselli, and Sebastiano Bernuzzi, “New avenue for accurate analytical waveforms and fluxes for eccentric compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D105, L121503 (2022), arXiv:2203.16286 [gr-qc]
-
[55]
Gunnar Riemenschneider, Piero Rettegno, Matteo Breschi, Angelica Albertini, Rossella Gamba, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Alessandro Nagar, “Assessment of consistent next-to- quasicircular corrections and postadiabatic approximation in effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D104, 104045 (2021), arXiv:2104.07533 [gr-qc]
-
[56]
Effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for eccentric binary black holes with nonprecessing spins,
Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, Mohammed Khalil, and Serguei Ossokine, “Effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for eccentric binary black holes with nonprecessing spins,” Phys. Rev. D105, 044035 (2022), arXiv:2112.06952 [gr-qc]
-
[57]
Xiaolin Liu, Zhoujian Cao, and Zong-Hong Zhu, “Effective- One-Body Numerical-Relativity waveform model for Eccen- tric spin-precessing binary black hole coalescence,” (2023), arXiv:2310.04552 [gr-qc]
-
[58]
Complete waveform model for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,
E. A. Huertaet al., “Complete waveform model for compact binaries on eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D95, 024038 (2017), arXiv:1609.05933 [gr-qc]
-
[59]
E. A. Huertaet al., “Eccentric, nonspinning, inspiral, Gaussian- process merger approximant for the detection and characteriza- tion of eccentric binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D97, 024031 (2018), arXiv:1711.06276 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[60]
Abhishek V . Joshi, Shawn G. Rosofsky, Roland Haas, and E. A. Huerta, “Numerical relativity higher order gravitational wave- forms of eccentric, spinning, nonprecessing binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D107, 064038 (2023), arXiv:2210.01852 [gr-qc]
-
[61]
Hao Wang, Yuan-Chuan Zou, and Yu Liu, “Phenomenolog- ical relationship between eccentric and quasicircular orbital binary black hole waveform,” Phys. Rev. D107, 124061 (2023), arXiv:2302.11227 [gr-qc]
-
[62]
Unveiling the Merger Structure of Black Hole Binaries in Generic Planar Orbits,
Gregorio Carullo, Simone Albanesi, Alessandro Nagar, Rossella Gamba, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Tomas Andrade, and Juan Trenado, “Unveiling the Merger Structure of Black Hole Binaries in Generic Planar Orbits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 101401 (2024), arXiv:2309.07228 [gr-qc]
-
[63]
Alessandro Nagar, Alice Bonino, and Piero Rettegno, “Ef- fective one-body multipolar waveform model for spin-aligned, quasicircular, eccentric, hyperbolic black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D103, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2101.08624 [gr-qc]
-
[64]
Sashwat Tanay, Maria Haney, and Achamveedu Gopakumar, “Frequency and time domain inspiral templates for comparable mass compact binaries in eccentric orbits,” Phys. Rev. D93, 064031 (2016), arXiv:1602.03081 [gr-qc]
-
[65]
Aldo Gamboaet al., “Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned-spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one- body model SEOBNRv5EHM,” (2024), arXiv:2412.12823 [gr-qc]
-
[66]
Gonzalo Morras, “Modeling Gravitational Wave Modes from Binaries with Arbitrary Eccentricity,” (2025), arXiv:2507.00169 [gr-qc]
- [67]
-
[68]
Ian Hinder, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Harald P. Pfeiffer, “Eccen- tric binary black hole inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model from numerical relativity and post-Newtonian theory,” Phys. Rev. D98, 044015 (2018), arXiv:1709.02007 [gr-qc]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[69]
Maria de Lluc Planas, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Cecilio García- Quirós, Héctor Estellés, Sascha Husa, and Maria Haney, “Time-domain phenomenological multipolar waveforms for aligned-spin binary black holes in elliptical orbits,” (2025), arXiv:2503.13062 [gr-qc]
-
[70]
Abhishek Chattaraj, Tamal RoyChowdhury, Divyajyoti, Chan- dra Kant Mishra, and Anshu Gupta, “High accuracy post- Newtonian and numerical relativity comparisons involving higher modes for eccentric binary black holes and a domi- nant mode eccentric inspiral-merger-ringdown model,” Phys. Rev. D106, 124008 (2022), arXiv:2204.02377 [gr-qc]
-
[71]
Adding eccentricity to quasicircular binary-black-hole waveform models,
Yoshinta Setyawati and Frank Ohme, “Adding eccentricity to quasicircular binary-black-hole waveform models,” Phys. Rev. D103, 124011 (2021), arXiv:2101.11033 [gr-qc]
-
[72]
Kaushik Paul, Akash Maurya, Quentin Henry, Kartikey Sharma, Pranav Satheesh, Divyajyoti, Prayush Kumar, and Chan- dra Kant Mishra, “ESIGMAHM: An Eccentric, Spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model with Higher Modes for the detection and characterization of binary black holes,” (2024), arXiv:2409.13866 [gr-qc]
-
[73]
An improved IMR model for BBHs on elliptical or- bits,
Pratul Manna, Tamal RoyChowdhury, and Chandra Kant Mishra, “An improved IMR model for BBHs on elliptical or- bits,” (2024), arXiv:2409.10672 [gr-qc]
-
[74]
Akash Maurya, Prayush Kumar, Scott E. Field, Chandra Kant Mishra, Peter James Nee, Kaushik Paul, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Adhrit Ravichandran, and Vijay Varma, “Chase Orbits, not Time: A Scalable Paradigm for Long-Duration Eccentric Gravitational-Wave Surrogates,” (2025), arXiv:2510.00116 [gr-qc]
-
[75]
Alessandro Nagar, Danilo Chiaramello, Rossella Gamba, Si- mone Albanesi, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Veronica Fantini, Mat- tia Panzeri, and Piero Rettegno, “Effective-one-body wave- form model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries. II. High accuracy by improving logarithmic terms in resummations,” Phys. Rev. D111, 064050 (2025), arXiv:2407...
-
[76]
Antoni Ramos-Buades, Quentin Henry, and Maria Haney, “Fast frequency-domain phenomenological model- ing of eccentric aligned-spin binary black holes,” (2026), arXiv:2601.03340 [gr-qc]
-
[77]
Gonzalo Morras, Geraint Pratten, Patricia Schmidt, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects,” (2026), arXiv:2604.11903 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[78]
Revisiting the Coprecess- ing Frame in the Presence of Orbital Eccentricity,
Lucy M. Thomas, Katerina Chatziioannou, Sam Johar, Tay- lor Knapp, and Michael Boyle, “Revisiting the Coprecess- ing Frame in the Presence of Orbital Eccentricity,” (2026), arXiv:2603.29307 [gr-qc]
-
[79]
Ben G. Patterson, Sharon Mary Tomson, and Stephen Fairhurst, “Identifying Eccentricity in Binary Black Hole mergers using 19 a Harmonic Decomposition of the Gravitational Waveform,” (2024), arXiv:2411.04187 [gr-qc]
-
[80]
Tousif Islam, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Ajit Kumar Mehta, Isha Anantpurkar, Digvijay Wadekar, Javier Roulet, Jonathan Mushkin, Barak Zackay, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Data-driven extraction, phenomenology and modeling of eccentric har- monics in binary black hole merger waveforms,” (2025), arXiv:2504.12469 [gr-qc]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.