Pith. sign in

Citation notice #8268 · 2026-08-03 12:19:46.076279+00:00

Pursuing transparency: How research performing organizations in Germany collect data on publication costs

Correction Crossref Open

cites Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume =, which carries a correction notice dated 2025-09-24. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 6

Kendall, Graham , date =. Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_c_00305 , pages =

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Kendall, Graham, date =. Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money?, volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_c_00305, pages =

02Event

Type
Correction
Source
Crossref
Original DOI
10.1162/qss_c_00305
Notice DOI
10.1162/qss.x.10
Date
2025-09-24
Title
Erratum: Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money?
Reasons
['Correction']
Work
Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume = (?)

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.