ref [20] · 2502.08732 · notice #5154 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Galaudage, S., Talbot, C., Nagar, T., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 921, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c
Reference change · event page
Reference changes · DOI
Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.
This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.
ref [20] · 2502.08732 · notice #5154 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Galaudage, S., Talbot, C., Nagar, T., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 921, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c
ref [239] · 2605.05563 · notice #5153 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c , eid =. arXiv , author =:2109.02424 , journal =
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c, eid =. arXiv, author =:2109.02424, journal =
ref [244] · 2606.06209 · notice #5156 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Galaudage, S.; Talbot, C.; Nagar, T.; Jain, D.; Thrane, E.; Mandel, I. Building better spin models for merging binary black holes: Evidence for non-spinning and rapidly spinning nearly aligned sub-populations.ApJL2021,921, L15. arXiv:2109.02424 [gr-qc], https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c
ref [204] · 2606.18081 · notice #5155 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Building Better Spin Models for Merging Binary Black Holes: Evidence for Nonspinning and Rapidly Spinning Nearly Aligned Subpopulations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c , archivePrefix =. 2109.02424 , primaryClass =
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
Building Better Spin Models for Merging Binary Black Holes: Evidence for Nonspinning and Rapidly Spinning Nearly Aligned Subpopulations., keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f3c, archivePrefix =. 2109.02424, primaryClass =
Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.