Reference change · event page

Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557
Notice DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139783
Event date: 2015-09-29
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

Publishing Without Journals: An Open, Forkable Archive with Attributed Review

ref [12] · 2607.05454 · notice #8193 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557. D. P. Peters and S. J. Ceci. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2):187–195,

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557. D. P. Peters and S. J. Ceci. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2):187–195

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.