pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25536 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Large-Eccentricity Asymptotics and Fast Analytic Approximation for Fourier modes of Post-Newtonian Eccentric Waveforms

Xiaolin Liu , Zhoujian Cao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavespost-Newtonianeccentric binariesFourier modesasymptotic expansionsquasi-Keplerian parametrizationtail contributions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Large-eccentricity asymptotics yield a fast analytic approximation for Fourier modes of eccentric gravitational waveforms with error below 10^{-3}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs analytic asymptotic expansions to evaluate the Fourier modes of gravitational waves from post-Newtonian eccentric binaries using the quasi-Keplerian description when eccentricity is large. It further obtains the corresponding expansion for the eccentricity enhancement factor that appears in the tail part of the radiation. These expansions support an endpoint-constrained approximation whose error stays under 10^{-3} and that works for all Fourier modes with index no larger than 200. This matters because it supplies a rapid, accurate way to generate the frequency-domain waveforms needed to detect and analyze signals from highly eccentric compact-object binaries.

Core claim

In the high eccentricity regime, analytic asymptotic methods compute the Fourier modes of post-Newtonian eccentric waveforms in the quasi-Keplerian parametrization. The large-eccentricity asymptotic expansion of the eccentricity enhancement function in the tail contributions is derived as well. An endpoint-constrained analytic approximation is then constructed that accelerates the computation while keeping the overall error within 10^{-3} for Fourier modes with p ≤ 200. This provides analytic building blocks for frequency-domain gravitational wave modeling from highly eccentric binaries.

What carries the argument

Endpoint-constrained analytic approximation from large-eccentricity asymptotic expansions of Fourier modes and eccentricity enhancement function in quasi-Keplerian parametrization.

If this is right

  • The approximation accelerates computation of Fourier modes at large eccentricity.
  • The error is controlled within 10^{-3} for modes with p≤200.
  • It provides analytic building blocks for modeling frequency-domain gravitational waves from highly eccentric binaries.
  • The asymptotic expansion for the eccentricity enhancement function in tail contributions is obtained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Faster computation enables broader exploration of eccentric binary parameter spaces in gravitational wave data analysis.
  • The technique may generalize to other post-Newtonian waveform components or higher-order effects.
  • It could serve as a benchmark for numerical computations of eccentric waveforms.

Load-bearing premise

The quasi-Keplerian parametrization remains valid and the asymptotic expansions accurately capture the behavior in the high eccentricity regime without significant higher-order corrections affecting the error bound.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of the exact Fourier modes at high eccentricity (e.g., e=0.99) for p=200 and comparison to the approximation to see if the error exceeds 10^{-3}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25536 by Xiaolin Liu, Zhoujian Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Comparison of the numerical results (labeled as ‘Numeric’) with the two approximation schemes—the ∆ view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Comparison of the numerical results (labeled as ‘Numeric’) with the analytic approximated form of the PN-elliptic view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Left panel: the error between the analytic approximation of the regularized integrals and the numerical results as a view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Comparison of the 3PN leading-mode waveform view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Comparison between the numerical results for the regularized EEFs (black cross markers) ( view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Comparison between the numerical results for the EEFs (black cross markers) ( view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we developed analytic asymptotic methods for computing the Fourier modes of gravitational waves from post-Newtonian binary systems in the quasi-Keplerian parametrization in the high eccentricity regime. We have also derived the large-eccentricity asymptotic expansion of the eccentricity enhancement function appearing in the tail contributions to the radiation. Furthermore, based on these results, we constructed an endpoint-constrained analytic approximation that significantly accelerate the computation of the Fourier modes at large eccentricity.The overall error of this analytic approximation is controlled within $10^{-3}$, and it remains valid for Fourier modes with $p\le200$. This approach provides an analytic building blocks for modeling frequency-domain gravitational wave from highly eccentric binaries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops analytic asymptotic methods for computing the Fourier modes of post-Newtonian gravitational waves from eccentric binaries in the quasi-Keplerian parametrization in the high-eccentricity regime. It derives the large-eccentricity asymptotic expansion of the eccentricity enhancement function for tail contributions and constructs an endpoint-constrained analytic approximation for the modes. The central claim is that this approximation controls the overall error within 10^{-3} and remains valid for Fourier modes with p ≤ 200, providing efficient analytic building blocks for frequency-domain modeling of highly eccentric systems.

Significance. If the error control and validity claims are substantiated, this work would offer a valuable contribution to efficient waveform modeling for highly eccentric post-Newtonian binaries, which are relevant for sources in dense environments. The principled use of asymptotic expansions combined with endpoint constraints, rather than pure numerical fitting, is a strength that could reduce computational costs in gravitational-wave data analysis while maintaining analytic insight. The focus on the tail enhancement function and high-eccentricity regime addresses a computationally challenging limit.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on the endpoint-constrained analytic approximation and its validation] The claim that the analytic approximation controls error within 10^{-3} for p≤200 (abstract and the section on the endpoint-constrained approximation) lacks explicit remainder estimates or scaling analysis for the truncation errors in the large-eccentricity expansions. Without these, it is unclear whether omitted higher-order terms remain negligible as e approaches 1 for p=200, especially since validation appears to rest on numerical checks rather than analytic bounds; this directly affects the reliability of the central error-control statement.
  2. [Sections deriving the large-eccentricity asymptotic expansions] The derivations of the asymptotic expansions for the Fourier modes and eccentricity enhancement function (in the sections presenting the large-eccentricity asymptotics) do not discuss how truncation errors scale with mode number p or post-Newtonian order. This omission is load-bearing because the claimed validity up to p=200 could be compromised if remainders grow with p near e=1.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief quantitative statement on the computational speedup achieved by the approximation relative to direct numerical evaluation of the modes.
  2. Notation for the Fourier mode index p, eccentricity e, and post-Newtonian parameters could be consolidated in a table or early definitions section to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the quasi-Keplerian framework.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding error analysis are well taken, and we will revise the paper to include additional discussion and numerical evidence on truncation scaling. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that the analytic approximation controls error within 10^{-3} for p≤200 (abstract and the section on the endpoint-constrained approximation) lacks explicit remainder estimates or scaling analysis for the truncation errors in the large-eccentricity expansions. Without these, it is unclear whether omitted higher-order terms remain negligible as e approaches 1 for p=200, especially since validation appears to rest on numerical checks rather than analytic bounds; this directly affects the reliability of the central error-control statement.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript presents the 10^{-3} error bound primarily through numerical validation over a dense grid of eccentricities (up to e=0.999) and modes (p≤200). Deriving fully rigorous analytic remainder bounds for the composite endpoint-constrained approximation is technically involved given the structure of the integrals and the matching to the quasi-Keplerian parametrization. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection that (i) derives the leading scaling of the truncation error with (1-e) from the asymptotic expansion, (ii) presents additional numerical results confirming that the maximum relative error stays below 10^{-3} with no systematic growth as p increases to 200 at fixed high e, and (iii) discusses why the endpoint constraints suppress higher-order contributions. We will also qualify the abstract statement to reflect this strengthened numerical-plus-scaling support rather than claiming a purely analytic bound. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The derivations of the asymptotic expansions for the Fourier modes and eccentricity enhancement function (in the sections presenting the large-eccentricity asymptotics) do not discuss how truncation errors scale with mode number p or post-Newtonian order. This omission is load-bearing because the claimed validity up to p=200 could be compromised if remainders grow with p near e=1.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of error scaling with p and PN order would improve clarity. In the revised sections on the large-eccentricity asymptotics we will insert a short paragraph noting that the leading asymptotic terms for the Fourier modes and tail enhancement function are independent of p in the e→1 limit, while sub-leading corrections are suppressed by positive powers of (1-e) with only weak logarithmic dependence on p through the argument of the Bessel functions. Because the underlying PN expansion is performed at fixed order, the eccentricity truncation is decoupled from the PN truncation. We will support this with a brief numerical study showing that the observed error remains flat or decreases slightly with p at e>0.99. These additions directly address the concern about possible growth of remainders near e=1. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: asymptotics derived independently, approximation constrained by those results

full rationale

The paper derives large-eccentricity asymptotic expansions for Fourier modes and the tail eccentricity-enhancement function directly from the quasi-Keplerian parametrization. The endpoint-constrained analytic approximation is then constructed to match these independently derived asymptotics at the boundaries (e=0 and e→1 limits), which is a standard non-circular construction technique. The quoted 10^{-3} error bound for p≤200 is presented as a numerical validation result rather than a definitional identity. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or fitted inputs renamed as predictions appear in the derivation chain. The central claims retain independent content from the asymptotic analysis and remain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions in gravitational wave physics and PN theory, with no new free parameters or invented entities mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Post-Newtonian expansion is valid for the binary systems considered.
    Assumed in the use of PN waveforms.
  • domain assumption Quasi-Keplerian parametrization accurately describes the eccentric orbits.
    Used for the parametrization in high eccentricity regime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5416 in / 1517 out tokens · 127468 ms · 2026-05-07T15:17:02.061724+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    real-world

    The initial eccentricity ise 0 = 0.7. The gray line corresponds to the numeric results, obtained by summingh 22 ∝v 2e−i2(l−λ)P p ˆH2(−2)peipl until the required accuracy is reached. The blue and red lines correspond to the results obtained by computing each mode ˆH2(−2)p using our approximate expressions (123), and then summing overpup top= 10 (labeled by...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2016

  2. [2]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari, et al., Physical Review Letters116(2016), ISSN 1079-7114, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  3. [3]

    2017, PhRvL, 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari, V. Adya, et al., Physical Review Letters119(2017), ISSN 1079-7114, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  4. [4]

    LIGO,Gwtc-2 data release documentation, URLhttps://www.gw-openscience.org/GWTC-2/

  5. [5]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    R. Abbott, T. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, N. Adhikari, R. Adhikari, V. Adya, C. Affeldt, D. Agarwal, et al., Physical Review X13(2023), ISSN 2160-3308, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023

  6. [6]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, A. G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adamcewicz, S. Adhicary, D. Adhikari, et al.,Gwtc-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra observing run(2025), 2508.18082, URLhttps://arxiv. o...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    M., et al

    G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, L. Blecha, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters951, L8 (2023), ISSN 2041-8213, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2023

  8. [8]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array

    J. Antoniadis, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam, S. Babak, M. Bagchi, A.-S. Bak Nielsen, C. G. Bassa, A. Bathula, A. Berthereau, M. Bonetti, et al., Astronomy & amp; Astrophysics678, A50 (2023), ISSN 1432-0746, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 2023

  9. [9]

    D. J. Reardon, A. Zic, R. M. Shannon, G. B. Hobbs, M. Bailes, V. Di Marco, A. Kapur, A. F. Rogers, E. Thrane, J. Askew, et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters951, L6 (2023), ISSN 2041-8213, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ acdd02

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2023

  10. [10]

    H. Xu, S. Chen, Y. Guo, J. Jiang, B. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Xue, R. Nicolas Caballero, J. Yuan, Y. Xu, et al., Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics23, 075024 (2023), ISSN 1674-4527, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 2023

  11. [11]

    A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi, A. Albertini, A. Agapito, M. Agathos, C. Albertus, N. Andersson, T. Andrade, I. An- dreoni, et al.,The science of the einstein telescope(2025), 2503.12263, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12263

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evans, R. X. Adhikari, C. Afle, S. W. Ballmer, S. Biscoveanu, S. Borhanian, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, R. Eisenstein, A. Gruson, et al.,A horizon study for cosmic explorer: Science, observatories, and community(2021), 2109.09882

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, et al.,Laser interferometer space antenna(2017), 1702.00786, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity33(3), 035010 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016), ISSN 1361-6382, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2016

  15. [15]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, International Journal of Modern Physics A35, 2050075 (2020), ISSN 1793-656X, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X2050075X

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x2050075x 2020

  16. [16]

    Isoyama, H

    S. Isoyama, H. Nakano, and T. Nakamura, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2018(2018), ISSN 2050-3911, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/pty078

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/pty078 2018

  17. [17]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet,Post-newtonian theory for gravitational waves(2024), 1310.1528, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1528

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Damour, Physical Review D94(2016), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104015

    T. Damour, Physical Review D94(2016), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.104015 2016

  19. [19]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. Mogull, R. Patil, and L. Pompili,Post-minkowskian theory meets the spinning effective-one-body approach for bound-orbit waveforms(2024), 2405.19181, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19181

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 016904 (2018), ISSN 1361-6633, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-6633/aae552

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae552 2018

  21. [21]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell,Black Hole Perturbation Theory and Gravitational Self-Force(Springer Singapore, 2021), p. 1–119, ISBN 9789811547027, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_38-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_38-1 2021

  22. [22]

    K. Jani, J. Healy, J. A. Clark, L. London, P. Laguna, and D. Shoemaker, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 204001 (2016), ISSN 1361-6382, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/20/204001

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/20/204001 2016

  23. [23]

    Healy, C

    J. Healy, C. O. Lousto, Y. Zlochower, and M. Campanelli, Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 224001 (2017), ISSN 1361-6382, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa91b1

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa91b1 2017

  24. [24]

    Boyle, D

    M. Boyle, D. Hemberger, D. A. B. Iozzo, G. Lovelace, S. Ossokine, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, L. C. Stein, C. J. Woodford, A. B. Zimmerman, et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity36, 195006 (2019), ISSN 1361-6382, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab34e2

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab34e2 2019

  25. [25]

    Ajith, S

    P. Ajith, S. Babak, Y. Chen, M. Hewitson, B. Krishnan, J. T. Whelan, B. Br¨ ugmann, P. Diener, J. Gonzalez, M. Han- nam, et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity24, S689–S699 (2007), ISSN 1361-6382, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/24/19/S31

    2007

  26. [26]

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. J. Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, Physical Review D93(2016), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.044007 2016

  27. [27]

    Pratten, S

    G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estell´ es, and R. Jaume, Physical Review D102 (2020), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.064001 2020

  28. [28]

    Pratten, C

    G. Pratten, C. Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estell´ es, M. Mateu-Lucena, R. Jaume, M. Haney, D. Keitel, J. E. Thompson, et al., Physical Review D103(2021), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.104056

    2021

  29. [29]

    H. Yu, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Physical Review D108(2023), ISSN 2470-0029, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064059. 46

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.064059 2023

  30. [30]

    Ramos-Buades, Q

    A. Ramos-Buades, Q. Henry, and M. Haney,Fast frequency-domain phenomenological modeling of eccentric aligned-spin binary black holes(2026), 2601.03340, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03340

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Physical Review D59(1999), ISSN 1089-4918, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.59.084006

    1999

  32. [32]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Physical Review D62(2000), ISSN 1089-4918, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.62.064015

    2000

  33. [34]

    Estell ´es, A

    H. Estell´ es, A. Buonanno, R. Enficiaud, C. Foo, and L. Pompili,Adding equatorial-asymmetric effects for spin-precessing binaries into the seobnrv5phm waveform model(2025), 2506.19911, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19911

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    Gamboa, M

    A. Gamboa, M. Khalil, and A. Buonanno,Third post-newtonian dynamics for eccentric orbits and aligned spins in the effective-one-body waveform model seobnrv5ehm(2024), 2412.12831, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12831

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    Nagar, S

    A. Nagar, S. Bernuzzi, W. Del Pozzo, G. Riemenschneider, S. Akcay, G. Carullo, P. Fleig, S. Babak, K. W. Tsang, M. Colleoni, et al., Physical Review D98(2018), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98. 104052

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98 2018

  36. [37]

    Albanesi, R

    S. Albanesi, R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, J. Fontbut´ e, A. Gonzalez, and A. Nagar,Effective-one-body modeling for generic compact binaries with arbitrary orbits(2025), 2503.14580, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14580

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Physical Review D111(2025), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.111.084052

    2025

  38. [39]

    Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, and A. Buonanno (2026), 2604.11903

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [40]

    Liu and Z

    X. Liu and Z. Cao, Physical Review D112(2025), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/1sm3-4r1h

    work page doi:10.1103/1sm3-4r1h 2025

  40. [41]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique43, 107 (1985), URLhttps://www.numdam.org/item/ AIHPA_1985__43_1_107_0/

    1985

  41. [42]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Sch¨ aeer, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)101, 127 (1988)

    1971

  42. [43]

    Sch¨ afer and N

    G. Sch¨ afer and N. Wex, Physics Letters A174, 196 (1993)

    1993

  43. [44]

    Memmesheimer, A

    R.-M. Memmesheimer, A. Gopakumar, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.104011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.104011 2004

  44. [45]

    Yunes, K

    N. Yunes, K. G. Arun, E. Berti, and C. M. Will, Physical Review D80(2009), ISSN 1550-2368, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084001 2009

  45. [46]

    Klein, N

    A. Klein, N. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Physical Review D88(2013), ISSN 1550-2368, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.88.124015

    2013

  46. [47]

    K. S. Thorne, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.299

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.299 1980

  47. [48]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series a, mathematical and physical sciences320, 379 (1986)

    1986

  48. [52]

    Fumagalli, N

    G. Fumagalli, N. Loutrel, D. Gerosa, and M. Boschini, Physical Review D112(2025), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/znmj-6wvt

    work page doi:10.1103/znmj-6wvt 2025

  49. [53]

    K¨ onigsd¨ orffer and A

    C. K¨ onigsd¨ orffer and A. Gopakumar, Physical Review D73(2006), ISSN 1550-2368, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.73.124012

    2006

  50. [54]

    Boetzel, C

    Y. Boetzel, C. K. Mishra, G. Faye, A. Gopakumar, and B. R. Iyer, Physical Review D100(2019), ISSN 2470-0029, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.044018 2019

  51. [55]

    P. C. Peters, Phys. Rev.136, B1224 (1964), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1224

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b1224 1964

  52. [56]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/16/165003 , eid =

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, B. R. Iyer, and S. Sinha, Classical and Quantum Gravity25, 165003 (2008), ISSN 1361-6382, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/16/165003

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/16/165003 2008

  53. [57]

    Morras,Modeling gravitational wave modes from binaries with arbitrary eccentricity(2025), 2507.00169, URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.00169

    G. Morras,Modeling gravitational wave modes from binaries with arbitrary eccentricity(2025), 2507.00169, URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.00169

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [58]

    N. Bleistein, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics19, 353 (1966), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.3160190403, URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/ 10.1002/cpa.3160190403

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160190403 1966

  55. [59]

    Olver,Asymptotics and special functions(AK Peters/CRC Press, 1997)

    F. Olver,Asymptotics and special functions(AK Peters/CRC Press, 1997)

    1997

  56. [60]

    M. H. Holmes,Introduction to perturbation methods(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  57. [61]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory, vol. 1 (Springer, 1999)

    1999

  58. [62]

    J. Ramos,R. wong, asymptotic approximations of integrals, academic press, new york (1989)(1991)

    1989

  59. [63]

    N. M. Temme,Uniform asymptotic methods for integrals(2013), 1308.1547, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1547

    work page arXiv 2013

  60. [64]

    DLMF,NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions,https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15, f. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds., URLhttps://dlmf.nist.gov/. 47

    2025

  61. [65]

    J. L. Lopez and N. M. Temme,Two-point taylor expansions of analytic functions(2002), math/0205064, URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/math/0205064

    work page arXiv 2002

  62. [66]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Faye, Journal of Mathematical Physics41, 7675–7714 (2000), ISSN 1089-7658, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1063/1.1308506

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1308506 2000

  63. [67]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qusailah, Physical Review D77(2008), ISSN 1550-2368, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.064035 2008

  64. [68]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qusailah, Physical Review D77(2008), ISSN 1550-2368, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064034

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.064034 2008

  65. [69]

    K. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. Iyer, and S. Sinha, Physical Review D80(2009), ISSN 1550-2368, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.124018 2009

  66. [70]

    Tinto and J

    C. Munna and C. R. Evans, Physical Review D102(2020), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 102.104006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2020