Recognition: unknown
Parameter Estimation with Targeted Eccentric Numerical-Relativity Simulations for GW200208₂2 and GW190620
read the original abstract
We have analyzed LVK gravitational wave events that show some evidence of eccentricity from TEOBResumS modeling parameter estimations and have confronted them independently with full numerical generated waveforms from our bank of nearly two thousand simulations of binary black holes. We have used RIFT for Bayesian parameter estimation and found that GW200208_22 KDE estimates favor eccentricities $e_{20} = 0.198_{-0.180}^{+0.119}$ upon entering the LVK band at $\sim20$Hz within a $90\%$ confidence interval. Within this event analysis we employed 42 new targeted full numerical relativity simulations and we have thus found a top improved likelihood $\ln\mathcal{L}$ matching waveform, compared to model-based analysis, with an estimated eccentricity at 20Hz, $e_{20}=0.200$, thus reinforcing the eccentric hypothesis of the binary. We have also used our full bank of numerical waveforms on GW190620 finding that the KDE estimate favors eccentricities at 10 Hz in $e_{10}=0.190_{-0.186}^{+0.046}$. New specifically targeted simulations will be required to narrow these eccentricity ranges.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions
The gwNRHME framework constructs a multi-modal non-spinning eccentric gravitational waveform surrogate by modulating quasi-circular models with universal eccentric functions, achieving median mismatches of ~9e-5 again...
-
Assessing the imprint of eccentricity in GW signatures using two independent waveform models
Dual-model analysis of 162 GW sources disfavors eccentricity for most events but finds potential evidence in GW200129, GW231001, and GW231123.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.