pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11903 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

Gonzalo Morras , Geraint Pratten , Patricia Schmidt , Alessandra Buonanno
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wave waveformspost-Newtonian approximationeccentric binariesspin precessionhigher-order modestidal effectscompact binariesinspiral modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new post-Newtonian waveform model accurately describes the inspiral of eccentric precessing compact binaries with higher modes and matter effects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops pyEFPEHM as a post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for compact binaries that are both eccentric and have spins that precess. It builds on an earlier version by adding all available higher-order quasi-circular corrections to the orbital phasing, generalizing the multiple-scale analysis treatment of spin precession to higher orders, and including eccentric corrections up to 1PN order in the amplitudes of ten gravitational-wave multipoles. Validation against analytical models and numerical relativity simulations shows good agreement over a broad parameter space up to close to merger. Such models support analysis of gravitational-wave observations and studies of how compact binaries form.

Core claim

The authors establish that incorporating all available higher-order quasi-circular post-Newtonian corrections to the orbital phasing, extending the multiple-scale analysis solution of the spin-precession equations, and adding eccentric corrections up to 1PN order in the amplitudes for the multipoles (l,|m|) = (2,2), (2,1), (2,0), (3,3), (3,2), (3,1), (3,0), (4,4), (4,2), (4,0) produces a model that gives a robust and computationally efficient description of the inspiral with good agreement to numerical relativity across a wide region of parameter space up to close to merger.

What carries the argument

The generalized multiple-scale analysis solution of the spin-precession equations extended to higher post-Newtonian orders, combined with the post-Newtonian expansion of the orbital phasing and 1PN eccentric corrections to the waveform amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The model supplies efficient waveforms for gravitational-wave data analysis of eccentric precessing systems.
  • It serves as a foundation for adding higher-order corrections and calibrating to numerical relativity.
  • Improved late-inspiral modeling supports tighter constraints on binary parameters from observations.
  • Accurate eccentric signals allow better tests of compact-binary formation channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Attaching a merger-ringdown model to this inspiral description could produce complete templates for the full signal from eccentric precessing binaries.
  • Systematic comparison against numerical relativity in the high-eccentricity and high-spin regimes would map the precise boundary of the model's validity.
  • Deployment in parameter-estimation pipelines could reveal population-level features of eccentric binary formation.

Load-bearing premise

The post-Newtonian expansion remains sufficiently accurate in the late inspiral even after the higher-order quasi-circular and eccentric corrections are added, despite known breakdown for very unequal masses, high aligned spins, and high eccentricities.

What would settle it

Numerical relativity simulations that exhibit large phase or amplitude differences from pyEFPEHM predictions in the late inspiral for systems with mass ratio below 0.1, effective spin magnitude above 0.5, or eccentricity above 0.6 would show that the accuracy claims do not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11903 by Alessandra Buonanno, Geraint Pratten, Gonzalo Morras, Patricia Schmidt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Relative log-likelihood error, 2 log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Violin plots showing the distribution of mismatches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Violin plots showing the distribution of mismatches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Violin plots showing the distribution of mismatches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Scatter plots of the mismatches between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Comparisons between NR and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Comparisons between NR and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Comparisons between NR and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of selected parameters from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of selected parameters for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce pyEFPEHM, a post-Newtonian (PN) inspiral waveform model for eccentric and spin-precessing compact binaries that includes higher-order modes and matter effects. Accurate and efficient waveform models capturing these effects are essential for probing compact-binary formation channels and exploiting current and future gravitational-wave (GW) observations. pyEFPEHM extends pyEFPE, significantly improving its physical content and accuracy. In particular, we show that above 2.5PN order the quasi-circular contributions to the orbital phasing dominate at each PN order, and incorporate all available higher-order quasi-circular PN corrections to the phasing, including adiabatic tidal effects. We generalize the multiple-scale analysis solution of the spin-precession equations, extending it to higher PN orders and including all available quasi-circular corrections. Finally, we add eccentric corrections up to 1PN order in the waveform amplitudes, including the GW multipoles $(l,|m|)=(2,2),(2,1),(2,0),(3,3),(3,2),(3,1),(3,0),(4,4),(4,2),(4,0)$. We validate pyEFPEHM against analytical waveform models and numerical relativity simulations, showing that it provides a robust and computationally efficient description of the inspiral, with good agreement across a broad region of parameter space and up to close to merger. The accuracy degrades in the late inspiral for systems with very unequal masses ($m_2/m_1 \lesssim 0.1$), significant spins aligned with the orbital angular momentum ($|\chi_\mathrm{eff}| \gtrsim 0.5$), and high eccentricities ($e \gtrsim 0.6$), where the PN expansion is expected to break down. pyEFPEHM represents a significant step toward physically complete and efficient waveform modeling of eccentric and precessing binaries, providing a foundation for future extensions including higher-order corrections, calibration to numerical relativity, and merger ringdown modeling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces pyEFPEHM as a post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing compact binaries, extending pyEFPE to include higher-order modes and matter effects. Key improvements include incorporating all available higher-order quasi-circular PN corrections to the orbital phasing (including adiabatic tidal effects), generalizing the multiple-scale analysis solution of the spin-precession equations to higher PN orders, and adding eccentric corrections up to 1PN in the amplitudes of GW multipoles (2,2), (2,1), (2,0), (3,3), (3,2), (3,1), (3,0), (4,4), (4,2), (4,0). The model is validated against analytical waveform models and numerical relativity simulations, with the claim of robust and computationally efficient description across a broad parameter space up to close to merger, while accuracy degrades for mass ratios m2/m1 ≲ 0.1, |χ_eff| ≳ 0.5, and eccentricities e ≳ 0.6.

Significance. If the implementation and validation hold, this represents a significant contribution to the field of gravitational-wave modeling by providing an efficient PN model that captures eccentricity, precession, higher modes, and tidal effects. This is essential for interpreting observations and probing astrophysical formation channels. The paper is credited for its transparent qualification of the validity region, which addresses concerns about PN accuracy in the late inspiral for challenging parameter regimes, and for building upon standard expansions in a way that supports reproducibility.

minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the PN orders and the specific multipoles should be clearly defined and used consistently in all sections and figures.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from additional references to recent works on eccentric waveform modeling to contextualize the extensions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive report, which recognizes the significance of pyEFPEHM as an extension of prior PN models for eccentric precessing binaries. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and the acknowledgment of our transparent discussion of the model's validity region.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation assembles standard PN expansions and external validations

full rationale

The paper extends the prior pyEFPE code base by incorporating known higher-order quasi-circular PN corrections to phasing (including adiabatic tides), generalizing the multiple-scale analysis for spin precession to higher orders, and adding explicit 1PN eccentric corrections to selected waveform amplitudes. These additions are drawn from the established post-Newtonian literature and are validated directly against independent analytical waveform models and numerical relativity simulations. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or unverified self-citation chain; the central claims of robustness within a bounded parameter space are supported by external benchmarks rather than internal construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the post-Newtonian expansion and the validity of the multiple-scale analysis for spin precession; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Post-Newtonian expansion of general relativity accurately describes the inspiral dynamics up to the orders retained
    Invoked throughout the construction of phasing and amplitudes
  • domain assumption Multiple-scale analysis can be extended to higher PN orders while retaining quasi-circular corrections
    Used to solve the spin-precession equations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1439 out tokens · 61654 ms · 2026-05-10T14:54:17.279349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large-Eccentricity Asymptotics and Fast Analytic Approximation for Fourier modes of Post-Newtonian Eccentric Waveforms

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives large-eccentricity asymptotics for post-Newtonian eccentric waveform Fourier modes and builds a fast endpoint-constrained analytic approximation with error under 10^{-3} valid to p=200.

  2. Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    The gwNRHME framework constructs a multi-modal non-spinning eccentric gravitational waveform surrogate by modulating quasi-circular models with universal eccentric functions, achieving median mismatches of ~9e-5 again...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 150 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Making Sense of the Unexpected in the Gravitational- Wave Sky

    Waveform comparisons To better understand the origin of the mismatches, in Figs. 9, 10, and 11 we show the GW strains for the in- clination, phase, and polarization angles that yield the largest mismatch againstpyEFPEHMfor each simulation. While mismatch calculations are performed using the frequency-domain implementation ofpyEFPEHMbased on the SUA up tof...

    2078

  2. [2]

    J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space- Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors, Living Rev. Rel. 16, 7 (2013), arXiv:1212.5575 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evanset al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Ex- plorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Harry and J

    I. Harry and J. Noller, Probing the speed of gravity with LVK, LISA, and joint observations, Gen. Rel. Grav.54, 133 (2022), arXiv:2207.10096 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Work- ing Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interfer- ometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), KAGRA: 2.5 Generation In- terferometric Gravitational Wave Detector, Nature As- tron.3, 35 (2019), arXiv:1811.08079 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational- wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA, Living Rev. Rel.19, 1 (2016), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150M⊙, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L25 (2025), arXiv:2507.08219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Forma- tion and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High- spin Black Hole Coalescences, Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L21 (2025), arXiv:2510.26931 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Gerosa and M

    D. Gerosa and M. Fishbach, Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave sig- natures, Nature Astron.5, 749 (2021), arXiv:2105.03439 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    C. A. ´Alvarez, H. W. Y. Wong, A. Liu, and J. Calder´ on Bustillo, Kicking Time Back in Black Hole Mergers: Ancestral Masses, Spins, Birth Recoils, and Hierarchical-formation Viability of GW190521, As- trophys. J.977, 220 (2024), arXiv:2404.00720 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.23897, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.23897

    Y.-J. Li, Y.-Z. Wang, S.-P. Tang, and Y.-Z. Fan, Aligned Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in AGN disks revealed by GWTC-4, (2025), arXiv:2509.23897 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    2020, NatAs, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2009.05461 Gond´an, L., & Kocsis, B

    V. Gayathri, J. Healy, J. Lange, B. O’Brien, M. Szczep- anczyk, I. Bartos, M. Campanelli, S. Klimenko, C. O. Lousto, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Eccentricity estimate for black hole mergers with numerical relativity simula- tions, Nature Astron.6, 344 (2022), arXiv:2009.05461 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Gamba, M

    R. Gamba, M. Breschi, G. Carullo, S. Albanesi, P. Ret- tegno, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, GW190521 as a dy- namical capture of two nonspinning black holes, Nature Astron.7, 11 (2023), arXiv:2106.05575 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Four Eccentric Mergers Increase the Evidence that LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA’s Binary Black Holes Form Dynamically, Astrophys. J.940, 171 (2022), arXiv:2206.14695 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA

    N. Gupteet al., Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA, Phys. Rev. D112, 104045 (2025), arXiv:2404.14286 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    M. d. L. Planas, A. Ramos-Buades, C. Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, H. Estell´ es, S. Husa, and M. Haney, Reanalysis of bi- nary black hole gravitational wave events for orbital ec- centricity signatures, Phys. Rev. D112, 123004 (2025), arXiv:2504.15833 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Romero-Shaw, J

    I. Romero-Shaw, J. Stegmann, H. Tagawa, D. Gerosa, J. Samsing, N. Gupte, and S. R. Green, GW200208 222617 as an eccentric black-hole binary merger: Properties and astrophysical implications, Phys. Rev. D112, 063052 (2025), arXiv:2506.17105 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Orbital eccen- tricity in a neutron star - black hole binary, (2025), arXiv:2503.15393 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    M. d. L. Planas, S. Husa, A. Ramos-Buades, and J. Va- lencia, First Eccentric Inspiral–Merger–Ringdown Anal- ysis of Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers, Astrophys. J. 995, 47 (2025), arXiv:2506.01760 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Jan, B.-J

    A. Jan, B.-J. Tsao, R. O’Shaughnessy, D. Shoemaker, and P. Laguna, GW200105: A detailed study of eccen- tricity in the neutron star-black hole binary, Phys. Rev. D113, 024018 (2026), arXiv:2508.12460 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Kacanja, K

    K. Kacanja, K. Soni, and A. H. Nitz, Eccentricity sig- 35 natures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s binary neutron star and neutron-star black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 122007 (2025), arXiv:2508.00179 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Tiwari, S

    A. Tiwari, S. A. Bhat, M. A. Shaikh, and S. J. Kapa- dia, Testing the Nature of GW200105 by Probing the Frequency Evolution of Eccentricity, Astrophys. J.995, 48 (2025), arXiv:2509.26152 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, G. Morras, and G. Prat- ten, Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search, (2025), arXiv:2512.10803 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries, (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Stegmann and J

    J. Stegmann and J. Klencki, Orbital Eccentricity and Spin–Orbit Misalignment Are Evidence that Neu- tron Star–Black Hole Mergers Form through Triple Star Evolution, Astrophys. J. Lett.991, L54 (2025), arXiv:2506.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Romero-Shaw, J

    I. Romero-Shaw, J. Stegmann, G. Morras, A. Dorozs- mai, and M. Zevin, Astrophysical Implications of Eccen- tricity in Gravitational Waves from Neutron Star-Black Hole Binaries, (2025), arXiv:2512.16289 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Stegmann, F

    J. Stegmann, F. Antonini, A. Olejak, S. Biscov- eanu, V. Raymond, S. Rinaldi, and B. Flanagan, In-plane Black-hole Spin Measurements Suggest Most Gravitational-wave Mergers Form in Triples, (2025), arXiv:2512.15873 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    von Zeipel, Sur l’application des s´ eries de M

    H. von Zeipel, Sur l’application des s´ eries de M. Lind- stedt ` a l’´ etude du mouvement des com` etes p´ eriodiques, Astron. Nachr.183, 34 (1910)

    1910

  39. [39]

    M. L. Lidov, The evolution of orbits of artificial satel- lites of planets under the action of gravitational per- turbations of external bodies, Planet. Space Sci.9, 719 (1962)

    1962

  40. [40]

    Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity, Astron

    Y. Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity, Astron. J.67, 591 (1962)

    1962

  41. [41]

    Maggiore, C

    M. Maggioreet al.(ET), Science Case for the Ein- stein Telescope, JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 1912

  42. [42]

    Branchesi, M

    M. Branchesiet al., Science with the Einstein Tele- scope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP07, 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribu- tion to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys

    L. Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved ac- curacy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing bi- nary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124035 (2023), arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estell´ es, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and ef- ficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124037 (2023), arXiv:2303.18046 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Estell ´es, A

    H. Estell´ es, A. Buonanno, R. Enficiaud, C. Foo, and L. Pompili, Adding equatorial-asymmetric effects for spin-precessing binaries into the SEOBNRv5PHM waveform model, (2025), arXiv:2506.19911 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Hamiltonet al., PhenomXPNR: An improved gravitational wave model linking precessing inspirals and NR-calibrated merger-ringdown, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2507.02604 [gr-qc]

    E. Hamiltonet al., PhenomXPNR: An improved gravitational wave model linking precessing inspi- rals and NR-calibrated merger-ringdown, (2025), arXiv:2507.02604 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Numerical relativity surrogate model with memory effects and post-Newtonian hybridization,

    J. Yooet al., Numerical relativity surrogate model with memory effects and post-Newtonian hybridization, Phys. Rev. D108, 064027 (2023), arXiv:2306.03148 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Gamboa, A

    A. Gamboaet al., Accurate waveforms for eccen- tric, aligned-spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model seobnrv5ehm, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044038 (2025), arXiv:2412.12823 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    K. Paul, A. Maurya, Q. Henry, K. Sharma, P. Satheesh, Divyajyoti, P. Kumar, and C. K. Mishra, Eccentric, spinning, inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model with higher modes for the detection and characteriza- tion of binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D111, 084074 (2025), arXiv:2409.13866 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    M. d. L. Planas, A. Ramos-Buades, C. Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, H. Estell´ es, S. Husa, and M. Haney, Time-domain phe- nomenological multipolar waveforms for aligned-spin bi- nary black holes in elliptical orbits, Phys. Rev. D113, 024006 (2026), arXiv:2503.13062 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    P. J. Neeet al., Eccentric binary black holes: A new framework for numerical relativity waveform surrogates, (2025), arXiv:2510.00106 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Ramos-Buades, Q

    A. Ramos-Buades, Q. Henry, and M. Haney, Fast frequency-domain phenomenological modeling of ec- centric aligned-spin binary black holes, (2026), arXiv:2601.03340 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    X. Liu, Z. Cao, and Z.-H. Zhu, Effective-one-body numerical-relativity waveform model for eccentric spin- precessing binary black hole coalescence, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 195019 (2024), arXiv:2310.04552 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Improved post- Newtonian waveform model for inspiralling precessing- eccentric compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D111, 084052 (2025), arXiv:2502.03929 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Albanesi, R

    S. Albanesi, R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, J. Fontbut´ e, A. Gonzalez, and A. Nagar, Effective-one-body mod- eling for generic compact binaries with arbitrary orbits, Phys. Rev. D112, L121503 (2025), arXiv:2503.14580 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    DDPC, Description of the common dataset 1 light (mojito light) of the lisa ddpc, In prep

    L. DDPC, Description of the common dataset 1 light (mojito light) of the lisa ddpc, In prep

  60. [60]

    Roy and J

    S. Roy and J. Janquart, Testing modified gravity with the eccentric neutron star-black hole merger GW200105, Phys. Rev. D113, 024056 (2026), arXiv:2507.21315 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Miao and H

    Z. Miao and H. Yang, Probing Intrinsic Ellipticity in Neutron Star Binaries, (2025), arXiv:2511.08895 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Fourier domain gravitational waveforms for precessing eccentric binaries

    A. Klein, Y. Boetzel, A. Gopakumar, P. Jetzer, and L. de Vittori, Fourier domain gravitational waveforms for precessing eccentric binaries, Phys. Rev. D98, 104043 (2018), arXiv:1801.08542 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Klein, EFPE: Efficient fully precessing eccentric gravitational waveforms for binaries with long inspirals, (2021), arXiv:2106.10291 [gr-qc]

    A. Klein, EFPE: Efficient fully precessing eccentric gravitational waveforms for binaries with long inspirals, (2021), arXiv:2106.10291 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    J. N. Arredondo, A. Klein, and N. Yunes, Efficient gravitational-wave model for fully-precessing and mod- erately eccentric, compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. 36 D110, 044044 (2024), arXiv:2402.06804 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircu- lar Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half Post-Newtonian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 121402 (2023), arXiv:2304.11185 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Gravitational ra- diation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106, L101501 (2022), arXiv:2201.05138 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Khalil, A

    M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and A. Ramos-Buades, Theo- retical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two- body dynamics of the effective-one-body waveform mod- els SEOBNRv5, Phys. Rev. D108, 124036 (2023), arXiv:2303.18143 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Marsat, Class

    S. Marsat, Cubic order spin effects in the dynam- ics and gravitational wave energy flux of compact ob- ject binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 085008 (2015), arXiv:1411.4118 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Dones, Q

    E. Dones, Q. Henry, and L. Bernard, Tidal contributions to the full gravitational waveform to the second-and-a- half post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D111, 084043 (2025), arXiv:2412.14249 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Abdelsalhin, L

    T. Abdelsalhin, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani, Post- Newtonian spin-tidal couplings for compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D98, 104046 (2018), arXiv:1805.01487 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Morras,Modeling gravitational wave modes from binaries with arbitrary eccentricity(2025), 2507.00169, URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.00169

    G. Morras, Modeling gravitational wave modes from the inspiral of binaries with arbitrary eccentricity, Phys. Rev. D112, 084015 (2025), arXiv:2507.00169 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Li- brary - LALSuite, free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  73. [73]

    Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors

    A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D80, 084043 (2009), arXiv:0907.0700 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    Sturani, Note on the derivation of the angular mo- mentum and spin precessing equations in SpinTaylor codes (2015)

    R. Sturani, Note on the derivation of the angular mo- mentum and spin precessing equations in SpinTaylor codes (2015)

    2015

  75. [75]

    Isoyama, R

    S. Isoyama, R. Sturani, and H. Nakano, Post-Newtonian templates for gravitational waves from compact bi- nary inspirals 10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7 31-1 (2020), arXiv:2012.01350 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7 2020

  76. [76]

    Gamboa, M

    A. Gamboa, M. Khalil, and A. Buonanno, Third post-Newtonian dynamics for eccentric orbits and aligned spins in the effective-one-body waveform model seobnrv5ehm, Phys. Rev. D112, 044037 (2025), arXiv:2412.12831 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Nagar, D

    A. Nagar, D. Chiaramello, R. Gamba, S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, V. Fantini, M. Panzeri, and P. Rettegno, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries. II. High accuracy by improving logarithmic terms in resummations, Phys. Rev. D111, 064050 (2025), arXiv:2407.04762 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Nagar, R

    A. Nagar, R. Gamba, P. Rettegno, V. Fantini, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries: The importance of radiation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084001 (2024), arXiv:2404.05288 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980)

    1980

Showing first 80 references.