Reference change · event page

Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume =

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1162/qss_c_00305
Notice DOI: 10.1162/qss.x.10
Event date: 2025-09-24
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

Pursuing transparency: How research performing organizations in Germany collect data on publication costs

ref [6] · 2601.08340 · notice #8268 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Kendall, Graham , date =. Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_c_00305 , pages =

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Kendall, Graham, date =. Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money?, volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_c_00305, pages =

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.