Citation notice #8268 · 2026-08-03 12:19:46.076279+00:00
Pursuing transparency: How research performing organizations in Germany collect data on publication costs
cites Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume =, which carries a correction notice dated 2025-09-24. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.
Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes
01Evidence
Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 6
Kendall, Graham , date =. Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_c_00305 , pages =
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
Kendall, Graham, date =. Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money?, volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_c_00305, pages =
02Event
- Type
- Correction
- Source
- Crossref
- Original DOI
- 10.1162/qss_c_00305
- Notice DOI
- 10.1162/qss.x.10
- Date
- 2025-09-24
- Title
- Erratum: Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money?
- Reasons
- ['Correction']
- Work
- Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? , volume = (?)
03Dispute this notice
If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.